New York State Report Cards Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability April 2014.
Advertisements

Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
1 st Place Post-Secondary Winner. 2 nd Place Post-Secondary Winner.
Evaluation Learning Community New York’s Team: Robert Purga, ACCES Adult Education Venu Thelakkat, ASISTS James Matt, RAEN Marisa Boomhower, Accountability.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Central Southern Tier RAEN July 17,  Goal Setting Targets are removed from Report Card and Program Evaluation Reports 10 points.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 12/13 Presented by: Rosemary Matt.
New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 10/11 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
LACES Cohorts. Cohort #1: Enter Employment The most important thing to remember regarding employment cohorts for 12/13 is that most of the employment.
New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 08/09 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NRS Liaison for NYS.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
NRS Changes & Implications Central Southern Tier RAEN December 14, 2012.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
December 2010 Performance Reporting and Analysis, Manager One-Stop and Program Support Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation 107 East Madison Street.
Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.
Secondary WOLT Grading Committee Recommendations to Support District Benchmarking Initiative.
NRS and MABLE Changes July 1, new data fields for students Highest Credential Achieved Education Location – U.S. or non U.S. Diploma at Entry?
Comparing Statistical Data MeanMedianMode The average of a set of scores or data. The middle score or number when they are in ascending order. The score.
Technical Assistance Workshop Office of Adult Education January 16,
Table 5 and Follow-up Collecting and Reporting Follow-up Data Or What’s Behind Table 5? American Institutes for Research February 2005.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards Fiscal Year 09/10 Presented by: Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs: The Methodology Report E. L. Fink & S. Chai University of Maryland.
Understanding Newspaper League Tables Nov 2015 Katarina Thomson Planning and Statistics.
 Life Expectancy is 180 th in the World.  Literacy Rate is 4 th in Africa.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
New York State’s Report Card Summary.  Evaluated in TWO Methods NYS Benchmarks Quartile Ranked Educational Gain = 46% Post Test Rate = 65% Follow Up.
PALS 1-3 What Type of Test is It? PALS is a Screening Assessment Pre & Post Academic Year Given by Classroom Teacher Given to all Students Items.
Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:
Understanding the NRS Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability.
Understanding the National Reporting System Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability NRS.
Academic Year – Dawson Springs Independent.
Rosemary Matt Director of Accountability for Adult Education.
Common Performance Measures for Employment and Training Programs SC Workforce Development Partnership Conference October 26-29, 2003 Brad Sickles
NYS by the Numbers - The 2016 Statistical Picture.
TOPSpro Special Topics V: Meeting Federal Accountability Requirements.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Dr. Kristen Corbell Director of Program Quality and Accountability
DJJ Accountability Rating System
Rosemary Matt NYS Accountability
Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score
New Orientations in Evaluation and Reporting
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome back Finger Lakes RAEN adult education FY
What is “Annual Determination?”
Important Changes New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards
Transcripts and GPA College 101 November 7, 2016.
New York State Report Cards
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
Adult Education Adult Literacy Job Training Employer Specific Training.
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
Texas State Accountability
Central Southern Tier RAEN
NRS Updates and Changes
Overview of Ohio’s Career-Technical Planning District Report Card
Growth Last updated: 08/20/09.
Important Changes New York State Report Cards Program Report Cards
Comparing Statistical Data
ASISTS Program Manager’s Training
Spencer County Public Schools
Data Management for FY2017 Reporting
MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA ! ?.
Presentation transcript:

New York State Report Cards Rosemary Matt NYS Director of Accountability

Evaluated with TWO Methods NYS BenchmarksQuartile Ranked Educational Gain = 51% Post Test Rate = 70% Follow Up Outcomes = 69% Educational Gain (Weighted) Post Test Rate Follow Up Outcomes FY

NYS Benchmarks FY15/16

Quartile Ranks  Unacceptable  Missed one or more benchmark & in the 1 st quartile  Needs Improvement  Missed one or more benchmark & in the 2 nd, 3 rd, or 4 th quartile  Proficient  Has met all the benchmarks (any quartile)  Highly Proficient  Has met all the benchmarks & in quartile 4

NYS Benchmark Summary: Meeting NRS Criteria Check Funding Sources

NYS Benchmark Details: Benchmark uses Unweighted Gain

Weighted Academic Gain: Quartile Ranked

Post Test Rate Quartile Ranked Post Test Rate remains 70% in FY16 NYS average was 80%

Follow Up Outcomes: Raw numbers used to calculate Program Performance Percentage # students achieving goal # students exiting with goal = 88%

Follow Up Outcomes: Not used in the calculation

Follow Up Outcomes: Therefore, the remaining 3 outcomes will carry more weight into the 69% benchmark

Survey Response Rate:

Quartile Rank Summary:

Final Ranking:

Quartiles Quartile Quartile 2 1 – 1.99 Quartile 3 2 – 2.99 Quartile 4 3 – 4.00 Final Ranking:

Overall Performance: Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile

Total Score – Calculations for FY13/14  Maximum rating points to be earned:  Weighted Academic Gain 50  Follow-up Measures 20  Post Test Rate 20  Response Rate 10  Maximum Total100

Educational Gain remains 51% in FY15

Overall New York State Performance  Educational Gain – 58%  Post test percentage – 80%  Obtain employment – 85%  Retain Employment – 88%  Earn HSE/Secondary School diploma – 91%  Enter post secondary education/training – 95%

Report card statistics Benchmark statusNumber of agencies Did Not Meet NYS Benchmarks25 Met NYS Benchmarks129 Program ratingNumber of agencies Unacceptable16 Needs Improvement9 Proficient90 Highly Proficient39

Questions?