PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Trends on Student Involvement in Quality Assurance Agencies
Advertisements

Setting internal Quality Assurance systems
Official BFUG Bologna Seminar ENHANCING EUROPEAN EMPLOYABILITY July 2006 University of Wales Swansea.
ARMENIA: Quality Assurance (QA) and National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Tbilisi Regional Seminar on Quality Management in the Context of National.
Head of Learning: Job description
1-st stage DoQuP Report on countries. State standards in the area of assurance of education quality are developed with the aim of:  meeting permanent.
Quality Assurance: Dimension of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat June 10-11, 2014 Munich.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
NCFHE Guidelines on Internal Quality Assurance
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Prof. A.Rauhvargers First draft of the revised Standards and Guidelines for the Quality Assurance in the EHEA.
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
6 th February How can/should quality assurance feature in the design of discipline- specific learning outcomes? Dr. Norma Ryan Director, Quality.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Quality Assurance in Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Maria Helena Nazaré EUA President Former Rector Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal.
Bishkek 3/5/2011 DoQuP Standards for QA of SPs in PCs 1 WP.1 - Deliverable 1.1 Standards for Quality Assurance of Study Programmes DoQuP standards for.
Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.
European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Colin Tück St Paul’s Bay, 22 June 2015 Peer Expert Training.
Doctoral education through students’ eyes Juuso Leivonen The 21st century doctorate – sharing European developments Scotland House Conference.
The European standards and guidelines for quality assurance Séamus Puirséil, Vice – President, ENQA.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
KNU - Bishkek (KS) 21 April 2015 DOQUP PROJECT FINAL DISSEMINATION CONFERENCE 1 Tempus Project n TEMPUS IT-SMGR Documentation for QA of.
EU/CoE PROJECT “STRENGTHENING HIGHER EDUCATION REFORMS IN SERBIA”
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Genova 3-4/11/2011 DoQuP Presentation 1 Presentation of the Tempus Project Number TEMPUS IT-TEMPUS-SMGR ( / ) “Documentation.
Dr Vladimir Radevski Ohrid, 4 April 2012 National Frameworks and their associated Quality Assurance.
European Standards and Guidelines – ESG 2015 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Head of Higher Education Evaluation Unit, FINEEC Former Vice-President of ENQA Vi flyttar.
Developments in Quality Assurance in Europe and its impact upon higher Education Institutions Dr. Padraig Walsh President, European Association for Quality.
© 2008, Tod O' Dot Productions EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY – ENTERPRISE COOPERATION NETWORK Socrates Erasmus Programme Project No: Ref LLP
Outline of the presentation Historic development Main principles Standards and guidelines Areas Stakeholders Internal QA, external QA, QA agencies Trends.
The European Students’ Union REPRESENTING STUDENTS SINCE 1982 Cristi Popescu – Executive Committe Member European context of QA ESPAQ Training Yerevan,
Briefing Michael Mulvey PhD Director of Academic Affairs and Registrar
ESG 2015: Linking external and internal QA Involving stakeholders Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Implementing the European Standards and Guidelines on Quality Assurance in Higher Education Peter Williams President, ENQA.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Double degrees and joint degrees: international inter-university cooperation Lewis Purser, Director Academic Affairs.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
QA in HEIs: ZIMCHE’s Perspectives Workshop on trends in HE for BUSE Administrators 8-9 April 2016 Evelyn Garwe, Deputy CEO.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Arancha Oviedo EQAVET Secretariat
Quality Assurance and Developments of Higher Education in Europe
Quality Assurance in Vocational Education and Training in Kosovo
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Promoting an Internal Quality Culture in Mozambican Universities
International Information Seminar Seminar, Minsk October 2016, Minsk State Linguistics University MODULE BASED EDUCATION. ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING.
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Qualifications Ireland and its Functions
TEACHING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FRAMEWORK
Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Europe
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Integrating the ESG-2015 in the context of higher education in Armenia
Introduction to the training
quality culture in the EHEA
European Style Pilot Evaluations in Azerbaijan Higher Education Baku 20 June 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Project Leader.
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

PUBLIC ACCREDITATION AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION “Key aspects of quality assessment for teaching and learning in HE” Niko Hyka Innovation and information technology as a mean for improving and developing teaching methods 8 July 2016, Vlora, Albania University “Ismail Qemali” of Vlora

Content: Concepts of quality in HE ESG 2015, Key aspects Teaching and learning concepts in HE New developments for monitoring the quality of teaching & learning Evaluation of HEIs , MoES – QAA - PAAHE

Set of regulations and procedures for internal quality assurance (at the level of the whole institution) Higher Education Institutions Periodic external evaluation and monitoring Accreditation Agency, Other bodies / organizations processes Internal mechanisms External evaluation Concepts of quality in Higher Education (HE)

Basic principles of QA providers of higher education (HEIs), have the primary responsibility for the quality of their provision and its assurance; the interests of society in the quality and standards of higher education need to be guaranted; the quality of academic programmes need to be developed and improved for students and other beneficiaries of higher education across the EHEA; there need to be efficient and effective organisational structures within which those academic programmes can be provided and supported; transparency and the use of external expertise in quality assurance processes are important; there should be encouragement of a culture of quality within higher education institutions; processes should be developed through which higher education institutions can demonstrate their responsibility, including responsibility for the investment of public and private money; quality assurance for responsibility purposes is fully compatible with quality assurance for enhancement purposes; institutions should be able to demonstrate their quality at home and internationally; processes used should not stifle diversity and innovation.

Policy and procedures for quality assurance: Institutions should have a policy and associated procedures for the assurance of the quality and standards of their programmes and awards. They should also commit themselves explicitly to the development of a culture which recognises the importance of quality, and quality assurance, in their work. To achieve this, institutions should develop and implement a strategy for the continuous enhancement of quality. The strategy, policy and procedures should have a formal status and be publicly available. They should also include a role for students and other stakeholders. Approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards: Institutions should have formal mechanisms for the approval, periodic review and monitoring of their programmes and awards. Assessment of students: Students should be assessed using published criteria, regulations and procedures which are applied consistently. Quality assurance of teaching staff: Institutions should have ways of satisfying themselves that staff involved with the teaching of students are qualified and competent to do so. They should be available to those undertaking external reviews, and commented upon in reports. Learning resources and student support: Institutions should ensure that the resources available for the support of student learning are adequate and appropriate for each programme offered. Information systems: Institutions should ensure that they collect, analyse and use relevant information for the effective management of their programmes of study and other activities. Public information: Institutions should regularly publish up to date, impartial and objective information, both quantitative and qualitative, about the programmes and awards they are offering. ESG for QA in HEIs

What does ESG 2015 mean for Higher Education Institutions? Expansion of Part 1 – Standards and Guidelines for Internal Quality Assurance (standards from 1 to 10) 1.Policy for quality assurance 2.Design and approval of Programmes 3.Student-centred learning, teaching and assessment 4.Student admission, progression, recognition and certification 5.Teaching staff 6.Learning resources and student support 7.Information management 8.Public information 9.On-going monitoring and periodic review of programmes 10.Cyclical external quality assurance 6 We will encourage and support higher education institutions and staff in promoting pedagogical innovation in student-centred learning environments and in fully exploiting the potential benefits of digital technologies for learning and teaching. Study programmes should enable students to develop the competences that can best satisfy personal aspirations and societal needs, through effective learning activities. These should be supported by transparent descriptions of learning outcomes and workload, flexible learning paths and appropriate teaching and assessment methods. It is essential to recognise and support quality teaching, and to provide opportunities for enhancing academics’ teaching competences. Moreover, we will actively involve students, as full members of the academic community, as well as other stakeholders, in curriculum design and in quality assurance. Yerevan Communiqué (2015)

Teaching and learning concepts Teaching and learning Methods of Curriculum Development Learning Outcomes Content for Teaching and Learning Learning Methodology (Methods and facilities) Learning Environment Programme Team

Teaching & Learning… CHARACTERISTICSDESCRIPTIONCRITERIA Methods of Curriculum Development Curriculum development refers to methods of learning design and development of curricula learning objectives and outcomes. Curricula are developed by HEI in collaboration with stakeholders, taking into account the future needs of the practice and context of employment. Learning Outcomes The learning outcomes refer to what a student is expected to know, understand and be able to do as the result of a process of learning. The learning outcomes reflect essential knowledge, skills and attitudes related to the specific professional requirements, but should not be limited to this. In addition, students acquire professional and life skills which enable them to act successfully, in an innovative and self-organised way in a changing work environment. The involvement of students in research, development and innovation activities leads them to better professional practice.

Teaching & Learning… CHARACTERISTICSDESCRIPTIONCRITERIA Content for Teaching and Learning The content comprises working methods, practice examples, a syllabus and other materials. The learning content is productively integrating theory and practice as the basis for complex problem-solving in real work situations. The content is informed by the latest research, trends and references from both the world of work and academia. Learning Methodology The learning methodology includes: the learning design, the assessments needed to achieve the learning outcomes. The learning methodology includes methods of active, collaborative and self-organised learning and while focusing on experience based learning methods including but not limited to simulation based learning, scenario based learning, problem based learning, or any other authentic learning situations. Both formative and summative assessments should reflect the nature and methodology of the specific learning environment.

Teaching & Learning… CHARACTERISTICSDESCRIPTIONCORE CRITERIA Learning Environment The learning environment refers to the surroundings and conditions in which learning takes place The learning environment includes experience within Institutions as well as outside, in the world of work. Significant practice phases and/or job experiences serve to reflect theory in a practical context. Programme TeamThe programme team refers to all persons involved in the design, delivery and assessment of learning, including visiting lecturers, professionals and support staff At the programme level, the team shows a combination of academic background and relevant experience from the world of work.

What to do in this new context? Enhancing the quality and relevance of learning and teaching Confirmation on former intentions and objectives Support of HEIs and their staff Link between teaching, learning and research at all study levels, Recognition and support of quality teaching and enhancement of teaching competencies Involvement of all stakeholders with emphasis on students in quality assurance Fostering the employability of graduates Graduates competence for entry into the labour market with a long-term foundation for working lives and development Support HEIs in exploring diverse measures to reach these goals – dialogue with employers, programmes with balanced theoretical and practical components, mobility for both study and placement 11

New developments for monitoring of the quality of learning Legal basis: New concepts of QA in new Law 2015: (quality control /evaluation to Quality Assurance in HE) Quality Code with new improved mechanisms for the periodic evaluation of the quality assurance processes Wide scope of operation and focus on the teaching and learning quality. Continuous QA monitoring in HE, monitoring of quality of teaching through student questionnaires National student survey every 3 years for evaluations of teaching and learning in HEIs

Evaluation of HEIs, MoES – QAA – PAAHE (2016 – 2017) Teaching and learning assessment Student survey Institutional Review Areas; 5 1.The organisation and its management 2.Resourcing 3.The curriculum 4.Teaching, learning, assessment and research 5.Students and their support.

Thank you Niko Hyka Public Accreditation Agency for Higher Education, PAAHE Rr.Drurrësit, Tirana