Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 NC-DAQ Educational Opportunities Series 18 March 2015 Regional Haze Discussions and Issues in North Carolina.
Advertisements

WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP IOC NOx Issues Meeting Denver, CO July 28, 2003.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Air Quality Monitor Networks 2014 Annual AQ Monitor Meeting MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Protecting Maine’s Air, Land and Water.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Natural Background Visibility Feb. 6, 2004 Presentation to VISTAS State Air Directors Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtn. National Park.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
AIR QUALITY for the Interagency Wilderness Fire Resource Advisor 2011 SOUTHERN AREA ADVANCED FIRE AND AVIATION ACADEMY Discussion Topics: Very Brief Overview.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
Effects of Pollution on Visibility and the Earth’s Radiation Balance John G. Watson Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute Reno,
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
Lessons Learned: One-Atmosphere Photochemical Modeling in Southeastern U.S. Presentation from Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative to Meeting of Regional.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Brief Description of CALPUFF Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Options for Estimating Natural Background Visibility in the VISTAS Region Ivar Tombach with benefit of material prepared by Jim Boylan and Daniel Jacob.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
VISTAS Emissions Inventory Overview Nov 4, VISTAS is evaluating visibility and sources of fine particulate mass in the Southeastern US View NE from.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Santa Fe December 2006 Update on Regional Haze 308 SIP Template.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Air Quality Modeling for SAMI: July 1995 Episode Talat Odman, Ted Russell, Jim Wilkinson, Yueh-Jiun Yang, Jim Boylan, Alberto Mendoza.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
1 Brian Finneran, Oregon DEQ WRAP IWG Meeting, Portland August 2006 Suggested Changes to IWG Section 308 SIP Template.
Air Quality Relative Values Data Summaries Graphical summaries of the current air quality status and trends in National Parks and other federal lands.
VISIBILITY SIPS The Regional Haze Rule Requirements for Fire The Role of the RPOs Opportunities for Participation US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Dennis Haddow.
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
VISTAS Modeling Overview Oct. 29, 2003
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Air Quality and Seney National Wildlife Refuge Jill Webster June 14, 2007.
Summary of WRAP Stationary Source (SS) NOx and PM Report Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
308 Outline (a) Purpose (b) When are 1st plans due (c) Options for regional planning (d) Core requirements (e) BART requirements (f) Comprehensive periodic.
Sulfate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
Regional Haze SIP Template: Mobile Sources Edie Chang California Air Resources Board WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 2002.
CALIFORNIA Regional Haze SIP Development Progress Report IWG Meeting Portland, Oregon August 29-31, 2006.
1 Recent MANE-VU Projections of Visibility for 2018 Gary Kleiman MANE-VU Stakeholder Briefing April 4, 2008 BWI.
Nitrate Discussion WRAP Meeting – Tucson, AZ January 10/11, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
MANE-VU Technical Overview
National RPO Technical Meeting June 9, 2005 Gary Kleiman, NESCAUM
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
A Basis for Control of BART Eligible Sources
Regional Air Quality Planning in the Upper Midwest
Source Attribution for Southeastern US: Weight of Evidence
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Sulfate Attribution Methods
Review upcoming Teach-Ins and participation in WRAP Regional Haze Planning Work Group - Jay Baker and Tina Suarez-Murias.
BART Overview Lee Alter Western Governors’ Association
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Clean Air Interstate Rule Office of Air and Radiation
Tom Moore (WESTAR and WRAP) and Pat Brewer (NPS ARD)
VISTAS Modeling Overview
Status of Regional Haze Rule
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
WRAP Stationary Sources Forum Meeting November 14-15, 2006
Summary of RH-LTS Requirements (d)(3)
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Acadia NP Size – 7.4 Horiz – 2.0 Vert – 0.1.
Acadia NP Size – 7.4 Horiz – 2.0 Vert – 0.1.
Presentation transcript:

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic The Drivers: CAA §169A “…calls for States to establish goals and emission reduction strategies for improving visibility in all 156 mandatory Class I national parks and wilderness areas.” 40CFR §51 “…prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in… which impairment results from manmade air pollution”

