Test Security Ryan Kuykendall April 19, 2011 February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Local School Audits Virginia Association of Test Directors Fall 2009 Conference Fairfax County Public Schools.
Advertisements

1 Test Coordinator Training Fall 2013 Roles of STC, TAs, and Proctors.
Test Monitor Training Administering Minnesota Assessments.
September 14, Testing Problems noted in previous testings Teachers reading, studying, discussing test items Test administrators and/or proctors.
Statewide Testing 2012 Dropout Prevention Conference.
© Caveon, 2006 Test Administration Manuals: Content Overview Jim Impara, Ph.D. Caveon, LLC.
Test Monitor Training Administering Minnesota Assessments “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Training for Proctors Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational.
TRAIN-THE-TRAINER FORMAT Minnesota Assessments Test Security Training for Districts and Schools.
– 14 CASSP CALIFORNIA ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND PROGRESS TEST EXAMINER TRAINING Whittier City School District.
Cleveland School District Gerald Finley, Property Manager Friday, July 27, 2012.
Training for Test Examiners CMT Training for Test Examiners New for 2012 Test Security  New statistical analyses will be used with the 2012.
Assessment Services, SDUSD CAHSEE Test Examiner Training.
Wisconsin Knowledge & Concepts Examination (WKCE) Test Security Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Office of Educational Accountability 06/26/2013.
This is a technology free training zone. Please silence your cell phones. Note taking only on iPads or computers. Thank you.
KYOTE Training: The People Purposes of Presentation Describe the positions that school personnel must fill in order to conduct KYOTE testing.
WESTEST 2 Online Writing Principal/Building Level Coordinator’s Responsibilities.
Test Security June 26, >
2010 Test Security 2011 Campus Test Coordinator Training Test Security January 26, 2011 Freeport Intermediate school.
Online Test Security Training. Agenda Welcome Communication and Support Policy and Key Terms Scheduling Monitoring Preventing Plagiarism Testing Students.
Ensuring Valid Test Results CGCS Annual Meeting Curriculum and Research Directors July 13, 2012.
Wyoming Department of Education Proficiency Assessments for Wyoming Students (PAWS) and Student Assessment of Writing Skills (SAWS) Test Security WDE.
Rowland Unified School District Student Assessment California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) Test Examiner Training Rowland Unified School.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2007 Utah State Office of Education.
Preseason Coaches Meeting. When faced with a question or concern regarding NCAA rules and regulations, the following process should be followed: Step.
NCSC Test Security. NCSC vs States’ role NCSC is not a vendor and does not handle data with PII except for prescribed research study roles by one organizational.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
Stanford 10 Workshop Your School March Background: Stanford 10 is  a norm-referenced test in which students’ performance is compared national norms.
Test Chair 101: Guidelines and Tips for New Test Chairpersons Wanda L. Cunningham 1.
Online Test Security Training. Agenda Welcome Communication and Support Policy and Key Terms Scheduling Monitoring Preventing Plagiarism Testing Students.
Test Examiner Responsibilities CAHSEE Rowland Unified School District 1 TE.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
1 Spring 2014 EOC Test Security April 3, Assessment Administration 2.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Administration Code for Kentucky’s Educational Assessment Program Spring 2012.
THE HEADLINES. Testing Code of Ethics Training
ADD school and date here. 2 Allow 15 to 20 additional time for administrative process Breaks are not included in timeframe Assessments are untimed. SubjectEstimated.
TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT New Hanover County Schools September 2012 ACT and PLAN.
EXPLORE Training October 3, Serves as a baseline measure of academic progress toward college and career readiness when used with PLAN and the.
Paper-Based Test Security Training for Schools. Agenda Welcome Communication and Support Policy and Key Terms Scheduling Monitoring Preventing Plagiarism.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Sample Test Security Training February 11; 2016 Office of the State Superintendent of Education Assessment Team 1.
FCAT Writing Administration Schedule Day 1 —Tuesday — February 25, 2014 Grades 4, 8, 10 Writing Prompt — Session 1 60 minutes Day 2 — Wednesday.
February 2010 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 School Test Coordinator Training February 15, 2010 Special Populations.
SAT School Day January SAT School Day One of the Superintendent Martinez’s college readiness initiatives is to offer the SAT School Day assessment.
It’s been a long day. Have a laugh!. Testing Code of Ethics Training
Paper-Based Test Security Training for Districts.
OHIO’S STATE TESTS TESTING SECURITY Ohio Law (Ohio Administrative Code (H) and (J))
BOY Test Training Testing Code of Ethics State and Federal Testing Office of Accountability.
Arizona Department of Education Transitioning from the Past into the Future Prevention, Detection, and Investigation Leila E. Williams, PhD Associate Superintendent.
TESTING SECURITY Ohio Law (Ohio Administrative Code )
Administering Minnesota Assessments
CAASPP Examiner Training for the Science CST/CMA
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
Field Inventory Services-Sanofi Inventory and Audit Training
Proctor Training Required for all Proctor Volunteers
2017 National Conference on Student Assessment
MANUALS READ THE MANUALS!!
Education Employment Procedures Law of 2001
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Proctoring In Our Schools St Johns County School District
2017 PAWS Test Administrator Training
Proctor Training Required for all Proctor Volunteers
Controlled Substances
Proctoring In Our Schools St Johns County School District
Assessment Monitoring
Cindy Blair, Director of Testing January 2016
Testing Code of Ethics Training
Test Security and Ethics
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Presentation transcript:

Test Security Ryan Kuykendall April 19, 2011 February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 1

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 2 Test Audits At least one school from every school district will be audited each year. Some districts may be audited several times in a school year. Test audits are conducted to observe the following: storage and distribution of secure materials, distribution and preparation for test, adequacy of the testing environment, process and procedures for the test administration, inventory and return of materials, and any other relevant occurrences.

February ©MDE - Test Security 3 Test Audits Training All auditors receive training before they are sent on site visits. Mississippi Public School Accountability Standards 2010, Appendix F is available on the web at:

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 4 Problems During Testing 1.Unsigned or out-of-date School Test Security Plan 2.Two people not present at all times (before, during, or after testing with secure materials); MDE auditor is not considered as one of the two people 3.Test administrator and proctor sitting and not actively monitoring entire room during test 4.Proctor leaving room during test, leaving only one person in the room 5.Staff members breaking the seal on test booklets

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 5 Problems During Testing 6.Testing with no hall monitors 7.Not testing according to the published test schedule 8.Subject-relevant charts on the wall 9.Using non-allowable accommodations 10.Not providing allowable accommodations 11.Coaching students (including strategic throat clearing) 12.Attempting to make a list of questions from the test

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 6 Problems During Testing 13.Reading ahead or reading the test and answering the questions on the test (This is a violation of Appendix F!) 14.Students not issued the correct test form (For example, Johnny Smith is issued a pre- ID answer document for Joseph Jones.) 15.Changing or altering answers after the test

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 7 Problems During Testing 16.Duplicate answers by two or more students 17.Students seated too close to each other (This situation also leads to issues when districts are responding to an OSA-mandated investigation!) 18.Improper storage of test materials 19.Too many students under one test administrator and proctor (recommended ratio is 25 to 2)

Problems During Testing Teacher student ratio: 27 students=1 test administrator 1 proctor students=1 test administrator 2 proctors students=1 test administrator 3 proctor You must add an additional proctor for every 10 for students over 27 February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 8

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 9 Problems During Testing 20.Staff not adhering to test security procedures 21.School staff handing out scratch paper with answers, formulas, or anything else written on them 22.School staff not verifying the correct number of test booklets needed for test administration prior to the day of testing 23.Secure test materials reproduced and distributed to school staff (At least one person surrendered a teaching license for violations that took place in )

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 10 Security Breech Consequences The district attorney may investigate allegations of violations of test security on his own initiative following receipt of allegations, at the request of a school district, or at the request of the Mississippi Department of Education. The Commission on Educator Licensure has the authority to revoke license pursuant to the authority granted in Section , Mississippi Code of 1972, as amended.

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 11 When districts are asked to investigate---- Our request for an investigation of the statistical inconsistencies does not ask you to prove that a testing violation did occur; rather, we ask for evidence that provides certainty that an irregularity did not occur. Generally, the DTC will always lead any investigation regarding testing irregularities. Superintendents should notify OSA if they intend to appoint someone else to investigate a possible testing irregularity.

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 12 Caveon The MDE currently uses a VERY conservative approach to Caveon analysis and investigates only when results exceeded a 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 (10 to the 19 th power or a threshold/collusion index of 20 or 10 Quintillion) the statistical probability. Please understand that such a staggering statistic cannot be explained by statements from the test administrator and /or proctor that one or both did not see/notice anything unusual.

February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 13 VERY IMPORTANT REMINDER Process Standard from the Mississippi Public School Accountability Standards, 2010 states that the school district employ an appropriately licensed full-time principal at each school. {MS Code , , and (c)} {Full time means no other assigned school districts duties such as Coaching, Head Coach, Director of Athletics, Curriculum Coordinator, District Test Coordinator, 21st Century Grant, etc.} *Clarification from the Office of Accreditation: building principals may NOT serve as the School Test Coordinator.

Appendix F Revisions 5.a. Any person involved in any phase of the testing program has been trained in appropriate assessment administration and test security procedures. Test administrators shall be licensed school personnel. February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 14

Appendix F Revisions 6. Both a test administrator and a proctor are present and actively monitoring students during the entire test administration. a. At least two people are present from the time that testing materials are distributed to the test administrator until all test materials have been returned to the secure area. February 1-3,2011 ©,MDE - Test Security 15

Appendix F Revisions b. A seating chart is required for each room/site used for any statewide assessment; the seating chart must be signed and dated by the test administrator, proctor, and schooltest coordinator. February 1-3, 2011 © MDE - Test Security 16