Ministry for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Sea in charge of Green Technologies and Climate Negotiations www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Available Techniques (BAT)
Advertisements

© European Communities, 2007 Purpose The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (European IPPC Bureau) of the JRC/IPTS was set up.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES of STANDARD MINIMUM EMISSION STANDARD (sometimes known as LIMIT VALUES) UNIFORM EMISSION STANDARD.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU
IPPC and Industry By Dr. Ken Macken Dublin Regional Licensing Manager.
Waste minimization, water management and energy efficiency techniques in the Soft Drinks Industry PROJECT COORDINATOR: Mr. Patrick J. Tanck, M.Sc, Foundation.
Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management: IPPC Neil Emmott Environment Directorate-General 7 April 2006.
Insert Filepath here International Symposium on Environmental Issues Industrial Pollution Control and Risk Management September 28 & Jack O’Keeffe.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
Practical use of newly developed BAT conclusions Valts Vilnītis.
The IPPC Recast. New environmental requirements for explosives production sites.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture How to take into account economy and local conditions in implementation of BAT?
BAT as a main tool for minimisation of the negative impact of industrial activities Aivi Sissa Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
SATI TEXTILE GROUP IPPC IMPLEMENTATION 23 March 2012.
The Sevilla process for supporting the implementation of the IPPC Directive Michael Parth Tallinn – Estonia 27 – 28 March 2008.
Egyptian and Italian Cooperation Programme on Environment Best Available Techniques (BAT) Mr. Giorgio Grimaldi Mr. Giorgio de Benedetti 1 Workshop: “Best.
Workshop, 12/3/2004 Banska Bystrica – SLOVAC REPUBLIC “INTEGRATED LICENCE PROCEDURE (Greek case)” Katerina Iakovidou-Anastasiadou Hellenic Ministry for.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
BULGARIAN APPROACH TO THE BAT IN THE IPPC PERMITTING BOYKO MALINOV MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER BULGARIA.
Economic and Cross Media aspects Bo Jansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
IPPC Directive state of play and future developements
Review of practice of ELVs and other conditions setting in EU member states for non-Annex I installations Valts Vilnītis.
The IPPC Directive and its implementation Alexandre Paquot European Commission Environment Directorate-General Phare Capacity.
Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection, ROMANIA 1 BERCEN 1 st Exchange program – November 2002 Croatia PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS IN COOPERATION.
The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU Gabriella Gerzsenyi & Menno Verheij European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions Unit 03.
The Process of Development of IPPC Legislation Robert Sarlamanov MA, IPPC Expert Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Bercen Exchange Programme,
1IndustrialEmissionsDirective. 2 The European Parliament is discussing the Industrial Emissions Directive as adopted by the Council for the second reading.
The European IPPC Bureau Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS) Seville, Spain Internet E.mail : Don.
IPPC vs Emissions Trading Lesley James Friends of the Earth (England, Wales & N.Ireland) and the European Environmental Bureau.
1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,
PERMIT ISSUANCE SYSTEM IN CROATIA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Authors: Jasna Paladin-Popović Iva Milić Štrkalj Renata Sinovčević Brijuni, 27 November /21/02Croatia.
3rd BERCEN Exchange Programme, Prague WASTE CONDITIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS Mrs. Marianne Lindström, Finnish Environmental Institute,
Assessment of options to streamline legislation on industrial emissions IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing 4 May 2007 Caspar Corden Entec UK Limited.
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
REVISION OF THE IPPC DIRECTIVE  DIRECTIVE ON INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
IED, BAT and Derogations Richard Wood URS Leeds 22 nd May 2013.
Sustainability and Facilities Management John Sullivan Energy & Sustainability Office Facilities & Services Division.
CROATIA Country Report IPPC Directive: implementation, problems, constraints, open questions,… Anita Pokrovac Patekar, B. Sc. Pharm. Ministry of Environmental.
Group EIA 1: Screening for Annex 2 Both:- case-by-case - thresholds < 10% goes to EIA All Countries have problems with “Salami Slicing” Little Information.
The current legal situation
VNPIVNPI 1 IPPC Practice Netherlands Refineries Commission Workshop on IPPC Brussels, July 4, 2008 VNPI Mr. Pieter Thomassen and Mr. Frans Driessen.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
1 Kosova/o ECENA 3 rd Plenary meeting September 18-19, 2008 Istanbul, Turkey.
1 Review of the IPPC Directive and related legislation Second Meeting Of Working Group E On Priority Substances 17 October 2007 Filip FRANCOIS – DG ENV.
24 Sept. 2009, Sibiu1 Towards effective Industrial Emission Prevention & Reduction: -Views of NGO on state of play IED- (with focus on BAT and LCP) Christian.
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
IPPC Permit Procedure in the UK Kiev, 26 January 2011 Alex Radway Senior Advisor Environment Agency for England & Wales, United Kingdom.
Integrated and Planned Enforcement of Environmental Law Phare Twinning Project CZ03/IB/EN/01 1 The IPPC Directive Introduction to the philosophy Rob Kramers.
IPPC A general overview Nigel Barraclough Policy Adviser Industrial Pollution Control Branch Air and Environment Quality Division. Taiwanese Environmental.
Workshop on Introducing integrated pollution control system – Kiev, 25 – 26 January, European IPPC Bureau Best Available Techniques (BAT) in the.
Introduction to the philosophy
BMRA Legislative Policy Group – Shredder Sub Group
MONITORING Mr. Jan Prášek IPPC Agency.
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
First position of the Belgian industry about the
INTEGRATED PERMITTING IPPC DIRECTIVE: BEST PRACTICE
Aleksandra Antonowicz Green Federation GAJA/CCB
General comments (1) Price level needs to be specified (recommended: € 2000). Operation and maintenance costs (O+M) should be splitted into fixed (depending.
IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing
Territorial impact assessment
METHODS FOR ANALYZING AND SUPPORTING A SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Data specifications for IED Annex II Module 4
Industrial Emissions Directive Targeted stakeholder survey
WFD CIS Working Group Meeting Brussels, 4/4/2019
Presentation transcript:

