1 North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative Overview Clay Norris, Chair OSC October 5, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Calista AVCP Regional Energy Plan. Preliminary Planning and Stakeholder Involvement Resource Inventory and Data Analysis Develop and Review Draft Energy.
Advertisements

THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
1 May 8, 2006 Briefing to Northwest Congressional Delegation Staff.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
2005 VSBA Strategic Planning Service Provided by: Vermont School Boards Association.
Justice Information Network Strategic Plan Development Justice Information Network Board March 18, 2008 Mo West, JIN Program Manager.
111 TAG Meeting June 8, 2015 Teleconference / Webinar FINAL.
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
Report on the NCTPC 2006 Collaborative Transmission Plan Mark Byrd, Manager – Transmission Planning Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc January 25, 2007.
MISMO Business and Standards Round-up Fall 2013 Educational Summit & Workshops MISMO Business and Standards Round-up Presenters: Kyle Bensen, MGIC, Chair.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
1 Transmission Advisory Group Meeting January 25, 2007 Raleigh, NC.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003.
Component 8 Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 4 Structured Systems Analysis and Design This material was developed by Duke University,
Forming a Cost Assignment/ Cost Recovery Team RMATS Steering Committee January 13, 2004.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Section 4.9 Review Report Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015.
1 TAG Meeting May 9, 2008 NCEMC Office Raleigh, NC.
TEXAS NODAL Market Design Structure and Process August 19, 2003.
Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI)
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
State Center Community College District Willow International Center Center-to-College Status Naming Process & Timeline.
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
1 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Indirect Potable Reuse Public Outreach Framework Jolene Walsh Senior Director, Public and Governmental.
1 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2014 PREMIER, INC. NYHQ DSRIP Committee Kick-Off Meeting March 2015.
Business Continuity Planning 101
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Implementation of RCA Projects
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
ERCOT Bylaws Amendments
Locational Net Benefit Analysis Working Group
Locational Net Benefit Analysis Working Group
Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Sixth Edition
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts
Reliability Assessment Committee Proposal TSS Meeting
Regional Transmission Organizations
Member Services Meeting July 14, 2017 Agenda
SEARUC Conference Little Rock, AR June 4, 2007
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
The Strategic Information Technology Formulation
By Jeff Burklo, Director
AM Business Model Wargame Working Team Documentation
AM Business Model Wargame Working Team Documentation
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Reliability Standards Development Plan
Greater Essex County District School Board
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
Request for MAC Approval December 1, 2015
MAC Board Effectiveness Survey
The EPSAS Governance Framework
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
North Asia Regional Aviation
Presentation transcript:

1 North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative Overview Clay Norris, Chair OSC October 5, 2005

2 Overview Summary of NC Transmission Planning Collaborative Implementation Status

3 Traditional Transmission Planning Process Transmission plans developed independently by each IOU for their own control areas Limited involvement from munis, co-ops and other transmission-dependent utilities Emphasis on reliability

4 Goals of the Process Improve the transmission planning process in North Carolina Increase involvement by all stakeholders

5 Changes to the Planning Process Each Participant will actively participate The Transmission Advisory Group (TAG) will allow participation by all stakeholders Collaborative development of a single transmission plan for Duke Power and Progress Energy Carolinas areas An Independent Third Party will be an integral part of the process and a “tie-breaker” for voting Simultaneous focus on reliability and enhanced access

6 Organizational Structure Oversight / Steering Committee (OSC) Planning Working Group (PWG) Transmission Advisory Group (TAG) Independent Third Party (ITP)

7 OSC Responsibilities Review and approve the reliability and enhanced transmission access planning criteria, critical assumptions and scenarios to be used by the PWG Oversee the study process and approve the plan

8 OSC Membership Cooperatives – 2 members Duke – 2 members Municipals – 2 members PEC – 2 members ITP – 1 member Each member has 1 vote

9 PWG Responsibilities Model development, model runs, problem identification, solution development and plan development Reports results to the OSC

10 PWG Membership Cooperatives – 3 members Duke – 3 members Municipals – 3 members PEC – 3 members ITP – 1 member

11 Transmission Advisory Group The purpose of the TAG is to provide advice and recommendations to the OSC which will aid in the development of a coordinated transmission plan The TAG will be facilitated by the ITP Membership open to all stakeholders

12 Independent Third Party Role Serves on the OSC and PWG and will vote to break a tie in the OSC Facilitates and advises the entire process

13 Where are we in the process? The Participation Agreement was executed on May 20, 2005 Gestalt LLC was selected as the ITP in August 2005 Top Priorities –Establish TAG –Implement new collaborative process

14 North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative Process Mark Byrd, Vice-Chair OSC October 5, 2005

15 Overview Goal of Process Components of Process – Reliability Process – Enhanced Transmission Access Process Schedule Milestones

16 Goal of the Process Develop a single coordinated transmission plan that includes both reliability and enhanced access plans and that appropriately balances costs, benefits and risks associated with the use of transmission and generation resources.

17 Components of the Process Reliability Process Enhanced Transmission Access Process

18 Reliability Plan Improvements justified for reliability purposes Developed by PWG and approved by OSC

19 Enhanced Transmission Access Plan Expand the transmission planning process to include analysis of increased transmission capability to provide greater access to resources inside and outside the control areas of Duke and Progress. PWG develops increased transmission capabilities, cost estimates, implementation timelines and project feasibility.

20 –Establish assumptions, criteria, and study methodologies –Perform studies: thermal, voltage, stability, short circuit –Evaluate results to identify problems and potential solutions –Perform cost analysis and rough scheduling of solutions –Input from Participants and TAG periodically throughout process –Select preferred final and alternative plans Reliability Planning Process

21 –Identify scenarios to be studied and included for analysis –Establish assumptions and criteria –Evaluate results to identify problems and potential solutions for increasing access –PWG develops increased transmission capabilities, cost estimates, implementation timelines and project feasibility Enhanced Transmission Access Planning Process

22 Schedule Milestones –December 2005: OSC approves reliability assumptions –May 2006: OSC approves enhanced transmission access assumptions and studies to be conducted –September 2006: OSC approves reliability plan and reviews enhanced transmission access project cost, schedule, and potential increased transmission capability –December 2006: Final draft of collaborative plan

23 Transmission Advisory Group Rich Wodyka October 5, 2005

24 TAG Overview Purpose Role Membership Process Independent Third Party Duties Discussion

25 TAG Purpose The purpose of the TAG is to provide advice and recommendations to the OSC which will aid in the development of a collaborative transmission plan.

26 TAG Role The TAG will provide input to the planning process. Inputs may include: – Proposing reliability studies/projects to the OSC – Proposing enhanced access studies/projects to the OSC – Providing generator information to the process

27 TAG Membership TAG membership is open to all parties interested in the development of a collaborative transmission plan in North Carolina.

28 TAG Process Meetings are open to all parties with no restrictions on the number of people from any organization. Members will make recommendations for improvements or changes to the transmission plan or planning process through the ITP. Non-binding straw votes may be used to achieve consensus. One vote per stakeholder entity. Quorum requirements do not apply. Meeting highlights will be posted on website.

29 Duties of the ITP include: – Chairing the TAG meetings – Developing mechanisms to solicit and obtain the input of all stakeholders – Serving as a facilitator to achieve consensus – Developing and maintaining a website to support TAG activities

30 Discussion Opinions Needs Suggestions Next Steps

31 Contact Information Rich Wodyka Gestalt, L.L.C. 680 American Avenue, Suite 302 King of Prussia, PA Office ext 289 Cell