1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SAVE OUR CITY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Commercial Revitalization.
Advertisements

1. 2 Municipal Management Districts (MMD) are special districts that are: Self governed, but must be approved by the host municipality; and have the.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
Tax Increment Financing Town Center Project Midwest City, OK.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
Eastside Community Redevelopment Area Response to BoCC request for additional information Alachua County Department of Growth Management November 15, 2011.
Utility Extension Project
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center Project Update.
Southside Flood Protection
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
Economic Benefits of DRGR Land Use Change July 2014.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN & PROJECT The Pekin City Council has been considering implementing a commercial and industrial TIF district.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing Daniel Stevenson, Office of the Commissioner, DECD Phone:
Old Corvallis Road Urban Renewal Program An Overview May 4 th, 2009.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
3TB Project Review Tax Increment Financing (“TIF”) Overview January 25, 2013.
Annexation Issues in Eden A History of Annexation in Eden Since 1968 NC Annexation History Current Annexation Issues in Eden January 2010.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
PUBLIC MEETING November 19, 2003 Lower Manhattan Redevelopment D015183, PIN NYCD NYSDOT, REGION 11 Route 9A Project.
Philadelphia’s Red Fields to Green Fields.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
Multi-Family Housing Limited Tax Exemption Program Applications City Center Redevelopment Authority December 17, 2015 Peggy Sheehan, Program Manager.
OLDE TOWN ARVADA TOD Update to RTD Board September 3, 2013
Tempe Town Lake Downstream Dam Replacement NEW DAM ALTERNATIVES SELECTION January 5, 2012.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
Proposed TIF-Funded Road Improvements: TIF 7 North Tarrant Parkway Presented by Jay Chapa, Assistant City Manager April 12, 2016.
Marian Anderson Place Site Update City Commission Special Workshop December 14, 2015.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Economic Development Agreements with Radio Shack City of Fort Worth Housing and Economic Development Department May 18, 2010.
May 18, 2004 City Bond Election. MAY 2004 BOND ELECTION General Election May 18, 2004 Elections City Mayoral Election City Council Election City Bond.
April 26, 2016 PRESENTER: Doug Green, Vice President.
1 Economic Development Program Agreement Sundance Square Central Plaza Robert Sturns Housing and Economic Development Department April 10, 2012.
TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expansion and Updated Project and Financing Plans Jay Chapa, Director Housing and Economic Development.
 Overview of Project  Economic Development Tools  Municipal Management Districts  Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones  Session Review, Q&A.
2014 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) Status Update April 1, 2014.
1 Presented to Housing and Economic Development Committee February 2, 2010 Timberland/Beach Roadway Project.
PROPOSED FEDERAL PROGRAM 2010
DEVELOPER WORKSHOP October 17, :00 p.m.
Community Dialogue about The NuCLEus Project
Tax Foreclosed Property
Regional Roads Committee
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Update
Southeast Madera County Development
Skillman Corridor TIF District
FY 2012 Status Report on the North Mainland (Ormond Crossings CRA)
PROPOSED MARCH LANE / HOLMAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Planning Commission Hearing
A Lake Runs Through It … Or Is It a River? Or Something Else?
Regional Railroad Authority (WCRRA)
The Economic Impact of the Conceptual Plan for the Redevelopment of the Green Bay Correctional Institution Site Commissioned by the Village of Allouez.
Early Learning Facilities
Work Session Follow UP Aug. 23, 2018.
Village of North Aurora, Illinois
Financial Considerations
Delta Water Supply Project
Joint City Council / Planning Commission
Northeast Marshall Neighborhood Improvement Authority
2014 Annual Program Evaluation (APE) Status Update
Presentation to the Special Administrative Board
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS
November Bond Election
First Public Hearing to Adopt the Tentative Budget and Millage Rate
Dakota County Board of Commissioners Meeting September 24, 2019
A “City” by Any Other Name…
Presentation transcript:

