Oakland 2010 Program Committee Meeting. authentication electioneer dischargeable indecipherable inheritability inexactitude public relations sanction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Two Issues Concerning Research Conferences Dave Patterson October 2004.
Advertisements

Tips for Publishing Qualitative Research Sandra Mathison University of British Columbia Editor-in-Chief, New Directions for Evaluation.
LECTURE 15: MIDTERM REVIEW IMA 101 Basic Mathematics 7/29/ IMA101 Basic Mathematics.
Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.
Finding Fund$ for Oregon Students. Oregon Student Assistance Commission (OSAC) The state student financial aid agency  Oregon Opportunity Grant.
POETRY!!! Students : YES! THANK YOU MRS.SMITH!!!!
Group Music Integration Units Final Planning. Group Music Integration Units C.M. – Individual Behavioral Plan RD & MD (key of D) Guitar (A & D) p. 156.
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
Your second annual progress review FMS postgraduate training workshop Tuesday 17 March 2015 Professor Dianne Ford Associate Dean for Taught Postgraduate.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
Class 1 Please pick up the handouts on the front table and begin reading the syllabus.
E TENDERING MASTERCLASS ANN MCNICHOLL TENDERING MASTERCLASS ANN MCNICHOLL COMMISSIONING MASTER CLASS – LEWISHAM Date 24 th September Presenter Ann McNicholl.
St. Mary’s Catholic School Science Fair Student Kickoff – 7 th and 8 th grade.
National Honor Society August 21, 2014 Welcome! All members sit in the front section of the auditorium. Next meeting will be on September 24, 2013.
Technical Program Committee selection Committee strategy Paper submission Paper assignment Paper reviewing Committee meeting Proceedings Conference Post.
Everything You Need to Know About the Write-On Competition.
The Communications Learning Center (The CLC)  Is located in Building 5 room 113  Offers the following courses: English 93/Independent Study Skills English.
Interview Skills Discussion What subconscious signals am I sending?
CloudCom 2010 Program  Over 250 submissions from 41 countries  48 main conference papers (less than 25% acceptance rate)  23 work in progress papers.
“I” Statements. Purpose of Using “I” Statements “I” Statements Help You ________ Avoid putting someone else down Express your feelings honestly Take ownership.
MedEdPORTAL Reviewer Tutorial Contact MedEdPORTAL
Intensive Course in Research Writing Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University Summer 2011.
G M LIGO Scientific Collaboration1 LSC Publication and Presentations Procedures LSC P&P Committee »Laura Cadonati, Brian Lantz, Dave Reitze (chair),
Request for Proposals: Workforce Solutions System
1 Cutover Market Call December 01, :30 AM.
How to Satisfy Reviewer B and Other Thoughts on the Publication Process: Reviewers’ Perspectives Don Roy Past Editor, Marketing Management Journal.
A Day of technology Improving upon your technology skills Giving every child the opportunity to learn in a robust digital environment everyday. making.
Welcome to the PC Meeting. Introductions Meeting Room Logistics Restrooms Breaks Lunch Dinner Cars? Spouses? Any special meal requirements?
Math – Monday – 10/27/14 Today:  Warm-up: Triangles on weekly outline  Correct 4.2 Worksheet  Lesson 4.3 Graphing Linear Non-proportional Relationships.
Let’s Talk …. Communication Skills. The Plan… Define bullying Discuss our experiences Participate in small and large group activities Use technology to.
Day 2 –Procedures Do now 1.Turn your introduction in to the TA. 2.Get out a new sheet of paper for the procedures. IN YOUR GROUPS (QUIET TALKING)
Welcome to Biology I (Mr. Rodriguez room S229) Please begin the day by copying and answering the “IN” question … IN: Tell me: a. What school you attended.
CTE Revitalization - Using Secure File Transfer and Last Minute Questions During this webinar… Please mute any microphones or phones A copy of the RFP.
Ongoing Submitted at least two days prior to day of lesson Uploaded to Live Text by last day of semester By last day of practicum.
ICSE 2016 Reviewing Process Laurie and Willem. Welcome Thanks for serving! 28 Program Board members – In charge of +-22 papers – Full review for +-6 of.
Writing For Researchers 2006 NSF Minority Faculty Development Workshop Jul 30-Aug 2 Malcolm J. Andrews National Security Fellow, LANL Professor Mechanical.
Using a 3D visual aid effectively during the demonstration speech LEARNING TARGET: I can effectively use visual aids during my demonstration speech. Tips.
AEL Contact Meeting October 28, 2015 October 29, 2015.
Choose a journal for these papers  Get together with your team.  Together, read the three abstracts.  Read the three journal descriptions.  Based on.
Scientific Peer Review Yixin Chen, Associate Professor Computer & Information Science University of Mississippi April 9, 2013.
Editorial decision making and common reasons for rejection Shirin Heidari.
292 Debriefing Please be sure to sign in. Blue Docs Use a #2 pencil.
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
HOPE YOU’RE READY TO EDIT! “The simpler you say it, the more eloquent it is.” ~ August Wilson 3/10/14 Please take out your rough draft with word count.
Lists and Sorting Algorithms Exploring Computer Science – Lesson 2-7.
How to Develop a Manuscript: More Aspects Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Professor, Texas A&M University Knowledge Community Editor, AuthorAID.
Foundations of Research-Based Reading EPI Instructor Shannon Ayrish or
CM202 Class Hints. Use a heading on all your papers. No cover (title) page. Following instructions counts on your grade. The heading should include: Name,
October 17, What is the primary purpose(s) and responsibility of our committee?
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Registration Market Call Nov 21, 2008.
Student Performance Evaluations Program Coordinator Instructions.
Chapter 9 and 10 Questions to Consider. Activity Today we are going to look at questions relating to love and marriage. As a group you will discuss them.
Your second annual progress review FMS postgraduate training workshop Monday 7 th March 2016 Alison Tyson-Capper Faculty Postgraduate Tutor Associate Dean.
IEEE TCRTS Survey for Conference Planning
DO NOW: Go to my section of the team web page, and open up the document titled “Sample Essay with MLA Formatting, Signal Phrases, and Parentheticals.
Publishing a paper.
As you enter, please answer each question on a separate note card:
PLDI 2018 Program-Chair Report Dan Grossman
Contents of Research Final Draft Folder
Review & maintenance of IAEG Glossary
Research and Life in Sakurai Lab.
No Warm-Up 5/16/17 Happy Tuesday!  We have 8 school days left this year! (and 1 more Tuesday after today!) You can choose your seat today; if you move.
Reviews and the Review Process
Publishing Addiction Science Dissemination Strategy
No Warm-Up 5/15/17 Happy Monday!  We have 9 school days left this year! (and 1 more Monday after today!) You can choose your seat today; if you move.
No Warm-Up 5/19/17 Happy Friday!  We have 5 school days left this year! You can choose your seat today; if you move the seats around, please put them.
SUBSTANTIVE REVIEW OF SCHOLARSHIP SUBMITTED TO RBS : A PRIMER
No Warm-Up 5/18/17 Happy Thursday!  We have 6 school days left this year! (and 1 more Thursday after today!) You can choose your seat today; if you.
Chapter 18: Submitting a paper
L&S analysts Roundtable
Presentation transcript:

