LLNL-PRES-559653 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

Ensuring Better Services and Fair Value “Introduction and roadmap to implementation of ISO in Zambia’s water utilities” Kasenga Hara March 2015.
Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority
International Safeguards VTC Lecture Series Building a Safeguards Facility Approach David H. Hanks SRNL Program Manager Safeguards Initiatives Global Security.
Session 3.1 Overview of the Additional Protocol
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
“ABACC and the interaction with its partners” Kevin Veal, PhD
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
1 Enhanced Cooperation with Partnership in Integrated Safeguards Seminar 20 Years of ABACC Nov. 11, 2011 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Wan Ki Yoon Korea Institute.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Foreign Obligations and Annual Inventories Jessica Norles Savannah River National Laboratory.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Thailand NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION: Regulatory Body Prof. Dr. Chaivat TOSKULKAO Secretary General Office of Atoms.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
ESARDA Working Group Training and Knowledge Management 1 Nuclear Material Subject to Safeguards G. Janssens-Maenhout ESARDA Course March 2015:
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
Anita Nilsson Director, Office of Nuclear Security
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Responsibilities and functions of the government Framework for safety The Regulatory.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service February William C. Smith Assistant Administrator Office of Program.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Azerbaijan.
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil Assistant Manager, Office of Operational Support DOE Idaho Operations Office September 12, 2006 Presentation to DOE ISM Champions.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators’ Meeting 2013 Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Non- Nuclear Countries Pil Soo Hahn Director.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Infrastructure Development Bridging the National & International Levels: The Euratom Experience and expertise Sotiris Synetos, Euratom.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Staffing and training. Objectives To understand approaches to the development of strategies and policies for staffing of a Regulatory Authority including.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Standards, Codes and Guidance for Radiation Safety Regulatory Infrastructure IAEA Advanced Regional.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Jean Maurice Crete Division of Concepts and Planning, Safeguards Training Section Capacity Building for Safeguards.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety and Regulatory Functions William Kennedy Research Reactor.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
International Atomic Energy Agency School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096 Vienna, 3 May, 2010 Adriana Nicic, Regulatory Activities.
JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
The State Evaluation Process Therese Renis Section Head Division of Operations B Department of Safeguards 08 February 2007.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Responsibilities and functions of the regulatory body Objectives of regulatory functions Organizational.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM/WS TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform conditions for periodical technical inspections of wheeled vehicles and the reciprocal recognition of such.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards and Public Exposure to Radon Trevor Boal Radiation Protection Unit - NSRW.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop on Topical Issues on Infrastructure Development: Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
SESSION 3 Policy Framework
Obligations of Educational Agencies: Parents’ Bill of Rights
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Safeguards Milestones
Reviewing Governmental and Regulatory Responsibilities
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Dr. Hany Sallam & Regulatory Activities
SAFEGUARDS CAPACITY BUILDING ARGENTINE EXPERIENCE
Presentation transcript:

LLNL-PRES This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC NGSI Safeguards Courses May 2012

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  IAEA safeguards authorities, tools, and technologies  IAEA’s application of safeguards within States  Case studies of responses to State noncompliance  Assistance provided to the IAEA

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  What are the State’s safeguards obligations and rights? Comprehensive Safeguards Agrmt Additional Protocol  State organizations implementing safeguards obligations State Systems of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material (SSAC) Safeguards Regulatory Authorities (SRA) Implementation best practices and challenges

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  “Each non-nuclear weapon State party to the treaty undertakes to accept safeguards as set forth in an agreement…with the IAEA” Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement Additional Protocol Top: The cover of the CSA Left: Malaysia signs its AP (Photo: IAEA)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Basic Undertaking “…an undertaking by the State to accept safeguards…on all source or special fissional material in all peaceful nuclear activities…” (1)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Cooperation “…the Agency and the State shall co-operate to facilitate the implementation of the safeguards provided for therein.” (3)  State System of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material (SSAC) “…the State shall establish and maintain a system of accounting for and control of all nuclear material subject to safeguards…” (7) — MORE ON THIS LATER IN THE PRESENTATION!

