Transition Process of the Policies Regarding Korean Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Activities of Civil Society HyeJeong Kim Chairperson of Nuclear Free Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
War in Korea By: Isabella de Jesus and Anna Marie Jennings.
Advertisements

Excellences, allow me first to remind you of some relevant information on the present status of peaceful use of nuclear energy within global energy strategy.
Dr Abdelwahab Biad University of Rouen France
KOREA THE COLD WAR BEYOND EUROPE. THE KOREAN WAR 1950 –1953 What was the situation in Korea after the Second World War? America’s policy was to contain.
Direct and Indirect Conflict American and Soviet Conflict by Proxy.
Development in South Korea. Japanese rule ( ) Control educational system –Japanese language and culture Control land (40% of entire country)
Indian strategy for management of spent fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors S.Basu, India.
The Korean War 25-4 The Main Idea Cold War tensions finally erupted in a shooting war in The United States confronted a difficult challenge defending.
The Korean War A Quick History. THE COLD WAR After World War II, the world was divided into two main superpowers, the democratic United States, and the.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
The Nonproliferation Treaty. Atoms for Peace December 8, 1953 President Eisenhower spoke to the UN suggesting that peaceful uses of the atom be promoted.
US History II Chapter 26 – Cold War Conflicts Section 2 – The Cold War Heats Up.
T HE K OREAN W AR “The Forgotten War”. I N THE BEGINNING … Japan had annexed Korea in 1910 until August th Parallel: Surrender to the Soviets.
Cold War Chapter 18 section 2.
SOL Review: American History
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FINANCING IAEA - Infrastructure Technical Meeting Vienna, November 2007 Fanny Bazile Forecast Director Nuclear Energy Division.
The Korean War The Main Idea
2-4 Notes 2: The Korean War Modern US History Unit 2-4: The Cold War May 17, 2010.
The crisis was costly – in human and financial terms 79 GB & US pilots were killed in accidents It did end ill feeling between Germany & the USA (now.
Korean War. War in Korea Soviets supplied the North Koreans with weapons and money-June 25, 1950 North Koreans invaded the South The Unites States following.
PBNC- 1 Overview of US Nuclear Energy Initiatives /06- 1 Harold McFarlane President American Nuclear Society.
1.Where was the maximum South Korean advance in 1950? How does its location compare to that of the Chinese and North Korean advance in 1950? Daily Focus.
Integrated Used Nuclear Fuel Management Regulatory Information Conference U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 11, 2009 Steven P. Kraft Senior Director.
KOREAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: CHRONOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT Prof. Choon-Hwan Kim College of Law, Chosun University, Korea.
The Korean War, The Forgotten War. Fast Forward to Marshall Plan Truman Doctrine 1948 Berlin Blockade/Airlift 1949 Soviets obtain.
ROK’s Development Strategies State-guided growth.
Segregation & Discrimination President Truman desegregated the military 1954, Brown v. Board of Education ▫Segregated schools were unconstitutional Separation.
Nuclear Energy and Waste By: David Long ( ); Chris Marcyniuk ( ); Adam Foster ( ) IMS3 Sustainability.
KOREAN WAR IB GLOBAL POLITICS. 1.Temporary Division a. Japanese troops in Korea above the 38th parallel surrendered to Soviet Allied troops and to western.
Vietnam and Korean Wars Unit 6 Ms. Hunt RMS IB
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
The Korean Conflict. What is a civil war? A war between citizens of the same country.
Why the nuclear industry is not good for our people David Fig Presentation to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Environment and Tourism 20 June 2007.
The only way forward: a bilateral Korea-Japan nuclear weapon free zone Richard Tanter and Yi Kiho Nautilus Institute.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
U.S. History Chapters 16 and 17 Review The Cold War.
16.2.  Soviets had been training revolutionaries across the world to spread communism  1949 – China would be their target.
The Korean War Leading up to 1950 Marshall Plan 1947 Truman Doctrine 1947 Berlin Blockade/Airlift Soviets obtain Nuclear weapons.
Iran has rejected a proposal to have much of its low-enriched uranium converted into fuel abroad and has suggested an alternative. Countries want Iran.
1. USSR – T he Union of Soviet Socialist Republics – the USSR – – i.e. communist Russia.
Current Korean Government and Prospects of Korean Reunification International Politics Prof. Ottopolik Hwang Hye Sook.
How did the Cold war develop?
DDG Nuclear Energy: Mr Zizamele Mbambo
Natural Resources Defense Council
Korea: Invasion and the UN Response
Ch 15 sec 4 The Korean War.
Intro Question – If you were drafted to go to a war, which was very unpopular in your country, is it justified to dodge the draft? 
Gwanghwamun, City Hall Square, the Culture of Protest and Celebration
János Krutzler Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority
Civil War in China 1937 Japanese invade China
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Unit 7 Notes The Korean War.
What is the Cold War? 40+ year struggle between the US and USSR
May 1, 2017 Turn in late vocab and textbook notes
The Korean War
Nuclear Power in Jordan
What started the Korean War, and what were the end results of it?
Cold War Gallery # 6 Korean War
Korean War [ ].
Development in South Korea
North Korea: Get Nukes Ready
DIVIDED KOREA AND THE PATH TOWARD REUNIFICATION (1954-PRESENT)
International Atomic Energy Agency
REGULATORY ASPECTS OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY Dr
COLD WAR Battles and protests (1950s-70s)
Korea Early History The Korean War Korea: North and South Leaders –
From Rhee to Park Nov. 6, 2014.
The Korean War.
Canada in The Post War World
Regulatory system in Hungary
Presentation transcript:

