National Early Years Conference Edinburgh Conference Centre Heriot Watt Campus October 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objectives Present overview & contrast different models of case management: broker, clinical, strengths based clinical Identify roles of engagement & collaboration.
Advertisements

Healthy Schools, Healthy Children?
Assessment and eligibility
Working with you for Better Health Family Nurse Partnership Jayne Snell Family Nurse Supervisor Clare Brackenbury Family Nurse.
Conception to age 2 - the age of opportunity Key Conclusions and Recommendations.
Midwifery Programme Overview Health and Well Being Sheffield Hallam University.
Drug Awareness for Primary Schools Richard Boxer Drug Education Consultant Health & Well-Being Team (CSF) Safeguarding: Drug Education Richard Boxer, Drug.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Welcome to The Expert Community Forum 19 November 2007.
Building Strong Partnerships to Improve Health – Mandy Chambers Head of Health Improvement NHS Derbyshire & Chair of Bolsover Partnership (BLSP)
Lancashire Assessment and Planning Framework Victoria Gent.
Our Roles and Responsibilities Towards Young Carers Whole Family Working: Making It Real for Young Carers.
Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.
TRANSITION PROJECT LEARNING NETWORK WORKSHOP 3 AISLING PROJECT: TRANSITION PROJECT.
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Suki Norris/Kristie Hill/Bernice Cooke Somerset Partnership
Midwifery Programme Overview Health and Well Being Sheffield Hallam University.
Engaging families, engaging fathers: Domestic abuse and safeguarding children Angela Everson, WomenCentre, Calderdale Dr Sue Peckover, University of Huddersfield.
Primary Mental Health Workers in Education Sarah Davies & Sarah Jones Promoting positive mental health and emotional well being of children and young people.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Baby Extra: “The birth of a baby is a unique moment in the life of parents. It makes parents more capable than they ever thought they would be.”
Health inequalities post 2010 review – implications for action in London London Teaching Public Health Network “Towards a cohesive public health system.
Early Intervention EYFS Framework Guide. Early intervention The emphasis placed on early intervention strategies – addressing issues early on in a child’s.
Maternity Strategy Where are we now……and where do we want to get to????
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
Hertfordshire in Action Working in Partnership to secure effective Transition and Progression.
Being Part of a Core Group Jacqui Westbury – CP Chair/IRO Team Manager Kate Lawson - Safeguarding Nurse Specialist.
11 November 2011 Midwives- making a difference. Joyce Leggate Belinda Morgan Family Health Project NHS Fife.
Whole Systems Approach to GIRFEC 25 th February 2014.
Bridlington Children’s Centres Development Plan East Riding Children’s Centres Bridlington “working in partnership”
Objectives 1. Children will be supported in an integrated way through the establishment of a Start Right Community Wrap- Around Programme in the target.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
National Support Team: Findings from the first 2 years Katrina Stephens Associate Delivery Manager, Alcohol Harm Reduction National Support Team, Department.
Making Data Count Manchester 3/11/08. Health and the 5 Outcomes Enjoying and Achieving Healthy and Safe Economic Wellbeing and Positive Contribution.
Health Visitor Pathways. Health Visiting Pathways DH developed 3 pathways in collaboration with DfE, RCN, CPHVA, Unite, SAPHNA, RCM 1.Health Visiting.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Charlie Henry HMI National.
Enhanced Case Management: Moving Beyond Service Brokering to Care Collaboration Unit I.
CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE’S PLAN ‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN MEDWAY’ Sally Morris Assistant Director of Commissioning and Strategy NHS Medway/Medway.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
HCHS Children’s Universal Services delivering health care through Children’s Centres & Extended Schools National Policy Context HCHS strategic direction.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
An Evaluation of the Fathers’ Development Work Programme.
EUROCHILD Members Exchange Seminar 2007 Promoting Children’s Rights through Positive Parenting Policies FAMILIES MATTER: SUPPORTING FAMILIES IN NORTHERN.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Mary Rayner HMI Lesley.
In Highland Bill Alexander Director of Care and Learning June 2014.
The Health Visitor’s role in Leading the Healthy Child Programme – Health Review 2 Southampton Sue Wierzbicki Locality Lead Co-ordinator – South cluster.
Evidence into Practice Using a Strength Based Approach in Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) Gail Trotter FNP Implementation Lead, Scotland.
…to integration Information and advice: A single point of access that filters enquiries using a single source of information (the ‘local offer’) as soon.
Sally Johnson, Head of Service (Maternal health) Identifying vulnerability and enabling access to services.
Dr Rebecca McGuire-Snieckus and Dr Janet Rose Brighter Futures and Bath Primary Partnership: an early intervention project to improve outcomes for vulnerable.
A DAY IN THE LIFE OF A HEALTH VISITOR. Jane Dingley (Health Visitor/Practice Teacher Oct 2013)
Schools - Reducing Persistent Absence Recent data Areas to considerExample questions Red Green Are pupils who are likely to meet PA criteria identified.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
People lives communities Preparing for Adulthood Getting a good life Contribution through volunteering Julie Pointer Preparing for Adulthood March 2016.
Network Name Celebrating Good Practice Louise Burton & Jane Bhatti Safeguarding Health Practitioners 24 January 2012.
SDF Conference & Projects Fair 29 th October 2014 Rosie Kerr, Manager, North Lanarkshire Integrated Addiction Service Eleanor McDermott, Development Officer,
Nursing for School aged children and young people.
Developing a Strategic Framework for Early Intervention: Children, Young People and Families Faith Mann Director of Targeted and Early Intervention Services.
Children’s Centres Update Mike Newman Children Centre Support Officer.
The Horrocks Family. Roy Horrocks What do you know about Roy? What will your Initial Assessment reveal? Which other professional bodies are involved?
IMPROVING THE HEALTH AND WELLBEING OF YOUNG CHILDREN.
Powys teaching Health Board: Laying the Foundations for Good Health Our approach to delivering prudent healthcare By engaging with our population, and.
Pre-school Learning Alliance Organising, Operating and Delivering the service at Queens Park Children’s Centre.
Loren Bell Linnea Sallack, MPH, RD Altarum Institute
Working together to improve the health outcomes of the 0-5s
Strategy
Completing the Child’s Plan (Education – Single Agency Assessment)
The Early Help Assessment Journey. Request for Early Help Support Form. Support for OUR Early Help Partner Agencies.
Reading Paper discussion – Week 4
Presentation transcript:

National Early Years Conference Edinburgh Conference Centre Heriot Watt Campus October 2010

Key findings from evaluation

REFERRALS 217 first time mums referred 52% postnatal and 48% antenatal 31 clients have successfully completed the programme 64% of the mums referred have and continue to fully engage

Key Findings- Impact Programme is performing well and has potential to meet outcomes First Steps is having a positive impact for ante-natal and post-natal clients. Specifically: Ante-natal –Healthy eating –Physical activity Post natal –Parenting skills –Confidence in interacting and supporting development –Confidence to care for the baby –Positive feelings towards the baby

Key Findings - The referral process Majority of referrals to the programme are young women (aged 21 and under) The majority of referrals are appropriate to programme criteria Concern that some women who could benefit are excluded by eligibility criteria Ante natal referrals are low –Mothers value support at ante-natal stage

Key Findings - Assessment & Action Planning Clients report that assessment process straight forward and not intrusive When should first assessment take place? –Takes time to establish a trusting relationship –Initial scores can be false But –Essential that activities tailored to client needs Clients often do not perceive benefits of the assessment/ action planning process

Key Findings- Assessment & Action Planning Continue to refine approach to setting and measuring goals. Action plans should be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Timely) Evidence that assessments and action plans are not always shared with partner agencies Some benefits are not captured by assessment tools e.g. confidence and self esteem / advocacy

Key Findings- Activities Most clients receive a weekly/ fortnightly visit – between an hour and a few hours depending on activity. Possibility of more intensive support in early stages? Activities tailored to needs of the client High satisfaction among clients with intensity/ nature of support Advocacy and emotional support highly valued by mothers

Key Findings- Activities FSWs role in promoting activities to mothers is valued – mothers report that they would not be aware of activities without First Steps. Concern that some become dependant. Workers should monitor and encourage mothers to try things on their own between visits.

Key Findings- Partnership working Public Health Teams –Relationship developing well –Regular informal dialogue about shared clients –FSW often attend PHN team meetings –PHNs value support of FSWs – they are able to work intensively with clients and provide support on issues outside of PHN remit –Relationship could be enhanced by more formal joint reviews of client progress

Key Findings- Partnership working Social work teams –Initial concern of duplication and too many agencies involved –But FSWs seen as valuable contribution to the team –Regular informal communication - primary communication through PHNs –FSWs have encouraged vulnerable mothers to access Family Centres

Key Findings- Partnership working Midwifery teams –Integration with midwifery teams less advanced than with PHNs. Perhaps most significant challenge in first year –Lack of referrals –Evidence that scope of First Steps support is not always well explained to eligible mothers –Priority area going forward

Key Findings- Areas for development Little evidence of impact in relation to smoking cessation Lack of ante-natal referrals therefore little opportunity to impact on breastfeeding

AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

1.Increase numbers of ante-natal referrals and engagement 2.Review and fine tune data collection 3.Build evidence base on vulnerable clients excluded 4.Assessment process 5.Client action planning 6.Engagement with other locally available services 7.Continuing professional development 8.Monitoring outcomes data 9.Sustainability 10.Caseload management 11.Cost benefit analysis

Recommendations 1.Increase numbers of ante-natal referrals and engagement Key findings –46% of referrals were ante-natal –39% referred at ante-natal stage are engaging Actions –Programme manager and implementation group to progress relationships –FSW work with midwives to identify reasons for non-engagement –Programme manager to seek agreement for FSWs to attend midwifery team meetings on regular basis

Recommendations 2.Review and fine tune data collection Key findings –There are currently gaps in the database –Unclear whether data is not collected or is collected but not in the format required Actions –GEN to identify current gaps and meet with Programme Manager and database developer to fine tune database

Recommendations 3.Build evidence base on vulnerable clients excluded by datazone or number of children Key findings –PHNs, Midwives, and FSWs report that current criteria is excluding clients who could benefit –Eligibility criteria cannot be changed in current funding period –By gathering evidence during 2010 Implementation Group in stronger position to consider different criteria going forward Actions –Midwives/ PHNs basic information for all clients they would refer regardless of eligibility. –This will be captured in database

Recommendations 4.Carry out initial review within 2 weeks of joining the programme Key findings –Some challenges completing initial review because FSWs need time to establish relationship –BUT It is important that ensure that activities are guided by formal assessment of need rather then assumptions Actions –Complete assessment within 2weeks –Where possible and appropriate increase number of visits during this period to establish relationship –At second review (6weeks after initial assessment) include questions about position prior to joining –This should be captured on the data base

Recommendations 5.Greater emphasis on action plans as a means of focussing clients on their objectives Key findings –When prompted clients were aware of action plans but they are not currently a tool that clients and FSWs use to guide activities and set goals for clients between visits Actions –FSWs should ensure that clients keeps a copy of action plan –Action plan should be referred to on each visit to discuss progress –Action plan should be presented to client as a working document

Recommendations 6.Greater emphasis on encouraging and supporting clients to engage in locally available services Key findings –FSWs are identifying local activities for clients and often attend with them at first –Clients often do not continue with the activities after their first visit –For sustainable outcomes is it important to develop and maintain networks of support Actions –Where clients do not enjoy the activity FSWs should continue to explore alternatives until something suitable is found –Where issue is confidence, workers should continue to attend until the client has developed the confidence to go alone and also undertake other activities

Recommendations 7.Review and maintain ongoing continuing professional development of FSWs Key findings –Ongoing training and development is a strength of the programme –Areas to consider for ongoing training include (Child Protection, Baby Massage, Drugs and Alcohol, Counselling and delivery of challenging health promotion messages Actions –Programme Manager and Implementation Group to continue to review training needs and invest in workers

Recommendations 8.Monitor outcomes data every two months Key findings –Programme impacting positively on clients health and parenting behaviours –More success against some outcomes than others but absence of data at present Actions –Data should be reviewed at team meetings every two months, challenging outcomes can be discussed and actions agreed to improve achievement on these

Recommendations 9.Explore options for future sustainability Key findings –Emphasis on early intervention at the national level – First Steps can clearly contribute to this agenda Actions –Scope for First Steps to contribute to research evidence base –Dialogue around potential mainstreaming and the search for additional funding should begin now –This will be taken forward by the Implementation Group

Recommendations 10. Alter database to record number of actively engaging clients, and ensure that FSWs have sufficient referrals to be working with 15 actively engaged clients at all times Key findings –While almost all workers operating at of slightly about the agreed maximum (15 clients) a number of these are not actively engaging Actions –Programme should aim for caseload of 15 actively engaging clients –Database to be updated to allow programme manager to review number of actively engaging clients –Definition of ‘actively engaging’ clients to be agreed between programme manager and FSWs –Work with PHNs/ Midwifery teams to maintain sufficient referrals

Recommendations 11. Consider revising the current outcome measures to capture the impact of advocacy work carried out by FSWs Key findings –Practical advocacy support is valued by clients –Support with these issues reduces stress and other barriers to engagement in healthy lifestyles –These benefits are not captured at the moment Actions –Implementation Group to review outcomes