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Provision of Information to the Agency “…the Agency shall be provided…with information concerning nuclear material subject to safeguards under the Agreement and the features of facilities relevant to safeguarding such material…” (8)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Provision of Information to the Agency “…Agency shall be provided…information concerning nuclear material…” (8, as elaborated in paras ) — With respect to each material balance area: –Accounting records / Inventory of material Including measurement results, adjustments, corrections –Measurement and accounting procedures –Material unaccounted for (MUF) — Transfers within, into, and out of the State — Material reaching the starting point of safeguards

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Provision of Information to the Agency “…Agency shall be provided…information concerning…the features of facilities…” (8) — “As early as possible before nuclear material is introduced” (42) –Description of facility –Processing equipment for nuclear material –Location and flow of nuclear material –Features and procedures for nuclear material accountancy and control — Operating records — Modifications to the facility relevant to safeguards

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Take steps to ensure Agency inspectors can perform their functions (9) Locations (76-77): — Strategic points and records For independent measurements, other verification rights — Prior to establishment of strategic points, to –Any location State’s initial report indicates nuclear material is present –Any location where inspections indicate nuclear material is present –Points where international transfers are received or dispatched — To additional locations as part of a special inspection

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Avoid undue interference with peaceful nuclear activities  Commercial or confidential state information protected  Consultation opportunity if questions arise about interpretation or application of safeguards, prior to IAEA determination that action is “essential and urgent”

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Provides the IAEA with enhanced authorities and information Information about R&D and more parts of the nuclear fuel cycle Complementary access Ability to use additional tools  Requires State to fulfill additional obligations Increased information sharing Facilitate increased IAEA access

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Article 2: Provision of Information 2.a. “[The State] shall provide the Agency with a declaration containing:” Information about, but not limited to: Nuclear related R&D NOT involving nuclear materials Expanded locations Expanded types of safeguards-relevant activities Expanded types of safeguards-relevant materials and equipment (see INFCIRC/540 Article 2.a. for complete list)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Article 2: Provision of Information (continued) 2.b. “[The State] shall make every reasonable effort to provide the agency with the following information:” 2.b (i) – Description of R&D related to enrichment, reprocessing, HEU/Pu waste processing not involving nuclear material carried out in the country but not authorized, controlled, or carried out on behalf of the State. 2.b (ii) – Information on entities or persons carrying out such activities upon specific request by the IAEA. 2.c. Provide clarifications upon request.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Articles 4 through 10: Complementary Access Article 5: The State “shall provide the Agency with access to” — Article 2 declared locations in addition to CSA declared locations — Sites — Decommissioned facilities — Agency specified locations for environmental sampling Article 4(a)(i-iii): For the purpose of — Assuring absence of undeclared nuclear material — Resolve questions or inconsistencies about declared information — Confirm decommissioned status

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  In addition to those rights granted by the CSA, an AP state has the right to Not have mechanistic or systematic verification by the Agency of Article 2 declarations Find alternative means or adjacent locations to satisfy Agency requirements if the State is “unable” to provide access to locations requested by the Agency. (The Agency decides if it is satisfied) “Manage” IAEA access to AP locations, provided the Agency is not precluded from performing its functions

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Establish national laws and regulations requiring safeguards obligations to be fully met — National laws binds relevant entities to the treaty requirements of the State  Provide timely, correct, complete information to IAEA  Provide the IAEA support and timely access to necessary locations and information

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  State System of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material (SSAC)  Safeguards Regulatory Authority

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  “Organizational arrangements at the national level which may have both A national objective to account for and control nuclear material in the State, and An international objective to provide the basis for application of IAEA safeguards” Definition from: IAEA Safeguards Glossary

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Involves government, governmental entities, regulators, operators  A system for nuclear material accounting: — Facility operators keep track of nuclear materials and report to government regulators — Regulator assembles reports, conducts audits of its facilities — Government transmits reports to IAEA  IAEA reviews reports, conducts independent verification

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  State System of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material (SSAC)  Safeguards Regulatory Authority (SRA)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  State System of Accounting for and Control of Nuclear Material (SSAC)  Safeguards Regulatory Authority (SRA)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Refers to the specific State authority/authorities responsible for all international safeguards implementation, including provision of design information and AP information  NEW TERM!! (But not new concept) — Introduced in IAEA Guidance for States Implementing Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements and Additional Protocols (March 2012)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Develop and enforce regulations  Collect, compile, maintain, and manage information  Conduct audits or inspections to ensure regulatory compliance and correctness of information  Transmit correct information in a timely manner  Support/facilitate IAEA activities in country