1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic Development Director

2 Presentation Overview Expanded and updated Project and Financing Plans Staff Recommendation Next Steps

3 Proposed Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plan

4 Highlights of Freese & Nichols Study New plan includes: –Added Gateway Park / Oxbow –Added completion dollars –Higher level of design and engineering –Current property numbers (acquisition and relocation)

5 Baseline Project Costs Land (acquisition, demolition, relocation)$226,213,500 Environmental remediation$38,355,100 Preliminary design$25,598,900 Ecosystem restoration$10,915,200 Recreation$8,785,400 Valley Storage$95,855,700 Utility relocation$88,135,500 Bridges and roadway$78,855,700 Pump station$8,857,200 Bypass Channel$112,724,300 Waterfront and pedestrian bridges$29,356,200 Gates$81,431,800 Dam$88,292,600 Program management$16,500,000 TOTAL COSTS$909,877,200

6 Primary Differences between $435M and $909M Project Expansion –Gateway Park / Oxbow (w/inflation)= $ 93,000,000 –Bypass Channel Betterments (w/inflation)= $ 29,000,000 Project Cost Refinements (Preliminary Design/Engineering and Inflation) –Inflation (3.5% simple interest)= $148,000,000 –Land (Acquisition/Demolition/Relocation) = $ 91,400,000 –Utilities = $ 56,000,000 –Bridges, Bypass Channel, Dams, Gates etc.= $ 57,000,000 TOTAL = $474,000,000

7 Optional Project Costs Inland water feature / environmental cleanup project $29,099,000 Surface storm water management infrastructure system $37,941,000 Gateway Park remaining recreation features (N. Beach to Oakland Blvd.) $31,145,000 Police / Fire training center$20,000,000 TOTAL OPTIONAL COSTS$118,185,000

8 Delivery Plan Expand TIF boundary to include Oxbow and Gateway Park area Extend life of TIF from 25-years to 40-years (earlier expiration if obligations are met) Continue current participation levels from all taxing entities (80%) Allow forward funding agreements from partner agencies (ex. TRWD) No impact or increase of local funding commitments

9 TIF 9A and 9B Note: TIF 9A is coded in red; TIF 9B extension is coded in green

10 TIF 9B Boundary

11 TIF 9B Description 2,600 acres Adjacent to eastern edge of TIF 9A Extends east along west fork of Trinity River to Oakland Blvd. and E. 1 st St. Includes Gateway and Riverside parks

12 TIF 9B Goals Flood protection / valley storage sites Recreational amenities 1,000 acre urban programmed park Transportation improvements (E. 1 st St.) Ecosystem restoration Economic development along Gateway Park East and southeast neighborhood connection to Trinity River Corridor

13 Updated Financing Plan Summary TRV Project cost estimate$909,877,200 Federal funds (53.6%)$487,822,900 Local funds (46.4%)$422,054,300 City of Fort Worth$26.6 million Tarrant County$11 million Tarrant Regional Water District$64.4 million Local funds subtotal$102 million REMAINING TO FINANCE FROM TIF$320,054,300 City $181.9 M County $ 56.1 M Hospital District$ 48.5 M College $ 29.3 M TRWD $ 4.2 M

14 Projected TIF Revenue Baseline Model (25) –$109,400,000 Extended Length (40) –$448,000,000 (Projections provided by TXP) Note: Based on 80 percent participation; TXP model assumes 3-year lag in development

15 Economic Impact Comparison Original Plan Expanded Plan No Build Permanent Jobs 12,00017,4955,196 Construction Jobs 6,00020,0220 New Households 6,5007,000< $337 million more in real property tax revenue to Fort Worth ISD from the expanded plan versus the No Build option * Projections provided by TXP

16 City of Fort Worth General Fund Tax Impact Comparison (with 80% participation in TIF) No BuildExpanded PlanDifference 2010$2.43 mil.$1.02 mil.($1,403,875) 2020$3.98 mil.$5.03 mil.$1,052, $5.68 mil.$8.19 mil.$2,510, $5.89 mil.$8.83 mil.$2,939, yr. Total $ mil.$ mil.$48,139,827 - Data provided by TXP

17 Staff Recommendation and Next Steps

18 Staff Recommendation TIF Board approved the proposed amended updated Project and Financing Plan which includes: –Expansion of the TIF boundary to include TIF 9B –Update the project costs total to $909.8 million, with approximately $320 million to be paid from TIF funds –Extend the life of TIF from 25-years to 40-years, or earlier expiration if obligations are met –Approval to fund items included in $909 million project Alternative items to be added only if funding is available and the plan is amended and approved by the TIF Board and taxing entities Approve amended TIF Policy

19 Next Steps Sept. 25 th Initial endorsement from TIF Board on proposed amended Project and Financing Plan Completed Oct. 2 nd Proposed amended plans provided to all taxing entities for 60-day review period Completed Oct. 6 th Presentation of proposed amended plans to City Council Completed Oct. 16 th City staff meets with taxing entities to discuss amended Project and Financing Plan Completed Nov. 10 th City staff makes formal presentation to County Commissioners Completed Nov. 19 th City staff makes formal presentation to College District Board Completed Dec. 4 th TIF board reconvenes to approve amended plans Completed Dec. 8 th -15 th Council considers ordinance approving TIF expansion, extension, and amended plans Dec. 18 th TIF board meets to consider Development Agreement with Tarrant Regional Water District for forward funding of eligible project costs

20 QUESTIONS?

21 Project Progression Summary In 2021 Dollars (includes contingencies and inflation) In 2021 Dollars Doubled Scope

22 Requested Options Remaining Recreation Features at Gateway Park

23 Chronology of TIF 9 November 2003 – September /2003Distribution of Preliminary Plans 12/2003Council establishes TIF 9 09/2005TIF 9 Board recommends Plans for Council consideration 01/2006Council approves plans 08/2007TIF 9 Board approves funding for engineering study to update project schedule and costs 06/2009Engineering study completed with cost update, including project area 07/2009State TIF bill allows extension of TIF district terms 09/2009Project and Financing Plans amended based on expanded project scope (Gateway Park) engineering study findings and costs

24

25 Initial Project Costs Land acquisition and demolition$81,300,000 Utility relocation and demolition$21,900,000 By-pass channel / levee construction$63,900,000 Valley storage balance$56,950,000 Water control structures$80,580,000 Storm runoff$8,550,000 Roadway, bridges, railroad grade separations$65,350,000 Environmental remediation allowance$26,800,000 Waterfront and pedestrian bridges$28,800,000 Administration and TIF management$870,000 TOTAL$435,000,000 Note: Based on 2005 construction costs

26 Initial Financing Plan Summary TRV Project cost estimate$435,000,000 Federal funds (50%)$217,500,000 Local funds (50%)$217,500,000 City of Fort Worth$26.6 million Tarrant County$11 million Tarrant Regional Water District$64.4 million Local funds subtotal$102 million REMAINING TO FINANCE FROM TIF$115 million Note: Based on 2005 construction costs and 80 percent participation

27 Tax Increment Projection Assumptions Entities – 80 percent participation City of Fort Worth Tarrant County Tarrant County College District Tarrant County Hospital District Tarrant Regional Water District

28 Economic Impacts Average 600 jobs per year during construction 16,000 permanent jobs Up to 10,000 new households $518 million in real property tax revenue to FWISD over 25-year term $46.4 million in annual real property tax revenue to participating agencies (excluding FWISD)

29 Build-Out Analysis 40-Year Build-Out Residential –10,330 units; 11,363,000 SF Commercial / Office / Retail Support –2,750,000 SF Value –14,113,000 SF –$1.6 billion Additional Community Facilities –620,000 SF 25-Year Build-Out 11,800,000 SF $1.24 billion Note: Based on 2005 construction costs