UACT and CVUSD Certificated Employee Development and Evaluation Procedures For The 2015-16 School Year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
New Mexico Public School Department Guidelines for Annual Teacher Performance Evaluation School Year PDP Revision Committee: Dr. Janaan Diemer,
Idaho Tiered Teacher Licensure May 13, Vision for Tiered Teacher Licensure Attract and retain great teachers in Idaho Identify struggling teachers.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Academy School District 20. Licensed staff of Academy School District 20 will engage in a differentiated, collaborative, and reflective evaluation process.
Peninsula School District
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
ADEPT Framework
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.
Collective Bargaining Retreat for Management Discussion of the Impact of Measuring Teacher and Leader Effectiveness on Collective Bargaining August 17,
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
The Jordan Performance Appraisal System (JPAS) is designed to help educators in their continuing efforts to provide high quality instruction to all students.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
O UR S CHOOLS E VALUATION P ROCESS Brad, Chad, Holly, Katie, Lily, and Pat.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Welcome Rep Council October 5, Goals for  Greater Level of Communication  School Board Relations  Board Contact Teams  Organizing.
Evaluation School Year Review. Evaluation Intent  Collaborative process to support professional growth  Conversations and reflection should.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Supervision and Evaluation: Investing in Excellence Fresno Unified Is a Performance-Based Organization Namita S. Brown, Partner Fagen Friedman & Fulfrost.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Faculty Evaluations: Tenured, Tenure-Track, and Associate
TOPS TRAINING.
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Introduction to myIMPACT-Adjuncts
Presentation transcript:

UACT and CVUSD Certificated Employee Development and Evaluation Procedures For The School Year

The purpose of an effective teacher /nurse development and evaluation system is to inform, instruct and improve teaching and learning; to provide educators with prompt/timely and meaningful feedback on areas of strength and where improvement is needed; and to ensure fair and evidence-based employment decisions. Timely professional development opportunities should be embedded throughout a member’s evaluation system to support their growth and advancement.

 What I have realized is what really affects behavior and performance is the conversation between administrator(s) and bargaining unit member(s) on an ongoing basis throughout the school year.  If administration is using the evaluation process as a ”gotcha” the evaluation process will never work in favor of site administration, teacher, nor students.

 Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning  Creating and Maintaining Effective Environment for Student Learning  Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning  Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students  Assessing Student Learning  Developing as a Professional Educator

 Importance of CSTPs:  Prompt reflection about student learning and teaching practice;  Formulate professional goals to improve teaching practice; and  Guide, monitor, and assess the progress of a teacher’s practice toward professional goals and professionally-accepted standards.

 Probationary bargaining unit members are to be observed no less than two times per year and have at least one evaluation. Year:12 At Least Two Observations – At Least One Evaluation

 Permanent bargaining unit members are to be observed no less than one time per year and have at least one evaluation based on the following schedule: Years: At Least One Observation – At Least One Evaluation Observations and Evaluations outside a permanent bargaining unit member’s evaluation cycle is at the discretion of the site administration.

 Temporary bargaining unit members are to be observed no less than two times per year and have at least one evaluation. Year:Every Year At Least Two Observations – At Least One Evaluation

 The Principal (or Immediate Supervisor in the case of the District Office) is responsible for informing the staff of the evaluation procedures during the first two weeks (first three weeks) of their evaluation year. Notification should be given through .  Check the box that it was received and the receipt that it was opened.  MOU to push back dates

 Between the third week of school and the seventh week (ninth week) of school, the administrator and bargaining unit members will meet for their Standards and Key Elements meeting to select the required number of Standards from the CSTPs that will be evaluated in the course of the evaluation process.

 For a bargaining unit member in probationary or temporary status, all standards and key elements will be selected for the focus of the evaluation.  The administrator and the bargaining unit members in permanent status shall select three (3) standards upon which the evaluation will be based.  i.One standard selected by the bargaining unit member  ii.One standard selected by the administrator  iii.One standard selected jointly by the bargaining unit member and the administrator  iv.Standard six – imbedded into Board Policy

Standard & Key Elements Instructional StrategiesEvaluation Tools Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element The Goals written to Standards and Key Elements have been discussed and agreed upon as of this date but may be modified per Article 9 of the Contract Evaluator Signature: Date: Employee Signature: Date: CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION STANDARDS AND KEY ELEMENTS CONFERENCE Employee: Permanent: Probationary: Evaluator: Conference Date: School Site:

Standard & Key Elements Instructional StrategiesEvaluation Tools Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element The Goals written to Standards and Key Elements have been discussed and agreed upon as of this date but may be modified per Article 9 of the Contract Evaluator Signature: Date: Employee Signature: Date: CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION STANDARDS AND KEY ELEMENTS CONFERENCE Employee: Permanent: Probationary: Evaluator: Conference Date: School Site:

 The Classroom Observation Form will be used for the purpose of recording classroom observations.  A minimum of one formal classroom observation is required for permanent bargaining unit members.  A minimum of two formal classroom observations are required for non-permanent bargaining unit members.  No limit on informal observations

