1. Progress on Aid Effectiveness: Monitoring the Global Partnership and the Moldova Partnership Principles Lucreția Ciurea, State Chancellery Jakob Schemel, UN Moldova Donors’ Meeting, 28 November 2013

2. The global monitoring framework of indicators
Indicator No
Indicator description
Country level
Others 1
Development co-operation is focused on results that meet developing countries’ priorities X
Piloted in 10 countries, including Moldova 2
Civil society operates within an environment that maximizes its engagement in and contribution to development
CIVICUS Enabling Environment Index 3
Engagement and contribution of the private sector to development
Desk review in collaboration with the World Bank Institute 4
Transparency: information on development co-operation is publicly available
TBD
5a+b
Development co-operation is more predictable (annual and medium-term) 6
Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny 7
Mutual accountability strengthened through inclusive reviews
UNDESA work on mutual accountability 8
Gender equality and women’s empowerment
Collected by UN Women 9a
Quality of developing country PFM systems
CPIA Desk review 9b
Use of developing country PFM and procurement systems 10
Aid is untied
Collected by OECD-DAC

3. ODA disbursed to Moldova (in million USD)
Sources: Paris Declaration Surveys on 2005, 2007 and 2010; 2012 Global Partnership Monitoring

4. Major Financial Flows to Moldova in 2012 (in million USD)
Sources: (1) Foreign Direct Investments: 2012, World Bank. World Development Indicators; (2) Remittances: 2012, National Bank of Moldova; (3) ODA: 2012, Global Partnership Monitoring

5. Indicator 1 is piloted in 10 countries worldwide, including Moldova
Indicator 1. Development co-operation is focused on results that meet developing countries’ priorities
Indicator 1 is piloted in 10 countries worldwide, including Moldova
Assesses extent to which development partners use country-led results frameworks and their M&E systems

6. Global Partnership Survey
3 year average (2009 – 2011)
Global Partnership Survey
MOF Data

7. Indicator 5a. Development co-operation is more predictable (annual predictability, MOF data)

8. Indicator 5b. Development co-operation is more predictable (medium-term predictability)

9. Indicator 6. Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny

10. Indicator 7. Mutual accountability among development co-operation actors is strengthened through inclusive reviews
Criteria for Mutual Accountability
Existence of an aid or partnership policy that defines a country’s development co-operation priorities
Existence of country-level targets for effective development co-operation for both developing country government and providers of development co- operation
Assessment against these targets undertaken jointly by government and providers at senior level in the past two years
Active involvement of local governments and non-executive stakeholders in such reviews.
Comprehensive results of such exercises are made public

11. Indicator 9. Effective institutions: developing countries’ systems are strengthened and used
Overall score of Moldova on the World Bank Country Policy and Institutional Assessment: 4.0
Disbursements for the Government sector using national …

12. Post Busan principles and future discussion
Inclusive Development Partnerships.
e.g. Sector coordination council meetings, supported by lead donors
Results.
e.g. Provider strategies using national indicators; improved capacity for statistics
Transparency and accountability.
e.g. Public financial management systems further strengthened and used
Country Ownership.
e.g. Aid, including Technical Assistance, reflected in budgetary documentation

13. Areas for Feedback Annual Assessment of aid effectiveness
Quality data entered into the new Aid Management Platform
Revision of the Partnership Principles Implementation Plan
Reduction of the number of indicators
Revision of targets where applicable
Joint Partnership Council: expectations from development partners