BFCC - Baltic Fracture Competence Centre

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Advertisements

Frontrunners in innovation and sustainable growth: cluster organisations in European regions - The Case of Denmark Anders Hoffmann, Ph.D. Director of Entrepreneurship.
Valorisation of knowledge-intensive ideas in the South Baltic Area VALOR This project is part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development.
Enhancing transnational research & innovation cooperation in the Danube Region The EUREKA Initiative – Cross border cooperation Niki NASKA, Communications.
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Centre for Health & Technology Maritta Perälä-Heape, PhD Director, CHT.
“Draft Agora Strategy for Sustainable Tourism Development in the Baltic Sea Region” Agora - Network Sustainable Tourism Development in the Baltic Sea Region.
HORIZON 2020 Budget and financial instruments Dr. E. Kakaras Prof. NTUA.
First Science Park in the Baltics – operating since Founders: University of Tartu, Institute of Physics, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu.
EU Macro-regions e.g. Baltic Sea Region Macro-regions e.g. Baltic Sea Region National Regional City-regions Cluster Policy in Europe Local.
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
ICT policy and development trends and challenges in Bulgaria
Access to Clinical Expertise Steve Bain David Powell Jemma Hughes Paula Jeffries.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region - flagship project “Sustainable rural development” Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
Telematikplattform für Medizinische Forschungsnetze (TMF) e.V. TMF – A Common Platform for Medical Research Networks in Germany Improving the Organisation.
Connecting European Chambers: 26th March 2015 KNOWLEDGE ALLIANCES SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCES A PRIORITY FOR CHAMBERS.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
October 2005 RTD OMC-NET CALL –More effective national and regional research policies –Provision of additional resources to support trans-national policy.
KALININGRAD : A RUSSIAN REGION, A EUROPEAN OPPORTUNITY Regional Economic Development Agency Kaliningrad: a Russian region, an European opportunity by Alexey.
© BBR Bonn 2003 Hamburg, May 2007Wilfried Görmar, BBR The “Territorial Agenda” for the European Union – Effects on the Baltic Sea Region Baltic Sea.
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
General Project Information I n S e r v N e t In terregional Innovative Serv ice Sector Net work of Excellence.
1 PRIORITY MEDICINES FOR EUROPE AND THE WORLD Barriers to Pharmaceutical Innovation Richard Laing EDM/PAR WHO.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
Interreg Baltic Sea Region What type of projects can receive funding? Policy-to-project-to-policy Conference Copenhagen| 28 April 2016 Ilze Ciganska, Marta.
Part-financed by the European Union Investitionsbank Schleswig-Holstein Baltic Sea Tourism Center Operational structures for improved tourism communication.
EHealth for Regions Network 1 network – 1 project – 1 application Prof. Dr. Roland Trill Management Secretariat.
1 Date The Baltic Sea Region as One Test Site for Development of Health Care Products and Services Lars Lindsköld, PhD. eHealth Department, Region Västra.
Richard Escritt, Director – Coordination of Community Actions DG Research, European Commission “The development of the ERA: Experiences from FP6 and reflections.
The opportunities and challenges of sharing genomics data with the pharmaceutical industry Shahid Hanif, Head of Health Data & Outcomes, ABPI DNA digest.
BSR STARS - Programme for the Developement of Innovation, Clusters and SME-Networks Rima Putkienė Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania Maritime.
The future of eHealth activities within the NDPHS Anna-Lena Pohl eHealth for Regions Network Flensburg, Germany 11 th April 2013, Tallinn 1.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BALTIC SEA TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION: RU PERSPECTIVE Irina Karelina.
Mikolt Csap (Unit G.2 – Creativity)
PA Education education – research - employability
“MarChain”.
Baltic Sea Region Urban Forum for Smart Cities
Horizon 2020 – R&D Opportunities
Interreg Baltic Sea Region: Introduction to the Programme
EUROPE 2020 Seven Flagships
Go LNG LNG Value Chain for Clean Shipping, Green Ports and Blue Growth in Baltic Sea Region.
Getting Regional Smart Specialisation Strategies closer to business – the Interreg BSR project “EmpInno” Gert Proba Dr. Lars Schieber Baltic Dynamics,
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
Elena Zamsa National Contact Point Network Coordinator
EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
Musculoskeletal Health in Europe
Baltic Sea cooperation for reducing ship and port emissions through knowledge- & innovation-based competitiveness BSR InnoShip Baltic Sea cooperation for.
Izolda Bulvinaite, European Commission ,DG MARE, E1
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
Baltic Sea Region Programme : New Funding Opportunities
GREEN POWER ELECTRONICS
EU Research and Innovation: Horizon 2020
BALTIC SEA NETWORK - ESF
European Investment Bank Group
TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION:
Welsh Health Innovation Technology Accelerator
An Industry Perspective Nicole Denjoy COCIR Secretary General
EU health institutional and policy developments
27 November 2014 Mantas Sekmokas
ICTPSP Call 2007 ICT for ageing well
Introduction to the Academic Health Science Network (AHSN NENC)
European policy perspectives on social experimentation
Main results from the Interreg IVC Capitalisation project Winnet8
Inclusive Innovation Policies: Lessons from international case studies
– A View from German Development Cooperation –
1st PROG Marine Regions Forum
ALPINE SCALEUP NETWORK
Presentation transcript:

