Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

H1 SILICON DETECTORS PRESENT STATUS By Wolfgang Lange, DESY Zeuthen.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Outer Stave Prototype Update E. Anderssen, M. Cepeda, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman, J. Silber LBNL W. Miller, W. Shih Allcomp, Inc ATLAS.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
1 MUON UPGRADE: ME0 GMM All engineering drawings from Sasha Surkhov PRELIMINARY !!
Engineering Division 1 Mechanical and Integration CD0 Walkthru, 19-Dec, 2007 Eric Anderssen, LBNL.
SVX4 chip 4 SVX4 chips hybrid 4 chips hybridSilicon sensors Front side Back side Hybrid data with calibration charge injection for some channels IEEE Nuclear.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
ATLAS SLHC UPGRADE ENGINEERING – LIST OF DECISIONS which will affect the design of auxiliary systems layout and routing BASIC LAYOUT FOR BARREL and WHEELS.
Pixel Support Tube Requirements and Interfaces M.Olcese PST CDR: CERN Oct. 17th 2001.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
HEP GROUP MEETING work on the ATLAS UPGRADE T.J.Fraser.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
Roger Rusack – The University of Minnesota 1.
09/03/2010 ADO-PO section meeting Beam Pipe Extraction/Insertion R. Vuillermet.
CERN, Main challenges for the ATLAS upgrade project in the coming year.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
2 Silicon pixel part Done and to be written Written! Under way To be done Introduction 1.Hybrid Pixel Assembly Concept 2.Silicon sensor 1.First thinned.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
B-layer integration with beam-pipe and services ATLAS B-layer upgrade E. Anderssen A. Catinaccio.
PHENIX Silicon Vertex Tracker. Mechanical Requirements Stability requirement, short and long25 µm Low radiation length
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
Meeting with TUM 1/5/2016P. Petagna – LHC Detector Upgrades: Cooling Visit of the President of the Munich Technical University LHC DETECTOR UPGRADES: COOLING.
Peter Sharp CERN CMS Tracker Summary of the Tracking Trigger Working Group Peter Sharp 21 November 2008.
Simon Kwan - FermilabCMS Tracker Upgrade Workshop – June 3, Update on the Phase 1 FPIX Half Disk Design Simon Kwan Fermilab on behalf of the USCMS.
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Software Tools for Layout Optimization (Fermilab) Software Tools for Layout Optimization Harry Cheung (Fermilab) For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Working.
Walter Sondheim 6/9/20081 DOE – Review of VTX upgrade detector for PHENIX Mechanics: Walter Sondheim - LANL.
Robert Pak VTX Meeting Sept. 7, 2004 VTX. Robert Pak VTX Meeting Sept. 7, 2004 PHENIX Central Region From VTX Proposal (dims in mm) HBD is standalone.
1. Efficient trigger for many B decay topologies Muon System CALORIMETERS PRS + ECAL+ HCAL RICH1 VERTEX LOCATOR Efficient PID Good decay time resolution.
M. Gilchriese - September 2000 Pixel Insertable Layouts September 2000.
C.BAULT November 9 th  LAYOUT STRAWMAN 07V13 Vs STRAWMAN 07V14  SERVICES AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY  ENVELOPE SERVICES  BARREL SERVICES ROUTING.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
Rene BellwiedSTAR Tracking Upgrade Meeting, Boston, 07/10/06 1 ALICE Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD) Rene Bellwied, Wayne State University Layout, Mechanics.
10 September 2010 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Upgrade, Mechanics and Cooling OEPG/FAKT Meeting 2010.
LumiCal High density compact calorimeter at the ILC Wojciech Wierba Institute of Nuclear Physics PAS Cracow, Poland.
ATLAS ID Services Mock Up - Proposal Presented by Ian Wilmut at DESY, update from John Hill 4th May, 20101ATLAS Upgrade - RAL.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
20/07/ Marzio Nessi Agenda For NIKHEF plans for the ATLAS Upgrade. NIKHEF ATLAS upgrade plans and organization DL/NH Potential.
Upgrade plans for ATLAS. Nigel Hessey (Nikhef) is overall ATLAS upgrade coordinator.
EC: 7 DISK concept Preliminary considerations
11/08/07 SLHC, ATLAS considerations D.Lissauer, N.Hessey, M.Nessi.
 Silicon Vertex Detector Upgrade for the Belle II Experiment
FBK / INFN Roma, November , 17th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova
Some input to the discussion for the design requirements of the GridPixel Tracker and L1thack trigger. Here are some thoughts about possible detector layout.
P. Morettini Towards Pixel TDR PM - ITk Italia - Introduction 8/2/2017.
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
Micro-channel Cooling
Micro Vertex Detector of PANDA Strip Detector
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
? ENDCAP: Mechanics IFIC-Valencia.
Sensor Layout Options Aim is to understand the implication and constrains of possible sensor design/layout on the general ID Layout. Keep both ATLAS “drum”
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
Services Layout – Update
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
TK Upgrade report.
Sub-Detector Assembly Area Summary of discussion at ALCW2015
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
SIT AND FTD DESIGN FOR ILD
Silvan Steuli Roland Horisberger Stefan König CMS Upgrade Workshop
SLHC Non-Inner Detector Upgrades
Presentation transcript:

Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC Issues to be discussed in the layout advisory group.