APPENDIX D OBSERVATION FORM DETAILED INFORMATION IN RELATION TO OBSERVATION FORM. ACTIVITY (Method and Techniques) The lesson, lecture, demonstration, discussion, panel, student reports. EQUIPMENT USED (If Any) A.V., other aids (commercial or homemade), sufficient quantity. RESPONSE OF STUDENTS Attentiveness, interaction (verbal), appearance of understanding lesson, demonstration of skill, students exhibit what instructor expects of them. ORGANIZATION Opening and ending procedures, grouping, necessary material readily available, optimum use of time, lesson plans, organized and in sufficient detail to enable teacher to maintain continuity. APPEARANCE OF ROOM OR AREA (Within Control of Teacher) Neatness, organized, light, heat, bulletin boards, pleasant atmosphere, is room shared. FACTORS AFFECTING CLASS Number of students, composition of class, interruptions, weather, activity that day or previous and subsequent to, Special Education students.

 The evaluation shall focus on progress towards meeting the selected standards.  In preparing the final evaluation document, the administrator shall rely exclusively upon the following:  Data collected through actual formal and informal classroom observations/walk-throughs of the bargaining unit member’s performance.  The discussions in observation and evaluation conference(s).

 RATINGS:  D-Distinguished: Exceeds California Standards for the Teaching Profession  P-Proficient: Meets California Standards for the Teaching Profession  DE-Developing: Developing to meet California Standards for the Teaching Profession  U-Unsatisfactory: Does not meet California Standards for the Teaching Profession

 If the bargaining unit member receives an overall rating of “developing” in the written evaluation document, a Site-Level Development Plan document must be completed during the evaluation conference or a follow-up evaluation conference.  Define how this happens - majority of boxes checked as “developing” or “unsatisfactory”.

 At the time of the evaluation conference for a bargaining unit member who receives an overall “unsatisfactory” final evaluation, she/he must be informed in writing by the administrator that the bargaining unit member must participate in the Required Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) process the following school year.  Define

 CBA Article 34: The goal of a peer assistance program (voluntary) or a peer assistance and review (required) program is to help teachers develop practices to improve instruction and student performance.

 Review Collective Bargaining Agreement Language for Article 15: Employee Development and Evaluation Procedures

TimelineEvent Week: 1 – 2 / 1 – 3Notification to Teacher Week: 3 – 7 / 4 - 9Standards and Key Elements Meeting By March 1 st All unit members should have received at least one written report of a formal observation Week: 30Final Evaluation Meeting Must Be Held Week: 32Evaluation due to Personnel Services Please work with Personnel Office If There Are Any Possible Non-Reelects Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Last Day Of April A permanent teacher may request Voluntary PAR Last Day of AprilThe School Principal shall refer a permanent teacher with an unsatisfactory evaluation to PAR No Later than Last Day of MayThe CiPAR Governance Committee will issue a decision about PAR Participation For the following school year

Standard & Key Elements Instructional StrategiesEvaluation Tools Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element The Goals written to Standards and Key Elements have been discussed and agreed upon as of this date but may be modified per Article 9 of the Contract Evaluator Signature: Date: Employee Signature: Date: CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION STANDARDS AND KEY ELEMENTS CONFERENCE Employee: Permanent: Probationary: Evaluator: Conference Date: School Site:

Standard & Key Elements Instructional StrategiesEvaluation Tools Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element Standard Key Element The Goals written to Standards and Key Elements have been discussed and agreed upon as of this date but may be modified per Article 9 of the Contract Evaluator Signature: Date: Employee Signature: Date: CERTIFICATED PERSONNEL EVALUATION STANDARDS AND KEY ELEMENTS CONFERENCE Employee: Permanent: Probationary: Evaluator: Conference Date: School Site:

APPENDIX D OBSERVATION FORM DETAILED INFORMATION IN RELATION TO OBSERVATION FORM. ACTIVITY (Method and Techniques) The lesson, lecture, demonstration, discussion, panel, student reports. EQUIPMENT USED (If Any) A.V., other aids (commercial or homemade), sufficient quantity. RESPONSE OF STUDENTS Attentiveness, interaction (verbal), appearance of understanding lesson, demonstration of skill, students exhibit what instructor expects of them. ORGANIZATION Opening and ending procedures, grouping, necessary material readily available, optimum use of time, lesson plans, organized and in sufficient detail to enable teacher to maintain continuity. APPEARANCE OF ROOM OR AREA (Within Control of Teacher) Neatness, organized, light, heat, bulletin boards, pleasant atmosphere, is room shared. FACTORS AFFECTING CLASS Number of students, composition of class, interruptions, weather, activity that day or previous and subsequent to, Special Education students.

 Be professional and calm- if you’re not, that’s the only thing the teacher will remember.  Drop a note after the observation. Something short and positive.  Meet with the member ASAP after the evaluation. The anxiety is tough to handle.  Ask questions before making statements about what happened. The Socratic Method may get you more reflection than you think.