Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Main Electronics Package

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

Georgia Tech Digital Back-end µHRG interface Curtis Mayberry School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology January 13 th,
Op-Amp- An active circuit element designed to perform mathematical operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, differentiation and.
Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellVLSI Test: Lecture 181 Lecture 18 DSP-Based Analog Circuit Testing  Definitions  Unit Test Period (UTP)  Correlation.
Analog-to-Digital Converter (ADC) And
THEMIS/GBO Engineering Peer Review 1 UCB, Oct. 17, 2003 GROUND MAGNETOMETER GBO DESIGN.
Analog-to-digital Conversion and Digital-to-analog Conversion (with DSP) ES-3.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
1 IF Receiver for Wideband Digitally Modulated Signals Direct Instructor: Doctor Ronen Holtzman, Microwave Division, Elisra Electronic Systems Ltd. Supervising.
Effective Bits. An ideal model of a digital waveform recorder OffsetGain Sampling Timebase oscillator Fs ADC Waveform Memory Address counter Compute Engine.
/1 Testing Harmonics and Flicker /1 Harmonics & Flicker Two different test standards: EN & EN EN controls.
Spectrum Analyzer Basics Copyright 2000 Agenda Overview: What is spectrum analysis? What measurements do we make? Theory of Operation: Spectrum analyzer.
Ni.com Data Analysis: Time and Frequency Domain. ni.com Typical Data Acquisition System.
DSP Techniques for Software Radio DSP Front End Processing Dr. Jamil Ahmad.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS ICU/FSW Peter R. Harvey Dorothy Gordon –ICU Will Rachelson – FSW Dec 1, 2012.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 2014 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Digital Fields Board 1.
Understanding ADC Specifications September Definition of Terms 000 Analogue Input Voltage Digital Output Code FS1/2.
THEMIS-SCM THM – SCM – CDR – 08-April-2004 in Velizy
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
1 of 22 Glaciers and Ice Sheets Interferometric Radar (GISIR) Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
MonsonPeer Review – 5 December 2014 SPP/FIELDS LNPS PEER REVIEW Steven Monson University of Minnesota 1.
GoetzFIELDS Quarterly – 18 July 2013 SPP/FIELDS Modes and Operations Stuart D. Bale, Keith Goetz 18 July
ARISSat-1 Critical Design Review Orlando, Feb 15, 2010 U/v Transponder Bill Ress – N6GHz
1 LLRF Pre-readiness review (26th May, 2009) 27/10/2015 LLRF performance and its limitation based on KEK's experiments Shin Michizono (KEK) KEK’s LLRF.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April 19-20, 2004 Boom Electronics Board (BEB) Engineering Peer Review Apr. 20, 2004 Hilary Richard.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April 19-20, 2004 Boom Electronics Board (BEB) Engineering Peer Review Apr. 20, 2004 Hilary Richard.
SPECTRUM ANALYZER 9 kHz GHz
University of Kansas 2004 ITTC Summer Lecture Series Network Analyzer Operation John Paden.
Alexei SemenovGeneric Digitizer Generic Digitizer 10MHZ 16 bit 6U VME Board.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS DFB Report Quarterly Management July 18, 2013.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 16, 2015 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Q Digital Fields Board (DFB) 1.
David Malaspina CU/LASP
Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)
FIELDS iCDR – RFS Analog Dennis Seitz 1 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR RFS Analog Dennis N. Seitz UC Berkeley SSL
RBSP EFW DFB Peer Review 2009 Sept 10 1 EFW DFB Board-Level Testing Peer Review David Malaspina 2009 Sept 10.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 3-4 Sept. 2008EFW INST+SOC PDR447 Command, Telemetry, and Ground Support Equipment (CTG)
GoetzPre-PDR Peer Review October 2013 FIELDS Time Domain Sampler Peer Review Keith Goetz University of Minnesota 1.
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS RFS Peter R. Harvey. RFS FSW Requirements.
FIELDS iPDR – RFS Analog Dennis N. Seitz 1 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PDR Radio Frequency Spectrometer Analog Dennis N. Seitz UC Berkeley SSL
THEMIS CDR 1 UCB, June 16, 2004 ESA & SST (ETC) Interface Board Critical Design Review Robert Abiad University of California - Berkeley.
THEMIS Instrument CDR 1 UCB, April 20, 2004 ESA & SST (ETC) Interface Board Critical Design Review Robert Abiad University of California - Berkeley.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly November 21, 2014 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Digital Fields Board (DFB) 1.
CI Lecture Series Summer 2010 An Overview of IQ Modulation and Demodulation Techniques for Cavity LLRF Control.
BonnellFIELDS iCDR – AEB Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument CDR Antenna Electronics Board AEB J. Bonnell, D. Seitz UC Berkeley, SSL
Home Theater Pre-AMP Team #4 Title Christopher Merkl Negar Farzinnia
DFB BACK-UP SLIDES.
(4) Filters.
INSTRUMENT DATA PROCESSING UNIT (IDPU) REQUIREMENTS
LFR first PFM calibration results
Maj Jeffrey Falkinburg Room 2E46E
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
Analogue Electronic 2 EMT 212
Agenda. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER Agenda Feb 2, 2017.
Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Main Electronics Package
Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Verification Instrument mini-PER (V5)
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
SP+ DFB REE 12/01/12.
Boom Electronics Board (BEB)
Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument PSR - MEP Introduction
Radiation Belt Storm Probes Electric Field and Waves Instrument
Operational Description
Solar Orbiter RPW - Low Frequency Receiver
Digital Acquisition of Analog Signals – A Practical Guide
Lesson 11: Transducer Electrical Interfaces
Analysis of Adaptive Array Algorithm Performance for Satellite Interference Cancellation in Radio Astronomy Lisha Li, Brian D. Jeffs, Andrew Poulsen, and.
Turning photons into bits in the cold
EEG Probe Project Grant G. Connell.
The ATLAS LAr. Calibration board K. Jakobs, U. Schaefer, D. Schroff
FPGA Based Single Phase Motor Control Using Multistep Sine PWM Author Name1, Author Name2., Author Name3, (BE-Stream Name) Under the Guidance Of Guide.
SKAMP Square Kilometre Array Molonglo Prototype
Presentation transcript:

Solar Probe Plus – FIELDS Main Electronics Package Instrument Pre-Ship Review Digital Fields Board (DFB) David Malaspina LASP, University of Colorado David.malaspina@lasp.colorado.edu 10 April 2017

DFB FM2 Hardware Photos Top Bottom

DFB Performance – Gain / Phase Gain / Phase Performance Meets Requirements on all 26 channels (gain < +/- 0.1 dB from design, -3 dB @ 80% Nyquist, minimal phase distortion in-band, steady response over temperature, minimal variation between like channels) SCM Example: SCM z Low Frequency, High Gain

DFB Performance – Noise Noise Performance Meets Requirements (minimal variation over temperature, similar on like channels, dominated by SIDECAR ASIC) [Caveat: SCM end-to-end noise level to be verified at S/C assembly level]

DFB Performance – Offset Offset Performance Meets Requirements (minimal variation over temperature, simply calibrated out on flight)

DFB Performance – Crosstalk Crosstalk Performance Meets Requirements (characterized over temperature, worst case is 54.38 dB V5 DC to E34 DC HG)

DFB Performance – Total Harmonic Distortion Harmonic Distortion Performance Meets Requirements (characterized over temperature, most better than -70 dB, worst case is -61.3 dB)   Total Harmonic Distortion (dBc) Gain State -25°C Room Temp 55°C 70°C BX_MF_HG -73.821007 -77.159659 -68.773826 -61.315422 BY_LF_HG -79.831712 -84.073972 -71.016277 -62.234124 BY_LF_LG -70.636992 -74.117294 -74.007189 -71.161934 BZ_LF_LG -73.988616 -78.404136 -78.202683 -74.648779 BZ_LF_HG -76.463665 -79.863677 -69.539469 -61.568144 BX_LF_LG -79.999873 -86.000058 -83.451167 -77.533977 BX_LF_HG -75.947437 -78.983111 -69.972038 -62.167183 V1_AC -76.4204 -77.328829 -76.847457 -75.60987 E12_AC -73.358041 -76.713549 -77.978197 -77.910809 V2_AC -73.398466 -75.551832 -75.710232 -74.810496 V1_DC -78.54245 -83.621698 -81.685076 -76.292903 E12_DC_HG -88.995651 -87.001805 -77.398549 -66.922733 E12_DC_LG -72.928249 -70.852162 -69.643699 -69.009924 V2_DC -68.656252 -72.662291 -73.507997 -71.88438 V3_AC -72.870713 -75.400036 -75.546948 -74.377786 E34_AC -72.534099 -76.551188 -77.26587 -76.026058 V4_AC -74.538404 -76.136059 -76.094035 -75.054617 V3_DC -76.05761 -79.273392 -77.942444 -74.381945 E34_DC_HG -78.319953 -80.633204 -78.890798 -66.83056 E34_DC_LG -69.508021 -69.978995 -68.870558 -67.835102 V4_DC -77.156873 -80.444087 -79.954342 -76.912439 V5_AC -73.731375 -75.703035 -75.387551 -74.564933 EZ_AC -77.390528 -78.495053 -78.721822 -78.187984 V5_DC -76.105184 -79.785031 -79.238673 -75.761356 EZ_DC_HG -71.817568 -75.867694 -70.156379 -63.977987 EZ_DC_LG -72.750517 -70.71996 -69.4566 -68.766653

DFB Performance – FPGA All FPGA algorithms verified FPGA functions Signal Averaging Timing Synchronization Data Compression Digital Housekeeping CCSDS Data Packetization FPGA DSP Functions/Data Products FFT Spectral and Cross-Spectral Processing Digital Filters Digital Burst Memory Band-Pass Filter Banks Waveforms Spacecraft Potential Fields Probe/Processing Control 16 Programmable modes Modes are loaded from the DCB at power on All FPGA algorithms verified through board-level testing (compared end-to-end results with independently calculated results from IDL models) Production and distribution of DFB data products in flight configurations verified during MEP-level testing Flight-configuration DFB modes + register tables verified during MEP-level testing

DFB Readiness DFB is complete, integrated and tested in the MEP, and ready to ship DFB FM02 integrated in MEP and performing as specified DFB team supported MEP environmental testing FM2 EIDP complete and delivered to FIELDS SMA No outstanding RFAs/risks/actions, NCRs/waivers closed, drawings released DFB FM01 (flight spare) calibration testing complete and performing as specified Completed DFB L4 verification requirements reports

DFB PSR DFB Backup Slides

DFB Block Diagram

DFB FPGA DIAGRAM

DFB Performance – Frequency Response Gain / Phase response E AC Example: E34 AC

DFB Performance – Frequency Response Gain / Phase response E DC Example: E12 DC

DFB Performance – Frequency Response Gain / Phase response V AC Example V1 AC

DFB Performance – Frequency Response Gain / Phase response V DC Example V5 DC

DFB Performance – Frequency Response EDCLG Sample Plots EZDCLG

DFB Performance – Frequency Response BLG Sample Plots BxLFLG

DFB Performance – Noise Noise Performance Meets Requirements (minimal variation over temperature, similar on like channels, dominated by SIDECAR ASIC) [Caveat: SCM end-to-end noise level to be verified at S/C assembly level]

DFB Performance – Noise Noise Performance Meets Requirements (minimal variation over temperature, similar on like channels, dominated by SIDECAR ASIC) [Caveat: SCM end-to-end noise level to be verified at S/C assembly level] Non-flight SCM just misses Requirement Need flight SCM test

DFB Performance – Noise Noise Performance Meets Requirements (minimal variation over temperature, similar on like channels, dominated by SIDECAR ASIC) [Caveat: SCM end-to-end noise level to be verified at S/C assembly level]

DFB Performance - End to End CMRR Common Mode Rejection Ratio (CMRR) Performance Meets Requirements (characterized over frequency and temperature, similar on like channels) Worst case in-band CMRR Temperature (°C) E AC 12 E AC 34 E AC z E DC 12 HG E DC 34 HG E DC z HG E DC 12 LG E DC 34 LG E DC z LG +20 62.56 59.74 40.05 75.65 52.84 49.25 78.75 52.93 49.20 +55 68.36 62.87 40.33 72.52 52.54 49.49 73.40 52.65 49.37 +70 77.62 60.66 40.10 74.98 51.46 49.27 71.96 52.51

DFB Performance – Nominal Linearity -60 dBFS 66 DN -70 dBFS 21 DN -80 dBFS 6.6 DN

DFB Performance – ASIC (ADCs) ASIC verification SIDECAR ASIC ADCs can sample up to 32 channels @ 150,000 S/s DFB uses 26 of these ASIC performance characterized, flight channels selected ASIC performance verified during DFB board-level verification (300+ FM test-hours and 600+EM test-hours) and MEP-level verification testing.

FPGA – Design Drivers Calculate FFTs on four 18.75kss channels with 100% coverage Calculate FFTs on four 150kss channels with at least 12.5% coverage Drives SRAM size and bandwidth Provide digital filtering for 16 channels of 150kS/s data and 16 channels of 18.75kS/s data Package science data into CCSDS packets Perform compression on time series waveform and DBM data Perform pseudo-log compression on Spectra, X-Spectra, and Band-Pass Filter Banks results Generate sine wave data for SCM calibration signal

FPGA Functions Fields Probe/Processing Control 16 Programmable modes Modes are loaded from the DCB at power on Signal Acquisition & Digital Filtering 26 channels sampled simultaneously at 150K samples/second AC signals: digitally filtered and decimated to produce samples from 150KS/s down to 2.3KS/s DC signals: digitally filtered and decimated to produce samples from 18.75KS/s down to 1.1S/s. DCB Interface Serial Command Interface Serial Telemetry Interface 19.2Mhz system clock 4.8Mhz telemetry clock SCM Calibration Digitally Synthesized sine wave Sine values generated via the CORDIC algorithm Sent to 16bit DAC for analog conversion

DFB Readiness DFB is complete, integrated and tested in the MEP, and ready to ship DFB FM02 integrated in MEP and performing as specified DFB meets requirements and is ready for shipment DFB team supported MEP environmental testing No outstanding RFAs/risks/actions, NCRs/waivers closed, drawings released FM2 EIDP complete and delivered to FIELDS SMA DFB FM01 (flight spare) calibration testing complete and performing as specified Completed DFB L4 verification requirements reports 6 remaining L4s to be completed at MEP level, DFB team to review results/provide concurrence L4s Total To Be Complete In Process In Review Complete DFB Specific 9 MEP-level Interfaces 15 MEP-level Environmental Test 6 L4s to complete at MEP level I&T Environmental Review Complete Function throughout perihelion x Function throughout Solar Storms Accept Loss of Power Accept Momentum Dumps Environment: survival thermal & ops limits, launch loads, random vibe, radiation environment Spacecraft EMC compliance per the EMECP

MEP-Level DFB L5s L5 Specifications 1 DFB corner frequencies for AC should be 60Khz 10 DFB sensitivity levels for all channels should be recorded 2 DFB corner frequencies for DC should be 7.5Khz 11 DFB Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), including subharmonics from sampling, with the SIDECAR ASIC should not exceed 60dB for full-scale input at DC 937hz and AC 9.37Khz 3 DFB channel to channel for AC Low Pass should be within +/- 2Khz 12 DFB THD for analog section, without SIDECAR ASIC, should be approximately 80dB for full-scale input at DC 937hz and AC 9.37Khz 4 DFB channel to channel for AC High Pass should be within +/- 10hz 13 DFB cross talk at board level should be approximately 60dB or better among E-field channel. Evaluation frequencies should be 937Hz (DC), 9.37K (AC). 5 DFB channel to channel for DC should be at same frequency at approximately +/- 500hz. Record response 14 DFB cross talk at board level should be approximately 60dB or better among B-field channels. Evaluation frequencies should be 937Hz (DC), 9.37K (AC). 6 DFB roll off should be 120dB/decade, and 36dB/octave for B-Field, and 80dB/decade for E-Field 15 DFB cross talk between any E-field and any B-field channel should be approximately 80dB or better. Evaluation frequencies should be 937Hz (DC), 9.37K (AC). 7 DFB tolerance on each pass-band gain for single-ended E-field channel should be approximately 0.5dB. Need to verify full scale input to output wrt tolerance 16 DFB CMRR should be approximately 50dBc at the input to the SIDECAR ASIC in the passband of E12 and E34 channels 8 DFB tolerance on each pass-band gain for high and low gain differential E-field and B-field channel should be approximately 0.5dB. Need to verify full scale input to output wrt tolerance 17 DFB CMRR should be approximately 50dBc end-to-end in the passband of E12 and E34 channels 9 DFB offset on each analog channel output should be 1.65V +/- 50mV at operating temp, fluctuation at temperature needs to be considered and included in expected output.