1. GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM TECHNICAL SERVICES BUREAU WESTERN REGIONS PESTICIDE MEETING MAY 2007

2. Montana’s Program The MDA maintains 42 permanent monitoring wells throughout the state. Additionally, a special project area is chosen each year that incorporates urban, suburban, and rural sites. Generally 25-30 ground and surface water samples are taken twice during the use season.

3. Montana’s Program cont. Total number of analytes –MDA tests each sample for 102 pesticides In 2006: –136 groundwater samples collected –20 surface water samples collected –3 sediment samples collected –15,912 analyses for pesticides, degradates and nitrates were performed

4. Montana’s Program cont. In 2007: –Increase sediment testing for pyrethroids –Continue to incorporate surface water sampling into the program –Sample surface waters after heavy rains, to evaluate pesticide runoff from dryland cropping systems.

5. Implementation of Grant Guidance Three-Step Water Quality Measure

6. 52 of the 58 pesticides on the State List of Pesticides of Water Quality Interest are considered Pesticides of Interest in Montana. Montana has determined, through evaluation of monitoring results, that none of the Pesticides of Interest are Pesticides of Concern at this time. 1.Evaluate

7. 2. Take Action Specific Management Plans ≥50% of drinking water standard Educational Outreach < 50% of drinking water standard

8. 3. Demonstrate Progress Evaluate the success of actions through time: ―ground and surface water monitoring ―assess behavioral changes Adjust actions if necessary to achieve mitigation.

9. Region 8 Trends Refinement of our knowledge: Colorado—conducting county level pesticide use surveys Wyoming and North Dakota— prioritizing increased surface water sampling

10. Region 8 Trends, cont. Making our knowledge useful to others: Utah—making gw vulnerability information available to planners and developers Colorado—created a webpage for the public to access gw monitoring data

11. Challenges Ahead Drinking water standards –If they are not available, states cannot determine if the pesticide presents a human health risk. Inclusion of degradates in evaluations Evaluating the effects of pesticides on Aquatic Organisms Funding, staffing, laboratory capabilities Keeping the Pesticides of Interest List updated