1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
Advertisements

Dennis J. Kennedy NAEP State Coordinator West Virginia Department of Education.
Comparing State Reading and Math Performance Standards Using NAEP Don McLaughlin Victor Bandeira de Mello National Conference on Large-Scale Assessment.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
What is a Z Score?. The State’s Waiver from NCLB All schools will achieve 85% proficiency for all students in all subjects (as measured on a statewide.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2011 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
NAEP and International Assessments August 28, 2013 DAC Annual Meeting.
Highlights from PIRLS and TIMSS 2011 Jack Buckley National Center for Education Statistics Washington, DC December 11, 2012.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Uri Treisman Professor of Mathematics Director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin URBAN MATH LEADERSHIP.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST High School.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science – Grade 10 Note: Unless otherwise noted, these data include all students enrolled.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
Statistical Innovations for Health and Educational Research
Department of Research and Evaluation
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
2012 FCAT Results and Accountability Update
NAEP and International Assessments
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Accountability Update
Presentation transcript:

1

2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades 4, 8, and 12 Measures student performance and trends over time

3 Historical Context NCLB requires jurisdictions receiving Title I funds to participate in NAEP mathematics and reading at grades 4 and 8 Puerto Rico participated in NAEP mathematics in 2003 and 2005 U.S. Department of Education excused Puerto Rico from NAEP reading

4 NAEP Mathematics Assessment in Puerto Rico Administered in Spanish for first time in 2003, and again in 2005 Public school students in grades 4 and 8 Samples at each grade –Approximately 100 schools –Approximately 3,000 students

5 Students in Puerto Rico Estimated 73 percent enrolled in public schools: – 100 percent of students are classified as Hispanic – 10 percent of eighth-grade students reported coming from non-Spanish-speaking households – 99 percent of students are eligible for the National School Lunch Program

6 Comparing Results Results for Puerto Rico are compared to –all public school students in the nation –low-income students in the nation Because of modifications made for 2005, Puerto Rico results for 2003 and 2005 are not comparable

NAEP Mathematics Content Areas Number properties and operations Measurement Geometry Data analysis and probability Algebra

8 Reporting Results NAEP scores (0–500) –Overall –Five content areas Achievement levels – Basic – Proficient – Advanced

Results

Score Results Students in Puerto Rico scored lower than all students and low-income students in the nation * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. NOTE: In NAEP, low-income students are students identified as eligible for the National School Lunch Program. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Mathematics Assessment. Grade 4Grade 8

Achievement-Level Results Grade 4: Nine percent at or above Basic # Rounds to zero for Proficient and Advanced levels. * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Mathematics Assessment. Grade 8: Four percent at or above Basic 7667

Percentile Results: Grade 4 Students at the 90th percentile had a score of 212 * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Mathematics Assessment.

Results

Score Results Students in Puerto Rico scored lower than all students and low-income students in the nation * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. NOTE: In NAEP, low-income students are students identified as eligible for the National School Lunch Program. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Mathematics Assessment. Grade 4Grade 8

15 Grade 4: Twelve percent at or above Basic 2005 Achievement-Level Results # Rounds to zero for Proficient and Advanced levels. * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Mathematics Assessment. Grade 8: Six percent at or above Basic 7968

Results by Content Area: Grade 4 Puerto Rico students scored below the national average in all five content areas * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. NOTE: Score differences are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Mathematics Assessment

Results by Content Area: Grade 8 * Significantly different (p <.05) from students in Puerto Rico. NOTE: Score differences are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Mathematics Assessment. Puerto Rico students scored below the national average in all five content areas 76 49

18 Sample Geometry Question and Results NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Mathematics Assessment Results: Grade 4

19 NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Mathematics Assessment. Sample Data Analysis and Probability Question and Results 2005 Results: Grade 8

and Beyond

21 Plans for 2007 and –Faster reporting –Comparisons of Puerto Rico results for 2005 and –Inclusion of Puerto Rico results with state and national results

22