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic CenRAP WRAP Midwest VISTAS OTC NESCAUM MARAMA Regional Planning Organizations

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Class I areas in the OTC RPO Region Moosehorn Roosevelt Campobello Acadia Presidential Range Dry River Great Gulf Lye Brook Brigantine

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic PM2.5 monitoring network in place EPA designates areas as being in attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable States committing to regional planning process must submit committal SIP and haze plan within 1 yr of designation Regional planning states must submit complete haze SIP 3 yrs after last designation of any state in the RPO Source specific BART controls go into place “Reasonable Progress” report due (and every 5 years hereafter) New SIP (and every 10 years hereafter) Emissions trading/ alternative control measures must be complete

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Committal SIPs (2004-5) Agreement to participate in regional planning Showing that in-state emissions impact visibility in Class I areas out-of-state and vice-versa Description of regional planning process Commitment to submit complete SIP List of all BART-eligible sources in state

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Core SIP Requirements Calculation of natural and baseline conditions Establish reasonable progress goals for each Class I area (to achieve CAA goal by 2064) Statewide inventory of haze-related pollutants Submit long-term control strategy for each Class I area affected by in-state sources Submit monitoring strategy

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Year 1: Nature and Scope Chapter I : Introduction Chapter II: General Description of Haze and its Effect on Visibility Chapter III : Anatomy of Haze in the Northeast Chapter IV : The Regional Haze Rule and its Planning Elements

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Report Outline (Continued) Chapter V : Haze Planning - Evaluation of Trends, Baseline Conditions, Mechanisms Chapter VI: Emissions Chapter VII : Review of Analytical Tools Chapter VIII : Monitoring of Visibility Chapter IX : Social and Economic Impacts Chapter X : Summary and Conclusions

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Light Scattering and Absorption (adapted from Malm, 2000a)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Contributors to Visibility Impairment

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic The Deciview (dv)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Measures of Visibility Natural conditions in the Northeast Extinction, b ext (Mm -1 ) Deciviews (dv) Visual Range (km) Typical day in Northeast Typical day in Mid-Atlantic Extinction Coefficient (b ext ) = b SO4 + b NO3 + b OrgC + b Soil + b coarse + b ElemC + b Ray Visual Range (km) = / b ext (km -1 ) Deciview (dv) = 10 ln (b ext / 10 Mm -1 )

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Calculating Total Light Extinction b ext (Mm -1 )=b SO4 +b NO3 +b OC +b Soil +b Coarse +b ElemC +b Ray b SO4 =3[(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ]f(RH) b NO3 =3[NH 4 NO 3 ]f(RH) b OC =4[OC] b Soil =1[soil] b Coars =0.6[Coarse] b ElemC =10[EC] b Ray =Rayleigh Scattering f(RH)=Relative humidity adjustment factor [ ] = concentration in  g/m 3

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Northeast Natural Background Visibility Conditions

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Visibility Trends

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Brigantine Wilderness Area Visibility Trends

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Great Gulf Wilderness Area Visibility Trends (May - September Data Only)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Lye Brook Wilderness Area Visibility Trends

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Moosehorn Wilderness Area Visibility Trends

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Washington, D.C. Visibility Trends

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Visibility Trends and Goals

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Visibility Trends and Goals PM mass (  g/m 3 ) Right Scale Left Scale

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Visibility Trends and Goals

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Visibility Trends and Goals Natural + Anthropogenic Mass

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Brigantine Wilderness Area Visibility Trends and Goals

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Brigantine Wilderness Area Visibility Trends and Goals

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Brigantine Wilderness Area Visibility Trends and Goals Requirement

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Brigantine Wilderness Area Visibility Trends and Goals

