The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory reform in the Czech Republic

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Setting up the RIA System in Turkey Better Regulation Group İstanbul, OECD November 20, 2007.
Advertisements

Better Regulation in the EU 15 countries OECD studies financed by the European Commission, DG Enterprise Rolf Alter, Daniel Trnka OECD.
Czech approach to Regulatory Impact Assessment Prof. Michal Mejstřík Chairman of Regulatory Impact Assessment Board (RIAB) of the Czech Government Legislative.
C.H. Montin, Hsin Chu, August Hsin Chu, August 2012 Building Effective Institutions for Managing Regulatory Policy Charles-Henri Montin, Senior.
REGULATORY POLICY AND GOVERNANCE FOR STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS 15 December 2014 University of Economics, Prague Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division,
First years of systematic regulatory impact assessment in Estonia – lessons learnt , Tallinn Helena Braun Advisor of Regulatory Impact Assessment.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Role of Oversight Bodies for Regulatory Reform Claire Chaubert February 2007.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
BETTER REGULATION IN CYPRUS Andreas Charalambous Director of Economic Studies and EU Affairs Ministry of Finance 2 nd April 2012.
International Environmental Governance – where from here? Joy Hyvarinen FIELD.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
Establishment and Development of the Internal Audit System for the Public Sector in Kyrgyz Republic INTERNAL AUDIT COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE ISTANBUL
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
Community agencies: partners in accession Cooperation with EMCDDA - Polish experience Boguslawa Bukowska, National Bureau for Drug Prevention ,
Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Latvia Lāsma Stabiņa National Anti-Trafficking Coordinator Riga, 5 February 2015, HESTIA Kick-Off meeting.
1 UNDECLARED WORK IN CROATIA Executive Capacity of Governance and Underground Economy: The Case of Croatia Zagrebl, September 1, 2015.
RIA and the case of Mexico Dr. Manuel Gerardo Flores Senior Economist Regulatory Policy Division OECD OECD-Israel Workshop on Improving the Design and.
Better enforcement – the next step for regulatory policy Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate.
Improving Government responsiveness as key to meaningful public participation in decision-making processes: Croatian experience Igor Vidačak Government.
Our vision Donetsk Oblast Employment Service will introduce in the next 3-5 years efficient institutional changes and initiate reforms at the regional.
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” Workshop April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Introduction: Course Objectives and RIA Context in Turkey.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
Implementation of the project “Improvement of qualifications of Lithuanian civil servants representing Lithuania’s interests in the EU” Renata Pakalnytė.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 8 Standard Cost Model and RIAs.
Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr. Philipp Birkenmaier Secretariat of Nationaler Normenkontrollrat Nicosia, 2 April 2012.
Evaluation Capacity building in Lithuania Presentation for Presentation for Evaluation Units Open days by Mrs. Ana Stankaitienė EU Programmes Management.
The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Czech Republic Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public Governance.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Strategy for Better Regulation in Romania Expert - Florin.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Better Regulation in New EU Member States Public Policy –
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a policy tool to manage the flow of regulation Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on “Drafting Legislation.
APPROACHES TO REGULATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM Regulatory Impact Assessments: Case study from Uganda.
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
Regulation Inside Government: Approach and lessons learned Punita Goodfellow, Better Regulation Executive, Cabinet Office, UK.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Seminar on Administrative Simplification Seminar on Administrative.
Gil Hong-Keun Prime Minister’s Office Republic of Korea Administrative Simplification in Korea October 21 th 2008.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
Oversight Bodies for Regulatory Quality in OECD Countries Regional Capacity Building Seminar on “Drafting Legislation and Oversight Bodies for Regulatory.
Civil Service Of Lithuania. Structure of employment in state sector CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT UNDER THE MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR Health service and social.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
Better Regulation – practices
Regulatory Impact Assessment in Poland
ImPact Assessment: State of Play in OECD Countries
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
Legislative Impact Analysis of the NARS:
Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Role of non-state actors in the implementation of Czech Republic 2030
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Consultation Practices within the Process of Public Policies -- Challenges and Opportunities Ministry of Interior and Administrative Reform 1A Revolution.
Better enforcement – the next step for regulatory policy
IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS AND
Statutory participatory mechanisms
The Memorandum of Co-operation between Non-Governmental Organisations
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
Czech Republic Petr Fejtek Administrative Advisor Ministry of Interior.
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
Reducing Administrative Burdens -Initiatives-
Senior Adviser, OECD/SIGMA
RIA: Why it is useful for countries in transition
Office of the Government of the Czech Republic
REGULATORY POLICY AND GOVERNANCE FOR STRENGTHENING COMPETITIVENESS
The Sigma Experience of Public Internal Financial Control Peer Reviews
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Ad hoc Group of Experts on Better Regulation
Presentation transcript:

The Splendours and Miseries of Regulatory reform in the Czech Republic Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division OECD Ljubljana, 13 December 2016

The early years Started with OECD Review of Regulatory Reform in the Czech Republic in 2001 Later followed by the Better Regulation agenda of the EU Doing Business got some prominence as well Lesson #1: External pressures and advice might help

Three main pillars Administrative burden reduction for businesses Stakeholder engagement Regulatory Impact Assessment (in the beginning, only business impacts were assessed) Lesson #2: Having a plan is crucial, gradual implementation might be useful

Reducing Administrative Burdens 20% reduction target set in 2005, later changed to 25 % One of the 4 countries with a full baseline measurement No funds for external consultants, used expert assessment Attracted a lot of attention Lesson #3: Start with something easy to understand. Lesson #4: Target your resources

Stakeholder engagement New methodology for public consultations, tested on 3 pilot projects Consultations obligatory for all draft regulations Strengthened by making consultations part of the RIA process Lesson #5: Pilot testing helps to persuade your colleagues

Regulatory Impact Assessment First introduced in in 2005, business impacts, 3 pilot full RIAs Full implementation in 2017 – obligatory for all legislative proposals and amendments of the Government Two stage RIA - Similar structure, difference mostly in scope, quantification, number of policy options In the beginning RIA mostly formal, lack of quality control Massive training, awareness raising seminars for senior officials

Main issues Insufficient teeth Civil servants’ reluctance Political pressure Efforts to avoid RIA Lack of data Losing momentum – no immediate results Lesson #6: Find external supporters, political support

RIA Quality Oversight Originally, Ministry of Interior the co-ordinating institution Before 2007 – Legislative Council 2007 – 2011 - Board for Regulatory Reform consisting of deputy ministers and deputy heads of agencies + representatives of regions, municipalities, Chamber of Commerce As of 2012 – Government Office became the coordinating body; RIA Board (an independent watchdog) – a real game changer Lesson #7: Institutions matter!

Thank you! daniel.trnka@oecd.org