Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading 2000. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading 2000. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading 2000

2 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment. Features of the 2000 Reading Assessment

3 Content of the 2000 Reading Assessment SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment.

4 Results Reported from the 2000 Reading Assessment SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment.

5 Average Reading Score Results for the Nation SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

6 Reading Score Percentiles SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

7 Profiles of Good and Poor Readers Good Readers = Top 10% of Students Poor Readers = Bottom 10% of Students

8 Achievement Level Results for the Nation SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

9 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000. Average Reading Scores by Race/Ethnicity 1992-2000

10 Percentage Reading at or above Proficient by Race/Ethnicity SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

11 Percentage of Students by Race/Ethnicity 1992-2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

12 Trends in Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

13 Average Reading Scores by Gender 1992-2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

14 Trends in Gender Gaps in Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

15 Percentage Reading at or above Proficient by Gender SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

16 Average Reading Score by Type of School 1992-2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments.

17 Pages Read Daily for School and Homework SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

18 Time Spent on Homework SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

19 Reading for Fun SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

20 Number of Different Types of Reading Materials in the Home SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

21 Time Spent Watching TV Daily SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Significantly different from 2000.

22 Accommodations Permitted in the NAEP Reading Assessment SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1998–2000 Reading Assessments.

23 Students with Disabilities SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Based on sample with accommodations permitted.

24 Students with Limited English Proficiency SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992–2000 Reading Assessments. Based on sample with accommodations permitted.

25 Average Scores by Type of Sample: 2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment. Significantly different from the sample where accommodations were not permitted.

26 Average Scores by Race/Ethnicity and Type of Sample: 2000 SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Reading Assessment. Significantly different from the sample where accommodations were not permitted.

27 End Page


Download ppt "The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading 2000. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google