Transition Process of the Policies Regarding Korean Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Activities of Civil Society HyeJeong Kim Chairperson of Nuclear Free Committee Korea Federation for Environment Movement

History of Nuclear fuel cycle development

Rhee Syngman Govt,1948~1960 :Introducing and researching nuclear energy 1956, announced the Korea-U.S. Atomic Energy Agreement 1958, introduced a research reactor, TRIGA MARK II from the US for the first time of the governments 1959, opened the Atomic Energy Board as one of the gov’t departments & founded Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) The gov’t introduced nuclear energy to develop nuclear weapon rather than utilizing nuclear power.

Park Chung-hee Govt , 1963~1979 : Development regarding nuclear fuel cycle & policy ① Gov’t was more closely connected to developing the nuclear weapon in 1970s. KAERI had prioritised establishment of nuclear fuel cycle technology, concentrated on research & develop the technologies of processing & reprocessing. Started introducing a nuclear fuel reprocessing facility& MOX from the UK and France. Park pushed forward introducing Canadian CANDU heavy-water reactor. KAERI suggested building NRX & a nuclear fuel fabrication plant in parallel with introducing the heavy-water reactor.

Park Chung-hee Govt, 1963~1979 : Development regarding nuclear fuel cycle & policy② In 1971~1972, KAERI & Young Nam Hwahak tried to build reprocessing plant The US opposed Korea introducing the nuclear fuel cycle technology & required France & Canada to discontinue exporting the reprocessing plant, the heavy-water reactor. The export & import bank of the USA determined not to permit the loan for second reactor(Gori NPP 2) & the guarantee for the loan until Korea would join NPT

Park Chung-hee Govt, 1963~1979 : Development regarding nuclear fuel cycle & policy③ Finally, the gov’t withdrew the introduction of the reprocessing facility and NRX and discontinued the secret project 890. As a result, the loan agreement with Canada resumed, the export and import bank of the US approved the loan, and the US granted official permission to export the nuclear reactor for Gori NPP 2. However, Park gov’t & the nuclear groups didn't completely give up on the development of nuclear technology. Later, they indirectly kept pushing forward in far stricter secrecy.

Park Chung-hee Gov’t, 1963~1979 :Development regarding nuclear fuel cycle & policy④ To escape the eyes of the US, Park disguised underlying military purpose as the peaceful use in a thorough way. Gov’t founded the solution at localisation of the nuclear industry. President Park set his sights on the localisation of the nuclear industry and securement of independent nuclear fuel technology. At the same time, undertakings that could convert to reprocessing technology were carried forward, such as mixed nuclear fuel fabrication plant, the spent nuclear fuel test facility.

Chun Doo-hwan Govt, 1980~1988 : Indirect Development of Nuclear Fuel Cycle After Park Chung-hee died in 1979, the new military authority took power, the absence of the strong supporter of the development of nuclear technology put the secret project's future in jeopardy. The new military authority took over the gov’t in a military coup and suspended the development of a nuclear weapon to obtain the support of the USA, even instructing on disorganisation of KAERI. KAERI persuaded the new gov’t of the localisation of heavy-water nuclear fuel & others & made them national projects, which gave way out to the organisation.

Roh Tae-woo Govt, 1988~199 : Announcing the inter-Korean denuclearization pact In1991, made a declaration for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula & establishment of peace; ① South and North Korea do not test, manufacture, produce, receive, possess, store, deploy or use a nuclear weapon; ② The two sides use the nuclear energy for peaceful purpose only; ③ The two sides do not possess a nuclear reprocessing, or a uranium enrichment facility. Nevertheless, KAERI didn't stop researching or developing the nuclear fuel cycle technology & even carried out a uranium enrichment experiment.

Kim Dae-jung Govt,1998~2003 : KAERI’s secret uranium enrichment Between January and March in 2000, KAERI secretly carried away the laser enrichment experiment three times and produced 0.2g of enriched uranium.

Roh Moo-hyun Govt, 2003~2008 :Announced 4 Principles of Peaceful Nuclear Usage In 2004, the investigation for secret uranium enrichment facility of IAEA revealed. The enriched uranium KAERI produced contained 77% of uranium 235 KAERI was hiding it & found out by IAEA. The case was about to be relegated to the U.N. Security Council, but the Gov’t convinced them that it had been out of 'the scientists' curiosity & mistake' so they could avert punishment. Finally, Roh gov’t officially announced 'Four Principles of Peaceful Nuclear Usage' which confirmed we had no intention to develop a nuclear weapon.

Lee Myung-bak Gov’t, 2008~2013 : Determined reprocessing & fast breeder development In 2008, determined to reprocess the spent nuclear fuel and commercialise & develop the fast – breeder reactor In 2011, Lee confirmed the plan for the development of sodium-cooled fast breeder reactor and prototype reactor by 2028, with the plan for the development of the pyro-processing & the fast reactor nuclear fuel cycle system The biggest obstacle to the reprocessing business, pyro-processing, was the Korea-U.S. Nuclear Energy Agreement where the US prevented Korea from running a reprocessing business without the approval of the US. The Lee set a governmental policy to commercialise and develop the pyro and actively lobbied the US government to revise the Korea-U.S. NEA.

Park Geun-hye Govt, 2013~Present : Revising the Korea-U. S Park Geun-hye Govt, 2013~Present : Revising the Korea-U.S. Nuclear Energy Agreement Park Keun-hye gov’t took power in 2013. She met representatives of the USA & required the revision of the Korea-U.S. NEA even before the authority officially started. USA revised the agreement that they allow Korea to enrich U.S. uranium less than 20% and research the pyro-processing on phase 1. KAERI is planning to carry out the phase 1 experiment of the pyro-processing with the spent nuclear fuel from in July this year.

Activities of Civil society

Activities of Civil Society After Fukushima disaster, people actively staged a protest against construction and extension of a nuclear power plant, which was led to the closure of Gori NPP 1 in June 2015. In 2015, civil group took a legal action against operating license of Wolsung NPP 1 life extension by NSSC. Recently, the Court ruled that NSSC cancels the permission. Reprocessing spent nuclear fuel and constructing a fast-reactor haven't yet been able to be a core agenda of the anti-nuclear movement.

Activities of Civil Society Some hopeful perspectives; the pyro business is still in the research stage, and the US will finally oppose the reprocessing plan of Korea. However, facing the spent nuclear fuel experiment of KAERI, an anti-reprocessing campaign has started as 'the 30km solidarity for opposition against reprocessing the spent nuclear fuel,' where the core is civic groups around. Politics hold a debate to inform the problems of reprocessing pyro & reduce the business budget. People can stop the pyro-reprocessing. Korean civil society has been made the impossible possible in anti nuke movement.

Korean civil society has been made the impossible possible in anti nuke movement!!! We can stop the reprocessing!

Hye jeong Kim ecokim63@gmail.com Never give up! Hye jeong Kim ecokim63@gmail.com