Ministry for Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and Sea in charge of Green Technologies and Climate Negotiations Choice of BAT according to the IPPC directive Guy MOTTARD Directorate General for Risk Prevention

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Content of the presentation Which requirements ? Analysis methodology Example Conclusion 2

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Reminder : IPPC BAT requirements To define the BAT applicable to one plant, the following IPPC requirements have to be taken into account Availability of the techniques  techniques developed on a scale which allows implementation in the relevant industrial sector, under economically and technically viable conditions, taking into consideration the costs and advantages, whether or not the techniques are used or produced inside the Member State in question, as long as they are reasonably accessible to the operator Determination of the ELV  The emission limit values and the equivalent parameters and technical measures … shall be based on the best available techniques, without prescribing the use of any techniques or specific technology, but taking into account the technical characteristics of the installation concerned, its geographical location and the local environmental conditions In determining the best available techniques, special consideration should be given to the items listed in Annex IV 3

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 How to use the BREF ? The BREF documents do not set any legal requirement They are the main reference to implement the IPPC requirement concerning BAT application Others references can be used, but it is necessary to demonstrate that the techniques are “BAT” (on the basis of the considerations of annex IV) A BREF is not exhaustive (e.g. not taking into account all the type of production within a sector) A BREF cannot take into account the local environmental conditions The competent authority have to consider others issues when setting the permit conditions  the technical characteristics of the installation,  its geographical location  the local environmental conditions 4

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 What information in a BREF ? Precise description of the techniques For each best available techniques, additional information  achieved environmental benefits  cross-media effect  operational data  driving force for the implementation  example plants For each technique (if appropriate) the associated emission levels under the normal operating conditions (excluding start-up, shut down, …) 5

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 BAT conclusions 6

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Which requirements ? Analysis methodology Example Conclusion 7

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Analysis methodology ( 1/3 ) The following considerations have to be taken into account to chose the BAT to be applied Environmental impact of the installation in order to proportionate the actions to be taken Technical characteristics of the installation Geographical location Local environmental conditions 8

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Analysis methodology ( 2/3 ) Environmental impact of the installation in order to proportionate the actions to be taken  What is the contribution of the installation for each pollutant to the “non-quality” of the local environment ?  Costs/ benefits analysis Technical characteristics of the installation  Is the activity or type of production process covered by a BREF ?  If yes, does the BREF address all the potential environmental effects of the activity ?  Are the technical characteristics of the installation described in the BREF  If not, is there others reference document ? 9

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Analysis methodology ( 3/3 ) Geographical location  Climate (temperature, …)  Availability of resources (water, energy, …)  Space needed  … Local environmental conditions  High/low sensitivity of the environment to the pollution emitted by the activity  Are there environmental quality standards ?  Are they met ?  Biodiversity  … All the answers to these questions should be given in the permit application 10

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Which requirements ? Analysis methodology Example Conclusion 11

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Example New installation : incineration plant in urban area Main pollutant to be considered : NOx The BREF provide 2 different BATs 12

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 BAT 1 Option 1 : Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR)  Expected NOx emission : 180 mg/Nm 3 13

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 BAT 2 Option 2 : Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)  Expected NOx emission : 80 mg/Nm 3 14

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April SCRSNCR Achieved env. benefits Reduction efficiency BATAEL NH 3 > 80 % mg/Nm 3 (daily) < 10 mg/Nm 3 (daily) % mg/Nm 3 (daily) 5-30 mg/Nm 3 (daily) Economics Capital costs Operating costs Significantly higher higher Reference costs Cross-media effects Energy requirement Reagent consumption Residue type Residue amount Water consumption Effluent production kWh/t (thermal) 3 kg/t Spent catalyst when changed Negligible Not significant None kWh/t (thermal) 8,5 kg/t None Not significant None BREF information ( 1/2 )

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April SCRSNCR Operational data Complexity Flexibility High (additional process unit required) High (ability to operate under various input conditions) Medium Medium (temperature critical) Applicability Waste type Inter-process compatibility Plant size range New/existing Key location factor Any type Requires pre-dusting and SO 2 /SO 3 removal Any size but usually medium- large for economic reasons Often applicable to existing plants Location with high NOx sensitivity Any type Higher dose rates (high reduction efficiency) without ammonia slip needs downstream wet scrubbing Any size May be problematic for existing plants None BREF information ( 2/2 )

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April Other issues to consider Technical characteristics  the technical characteristics of the plant are taken into account in the BREF document  no reason to use another reference to define BAT Geographical location No particular specificity in this example which can justify the use of flexibility  the BAT described in the BREF are applicable Environmental local conditions  is the NOx environmental quality standard achieved ?  is there a particular high NOx sensitivity ?  is this plant among the largest NOx emitters of the area ?

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Which requirements ? Analysis methodology Example Conclusion 18

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April Conclusion The BREF does not provide any “one-size-fit-all” solution IPPC provides flexibility to define the conditions applicable to a particular plant  the quality of the content of the permit is important : it should provide all the necessary information to the competent authority to make its decision Again (from the French experience) : this approach requires different skills for the competent authority BAT-based permit is a very efficient regulatory tool

TAIEX Workshop – Practical aspects of implementation of the permitting process – April 2010 Thank you for your attention … 20