Dodge County Water Monitoring Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dodge County Waters : Programs and Trends. What is the quality of the ground water and surface water in Dodge County ? Is the quality improving or worsening?
Advertisements

Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Joseph Zachmann, Ph.D. Research Scientist Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division.
Paul Bireta December 4, 2012 The Impact of Large Storm Events on Nutrient Loadings in Texas Rivers 1.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Water Action Volunteers’ Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Kris Stepenuck - UW EX/WI DNR Statewide WAV Coordinator Mike Miller - WI DNR Baseline Stream.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
Brief Overview of MDA’s Non- Point Program and Midwest Fertilizer Fees Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture.
Illinois Drainage Water Management Demonstration Project Don Pitts Agricultural Engineer State Water Quality Specialist Champaign, IL NRCS USDA.
Elm Creek Watershed Green Lands, Blue Waters Annual Conference November 20-21, 2013 Linda Meschke, Rural Advantage.
Setting long-range goals for Minnesota’s water resources Minnesota’s Clean Water Roadmap.
Conversion of Pine Lands to Irrigated Row Crops; Who Would Have Guessed? Large losses of native and grassland habitats across the state has received a.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAU WESTERN REGIONS PESTICIDE MEETING MAY 2007.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
The SWHISA approach to extension:. The SWHISA approach extension:  participatory, farmer led,  open-ended and interactive relationship among farm families,
PowerPoint Development Tool For the Cooperative Lakes Monitoring Program Enabling YOU to make your own presentations.
Failing Septic Systems: Problems and Solutions Protect Our Waters 2003 Legislative Session Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy Minnesota Environmental.
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER NITRATE DATABASES FOR SOUTHEASTERN MINNESOTA, USA Greg Brick 1, E. Calvin Alexander,
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
Source Water Protection Management Strategies for Source Water Protection Plan’s Implementation Contact Information: Lisa Vollbrecht City of St. Cloud.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Sediment & Nutrient Management in the L’Anguille River Watershed St. Francis County Cost Share Project Patricia Perry St. Francis County Conservation.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Source Water Collaborative Online Partnership Tool 1 Collaboration Toolkit: Protecting Drinking Water Sources through Agricultural Conservation Practices.
Other Issues. Potential Educational Opportunities.
What are some ways to reduce the risks to public health in drinking water from Salinas Valley? Andrew Mims Nitrates In Groundwater Presentation ENSTU 300.
How can your soil health be related to your health? Audrey Eldridge, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, GWMA Mama The story of a groundwater improvement.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): Development.
The Meadows Center Texas Stream Team Prepared in cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and U.S. EPA. The preparation of this presentation.
MPCA Groundwater Roles
A Project to Reduce Bacteria in Texas Waterways: Lone Star Healthy Streams Larry A. Redmon 1, Kevin L. Wagner 2, Robert K. Lyons 3, and Garrett Norman.
Kakanui Rachel Ozanne, Water Quality Scientist. Long-term (SOE) monitoring Water quality ~78 sites Monthly sampling.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
K aren Worcester Staff Environmental Scientist with thanks to M. Thomas, D. Paradies, L. Harlan, and P. Meertens California Central Coast Regional Water.
Integrating a Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network into Texas’ Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program Jill D. Csekitz, Aquatic Scientist Texas.
Jim Stockinger, Erin Eid, Jennifer Maloney and Mike Trojan
To better understand ground water, it’s important to visualize the rock layers, most of which serve as drinking water aquifers, which exist under Dodge.
EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.
26 May, 2016 Panevėžys, Lithuania
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Kennett Township land Stewardship Initiative
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Topics BMP Recommendations Direct Conduit Recommendations
Thief River Watershed Sediment Investigation
Clean Water Fund Grants
Clean Water Fund Competitive Program
Niagara River Area of Concern
The Urban Forest Management Plan
Mulberry Watershed Management Plan
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Georgia Agricultural Metering Program
Subsurface (Tile) Drainage Hydrology & Water Quality
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
West Virginia CBP Non-tidal Network: 2006 Status Update
Water Contamination Issues in SE Minnesota Karst Lands
Environmentally sensitive areas
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Environmental problems caused by Dairy Farming
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Dodge County Water Monitoring Update - 2017

Why Monitor ? To assess & protect public health To support existing grants and programs – and promote possible extensions To promote public education and participation To explore new grant possibilities To support water plan objectives

Private Well Testing Monitoring Program: Goals: To assess & protect public health To expand the private well data- base and increase potential for data-based projects. To determine water quality trends over time. Future/ Timeline: Ongoing program Primarily funded through user fees.

Compared to 79-15-6 in 2003

High nitrate wells occur most frequently in the Highly Sensitive Groundwater Area, where depth-to-bedrock is less than 50 ft, or where under-ground sand lenses exist.

Woodchip Bioreactor & Saturated Buffer Monitoring Program: Woodchip Bioreactor & Saturated Buffer Goals: To support an existing grant, and promote possible extension. To demonstrate, for interested neighbors, a successful means of reducing nitrate in tile water. Future/ Timeline: Bioreactor success shown on both local and regional scale; Sat. buffer needs further local monitoring. Recommended bioreactor sampling end after 2017; Sat. buffer after 2018.