Oakland 2010 Program Committee Meeting

authentication electioneer dischargeable indecipherable inheritability inexactitude public relations sanction vomit-grass belittle bid

Avail yourself of these means to communicate to us at seasonable intervals a copy of your journal, notes & observations of every kind, putting into cipher whatever might do injury if betrayed. Jefferson’s instructions to Captain Lewis

Review Process Two Reviews One more review One-two more reviews SoK

Reviewing Lowlights/Highlights Out of research+SoK submissions: Number of papers with no “weak reject” (3) or worse reviews: Number of papers with no “reject” (2) or worse reviews: Total number of reviews with overall merit 6: 0 For every submitted paper, there is at least one PC member who thinks that paper should be rejected! % improvement from last year!

Plan for Meeting Today: (now-~5:30) – Discuss each “discuss” paper – Classify as: accept, reject, revisit – Research papers first, SoK papers Tomorrow: (8:30-1pm) – Make final decisions on all papers Target: Accept ~30 research papers, 2-5 SoK papers 2009: : 28 To see the discussion order: Search: order:order

Discussion Lead Summarize neutrally what the paper is about Summarize the non- attending reviews Present your own views Update your review to reflect any important issues that come up in discussion

Reminders No decision is final until meeting closes People in the room may have conflicts with other papers: avoid making unnecessary comparisons Please don’t leak information that compromises reviewer anonymity

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.