March 2013. Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust & Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund  There are a number of documents that relate to the NWRT and NWSF:  1.)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Marie Curie Schemes Science is not the whole story! (How to write a successful Marie Curie RTN Proposal) Siobhan Harkin.
Advertisements

Campus Improvement Plans
2011 Systems Science Grantsmanship Workshop USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture in cooperation with University of Tennessee AgResearch.
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
Lunchtime Topics Craig Weise Construction Reform Program Director Lisa Conomy Construction Counsel OSU Office of Legal Affairs.
1.  CDBG: Owner-Occupied Rehab.,  Special projects to remove physical barriers for elderly and handicapped persons. 2.
Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre April 1, 2010.
LA GRAD Act LCTCS Conference LA Board of Regents March
CALLS4ACTION Taking Positive Action to address Inequalities.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Grant Writing 101 – Part 2 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting a Grant Application Nancy Alexander, MBA Office of Sponsored Programs.
LEADER -The acronym ‘LEADER' derives from the French words "Liaison Entre Actions de Développement de l'Économique Rurale“ which means, ‘Links between.
Compensation Model Supervisor Training Presented by: Jennifer Larson
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Anne Louise Friedrichsen, LIFE unit LIFE+ Results and lessons learned from the first application round 2007 Anne Louise Friedrichsen, European Commission.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way SELECTION PANEL PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL TEACHERS 2009 Procedural.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
Health Infrastructure Renewal Fund HIRF Program LHIN and Hospital Teleconference October 25, 2013.
Grant Writing 101 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application Debbie Kalnasy Bryan Williams Office of Safe and Drug-Free School s.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Post-Secondary Education Program Joint AFN/INAC PSE Program Review with representation from NAIIHL and the Labrador Inuit Regional Information Process.
Define the project identify potential funding sources gather information write and package the proposal submit the proposal to a funder Piece of cake?
Transportation Improvement Program Status and Update.
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
Atlantic Innovation Fund Round VIII February 5, 2008.
2015 HUD Continuum of Care NOFA Bidder’s Conference 1.Review of Community Input Session 2.Local Process and Strategic Changes 3.Application Highlights.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Budget Formulation 2017/2018 A review of the 2017 process and the 2018 process. Office of Budget and Performance Management November 2015.
Gabie Frazier Dr. Lynn Sodat Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of Education National Title I Distinguished Schools.
2015 NOFA Committee Orientation. A Continuum of Care (CoC) is a regional or local planning body that coordinates housing and services funding for homeless.
Scheme to Support National Organisations Application Guidance 19 th January, 2016 Pobal is a not-for-profit company that manages programmes on behalf of.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Spring 2015 OMSP Request For Proposal. Important Dates Intent to Submit: March 21, 2015 Applications: 4:30 p.m., Friday, May 15, 2015 Announcement of.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust and Studies Fund March 2015.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
EuropeAid/152087/DD/ACT/LB Cultural activities 2016 Information Session 13 th June 2016.
The Promotion and Tenure Process at Alabama State University.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D: PREPARATION OF LEADERSHIP PERSONNEL Webinar on Project Objective and Performance Measures for the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Tulare County Youth Commission
Emergency Resiliency Fund (ERF)
Key Factors for Clubs in doing both Club and Global Grants
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME
at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting an Application
Emergency Resiliency Fund (ERF)
Prop-50 IP Address Transfers
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
2012 Annual Call Steps of the evaluation of proposals, role of the experts TEN-T Experts Briefing, March 2013.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation CGBN meeting
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

March 2013

Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust & Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund  There are a number of documents that relate to the NWRT and NWSF:  1.) Policies  2.) Funding Guides  3.) Online application forms  4.) Score sheets (not public documents)  We will start with an overview of the NWRT; then identify the differences between the two.

Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust  The NWRT was created to fund wildlife research conducted by territorial and federal government departments.  The NWRT provides an annual allocation to address wildlife research priorities as identified by NWBM through its identification of NWMB and Regional Wildlife Organization Management and Research Priorities in the three regions of Nunavut.

Application Process  Only Federal or Nunavut territorial government departments are eligible for funding by the NWRT.  Research must be carried out within the Nunavut Settlement Area or adjacent marine areas  Applications to the NWRT are submitted via an internet-based electronic application system.  Application deadline January 15 each year.

Scoring Structure: NWMB and Regional Priorities  NWRT scoring gives higher priority to research focused on NWMB priorities.

Scoring Structure: NWMB Priorities

Scoring Structure: Quality of Research  Projects are awarded more points for research that will be applicable in the near future and that includes IQ/TEK.

Scoring Structure: Financial Contributions  Financial contributions by the applicant and other organizations are combined.

Scoring Structure: Consultation and Reporting  Applicants are required to provide a letter of support from communities or demonstrate conscientious consultation in their proposals.

Scoring Structure: Deductions  The scoring system deducts points for outstanding and late reporting.

Funding Limitations & Eligibility  Proposals must score a minimum of 65 points to be considered by the NWMB.  The Board will only consider a package of the top ranked proposals making up not more than 135% of the amount available to allocate.  The Director of Wildlife Management has the authority to reject applications that are not submitted in adequate detail, do not meet the funding guide criteria or minimum score, or where reporting requirements have not been met.

Funding Limitations & Eligibility  At least 50% of the total project budget must be funded by the applicant or other external sources.  Projects that involve the compilation of existing data will not be funded unless this is an integral part of a project which is judged to be necessary in meeting wildlife management and research priorities.

Funding Limitations & Eligibility: Multi-year Funding  Limited to 25% of the total amount available for funding.  To be considered, proposals must meet the following four criteria:  Research Priority = 65%  Research Quality = 70%  Funding and Training = 60%  Consultation and Reporting = 70%

Funding Limitations & Eligibility: Preliminary Funding  Maximum $15,000 per project.  Limited to 10% of the total funding available.  Examples of preliminary study funding:  Development of research methods  Consultations to obtain community support  Consideration of community participation  Inclusion of IQ/TEK

Notification of Funding Decisions  Proposals are reviewed by the Board during the March meeting  Individual applicants and departments will be advised in writing of the NWMB’s funding decisions by mid-April  All funding conditions must be met by 30 June  The NWMB may establish additional funding conditions prior to funding being issued

 Overall, very similar structure to NWRT  The Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund (NWSF) was created by the NWMB to fund community-based management and research projects in Nunavut, in particular, projects led by Hunters and Trappers Organizations.  Addresses issues of local concern. Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund

 There is no option for multi-year funding  Maximum amount available is $30,000 per project  Maximum preliminary funding is $7,500.  Staff can work with potential applicants to develop an approach to their research, or may contact applicants to obtain more information during evaluation. Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund

 Government of Nunavut researchers can support the HTOs with applications and research, however the HTO maintains responsibility for all correspondence with the NWMB and submission of all required documents. Nunavut Wildlife Studies Fund

Scoring Structure  Scoring Structure similar to NWRT but recent changes to the policy reflect the intention of the NWSF to target community-based organizations:  Financial Contributions  Consultation and Reporting  Plans for publication  Projects must score 50% to be brought to the Board for consideration

Questions / Comments ? Mallory, M Presentation to NWMB. pp