MN Nutrient Reduction Strategy Studies conducted by various government agencies can often provide impetus to a sampling effort. MN Nutrient Reduction Strategy Source: MPCA – Minnesota Nutrient Reduction Strategy December 2014

Located in rural Ashland Township Field tile drainage is diverted through woodchips, where a percentage of nitrate is removed. Located in rural Ashland Township

Dodge County Saturated Buffers 14.0 12.1 4.2 9.9 Nitrate Levels (mg/L) DITCH BUFFER FIELD TILE Field tile runoff, high in nitrate (14.0 mg/L), is diverted to seep through the ditch buffer, reducing the nitrate to 4.2 mg/L as it enters the ditch. Source: Dodge County Environmental Services

Transparency Tube Sampling Stream-bottom Bug Sampling Monitoring Program: Transparency Tube Sampling Stream-bottom Bug Sampling Goals: To promote public education and participation in water quality To continue assessment of Impaired Waters in Dodge County To continue assessment of biotic health in the primary county streams Future/ Timeline: T-Tube: Minimal Base Monitoring Bugs: Cooperative project with DNR and WSU. Biotic summary exists for years 2001- 2015. Program awaiting new partners. Maintenance sampling every 3 – 5 years.

Programs promoting public education and participation Transparency Tube Stream Bug Sampling

Transparency tube readings (over 5000 Transparency tube readings (over 5000!) were instrumental in determining the Impaired Waters list in Dodge County

Trendline Sample of the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) results generated by examining and sorting macroinvertebrates (bugs) gathered from each stream site. Upward trend lines indicate an improving stream environment for living organisms.

Combined, bug sampling and transparency tube results can be used to indicate trends in the health of individual streams. Masten Creek Grade: B+ Trendline

Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Program: Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Goals: To support an existing grant, and promote possible extension. To promote public education and participation in water quality. To expand the database of nitrate levels in drinking water aquifers. Future/ Timeline: Program primarily grant funded by various government agencies since inception in 2007. Recommend continuing program at least until grant funding ends.

Dodge County Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network A grant-funded network operating across southeast MN since 2007. Approximately 100 private well owners participate in Dodge County, sampling their wells every 6 months. The Dodge County network is sub-divided into one baseline, and three targeted, groups. The targeted groups are: Wells to monitor areas near known high-nitrate wells. 2) Wells to monitor areas near existing sinkholes. 3) Wells to monitor the region along the Decorah Edge.

Dodge County Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Results MN Dept. of Health Drinking Water Limit = 10 mg/l Nitrate Level (mg/l) 0 – 1 mg/l is considered back- ground level

Surface Water Nitrate @ Bug Sites Monitoring Program: Surface Water Nitrate @ Bug Sites Goals: To explore new grant opportunities and establish a surface water nitrate database at important primary county streams. Future/ Timeline: Three years of sampling enough to indicate high nitrate levels, which may lead to future opportunities. Recommend sampling discontinue after 2017 season.

Surface Water Nitrate @ Bug Sites DATE Site 1 - So. Br. Zumbro River @ 260 Ave. Site 2 - So. Br. Salem Creek @ 260 Ave. Site 3 - No. Br. Salem Creek @ 670 Ave. Site 5 - Masten Creek @ Cty 15 Site 6 - So. Br. MFZR @ 272 Ave. Site 7 - Harkom Creek @ 270 Ave. Site 8 - MFZR @ Cty 24 Site 9 - Milliken Creek @ 570 St. Site 12 - Dodge Center Creek @ 635 St. 3/9/2016 11.33 16.17 17.93 11.22 10.78 13.6 15.73 3/25/2016 13.97 18.48 19.36 15.07 14.6 19.91 18.7 4/6/2016 18.59 20.46 20.9 18.92 18.04 18.4 20.68 21.01 4/20/2016 16.61 17.6 11.77 10.12 13.3 16.94 18.15 16.5 5/5/2016 15.95 19.58 12.32 15.84 13.5 18.37 5/18/2016 27.2 31.1 32 25.3 27 28.2 31.4 32.2 31.8 5/24/2016 21.3 29.6 30.9 19.6 21 25.1 30.1 30.7 29.7 6/1/2016 32.9 29.8 27.7 32.6 33.5 32.5 6/8/2016 30.3 32.7 29.3 26.7 29.9 31 31.6 6/15/2016 14.1 15.6 18.2 16.1 15.1 17.9   17.5 6/21/2016 29 33.3 26.5 31.7 33.1 34 7/6/2016 7.3 20.2 22.9 3.9 8.1 11.7 15 12.5 9.2 7/27/2016 14.8 16.9 17.2 11.4 15.4 18.1 20 15.2 8/24/2016 6 13.4 37.4 9.9 9.8 14.2 14.9 12.9 9/8/2016 11 14.7 10.5 7.8 12.6 13.8 9/28/2016 10.2 13 9 14.4 12.1 12.4 10.7 10/12/2016 8.5 10.8 12 10.9 Stream Nitrate > 30 mg/L !!

Expanded Well Monitoring Program (with MN Dept. of Agriculture) Goals: To explore new grant opportunities, and facilitate implementation of the MN Dept. of Agriculture’s Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan To provide additional information to rural residents regarding the safety of their well water Future/ Timeline: Awaiting more information regarding MDA’s implementation plan – timeline uncertain.

The MN Dept. of Ag. recently tested wells in 7 townships for excess nitrate. Their results coupled with our existing Highly Sensitive Ground Water Region show a likely relationship.

Continuous Monitoring Station near Byron Sportsmen’s Club Program: Continuous Monitoring Station near Byron Sportsmen’s Club Goals: To continuously collect basic stream water quality data at a site near the Dodge/Olmsted county line, and share it with the MPCA state-wide network. Future/ Timeline: Program funded cooperatively through DNR and MPCA sources Recommend continued operation of the monitoring station.

Continuous Monitoring Station Located on the South Branch Middle Fork Zumbro near Olmsted County, this station continuously monitors: Air Temperature Rainfall Water Temperature Water Depth Turbidity

Sampling sensors are an essential part of the monitoring station.