 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students. I want to find out if whole group instruction or small group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Pre-Assessments, Instructional Strategies, and Grouping Decisions Differentiation As you enter, please place a dot on the continuum. Rate your level.
Advertisements

1 Presenting Action Research. 2 Purpose Provide an overview of the issue or the purpose for your action research. What are you trying to teach? (E.g.)
The Lexile Framework ® for Reading Overview and Uses.
Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?
Learning Contracts. Objectives : Define learning contracts. Why use learning contracts? Important components of learning contracts. How to assess using.
STUDENT LEARNING IMPACT PROJECT: Reading for Meaning Kelly Johnson Cedar Ridge Elementary School April 19, 2007.
Corrective Feedback of Student Writing in a Second Language Kristen Tangen Empowering Teachers as Leaders Spring 2014.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Instructional Support Modules In Reading How to Score Assessments and How to Use Assessment to Improve Student Learning.
Barbara Willingham. Area of Focus Statement To find effective tools, methods, and strategies to help improve reading skills, fluency, and comprehension.
The Key Attributes of a Successful School. 1.A belief that every child matters and can achieve at the highest level – a culture, ethos and vision that.
FLIPPED LEARNING. HOMEWORK EXPECTATIONS ➤ Students are expected to watch video examples (found on the SFE 6 th Grade Math Page) while following along.
Math Intervention Focusing on Interventions in Mathematics.
Action Research Action. Pre-Assess (if appropriate) ► Before enacting your plan, gather data and information about the population you are teaching. ►
Urban Mathematics Initiative Our Partners: Saint Louis Public School District Maryville University Non-Publics:  Archdioceses & Tower Grove Christian.
RACHELLE VARGAS EDU 671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PROF. WANDA FERNANDOLULLE JANUARY 20, 2016 My Action Research Proposal.
Action Research Proposal: Virtual Manipulatives & Academic Success of Middle School Math Students Byekwaso Gilbert EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Nena Williams Ashford University May 14, 2015.
Action Research Proposal EDU 671 KATHLEEN WALTERS 1.
Final Action Research Proposal Presentation Jasmine Crowder EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Tony Valley January 9, 2014.
MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL Seay Lynn Phillips EDU671:Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor Susan Hughes February 06, 2014.
Ally Clark EDU 671 Dr. Kirgan EFFECTIVENESS OF ABILITY GROUPING.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Tara S. Burch EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Professor Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
Learning Algebra Can Be Fun Presented by Erin Schilke EDU 671 Prof. Newton Miller.
Robert Blackman Edu 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research 6/22/15.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Action Research Proposal: Bullying Kaila White EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Benjamin Kirgan.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research ( MRD1423A ) Instructor: Frederick Ansoff Andrea Chisholm.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
Action Research Proposal: Controlling Obesity through Nutrition and Exercise Michale D. Medina EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Kathleen.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation EDU 671 Fundamentals Of Educational Research By Valerie L. Brown.
Action Research Proposal: Improving Confidence in the Workplace Rebecca Jackson EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller January 21, 2016.
Action Research Patricia Smith EDU671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Newton Miller August 20, 2015.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Sharelius Holmes Dr. Miller EDU 671: Fundamental of Educational Research March 3, 2016.
ACTION RESEARCH PLAN Master’s of Teaching and Learning with Technology E-Portfolio Zenneah Jenkins Ashford University.
Jamillah Gleason EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Dennis Lawrence Reading Literacy Action Research Proposal.
Amanda M Surmann May 5 th 2014 EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1413A) Instructor: Dennis Lawrence.
Action Research Proposal Presentation Shantel L. Pugh Dr. Jessica Bogunovich – Instructor EDU671 Ashford University.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Claudia S. Herrera EDU671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller May 8, 2014.
JUDY CALLOWAY EDU 671 MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT PRESENTATION MARCH 27, 2014 NEWTON, MILLER.
DIANA G. FIELDING EDU-671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASHFORD UNIVERSITY DR. A. VALLEY DECEMBER 13, 2013.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 11th, 2014.
Week #5 Discussion Course:EDU695: MAED Capstone Topic: Share your action research studty Professor: Dr. Sherry Leialoha-Waipa Student: Okia Thomas.
Teaching Strategies GOLD
Action Research Proposal LaTrisha Pennington Edu 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller March 14, 2016.
TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PLAN Rachelle Ryan EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor Frederick Ansoff Thursday, February 27, 2014.
 Determine how effective multisensory teaching methods, and learning can be.  To demonstrate that this type of learning can help students understand.
Shauntel Dorsey EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller Shauntel Dorsey EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL Erik Carroll. AREA-OF-FOCUS STATEMENT The purpose of this study is to get kids moving!
 Area of Focus to monitor fluency with students  That are behind in their reading skills and  use a program to see if the students improve  Both in.
The Effects of High Quality Early Childhood Education.
Derryn Beasley EDU 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Frederick Ansoff May 22 nd, 2014.
Area of Focus Statement The purpose of my study is to investigate if students are retaining reading information while listening to music through their.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 1, 2014.
MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SHEENA BOTTING EDU 671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: DOUGLAS GOSS JULY 21, 2016.
Jennifer Keefe GOVERNOR’S TEACHER NETWORK ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT.
Action Research for School Leaders by Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez.
Justin Allegra EDU 671 – Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Newton Miller Ashford University March 12, 2016 Action Research Proposal Final Project.
Keep the F-U-N In Education. An Action Research Plan On Play Based Education. Tressa Morris EDU 671 Dr. Miller September 8,2016.
EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH
Hopewell Middle School
Introduction:- Instructional technology has become an important part of teaching and learning within the classroom as well as working with fully online.
The Narnian Virtues Character Education English Curriculum:
Data Collection: Designing an Observational System
Reminder for next week CUELT Conference.
HLPs and EBPs in mathematics and science in clinical experiences
Presentation transcript:

 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students. I want to find out if whole group instruction or small group instruction more effective. My goal is to find out which method is the most effective based on proven research and data so that I can provide the best possible education to my students.

 YouTube Video, “Effective small differentiated instruction”  PDF File, “Differentiating Instruction: Compass Math”  Power point, “Differentiaitng and small group instruction”

 Variables could include but not limit to lack of prior knowledge, family home issues, lack of parental support, and lack intrinsic motivation.

 How do the students feel that they learn best?” . “Are small group instruction effective?”  “How do other educators feel about small group instruction?”

 The first step will be to decide which group of students will be involved in the study.  The second step will be to decide on a skill to teach and give a pre-assessment on that skill.  The third step will be the actual study.  The final step will be conducted after the study. The students will take a survey to inform of the best way in which they believe that they learn best. A survey will be also given to other teachers to see which method that they believe is the best method as well.

 The Data will be collected through pre and post assessment, teacher and student questionnaires, and as an active participant obsever.

 I will need to attain permission from the parents and the students to get their consent to participate in the study. I will definitely respect them and share only the results as they pertain to the benefit of the study. I will ensure them that this study is only for enhancing teaching practices.

 The students pre-test and post-test will be analyzed to determine who scored the best on the assessment.

 Is whole group or small group instruction more effective?  The timeline for the study is two weeks.  Pre/post test, teacher/student questionnaires, and active participant observations will be used as data collection tools.  The goal is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students.

 Mills, G. E. (2014). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.