Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Writing an IRA/NCATE SPA Report. IRA Requirements Programs must have: –Minimum of 24 credit hours of reading/literacy courses aligned with IRA Standards.
Pennsylvania BANNER Users Group 2006 NCATE Assessments John Tabor University of Scranton.
What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Angie Gant, Ed.D. Truett-McConnell College 1.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
Office of Professional Preparation and Licensure (OPPL) Annual Report.
The Program Review Process: NCATE and the State of Indiana Richard Frisbie and T. J. Oakes March 8, 2007 (source:NCATE, February 2007)
Certification, Teacher Education, and Professional Development Marcia Harmon Rosenbusch National K-12 Foreign Language Resource Center Iowa State University.
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment April 19, 2008.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Teacher Preparation Family.
Welcome to Teacher Education at ECU. Teacher Education Undergraduate programs lead to initial license in NC in 21 different teaching areas Director of.
NCATE Standards 1 & 2 January 2002 Donna M. Gollnick & Antoinette Mitchell.
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Tuesday, April 19, 2011 Van Houten South 9:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. 9:30 – 10:30Introduction, Overview and Timeline 10:30 – 12:00Sharing SPA data by program.
Study Session   The purpose of the Comprehensive Examination is for Graduate students to synthesize in writing the knowledge, skills, and competencies.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
University of Central Florida S.O.S.: Student Outcomes Solutions for Program Assessment Paula S. Krist, Ph.D. Director, OEAS December 5, 2005 CS-55.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
NCATE STANDARD I REVIEW Hyacinth E. Findlay Carol Dawson Gwendolyn V. King.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Oregon State Program Review Process February 10-12, 2010 Commission Meeting.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
The Role of the NCATE Coordinator Kate M. Steffens St. Cloud State University NCATE Institutional Orientation September, 2002.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Educator Preparation Family.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
New York Institute of Technology
NCATE Vocabulary Candidates--university/college students
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
NCATE Board of Examiners Visit Widener University.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
New State Licensure for Middle Grades 5-8: Master of Arts in Teaching in Middle Grades as Proposed by National Louis University AMLE Annual Meeting October.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
STANDARDS FOR THE PREPARATION OF TEACHING LEARNING PROJECT 1 SARA HINE.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Copyright © 2012 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved
Deconstructing Standard 2c Laura Frizzell Coastal Plains RESA 1.
NCATE Unit Standards…Revised Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
Candidate Learning Outcomes. REPORTING AGENCIES STATE BOARD FOR EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION (SBEC) NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF TEACHER EDUCTION.
Performance-Based Accreditation
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Partnership for Practice
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
What It Is and How It Works
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010
Writing the Institutional Report
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
Follow-Up Surveys of Graduates and Employers Preparation in the Content Area
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation

Advanced Level Programs NCATE accreditation covers all programs that prepare professionals to work in P-12 settings. The only exceptions are programs in nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and social work.

Advanced Level Programs What is the definition of advanced level programs? –Programs at the post-baccalaureate levels for (1) the continuing education of teachers who have previously completed initial preparation or (2) the preparation of other professional school personnel…including master’s, specialists, and doctoral degree programs, as well as non-degree licensure programs.

Advanced Level Programs Examples of advanced level programs include programs for the continuing education of teachers, including: –Curriculum and instruction specialists –MAT’s, MEd.’s Examples of advanced level programs also include programs for the preparation of: –Superintendents –School counselors –School psychologists –Reading specialists –Educational technology specialists

Advanced Level Programs Are advanced level programs included in the NCATE unit review? In the NCATE program review process? –Yes, they are included in the NCATE Unit Review –Yes, they are included in the NCATE Program Review if NCATE has standards for those program State protocols will say if program review is mandatory –If the programs are accredited by another agency, then they need only be included in the unit review for Standards 1 and 6. (See NCATE policy on Relationships with other Nationally Recognized Accrediting Bodies)

Advanced Level Programs Are advanced level programs for educators and non-educators included in the NCATE review? –The answer depends on for whom the program was developed and whether the majority of program completers go to work in the P-12 school setting. –When there are questions, contact the NCATE office

Advanced Level Programs How are advanced level programs incorporated into the unit review? –In Standard 1, specific elements are labeled “Other Professional School Personnel” Content knowledge for other professional school personnel Prof. knowledge and skills for other professional school personnel Student learning for other professional school personnel –In Standard 1, some elements are for both initial and advanced Dispositions for all candidates

The elements in Standard 1 for advanced level programs are broad (i.e., content knowledge); individual advanced level programs can address these by using program standards If there are professional/program standards for a given program, then the program should address those standards. See NCATE website under Program Review for list of program standards Programs for the continuing education of teachers are encouraged to use the NBPTS propositions If there are no program standards, the unit must develop them.

Advanced Level Programs –In Standard 2, advanced level programs should be a part of the unit assessment system. –Like initial level programs, advanced level programs should have: links to the conceptual framework (candidate proficiencies) Transition points Identified assessment measures Proof that assessment measures are accurate, consistent, fair, etc. Studies of graduates (often means surveys of graduates and employers) A system for the collecting, summarizing, and analyzing data Regular use of the data collected and examples

Advanced Level Programs Standard 3 –All programs are expected to have field experiences –Most advanced level programs are expected to have a clinical component Only advanced level programs for the continuing education of teachers are not expected to have a clinical component. Usually they have a major project that takes place in the candidate’s classroom Most field experiences in programs for the continuing education of teachers occur in the teacher’s own classroom Programs for the continuing education of teachers are expected to expose candidates to diverse school settings

Advanced Level Programs Standard 4 –Advanced level programs should assess the unit’s proficiencies related to diversity and should be able to identify where in their curricula they are addressed. If the programs have additional or slightly different proficiencies, this should be clearly stated in the conceptual framework. –All of the elements on diverse candidates, faculty, and P-12 students apply to advanced level programs.

Advanced Level Programs Standard 5 and Standard 6 –Advanced level programs should meet these standards just as initial level programs do.

Advanced Level Programs How do units work to get advanced level programs into the process? –Help faculty understand accreditation as a means of accountability and improvement –Help faculty clearly understand what is and what is not being asked of them. –Help faculty understand the standards and where they fit into the standards. –Seek input from top administrators.