International Atomic Energy Agency Implementation of a Risk-Informed Approach into the Legislative and Regulatory Framework SNRCU Annual Topical Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Component Design Basis Inspection (CDBI) Graydon Strong 6/17/14.
Advertisements

UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
RISK INFORMED APPROACHES FOR PLANT LIFE MANAGEMENT: REGULATORY AND INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES Björn Wahlström.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
TRAINING AND DRILLS. Training and Drills Ensure A comprehensive, coordinated, and documented program as an integral part of the emergency management program.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Regulatory Approach to the Lifetime Management of the Nuclear Power Plants in Korea June 30, 2004 Choi, Kyung Woo Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety International.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK & REGULATORY SYSTEM f or introduction of NPP into Vietnam Le Chi Dung (VARANS, Vietnam) Vienna, December 2008.
Module 1.11 Management System Requirements Phil Metcalf Regional Training Course on Drafting Regulations on Waste Management and Public Exposure Including.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
1 Human Performance in Reactor Safety George E. Apostolakis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presented at the Quality Colloquium,
ENSI Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate ENSI ENSI Management System IAEA Regulatory Cooperation Forum, 18 September 2015 Dr. Hans Wanner, Director.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Operation Vienna, 26 November -7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
LESSONS LEARNED IN DEVELOPMENT OF SAFETY CULTURE FOR REGULATORY BODIES
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 EU Requirements Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
Presented by Dr. Kristóf Horváth Deputy Director General Hungarian Atomic Energy Authority Based on the Guideline developed by the WG on Computer Protection.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Advanced Workshop School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety RER/9/096.
Technical Meeting on Milestones for nuclear power infrastructure development Radiation Protection Khammar Mrabit Head, Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport.
Staffing and training. Objectives To understand approaches to the development of strategies and policies for staffing of a Regulatory Authority including.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Summary of Session 3 Post-Fukushima Operational Safety Improvements 1 Fred Dermarkar IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna International.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA): A Forum for sharing experience Mr. Luis E. Echávarri Director General NEA/IAEA/WANO, Cologne, May 2006.
International Atomic Energy Agency Irina Sanda Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda Safety Assessment Section Division of.
International Atomic Energy Agency M. El-Shanawany IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany Department of Nuclear Safety &
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) IRRS Missions : Analysis from a Radiation Safety.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program Workshop Information.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Overview of Risk Informed Inspection Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City,
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM/WS TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Practical examples of RIDM application.
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Benefits and limitations of RIDM by Géza.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Radioactive waste repositories
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda
IAEA Technical Support & Capacity Building Programme M. El-Shanawany
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
Presentation transcript:

International Atomic Energy Agency Implementation of a Risk-Informed Approach into the Legislative and Regulatory Framework SNRCU Annual Topical Meeting Kiev, Ukraine December 2008 John F. Preston, IAEA Implementation of a Risk-Informed Approach into the Legislative and Regulatory Framework SNRCU Annual Topical Meeting Kiev, Ukraine December 2008 John F. Preston, IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency Risk-Informed Decision Making (RIDM) - A Way of Thinking  We have a need – a decision is required, a judgement to be made  We apply a process – we consider, weigh, integrate complex inputs & insights  Deterministic Safety Assessment  Probabilistic Safety Assessment  Operational Experience  Compensating or Mitigating Measures  Other Pertinent Considerations  We consider each input & its context with each other & with whole  We assess Δs or Conformance to Guidance  We make a judgement based on: Safe, Sound, Optimum Decisions  We record the decision and process so that if further information becomes available – we can re-assess the validity of the judgement. (i.e. it is a fundamentally dynamic process sensitive to feedback)

International Atomic Energy Agency

Benefits of Risk-Informed Decision Making  Improved Safety:  Risk insights have revealed and led to the correction of installation vulnerabilities. Correction (provisions for prevention or mitigation) has been through installation changes; improved programs, processes, and procedures; and enhanced awareness, operations, maintenance, and other activities.  Increased Reliability:  Risk insights provide guidance to adjust surveillance and inspection scope and frequency. This balance increases overall system and component availability while adequately verifying operability.  Increased Operational Flexibility:  Having risk insights and understanding the change of risk with changing installation configuration can allow a more balanced and dynamic application of the licensed safe operating envelope; e.g., technical specifications.  Reduced Radiological Exposure:  Focusing maintenance on more risk-significant areas reduces unnecessary activities in high radiation areas. Applications such as risk-informed in-service inspection have provided significant radiological exposure reductions.  Increased installation performance and cost effectiveness of operations:  A comprehensive and balanced understanding of an installation’s risk spectrum allows limited resources to be applied to the more risk-significant aspects while conserving resources applied to less risk-significant aspects.

International Atomic Energy Agency How to achieve the benefits of RIDM  To gain the benefits that RIDM can provide, changes are required at the legislative and regulatory level as well as at the plant operational level  At the legislative and regulatory level, a legal basis for RIDM must be provided which includes safety goals, guidance and appropriate regulation  Change should be gradual  The ‘good news’ is that in many cases the existing legislative and regulatory procedures are already sufficient to allow RIDM – and if change is needed, often these can be very small (e.g. ‘should’ to ‘shall’)

International Atomic Energy Agency Implementation Infrastructure  Legal Basis  Policy  Safety Goals  Regulation  RIDM Upper Tier Guidance  Programs & Procedures  DSA, PSA, Monitors  Scope, Quality, Control, Maintenance  Support: Data, Insights, References, Other Information  Reporting & Communication  Trending, Feedback, Adjustment  Training & Qualification  Applications  With all these the IAEA can assist – a TECDOC is in preparation

International Atomic Energy Agency RIDM TECDOC RIDM Perspective, Principles, Limitations, Cautions RIDM Programme Structure Tool Control & Maintenance: DSA PSA Monitors Hardware Infrastructure: Legislation Safety Goals Regulatory Framework Guidance Licensing Interfaces Programmes Procedures Communication Reporting Applications: Procedures Decision Guidance Support: Data References Insights Staff Assessment: RIDM-IR Organizational Culture Development: Training Workshops Harmonization Groups

International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Assistance  RIDM TECDOC  RIDM Implementation Program & Infrastructure  Centre for Advanced Safety Assessment Tools (CASAT)  Data, Insights, References, & Other Information  RIDM International Review (RIDM-IR)  Capacity Development  Pilot Studies, Workshops, Fellowships, etc

Дякую - Спасибо

International Atomic Energy Agency

Pilots  Hungary  HAEA & Paks NPP  Armenia  Other Expressed Interest Note: Parallel WWER Regulators Forum Activities Support Pilot States

International Atomic Energy Agency RIDM Development  NPP Common Design Harmonization Groups  Experience Indicates Leaders Assess & Resolve Spectrum of Common Issues  Examples of Such Groups  PWR Owners Group  PWR Owners Group, PSA Sub-Committee Source: Significant RIDM Progress in U.S.  WWER Regulators Forum  WWER Regulators Forum PSA Working Group Potential Source: Significant RIDM Progress Internationally  Superb Forum for Both Regulators & Operators

International Atomic Energy Agency The Regulatory Benefits of RIDM  RIDM can help enhance:  Regulation Development  Licensing  Inspection Planning  Significance Determination  Events Assessment  Emerging Issues

International Atomic Energy Agency Education Needed  Culture Change  Gradual  Needs Progressive Cultivation  Benefits of RIDM & PSA  Recognized in Many Arenas  Other Arenas Starting to Recognize  Other Arenas Appear to Need Assistance

International Atomic Energy Agency How to achieve the benefits of RIDM (con’t)  The regulators must check that at the legislative and regulatory level that:  The specified safety goals encompass a RIDM approach?  The safety goals are quantitative?  That risk is factored into the licensing for plants in the member state?  Does the set of legal requirements establish the means to perform activities or the goals to be achieved?  The safety goals are reflected in RIDM related applications?  The regulators must specify and/or check the RIDM processes to ensure they have confidence in the conclusions  With all these the IAEA can assist – a TECDOC is in preparation

International Atomic Energy Agency  The international nuclear community (designers, suppliers, constructors, licensees, operators, support organizations, and regulators) increasingly recognizes and emphasizes that probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) and other risk evaluations provide extremely valuable complementary insight, perspective, comprehension, and balance to deterministic safety assessment of nuclear installations. Accordingly, there is an immediate need to establish international standards for RIDM.

International Atomic Energy Agency Applications  Configuration Management  Configuration Risk Analyzer (CRA)  Technical Specifications  Maintenance & Outage Planning, Assessment, & Management  Regulatory  Regulation Development  Licensing  Inspection Planning  Significance Determination  Events Assessment  Emerging Issues  NPPs  Plant Vulnerabilities  Design & Design Review  Plant Improvement  Program Improvement  In-Service Inspection  In-Service Testing  Quality Assurance  Special Treatment  Security  Emergency Response  Training  Non-NPP  Emerging Applications

International Atomic Energy Agency How to achieve the benefits of RIDM (con’t)  The regulators must specify and/or check the RIDM processes to ensure they have confidence in the conclusions:  As with any decision making, RIDM is not an exact science; it requires thoughtful and balanced consideration of a spectrum of inputs  Mathematical models, deterministic and probabilistic, can assess only what is modeled. Such models cannot address out of scope phenomena  There are uncertainties; such uncertainties relate to phenomenological understanding, model completeness, data, assumptions, boundary conditions, equipment performance, and human performance.

International Atomic Energy Agency PSA Working Group Intended Direction  Support RIDM Implementation in WWERs  Assimilate, Coordinate, Disseminate:  Data  Insights  References  Related Information & Lessons Learned  Establish & Support Harmonization  Organizational Culture  Fundamental RIDM Principles  Terms & Definitions  Data Format  Establish & Support Fluent Communication