BFCC - Baltic Fracture Competence Centre Implementation of a Transnational Fracture Registry Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hoffmann, University Medicine Greifswald 8th EUSBSR Forum, Berlin 14/06/2017

Fostering innovation for better fracture management Source: private Fostering innovation for better fracture management

Project in a nutshell 13 organisations from seven countries round the Baltic Sea Duration: 36 months (2016 – 2019) Total budget: EUR 3.6 million Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014-2020 Flagship project of the EU strategy In ageing societies, the need for innovative products and clinical procedures for fracture treatment is increasing due to more age related fractures and comorbidities such as osteoporosis or post surgery complications like infections. Innovations must reduce the total cost of care or clearly improve the quality of care at a justifiable cost and bring new solution to outstanding medical challenges. The industrial sectors for innovation are broad covering implants, imaging, pharmaceuticals, wound care or single use surgery devices. These trends already led to a rising demand for innovation and investments e.g. by the European medical technology industry which increased their R&D actors in the innovation process helping to identify needs and to ensure user oriented products. Around 50% of new products are initiated by clinicians. Accordingly, companies in the BSR spend 11% from 2012 to 2013. At the same time, research and innovation (R&I) within fracture management is facing various challenges in understanding clinical needs and effectiveness, reducing costs of innovation and time to market. Clinicians and companies often lack insight into the total costs of care, the effectiveness of treatment and the causes of adverse health outcome in hospitals. To overcome these challenges, clinical fracture registries can provide evidence in the clinical “real world” and reveal needs and potentials for innovation. Further, clinicians and hospitals are important SR need direct access to hospitals and clinicians for collaboration within needs assessment, preclinical research, product development, clinical trials, postmarket follow up studies or health technology assessment. Moreover, an intensified collaboration between clinicians across hospitals and countries benefits the innovation of clinical procedures through the exchange of best practice, influenced by different national, organisational and regulatory conditions. Finally, successful innovation is driven by fast market access across countries which can be facilitated by collaboration between clinicians and companies, which is especially relevant for startups and SMEs in the BSR. The BFCC responds to these challenges by aiming at accelerated and effective transnational collaboration for innovation within fracture management in the BSR. The BFCC develops and implements a transnational fracture registry platform of 6 hospitals from DE, DK, LT, PL, EE and SE, allowing a comparison of the process and outcome quality across institutions and countries. This transnational R&I infrastructure fosters the evidencebased identification of clinical bestpractice and needs for innovation. BFCC establishes a transnational collaboration platform between hospitals and industry, which will be tested in 3 transnational pilots, with 6 hospitals and 4 companies involved. As part of the EUSBSR flagship project HealthRegion the project opens the R&I infrastructure and all identified innovation needs to all BSR companies.

Fractures Hospital stay – Fractures are the 6. most common reason Starting point for BFCC is the fact that fractures are still one of the top reasons for a hospital stay today. *except Denmark Source: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/ File:Hospital_discharges_of_in-patients,_by_disease_injury,_2013_(per_100_000_inhabitants)_Health2015B.png

Fractures will increase …and with an ageing society – as we are facing here in the Baltic Sea Region – factures will occure even more often. Sources: Krankenhausstatistik Diagnosedaten der Patienten und Patientinnen in Krankenhäusern, Statistisches Bundesamt and http://www.statbank.dk/INDP01

Challenges Demographic Change // ageing society > more age-related fractures Unsolved medical issues // existing post-surgery complications > infections; non-unions EU data protection conformance Understanding clinical needs and effectiveness in real clinical world Ageing leads to higher risk for fractures. Prevalence of fractures will exponentially increase with ageing society (in terms of prevalence and health costs), problem will be magnified. We need to individualise treatment and pathways for a better health outcome and economy / health care costs Selection of treatment must better and more cost-effective.

