The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Process: What, when, by whom? Global Partnership monitoring workshop Copenhagen, 12-14 June 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop The MICS4 Process.
Advertisements

Guidance Note on Joint Programming
The UN-REDD Programme 1 st Policy Board Meeting 9-10 March 2009.
ADQ IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP Summary, Conclusions
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
1 Jonathan Brown UNGASS HLM, New York, June 2008 Progress & Lessons Learned.
How Country Stakeholders Get Involved Group Exercise June 2013 MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Update on Indicator to Measure Transparency IATI Steering Committee, 3 October, Copenhagen
The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.
Second Independent Evaluation Roles / Responsibilities & Relationships.
Annual Monitoring and Review & Mutual Review Quality Assurance Services.
1 PROPOSAL FOR PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF SHA DATA COLLECTION UNDER THE CO-OPERATION BETWEEN OECD, EUROSTAT AND WHO 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts.
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
© GEO Secretariat Task Point of Contact: a volunteer from among the Leads, who will provide a single point of communication for all those involved in the.
13 January 2011 Country Launch – 2011 Survey on Monitoring the Paris Declaration Role of Donors.
Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.
Civil society participation in the Universal Periodic Review.
WEBINAR 3 rd UN DCF Survey on Global Accountability Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UNDESA.
1 The Dialogue on the move First follow-up meeting Brussels, 9th -10th November 2011.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
December 4, 2015 UNAIDS Introduction to UN Team on AIDS in Mozambique (UNTAM) UNTAM Retreat 2-3 April Namaacha.
Process and mechanics of HFA progress monitoring and Review Sujit Mohanty, UNISDR Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership 24 – 26 March 2010 Bangkok.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
MULTILATERAL ORGANISATION PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT NETWORK The MOPAN Common Approach 2009 Presentation to DAC Network on Development Evaluation 15 June 2009.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
Donor Coordination Meeting Draft Guide to the Monitoring Framework of the Global Partnership March March 2013.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 2 How to meeting countries needs: What has been done and way forward.
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
Southeast Asia Primary Learning Metric (SEA-PLM) II CONSULTATIVE MEETING.
Coordination and Partnerships of SDG4-Education 2030 Le Thu Huong Section of Partnerships, Cooperation and Research, UNESCO Paris.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
The Global Partnership
Monitoring and evaluation of disability-inclusive development
Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel,
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Workshop on MDG Monitoring United Nations Statistics Division
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
Introduction to UN Team on AIDS in Mozambique (UNTAM)
Session 3 The 2nd monitoring round ( )
Civil Society Network for Education Reforms (E-Net Philippines)
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
ICP 7-th Regional Coordinators Meeting World Bank, Washington D.C.
Equitable Services Under ESSA
UN REDD FAO-UNDP-UNEP July 2008
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Session 4 Introduction to the 2nd monitoring round ( )
National Mechanisms for Reporting and Follow-up
Project and Program Information and Impact Reporting System (PIIRS) The FY17 data collection and reporting process.
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
State of play of B2G eInvoicing in public procurement
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
Roles and Responsibilities of Council Members and Focal Points
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
UNDP Asia Pacific Regional Centre August 2010
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
Presentation transcript:

The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Process: What, when, by whom? Global Partnership monitoring workshop Copenhagen, June 2013

Content 1.How will the evidence be gathered 2.What support tools and resources are available to facilitate country participation

1. How will evidence be gathered Data is collected at both the country and global levels according to what the indicators measure. Five indicators draw on information sources at the country level with the objective of grounding data collection in existing national monitoring and accountability frameworks. The remaining five indicators draw on global information sources.

Indicators requiring country level information IndicatorGovernment data Provider data 1 Use of country results frameworksG 5a Annual predictabilityP 5b Medium-term predictabilityG 6 Aid on budgetGP 7 Mutual accountabilityG 9b Use of PFM and procurement systems P

Country level process National focal points play a key role in Ensuring that country stakeholders are fully informed about Busan global monitoring efforts and facilitating their contribution to the process; Overseeing the collection of data on Busan global indicators either through existing mechanisms and tools or ad hoc processes; Organising multi-stakeholder dialogue in support of data consolidation and validation and ensuring the overall quality of data; and Filling in the country spread sheet and submitting data to the UNDP/OECD joint support team.

Timeline part I June 2013Workshop and support to country-level data gathering and validation National co-ordinators attend workshop, find out more about the indicators and exchange experiences and discuss concerns with the support team and other national co-ordinators. Final Monitoring Guidance and country spread sheet are circulated to the national co-ordinators in participating countries. On-going support to national co-ordinators for data gathering, validation and submission. July/August 2013 (final deadline TBC) Data collection and validation The national co-ordinators facilitate country level data collection in collaboration with development partners, including convening consultations and dialogue for data validation. Consequently, country co-ordinators submit completed country spread sheet based on data available at the country level. Information on indicators drawing on global processes are made available to the support team.

Timeline part II August- September 2013 Data processing and review Consolidation and aggregation of country-level data. Desk reviews and data consolidation for indicators drawing on global-level data sources (to the extent possible, data will be shared as available and relevant). Full country data tables are sent by UNDP-OECD to national co-ordinators for final review in consultation with relevant stakeholders. In the case of any errors in the data, the national co-ordinators notify the joint UNDP-OECD team. Providers of co-operation will also receive for information their full set of data pertaining to each country in which they have reported data to the government. September- December 2013 (Exact timeline TBC) Report production Data is analysed by the support team and is used as a basis for the progress report to inform political dialogue at the first Ministerial Meeting of the Global Partnership. Exact timeline for publication and dissemination of findings to be confirmed

2. What support is available? Based on workshop discussions, two main tools will be finalised

On-going support Global Partnership community site ( includes dedicated monitoring section withhttps://undp.unteamworks.org/node/ Regularly updated FAQs List of countries participating in Global Partnership monitoring All relevant documentation related to monitoring A helpdesk will be available during the entire process, and questions should be sent to

Country level Direct support to government: demand driven. Different countries – different arrangements. Helpful to clarify what kind of support is needed, varies in response to needs. Supporting contributions from all actors: UNDP HQ preparing communication to UN Resident coordinators to seek their support and feedback in facilitating the country consultations and dialogue around Global Partnership monitoring. UNDP also setting up internal helpdesk to support country offices to respond to requests for support at country level. OECD will make efforts to ensure the active contributions of development partners through the Development Assistance Committee Give us your feedback in today’s wrap up…

Questions and answers Sharing lessons

Indicator clinics Indicators will be covered in interactive break-out sessions (1hr 45min each). Participants will be split up in 4 groups: one group for francophone participants and three groups for English speaking participants. Each clinic will address the following issues: Definition and purpose of each indicator Practical examples of challenges encountered in measuring the indicator and possible solutions Questions and answers Clinic A: Indicators 1 and 7 (results and mutual accountability) Clinic B: Indicators 5, 6 and 9 (predictability, aid on budget and use of systems) Clinic C: Overview of indicators measured through global processes Clinic D: Joint clinic for all French speaking participants