U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Enabler’s Steering Committee Meeting January 9 th, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Advertisements

Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 EGTC regulation EGTC regulation ESF and EGTC regulations Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
1 AASHTO - FHWA Peer Exchange on Asset Management and Performance Management July 26-27, 2010.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Session 321 An Implementation Strategy: Identifies who is responsible for which actions Identifies what funding mechanisms and other resources are available.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
2010 Changes – Physician Fee Schedule Billing & Reimbursement for Consultations December 16, 2009.
JJ New Product Development at PCH. Publishers Clearing House PCH was founded in 1953 PCH’s name is synonymous with sweepstakes marketing In 1985 PCH started.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program February 2004 eAuthentication Integration Status eGovernment Program.
W5HH Principle As applied to Software Projects
Innovation Charter Exercises February 5, Develop a Charter For your department or the university, develop an innovation charter that you can present.
Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Of One Program Cyra Syed M&E Coordination Officer Resident Coordinator’s Office.
State of Kansas Statewide Financial Management System Pre-Implementation Project Steering Committee Meeting January 11, 2008.
Experience feed back committee (EFBC) in radiotherapy M. Delgaudine, N. Jansen, P. Coucke Department of Radiotherapy, CHU-Liège, Belgium
Lead Agency Department of Health & Senior Services Cumulative Enrollment SFY ,829 NJEIS Budget SFY $69,000,000 Average Cum Cost Per Child.
CHSRA Unsolicited Proposal Process 1 June 6, 2013.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program July 23, 2003 eAuthentication Initiative Agency Responsibilities and Funding Discussion eGovernment.
FIRST NATIONS JURISDICTION OVER EDUCATION Presentation January 19, 2006 Presented by Christa Williams Executive Director First Nations Education Steering.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program July 10, 2002 eGovernment Working Group Meeting Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive.
Cost accounting concepts and objectives Usually there are three management levels The operating management The middle management The executive management.
Market Design of SE Europe: Reflections from the 3rd Forum on the Way Forward 6 th Permanent High Level Group Meeting Athens, 07 December 2003.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
1 What’s Next for Financial Management Line of Business (FMLoB)? AGA/GWSCPA 6 th Annual Conference Dianne Copeland, Director, FSIO May 8, 2007.
The Philippine e-Library Project and e-Learning The Philippine eLibrary Project  One of the eleven government funded projects through the Information.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program February 5, 2003 eGovernment Working Group Meeting Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive.
Business Process’s Blue Print Pertemuan 3 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Early Market Briefing Proposed tender for the Australia-Timor-Leste Partnership for Human Development (ATLPHD) 14 September 2015, Dili.
Management Structure of JP and Roles of JPSC One UN programme
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eGovernment Working Group Meeting February 11, 2004.
The International Aid Transparency Initiative Why is it relevant to private aid organisations? Partos Plaza, Netherlands, 14 th October 2010.
 CB is a process of negotiations between employers and a group of employees aimed at reaching agreements  Typical issues covered in a labor contract.
2005 OSEP National Early Childhood Conference February 7, :00-12:30 “To Fee or Not to Fee: That is the Question” NEW JERSEY.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eGovernment Working Group Meeting Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive October 1, 2003.
Ben Turner ERC Executive Agency November 2013 ERC Work Programme 2014 Update.
Disability Services Value for Money and Policy Review 29/11/20151 Value for Money and Policy Review of Disability Services in Ireland Presentation to the.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on the Social Security Agency February 2005.
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
1 EXPORT SUPPORT THROUGH JOINT OFFICIAL PARTICIPATION IN TRADE FAIRS AND EXHIBITIONS ABROAD The Project Management of EU Project Funds.
Update on the MA Task Force on Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Associate Commissioner.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
1 Research Terms and Conditions Status Update Briefing to the Council on Governmental Relations.
Project Management Process
REINSURANCE REGULATORY MODERNIZATION ACT OF 2009.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eDeployment Kickoff August 26, 2003.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
UPDATE ON GAVI ALLIANCE, THE GLOBAL FUND AND WORLD BANK COLLABORATIVE EFFORT FOR MORE EFFECTIVE HSS SEPTEMBER, 2009 Exploring a potential common platform.
NGA Center for Best Practices January 10, 2001 Charleston, South Carolina National Environmental Information Exchange Network Kim Nelson Pennsylvania Department.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
Decision Making Chi Emodi Project and Contract Management Office December 9, 2015.
Bangladesh Joint Country Assistance Evaluation: Assessing Total ODA at the Country Level Presentation to OECD DAC November 2006 Bruce Murray Director General.
Project Management Methodology Project Closing. Project closing stage Must be performed for all projects, successfully completed or shut off by management.
Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results 1Info-Tech Research Group Establish an Effective IT Steering Committee.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
ITIL Project Change Management Workshop 7 February 2007
Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results Establish an Effective IT Steering Committee.
Understanding The New Cub Scout Program ●Research shows that a child’s development accelerates as youngsters begin their formal education in kindergarten.
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
July/August 2014 How the ONRC links with… Lynley Hutton.
Consortium Agreement Kari-Jouko Räihä. Characteristics  Origin Basis: UNECA (Unified Network of Excellence Consortium Agreement) Terminology adapted.
Transforming the future of public health in Missouri
Special Review Team Required Actions October 23, 2011
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on the Social Security Agency
Active Directory Security Improvements (ITCRB) CIO Council Update
Description of Revision
Breakthrough Series Collaborative Storyboard Template
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
EIS Project Status Briefing
Overall Project RAG Status:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2008 SNA IN AZERBAIJAN
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Enabler’s Steering Committee Meeting January 9 th, 2003

U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program 2 Early Adopter Process Map 1). Agencies express interest in becoming Early Adopters 2a). Agencies and eGov team finalize Early Adopter Project Scope 2b). Executive Council approves Costs for Enabler’s 3a). Agencies finalize Early Adopter agreement Continue? Yes 2c). Early Adopters identify resources (financial and personnel) 4). Begin Early Adopter Implementation 3b). Consider USDA-wide implementation No

U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program 3 Early Adopter Process Details The process for Early Adopters will have multiple steps and no Agency will be forced to participate… Step 1 of the process is to express interest in becoming an early adopter. Many Agencies have already completed this step by indicating specific areas of interest in the eDeployment initiative. There are multiple components to Step 2: Agencies that have signed up as early adopters will work with the eGovernment team to finalize the early adopter project scope. Simultaneously, the Executive Council will be working through defining and approving the Enabler’s Costs. Finally, the early adopter Agencies will be working to identify the financial and personnel resources that they can provide towards the implementation effort. Following Step 2, Agencies will decide whether or not they intend to continue with the early adopter process. Step 3 is the decision point in the process - As part of Step 3, Agencies that decide not to continue with the early adopter process due to lack of budget, personnel resources or other factors will consider joining the effort for USDA-wide adoption. Agencies that decide to continue will formally agree to the conditions of the early adopter agreement. Finally, in Step 4, Agencies will begin the early adopter implementation process. The full implementation will consist of tasks related to Agency specific requirement definition, project planning, design, build, rollout, and continued operations/support of the initiative.