BFCC // Baltic Fracture Competence Centre Fostering innovation for better fracture management Project objectives Improve health outcome Reduce hospital stay Strengthen competitiveness and support growth of BSR companies Answer research questions about fracture-related complications etc. Solutions Establish research and innovation network in fracture management Analyse clinical data from transnational registry Foster hospital-industry cooperation for new product and service development © SpotmatikLtd - shutterstock

Project outcome Transnational collaboration 4 new fracture registries Transnational fracture registry platform Innovation Reports Transnational R&I infrastructure 3 transnational pilots (diagnostics, infections, complications) Education and training - Initiate transnational collaboration for innovation within fracture management between hospitals and industry. - Implementation of new fracture registries in 4 hospitals (DE; PL; LT; EE). - Development of a transnational fracture registry platform from 6 hospitals (DE; PL; LT; EE; SE; DK). - Comparison of the clinical process and outcome quality and develop 2 innovation reports. - 3 transnational pilots (diagnostics, infections, complications). - Build up transnational R&I infrastructure. - Support education and training of clinicians and industry. In ageing societies, the need for innovative products and clinical procedures for fracture treatment is increasing due to more age related fractures and comorbidities such as osteoporosis or post surgery complications like infections. Innovations must reduce the total cost of care or clearly improve the quality of care at a justifiable cost and bring new solution to outstanding medical challenges. The industrial sectors for innovation are broad covering implants, imaging, pharmaceuticals, wound care or single use surgery devices. These trends already led to a rising demand for innovation and investments e.g. by the European medical technology industry which increased their R&D actors in the innovation process helping to identify needs and to ensure user oriented products. Around 50% of new products are initiated by clinicians. Accordingly, companies in the BSR spend 11% from 2012 to 2013. At the same time, research and innovation (R&I) within fracture management is facing various challenges in understanding clinical needs and effectiveness, reducing costs of innovation and time to market. Clinicians and companies often lack insight into the total costs of care, the effectiveness of treatment and the causes of adverse health outcome in hospitals. To overcome these challenges, clinical fracture registries can provide evidence in the clinical “real world” and reveal needs and potentials for innovation. Further, clinicians and hospitals are important SR need direct access to hospitals and clinicians for collaboration within needs assessment, preclinical research, product development, clinical trials, postmarket follow up studies or health technology assessment. Moreover, an intensified collaboration between clinicians across hospitals and countries benefits the innovation of clinical procedures through the exchange of best practice, influenced by different national, organisational and regulatory conditions. Finally, successful innovation is driven by fast market access across countries which can be facilitated by collaboration between clinicians and companies, which is especially relevant for startups and SMEs in the BSR. The BFCC responds to these challenges by aiming at accelerated and effective transnational collaboration for innovation within fracture management in the BSR. The BFCC develops and implements a transnational fracture registry platform of 6 hospitals from DE, DK, LT, PL, EE and SE, allowing a comparison of the process and outcome quality across institutions and countries. This transnational R&I infrastructure fosters the evidencebased identification of clinical bestpractice and needs for innovation. BFCC establishes a transnational collaboration platform between hospitals and industry, which will be tested in 3 transnational pilots, with 6 hospitals and 4 companies involved. As part of the EUSBSR flagship project HealthRegion the project opens the R&I infrastructure and all identified innovation needs to all BSR companies.

pseudonymised MDAT (Medical data) Transnational fracture registry @ Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme Hospital / Existing fracture registry Sahlgrenska University Hospital Hospital / Novel fracture registry University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein Lithuania University of Health Science University Hospital Krakow University of Tartu Research institution / IT infrastructure University Medicine Greifswald www Patient Registry PSN (pseudonym) pseudonymised MDAT (Medical data) MDAT + IDAT

Target groups Hospitals Medical professionals Companies Clinical research Health authorities and health insurances Medical societies Beneficial group: Patients What are the main groups targeted by BFCC… Hospitals interested in setting up quality benchmarks with other hospitals or countries (positive and negative outliers), as well as in reducing complications and costs. Medical professionals interested in promoting further professional development in fracture treatment, benchmark with other professionals and benchmark of different treatment methods. Companies interested in innovation needs and potentials, managing product complaints and recall, in perspective health economic modelling, accelerating market access and in efficient post-market surveillance Clinical research interested in collecting real life data, mirroring real life conditions, having access to a huge amount of patients in order to be able to generate hypothesis and collect epidemiological data. Health authorities and health insurances interested in the potentials for cost reductions, the epidemiology of fractures and in planning of health care provision. Medical societies interested in participating in new developments in their specific field of interest.

Project Contact Data Management www.bfcc-project.eu Dr Anna-Winona Struck Life Science Nord Management GmbH (Lead Partner) Legienstraße 40 24103 Kiel, Germany +49 (431) 90 88 58 28 struck@lifesciencenord.de www.lifesciencenord.de Data Management Prof. Dr. med. Wolfgang Hoffmann, MPH University Medicine Greifswald Institute for Community Medicine Ellernholzstr. 1-2 17489 Greifswald, Germany +49 (3834) 86 7750 wolfgang.hoffmann@uni-greifswald.de Project Management Ralf Duckert, DSN - Connecting Knowledge www.bfcc-project.eu