Executive Session Director’s Conceptual Design Review of Mu2e Project May 3-5, 2011 Jim Yeck.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Stephen W. Meador, Chairperson DOE/SC Review Committee Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Review.
Advertisements

The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.
The Re-Start Meeting Warren County School Strategic Planning Process Action Team Leaders September 25, 2013.
ANNOUNCEMENTS Please any technical issues to CHANGE OF LOCATION: – Days 1 and 2 will now BOTH be held at the Washington DC.
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Follow-Up Review of the APUL Project November 2-3, 2009 Dean A. Hoffer.
Managing Evaluations for Consistently High Quality American Evaluation Association Annual Conference Molly Hageboeck.
ISO TC 184/SC San Francisco Opening plenary1 ISO TC184/SC4-SC5 JWG8 N249 SAN FRANCISCO OPENPLENARY.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Welcome to the EQR Quarterly Meeting! Wednesday, March 26, :00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. (EDT) We will begin shortly. Call-in information is ,
Weekly Risk Report & Performance Metrics
Jan 28, 2009CFS-GBL meeting 1 PM report Jan 28, 2009: Reviews –AAP –PAC (May 9 and 10, 2009) Meetings –TILC09 FALC –Madrid, Jan 19, 2009.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Kin Chao, Chairperson DOE/SC Review Committee Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy Review Committee.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
1 MANAGEMENT CHECKUP May 17, 2012 Westminster Presbyterian Church Welcome!
ODADAS/DMH Consolidation: State and Local Relationship Items Potential ORC Modifications Meeting #1 August 17, 2012.
COURSE PREVIEW Course Name Course Director: Course Coordinator:
Introduction and Election of Co-Chair H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan NASA/GSFC Metrics Planning and Reporting (MPAR) WG 8 th Earth Science Data Systems Working.
First Executive Session Fermilab Director’s/DOE Fermi Site Office's Performance Management System Review of the NOvA Project June 19-20, 2007 Frank Gines.
Empowering Staff Through Institute Planning (ESTIP) Executive Workshop Institute Name: XXXXXX Presenter: XXXXXX Date: XXXXXX.
Exam Duration: 10 minutes reading, 2 hours writing Total marks: 50 marks Authorised materials: CALCULATOR Reference documents will be given as part of.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
GLAST LAT Offline SoftwareWorkshop - SLAC, Jan , 2001 R.Dubois Lehman Review Feb Joint NASA/DoE review My understanding: –“The purpose of the.
Project Lifecycle Section 6 - Closeout. Project Manager’s Role During Project Close-Out  Ensure that all project deliverables have been completed and.
Class #9 Magnificent Seventh Feburary 1 CBO Mentor Project.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
WELCOME! External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting Wednesday, June 18, :00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. WELCOME!
IENG 471 Facilities Planning
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
10/10/2015 IENG 471 Facilities Planning 1 IENG Lecture END Project Report Requirements & Project Presentation Information.
How to start Milestone 1 CSSE 371 Project Info There are only 8 easy steps…
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Insert: Title of Improvement Read Out Date:. 2 Objectives for Today’s Session Share results of improvement effort Demonstrate fact-base, analytical approach.
Mu2e WGM R. Ray Mu2e Project Manager Sept. 14, 2012.
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the Mu2e Project April 3, 2012 Elaine McCluskey.
LBNE Working Group Meeting December 20, :00– 5:00 PM Snake Pit.
Executive Session Director’s CD-1 Review of the LBNE Project September 25, 2012 Jim Yeck.
Executive Session Director’s Progress Review of the NOvA Project August 4-5, 2010 Dean A. Hoffer.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts Statewide Strategic IT Consolidation (ITC) Initiative IT Governance Subcommittee Working Session.
Survey Results & analysis for NCMA Board of Directors Assessment Checklist (November 13, 2011)
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Closeout Presentation and Final Report Procedures.
Public Speaking Course Details. Public Speaking School Year, Spring Semester Monday – 10:00 to 11:45 AM Wednesday – 2:00 to 3:45 PM Room B205.
DUSEL Beamline Working Group Meeting March 09, :00 AM – Snake Pit (WH2NE) By Dean Hoffer - OPMO.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Project X Working Group Meeting January 15, :00 PM Snake Pit.
Joint Science Workshop Biodiversity, Terrestrial Ecology, and Related Applied Sciences.
 Prepare  Study the agenda  Study the minutes  Prepare for your contributions  Prepare to play a major role  List questions.
1 Yet Another Mail Working Group IETF 76 November 11, 2009.
Leadership Retreat & Student Organization Training PAMA- Parkside American Marketing Association How to create a.
Query Health Operations Workgroup Standards & Interoperability (S&I) Framework October 13, :00am – 12:00pm ET.
Executive Session Director’s Conceptual Design Review of Muon g-2 Project June 5-7, 2013 Jon Kotcher.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE DOE/SC CD-2/3b Review of the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory February 4,
OFFICE OF SCIENCE DOE/SC CD-3c Review of the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Project Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory June 14-16, 2016.
ESET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment.
CPMGT 300 Week 4 Learning Team Collecting Requirements Check this A+ tutorial guideline at 300/CPMGT-300-Week-4-Learning-Team-Collecting-
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
February 28 Assignments HW #8, 9, and 10 assigned Implementation plan
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
360o Feedback Report Post-Training After-Session Actions
CPMGT 300 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CPMGT 300 STUDY Lessons in Excellence--cpmgt300study.com.
CPMGT 300 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com.
CPMGT 300 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com.
Director’s Progress Review Closeout Meeting
Standard Approach for Setting Up a Kaizen Event
[Project Name] Post-Mortem Presentation Template
NPSTC 10th Anniversary Activities
Presentation transcript:

Executive Session Director’s Conceptual Design Review of Mu2e Project May 3-5, 2011 Jim Yeck

03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 2 Agenda for Exec Session Charge and Review Focus Review Agenda Subcommittee Assignments Reviewer Writing Assignments Subcommittee Executive Sessions Reporting Structure Discussion

Charge 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 3

Charge (Continued) 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 4

Charge (Continued) 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 5

Review Focus This is NOT a Cost, Schedule, or Management Review. This is a technical review of the Conceptual Design. This review will satisfy the requirement of a Independent Design Review for CD-1 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 6

Project Design Phases 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 7

Agenda 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 8

Agenda continued 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 9

Agenda continued 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 10

Agenda continued 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 11

Reviewer Subcommittee Breakout Assignments Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May * Indicates Subcommittee Lead

Reviewer Subcommittee Breakout Assignments (continued) Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May * Indicates Subcommittee Lead

Reviewer Writing Assignments Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May

Reviewer Writing Assignments (continued) Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May

Reviewer Writing Assignments (continued) Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May

Subcommittee Executive Sessions First Subcommittee Executive Session –Tuesday, at 4:30 PM for 45 minutes (can stay in breakout room) –Consolidate thought and potential issues –Identify questions for the project or documentation needed for Wednesday morning breakout Second Subcommittee Executive Session –Wednesday at 1:00 PM for 90 minutes –Subcommittee to identify and consolidate potential recommendations –Start writing subcommittees portion of closeout presentation 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 17

Reporting Structure Results of the review are to be documented as findings, comments, and recommendations. The answers to the charge questions are to be a consolidation of feedback from all subcommittees. Answers should be an assessment of the overall project design. Findings, Comments, Recommendations and answers to the questions are to be presented in writing at a closeout with Mu2e and Fermilab’s management. Recommendations should not include a detailed list of items to be addressed, but be a summary of the issues. The detailed list of actions should be documented by each subcommittee and will be collected and given to the project separately from the Closeout/Final Report. Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May

Findings, Comments, and Recommendations Findings Comments Recommendations Findings are statements of fact that summarize noteworthy information presented during the review. Comments are judgment statements about the facts presented during the review. The reviewers' comments are based on their experiences and expertise. The comments are to be evaluated by the project team and actions taken as deemed appropriate. Recommendations are statements of actions that should be addressed by the project team. A response to the recommendation is expected and that the actions taken would be reported on during future reviews. 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 19

Reviewer Write-ups Write-up template ( Review Closeout Presentation Format ) is posted on Director’s Review Webpage. 5_03/Closeout_Presentation_Mu2e_ docx Write-ups (including answers to charge questions) are to be sent to Terry Erickson at prior to 7:00 AM on Thursday, May 5 for the Closeout Dry Run starting at 8:00 AM in One North Detailed list of items to be addressed by the project to be sent separately to Terry also. A final report will be issued within 2 weeks after the closeout. Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 03-May

Discussion 03-May-2011Director's Conceptual Design Review of the Mu2e Project 21 Questions and Answers