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Independence from facility operators from State policy makers  Empowerment Laws giving SRA legitimate authority  Procedure-driven Clear role and responsibilities Timely and correct meeting of responsibilities  Self-improving Continuous reviews of and updates to procedures Training for staff

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  “The Agency…shall make full use of the [SSAC]…and shall avoid unnecessary duplication of the State’s accounting and control activities”  “The Agency’s verification shall include…independent measurements and observations conducted by the Agency” - INFCIRC/153 (31)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Resistance from other national agencies/entities Lack of authority or high-level support  Scale of nuclear fuel cycle / related industry Small – limited pool of experts, less familiarity Large – complex activities, greater scope of activity  Experience / Human resources Need experts in nuclear engineering, materials, physics, chemistry, law, political science, management, accounting, statistics, IT…  Funding *In some states, SRA nonexistent because of challenge

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Improve efficiency of IAEA safeguards  Other benefits of nuclear material accounting Domestic safeguards benefits Economic operation of nuclear facilities  Secure international investment  Demonstrate nonproliferation commitment

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  IAEA SSAC Advisory Service (ISSAS) Provides assistance on regulatory, technical, and administrative measures — For States without SSACs or rudimentary SSACs, assistance focuses on establishing measures — For States with more advanced SSACs, ISSAS evaluates performance on these measures and recommends improvements  NNSA NGSI and other advanced states Technology and methodology development Regulation development Other infrastructure development

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  “Safeguards” isn’t only something that the IAEA does to a State  States accept obligations when they sign the NPT and their safeguards agreements  Fulfillment of obligations can be challenging, regardless of intentions  A strong SRA is NOT a guarantee of compliance  A weak SRA is NOT a guarantee of noncompliance

Thank You Questions?

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES  Other nuclear regulation and enforcement Safety at nuclear facilities Security at nuclear facilities  Regulation of other peaceful uses of nuclear technology Nuclear medicine Industrial use of radioactive sources  Auxiliary activities Radiation protection and health physics Quality assurance / quality control of its own activities Radioactive waste management Nuclear/radioactive emergency preparedness

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES Seiji Uchikoshi Nuclear Material Control Center JAPAN SEMINAR 20 YEARS OF ABACC Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Palácio Itamaraty, November 2011 An example SSAC Slides taken from presentation available at:

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES Seiji Uchikoshi Nuclear Material Control Center JAPAN SEMINAR 20 YEARS OF ABACC Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Palácio Itamaraty, November 2011

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory LLNL-PRES SSAC Structure in Japan BILATERAL AGREEMENT COUNTRIES BILATERAL AGREEMENT COUNTRIES Additional Protocol (INFCIRC/540) - Nuclear fuel-related R&D activities without NM - Buildings in sites - Activities specified in Annex I - Uranium mines, etc. NUCLEAR FACILITIES - Report on Inventory & Material Transfer - Notification/Confirmation of Transfer etc. International Inspection Data Processing GOVERNMENT OF JAPAN (Japan Safeguards Office, MEXT) National Inspection Comple- mentary Access NUCLEAR MATERIAL CONROL CENTER Accountancy Report - Inspection Result - Conclusion Report on buildings, activities, etc. under AP Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement (INFCIRC/153) International Atomic Energy Agency - Accountancy Report - Inspection Report Annual Declaration Taken from Uchikoshi, Seiji, “State sytem of accounting for and control of nuclear material (SSAC) in Japan”, Nuclear Material Control Center Japan

MEXT (JSGO) NMCC Nuclear Facilities Routine Inspection Assignment -Access -Item count -Book Audit -NDA -DA sampling -C/S Inspection Reports (inspection results & analysis results) Inspection -Scheduling -Inspection -DIV -CA NMCC is only the organization which has been approved on the national law to carry out the national SG inspection State Inspection Scheme Taken from Uchikoshi, Seiji, “State sytem of accounting for and control of nuclear material (SSAC) in Japan”, Nuclear Material Control Center Japan