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Speciated Contributions to Extinction 20% Worst Visibility (1997)20% Best Visibility (1997)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Washington D.C. 242 Mm -1 (16 km/31.9 dv) Brigantine 189 Mm -1 (21 km/29.4 dv) Lye Brook 144 Mm -1 (27 km/26.7 dv) Great Gulf (Presidential Range) 140 Mm -1 (28 km/26.4 dv) Acadia 110 Mm -1 (36 km/24 dv) Moosehorn (Roosevelt Campobello) 96 Mm -1 (41 km/22.6 dv) 20% Worst Visibility Speciated Contributions to Extinction (1997)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Washington D.C. 70 Mm -1 (56 km/19.5 dv) Brigantine 52 Mm -1 (75 km/16.5 dv) Lye Brook 26 Mm -1 (150 km/9.6 dv) Great Gulf (PresidentialRange) 30 Mm -1 (130 km/11 dv) Acadia 28 Mm -1 (140 km/10.3 dv) Moosehorn (Roosevelt Campobello) 27 Mm -1 (145 km/9.9 dv) 20% Best Visibility Speciated Contributions to Extinction (1997)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Shenandoah 193 Mm -1 James River Face 201 Mm -1 Dolly Sods/Otter Creek 232 Mm -1 20% Worst Visibility Speciated Contributions to Extinction (1997)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Shenandoah 45 Mm -1 James River Face 56 Mm -1 Dolly Sods/Otter Creek 51 Mm -1 20% Best Visibility Speciated Contributions to Extinction (1997)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic adapted from Malm (2000)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Acadia National Park Seasonal Analysis of Visibility Impairment

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Brigantine Wilderness Area Seasonal Analysis of Visibility Impairment

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Seasonal Role of Nitrates Note: Nitrate represents only 9-33% of total extinction in winter (and only 2% in summer)

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Role of Organics OH O3O3 NO 3 Anthropogenic Sources Natural Sources Natural Oxidation Anthropogenically Enhanced Oxidation Condensation (SOA formation) PM 2.5

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Role of Ammonia (NH 3 ) SO 4 = NO 3 - Anthropogenic Sources Natural Sources Reacts preferentially with Sulfate Enhances nucleation Accelerates particle growth Reacts with Nitrate in absence of sulfate wintertime PM 2.5

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic 3-D Eulerian AQ Model Spatial Domain   Class I Area Modeling Approach Domain for Annual or Episodic models

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic   Class I Area Source Dispersion Modeling Domain for Annual or Episodic models Modeling Approach

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic   Class I Area Domain for Annual or Episodic models Source Dispersion Modeling Trajectory Analysis Modeling Approach

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic   Class I Area Domain for Annual or Episodic models Source Dispersion Modeling Trajectory Analysis Source Apportionment Techniques Modeling Approach

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Monitoring Programs in the East Presque Isle Moosehorn Old Town Acadia Freeport Bridgton Mt. Washington Underhill Lye Brook Boston Truro Martha’s Vineyard Quabbin Mohawk Mountain Seney Connecticut Hill 2001.) New York Brigantine Whiteface Mtn. Pinnacle Park CASTNet (Note: About half these sites will not be operational until early IMPROVE IMPROVE Protocol Sites IMPROVE Protocol Sites (former NEPART sites) IMPROVE Protocol Sites (formersites) Other Rural Speciation Sites CAMNET sites Goddard Park Arendtsville Quaker City Shenandoah James River Face Dolly Sods Linville Gorge Shining Rock Cohutta Great Smoky Mtns Mammoth Cave Cadiz Livonia Bondville

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-AtlanticCAMNET

CAMNET Outreach Project Proposal under development Taking comments through February 2 nd Additional funding/support is needed for full implementation Contact: Lee Alter at NESCAUM

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic

Economic and Social Benefits of Visibility Improvements Over $130b per year in recreational spending. (Much of it at or near recreational sites) Improved visibility effects tourist preferences and travel expenditures. Non-valued benefits are significant. ($327m for ME; $6m for NH; and $600k to VT, Abt, 2000) Over $1.3b in health-care cost related benefits result from BART reductions in West.

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Linkages with other Air Quality Programs Haze particles = PM 2.5 (increased morbidity, mortality, respiratory and cardiac disease, etc…) Sulfates and Nitrates = Acid Deposition (decreased ANC, increase N Saturation, decreased pH) Nitrates  Eutrophication (deposited nitrate feeds algal blooms, depletes O 2, destroys marine ecosystem in bays and estuaries) VOCs, NO X  Ozone

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States NESCAUM Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management

Regional Haze and Visibility in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic