BY GAMINI SENANAYAKE.  Legislation applicable to staff and public Ionising radiation regulations 1999  Legislation applicable to patients – Ionising.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module: IMAGING AND REFERRAL
Advertisements

Radiation Protection Legislation Stephen McCallum
Quality assurance and Quality control in medical radiography
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
“Reform of the Child Care System: Taking Stock and Accelerating Action” South East Europe 3 – 6 July 2007, Sofia.
Protection Against Medical Exposure
Prelim 11/14/11. 2 nd Semester, 3 rd Year Level  The Early 1900’s, With The Work Of An Industrial Engineer Named Frederick Winslow Taylor.  “Father.
Standards and Guidance
Registered in England No VAT No
Do not adjust your set. Radiation Safety Induction for Radiology Registrars John Saunderson Radiation Protection Adviser CHH ext
1 CS38010 Professional Issues Health and Safety at Work.
OH&S Management System
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
Occupational health and safety
Radiation Protection in Paediatric Radiology
Current UK legislation and guidelines for radiation protection of patients and staff Prepared by: Dr D. Mladenova.
2015 HFAP Standards CMS Final Rule – Burden Reduction II May 2014 Karen Beem, MS, RN HFAP Standards Interpretation 2015 National Credentialing Forum1.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Enforcement.
Radiology & Nuclear Medicine Referrals - some legal requirements & duties - Mr John Saunderson, Consultant Physicist / Radiation Protection Adviser, Radiation.
Prime Responsibility for Radiation Safety
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Amanda Bath Advance Practitioner RPS
CHAPTER 14 – OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part III: Radiation Protection Performance Requirements Day 8 – Lecture 5(3)
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part III.
Some reasons for unnecessary procedures
Successful experiences for the availability and use of referral guidelines. Denis Remedios Clinical Radiologist, Northwick Park Hospital London, UK.
Energy Georgi Simeonov European Commission DG ENER, Radiation Protection Unit (D3) Justificação e Optimização das Exposições Médicas a Radiações Ionizantes.
Diagnostic reference levels in Medical Imaging. Concept and practice
Radiation Sources in medicine diagnostic Radiology
Authorization and Inspection of Cyclotron Facilities Radiation Protection of Staff.
International Atomic Energy Agency Medical exposure in radiology: Scope and responsibilities Module VIII.1 - Part 2 : Training.
Radiation Safety Regulations
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Radiation protection of the public IAEA Regional Training Course on Radiation Protection of patients for Radiographers,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
THE OFFICE FOR REGISTRATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, MEDICAL DEVICES AND BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS Responsibility in the handling of medical devices.
Every employer must ensure, as far as is reasonable practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all his employees More specifically, employers must.
Technical Services. Objectives To identify the technical services needed within the infrastructure for an effective implementation of regulatory programme.
X-Ray Personnel Security Screening Systems Update Presented to TEPRSSC October 1, 2003 Gaithersburg, MD.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE IN RADIOTHERAPY Part 1: Review of International Basic Safety Standards (BSS)
OH&S Management System
IR(ME)R compliance in NHS Dumfries & Galloway
Training Module Preparation for “AERB norms, licenses and signage”
Handout 1: Health and safety at work
UK implementation of the BSS Directive
Accountability and Delegation Medicines Management
Transposition of Requirements set out in the Basic Safety Standards for Nuclear Facilities in Lithuania Gintautas KLEVINSKAS Albinas MASTAUSKAS Radiation.
Sharan Packer Specialist Inspector (Radiation)
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
CHAPTER 2 – ROLES OF CONSTRUCTION PERSONNEL IN SAFETY AND HEALTH
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Pediatric Radiology By Dr. Wambani, J.S. Chief Radiologist
OH&S Management System
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Do not adjust your set.
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
People Responsible For Health and Safety
OHS Staff Introduction Training
Principles of Radiation Protection
The Public Sector Equality Duty
Definitions Hazard- the potential of a substance, activity or process to cause harm. They can take many forms such as chemicals, electricity or the use.
Legal and Organisation requirements for data recording
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
The Public Sector Equality Duty
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Do not adjust your set.
First FRCR Examination in Clinical Radiology Statutory Requirements and Non-Statutory Recommendations (b) Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations.
ESS Handbook for Radiation Protection
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
The Control of Electromagnetic Fields at Work Regulations 2016
Presentation transcript:

BY GAMINI SENANAYAKE

 Legislation applicable to staff and public Ionising radiation regulations 1999  Legislation applicable to patients – Ionising Radiation ( Medical Exposure ) Regulations 2000 GS

 IRRR 99 Made under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 ( HSWA 74 ).  Enforced by Health and Safety Executive – ( HSE).  In force since 1 st January  Replaces IRRR 85 GS

 To carry out risk assessments.  To restrict levels of ionising radiation to employees and others to be as low as is reasonably practicable (ALARP).  To designate and monitor control areas.  To provide staff and others with information, instruction and training.  To implement QA programmes. GS 

 Time- only be there if it is essential.  Shielding- ideally, behind screen if not wear protective clothing.  Distance – Maximise distance from tube and the patient ( If not behind screen).  Follow local rules for radiation protection. GS

RPA- Radiation protection adviser RPS – Radiation protection supervisor

MPE Employer Referrer Practitioner Operator MPE – Medical Physics Expert

 Local rules outline good working practice with x-rays.  Each Department will have a Radiation Protection Supervisor ( RPS ).  Dose received through occupational exposure should be as low as reasonably practicable.

 Dose must not exceed certain limits.  Employer to ensure limits not exceeded.  Employee must act responsibly.  Whole Body Limit applicable is 6mSv per year.

How did it all begin?  On the 30 th June 1997,the EU countries adopted Directive 97/43 /Euratom.  ER(ME)R 2000 Policy devised.  Became law January 2000 and replaces all previous regulations.

The legislation identifies 4 duty holder roles. These are: 1. The Employer. 2. The Referrer 3. The Practitioner. 4. The Operator.

 In most cases this will be the NHS Trust.  Written procedures for all medical exposures ( schedule 1)  Written protocols for every standard investigation for each piece of equipment.

 Ensuring that all Practitioners and Operators are adequately trained and participate in CPD  Investigating incidences where patients receive a higher than intended dose.  Establish referral criteria including: Radiation doses DRL’s QA Programmes Dose limits

Defined as: A Registered medical or other health professional who is entitled to refer for a medical exposure. E.g. Doctors Nurses Radiographic practitioners Dentists

 The referrer is responsible for supplying the practitioner with sufficient clinical data to justify every single exposure that they request.

Defined as: A registered medical practitioner or other health professional who is entitled to take responsibility for a specific medical exposure. E.g. Doctors Radiographers Radiologists Dentists

‘That no person shall carry out an exposure unless:’  It has been justified by the practitioner as showing a net benefit to the patient  It has been authorised by the practitioner

The practitioner must consider the following:  The specific objective for the exposure.  The total potential diagnostic benefit to the individual and to the society.  The risk to the individual.  Alternative diagnostic tests involving less or no radiation E.g. U/S or MRI.  Pregnancy.

 The practitioner and only the practitioner is legally responsible for exposing the patient to dose of radiation.  Responsibility can not be assumed by another party.  Under law a Practitioner/Operator must refuse an examination where insufficient clinical data has been supplied and / or where it doesn’t conform with the Royal College of Radiologist’s Guide Lines ( RCR).

 Guidance booklet on requesting X-rays from The Royal College of Radiologists.  For more information see

 A practitioner is: A radiologist or radiographer. Who takes legal responsibility for the justification of an exposure.  An operator is: - A radiographer -Who authorises an exposure using guidelines or criteria devised by practitioner(s)

 Justification means that you understand why and exposure would or wouldn’t be beneficial to the patient.  Authorisation means using a set of criteria or guidelines to make decision of whether or not an exposure is beneficial or not.

 (a) Patient identification To ensure that the correct patient is examined and that they have the correct examination performed.  (b) Identification of referrers, practitioners, and operators. To list the referrers from whom referrals may be accepted, and to list those who may justify and authorise the exposure.

 (c)Medical – legal exposures. To ensure that no examinations are repeated purely for medical legal purposes.  (d)Pregnancy and breast screening. To ensure that foetus is not unnecessarily irradiated.  (e)Evaluation and Review of employers procedure and protocols. To establish review dates and criteria for reviewing the employer’s procedures and policies.

 (f) Assessment of patient dose and administered activity. To ensure that an assessment of dose is made after examination.  (g) Use of diagnostic reference levels-DRL’s To identify doses that exceeds DRL’s and to take corrective measures.

 (h) Bio-medical research To ensure that a patient involved in a study doesn’t receive more than an acceptable dose.

 (1) Evaluation of medical exposures. To ensure that an examination, once completed is taken in to account when a patient is reviewed.  (2) Accidental over exposure/ unintended doses to the patients. To ensure that the possibility and magnitude of accidental over exposure is kept to minimum.

 (3) Investigation of accidental overexposure/unintended doses to patients. To provide a system by which all incidents of accidental/unintended exposure can be investigated and recorded.  (4) General radiation protection matters. To ensure that all patients, staff and members of public are given adequate protection from ionising radiation.

 (5) QA Programs. To ensure that equipment operates in a consistent manner in accordance with the manufacturers parameters.

 Know your responsibilities. Are you a practitioner, operator or both.  Remember, as a practitioner, you and only you are legally accountable for any exposure you make.  Be sensible. Discuss requests that falls short in a polite and professional manner.  ER(ME)R is not to be used to get out of x-raying patients.

Gamini Senanayake