General Layout Aim to give a preliminary layout to the Eng. Groups and establish specification and list of options for further study. E.g. for installation scenario study – need to boundary conditions – length , radius etc. that are being considering. As a start assume the “envelopes” of the 3+4+2 layout for preliminary studies. For Eng. options the Working groups/R&D grouping will develop the specification and the implications of the Layout options.

Straw man Barrel Layouts b-layer integrated to the beam pipe. 1 layer at R= 5 cm. Granularity 300m x 50 m Z 2x40 cm Inner Layers - Pixels 2 additional layers at R=12, 18 cm Granularity 400m x 50 m Z length 2x 40 cm Middle Layers 3 layers at R=27,38,50 cm 4 Layers (27,38,49,60) Granularity 3.5 cm x 80 m Z length 2x100 cm Outer Layers 2 Layers R= 70,95 cm 2 Layers (75,95) Granularity 9 cm x 80 m Z length 2x190 cm

Straw man End-cap Layouts Discs 7 discs Pixel: Z= 50, 75 SS: Z= 120,165 4 layers 120,165,180 LS: Z= 210,260,320 Coverage in h Assume coverage up to 2.5 Moderator Need to optimize the amount of moderator on the EC face. The main difference between the two options is if one has 3 or 4 SS layers and 6 or 7 Discs. This will depend at the end on the optimization of the overall detector.

ID Straw-man Layout (4 SS layers)

ID Straw-man Layout (4 SS layers) 3 Pixel Layers 14,32,48 f Sectors 5,12,18 R Location 4 Short strip layers 22,32,40,48 f Sectors 27,38,49,60 R Location 2 Long Strip layers 32,40 f Sectors 75,95 R Location Moderator

Straw-man Options: Borated Poly – Locations and thickness. Fixed Length Barrel Quasi “Projective” layout. Integrated Pixel Implications of sensor layout options Mechanical Layout – options and questions Barrel Cylindrical support structure “ATLAS Like” + Discs “Staves” + Discs EC-Disc design Cooling Options Pressure, operating temperature

Borated Poly: Design for an integrated Luminosity of 7000 pf-1 Reduced the neutron flux/energy to minimize the damage to the electronics and sensors. Borated Poly can be placed in: Barrel Calorimeter Surface 5-10 cm EC Calorimeter Surface 5-20 cm Cavity in front of the Forward calorimeter. 5-20 cm Ref. Radiation Task Force Optimization: Ian Dawson Vince Hedberg Mike Shupe

Projective vs. “fixed” length Barrel “Fixed length”: All layers in same radial region have the same length in Z. Projective – each layer have different length. Projective: Smaller Si Area Material – needs detail engineering to comment if can be an advantage. Fixed Length: Easier assembly Significant less Engineering “Fewer” special components e.g. fewer stave flavors. Straw man: “Fixed Length Barrel”

Independent vs. Integrated Pixel Independent : Insertion “tube” as in ATLAS. Integrated : only “b-layer” attached to beam- pipe Independent Pixel: Schedule of the more complicated system is decoupled from the large area detector. Integrated Pixel: Less material? Services routed at lower h Better chance for common system One cooling system One Heat shield Straw-man: b-layer with the beam pipe, 2,3rd layer integrated with the Barrel.

Mechanical Support Mechanical support Stave Option “Drum” Option

“Stave” Concept The need for High degree of Multiplexing of power, readout etc. Lead to the concept of treating a set of modules in common. The mechanical support can be ATLAS like support (Drums) or mechanical Stave. For each group of modules: power, readout, grounding “fully contained” Service design needs to be “integrated” to the mechanical and layout. Some of these issues are independent if it is a real or “virtual” stave. At this stage we try to propose a level of multiplexing that will allow to get an estimate for services volume and routing. The decision on the mechanical concept will have to be discussed with the engineering team that will design the mechanical structure.

Drum vs. Stave Options Atlas Drum—Current Atlas Individual Silicon Modules are mounted on drum Stave approach to Atlas Upgrade; many modules on one long support structure (stave) Staves supported by endrings

ASSYMMETRICAL SENSORS POSITION Stave tilted to compensate for the Lorentz angle.

SYMMETRICAL SENSORS POSITION Stave tangential to the Radius.

Modularity – Installation Sequence Surface Assembly of the Barrel Assemble as much of the Barrel as possible. In this version we assume that we can assemble part of the disks already on the surface – this needs detail Eng. Studies. The installation sequence of ID in the pit. Step I: Moderator and services on IWV Step II: Barrel Surface assembly Step III: Barrel Services (cables, pipes) Step IV: Outer Discs Step V: Outer Discs services Step VI: b-layer + beam pipe

Surface Assembly – Step 1

Surface Assembly – Step 2

Surface Assembly – Step 3

Surface Assembly – Step 4

Surface Assembly – Step 5

Surface Assembly – Step 6

Surface Assembly – Step 7

Surface Assembly – Step 8

Ready to Transport to the Pit

Assembly in the pit– Step 1

Assembly in the pit– Step 2

Assembly in the pit– Step 3

Assembly in the pit– Step 4

Assembly in the pit– Step 5

Assembly in the pit– Step 6

Summary – Si Area