PROMs Pilot for Long-Term Conditions in Primary Care Ray Fitzpatrick Department of Public Health.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NHS R&D Jessica Bisset Acting Research Operations Manager UH Bristol.
Advertisements

How to write a study protocol Hanne-Merete Eriksen (based on Epiet 2004)
What to expect from CHI Director, Policy & Development Jocelyn Cornwell.
Planning and preparing the national HES EHES Training seminar, Rome 11 February 2010 Päivikki Koponen.
The CAREDEM feasibility study Joint CIs: Iliffe (UCL) & Robinson (Newcastle University) PIs: Robinson (North east), Livingston (London), Fox (Kent)
Local Improvement following National Clinical Audit The View from a National Clinical Audit Provider – the Health & Social Care Information Centre.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
NIHR Research Design Service London Enabling Better Research Forming a research team Victoria Cornelius, PhD Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics Deputy.
A feasibility study to explore patient, clinician and GP decision making of acute recurrent tonsillitis for NATTINA: The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy.
Launch Event – 6 th November 2014 Trial Information and Design Isabel Rubie – Trial Manager The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy IN Adults: a clinical and.
1 Project planning and management 4 scenarios in comparison Dr. Birgit Greiner Senior Lecturer.
“Meeting Educational requirements for a Community Matron/Case Management role from a HEI’s Perspective” Vicky Kaye Senior Lecturer Primary Care.
Clinical Engagement and Telemedicine Church View Surgery Andrew Innes.
Authors and affiliation Research, University of Sheffield, 3 East Midlands Ambulance Service Study flow Conclusion In addition to measures relating to.
BALANCING EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY A NEW INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAMME ADDRESSING THE ROLE OF VALUES IN HEALTH CARE Department of Primary Care and Public.
© Nuffield Trust Inner North West London Integrated Care Pilot – year one evaluation 8 July 2013 Holly Holder Fellow in health policy Ian Blunt Senior.
Outcomes that matter to patients: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for people with renal replacement UK Renal Registry 2015 Annual Audit Meeting.
Case management for multimorbid patients Nathalie Versnel, MSc. François Schellevis, MD, PhD Giel Nijpels, MD, PhD Caroline Baan, PhD.
The Pursuit of Better Medicines through Genetic Research Terri Arledge, DVM US Department Head Drug Development Genetics.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Modelling the impact of service innovation in Stroke Care Tanaka Business School: Imperial College. Lead researcher: Dr Benita Cox Background Stroke is.
Ilana F. Gareen, Ph.D. Brown University Center for Statistical Sciences
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
…patient reported outcome (PRO) measure for your clinical study Dr Keith Meadows, DHP Research & Consultancy Ltd.
National Institute for Health Research Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permission (NIHR CSP) A single system for processing and reviewing applications.
1 Measuring Patients’ Experience of Hospital Care Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Progress with the literature reviews for the CHOICE programme Chris Dickens.
Strategies for health system performance comparison: some international experience Peter C. Smith Emeritus Professor of Health Policy Imperial College.
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust Application for Registration under the Health & Social Care Act 2008 Presentation to the Trust Board.
Mentoring for Excluded Groups and Networks (MEGAN) Peer Review Report Dr. Ioan Durnescu Brussels
Medical Audit.
UK Renal Registry 2013 Annual Audit Meeting
© Nuffield Trust June 22, 2012 Adam Steventon: Evaluating the Whole System Demonstrator trial Authors: Adam Steventon, Martin Bardsley Nuffield Trust.
The Acute Co-ordination Centre for the NHS Patient Survey Programme Use of Inpatient Survey Results Results of an online survey of acute hospital trust.
NHS South East London Quality, Innovation, Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) plan November 2010 Submission.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
E of computer-tailored S moking C essation A dvice in P rimary car E A Randomised Controlled Trial ffectiveness Hazel Gilbert Department of Primary Care.
The third international stroke trial (IST-3) effect of thrombolysis on outcomes at 18 months in 2348 patients in long-term follow- up cohort The IST3 collaborative.
Personal Health Budgets Evaluation Evaluation of the Personal Health Budgets Pilots Julien Forder 1, Karen Jones 1, James Caiels 1, Paul Dolan 2, Caroline.
Access to drugs, Reducing bottlenecks Matt Cooper Business Development & Marketing Director NIHR Clinical Research Network
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
E of computer-tailored S moking C essation A dvice in P rimary car E ffectiveness Hazel Gilbert, Irwin Nazareth and Richard Morris Department of Primary.
Translational Cancer Research Unit Exploring information-seeking preferences of patients with cancer and their primary support person Dr Sylvie Lambert.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
Brittle N 1, Mant J 2, McManus R 1, Lasserson D 3, Sackley C 1 Are TIAs as transient as the name suggests?
Croydon PCT Practice Profiles Dr Agnelo Fernandes MBE FRCGP.
Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre Winner of the Queen’s Anniversary Prize For Higher and Further Education 2009 Recruiting patients and collecting.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Group Elizabeth Gibbons Senior Research Officer
1 6 th National Children & Young People Survivorship Workshop A GP perspective Una Macleod Professor of Primary Care Medicine Primary care cancer lead,
PROMs Martin Orton – NHS Information Centre. Overview PROMs Overview IC’s central role in implementation –Matching & linking to HES & NJR –Applying the.
Dr Tony Ryan Stroke Theme Lead Prof. Pam Enderby NIHR Collaborative Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for South Yorkshire Barnsley Doncaster.
NHS Health Check National Learning Network 11 th Workshop - London 5 th July 2011.
Research and Development Dr Julie Hankin Medical Director.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health (PCPH)
NICOR A NICE Commissioned Pilot of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias Withers KL 1, Patrick H 2, Cunningham.
Lister Hospital & University of Hertfordshire
Development of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire to capture the impact of living with a vascular condition: ePAQ-VAS Patrick Phillips, Elizabeth.
Conclusions Context Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire Results
Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK
Amanda Lilley-Kelly Senior Trial Co-ordinator
Dr Kerry Woolfall Kerry_woolfall
Research funding application process
Surgical safety checklist trial
Presentation transcript:

PROMs Pilot for Long-Term Conditions in Primary Care Ray Fitzpatrick Department of Public Health

Research team Ray Fitzpatrick - Chief Investigator Michele Peters - Project Manager Crispin Jenkinson – Principal Investigator Alastair Gray – Health Economist Helen Doll- Statistician Helen Boyce – Data Manager Helen Boyce – Data Manager Elizabeth Gibbons - Interviewer Elizabeth Gibbons - InterviewerFunding Department of Health, Policy Research Programme

Rationale

Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Developed in the last 30 years to involve patients directly in judgements of health status and outcomes of services Developed in the last 30 years to involve patients directly in judgements of health status and outcomes of services Variously termed measures of: Variously termed measures of: Health status, health-related quality of life, functional status, patient-reported outcome or outcome Health status, health-related quality of life, functional status, patient-reported outcome or outcome Usually short self-report questionnaires Usually short self-report questionnaires Generic (EQ-5D and SF-36) or disease-specific (QOLIE-89 for epilepsy) Generic (EQ-5D and SF-36) or disease-specific (QOLIE-89 for epilepsy)

The use of PROMs Used in research or audit Used in research or audit Outcome measure in clinical trials Outcome measure in clinical trials Health services research Health services research Population survey Population survey Individual patient care Individual patient care Outcome measure for health services Outcome measure for health services From 2009, PROMs mandated for 4 elective surgical procedures (primary hip replacement, primary knee replacement, groin hernia repair and varicose vein procedures) From 2009, PROMs mandated for 4 elective surgical procedures (primary hip replacement, primary knee replacement, groin hernia repair and varicose vein procedures) Used separately or jointly (generic and disease-specific in combination) Used separately or jointly (generic and disease-specific in combination)

Why collect PROMs data? If quality is to be at the heart of everything we do, it must be understood from the perspective of patients. Patients pay regard both to clinical outcomes and their experience of the service... If quality is to be at the heart of everything we do, it must be understood from the perspective of patients. Patients pay regard both to clinical outcomes and their experience of the service... Quality of care should include effectiveness of care. This means understanding success rates from different treatments from different treatments for different conditions. Assessing this will include clinical measures such as mortality or survival rates, complication rates……. Just as important is the effectiveness of care from the patient’s own perspective which will be measured through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)… Quality of care should include effectiveness of care. This means understanding success rates from different treatments from different treatments for different conditions. Assessing this will include clinical measures such as mortality or survival rates, complication rates……. Just as important is the effectiveness of care from the patient’s own perspective which will be measured through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)… High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report.

Why collect PROMs data? NHS Outcomes Framework domains NHS Outcomes Framework domains Effectiveness of treatment and care provided – measured by clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes Effectiveness of treatment and care provided – measured by clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes Safety of treatment and care provided Safety of treatment and care provided Broader experience patients have of the treatment and care they receive Broader experience patients have of the treatment and care they receive Department of Health. Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010

Aims and objectives To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using PROMs for long-term conditions (LTCs) in primary care To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using PROMs for long-term conditions (LTCs) in primary care To assess possible barriers to individuals with LTCs completing PROMs To assess possible barriers to individuals with LTCs completing PROMs To assess cost of collecting PROMs data To assess cost of collecting PROMs data LTCs LTCs asthma, COPD, diabetes, epilepsy, heart failure and stroke asthma, COPD, diabetes, epilepsy, heart failure and stroke

PROMs Pilot Study Design

Design Multi-method design (postal survey and qualitative interviews) Multi-method design (postal survey and qualitative interviews) Two surveys Two surveys Cohort (one year apart) Cohort (one year apart) Cross-sectional Cross-sectional Interviews with individuals with a LTC and professional stakeholders (managers, PCT senior staff, GPs) Interviews with individuals with a LTC and professional stakeholders (managers, PCT senior staff, GPs)

PROMs Pilot GP DATABASE COHORT BASELINE COHORT FOLLOW-UPCROSS-SECTIONAL MAIL SURVEY 50% RECRUIT PRACTICES 12 months 0 months

PROMs pilot practice recruitment Sample Sample 18 years or over 18 years or over Approximately 4500 (750 per condition) Approximately 4500 (750 per condition) Location Location London and North-West England(NWE) London and North-West England(NWE) Based on QOF prevalence, need approximately 40 practices, half in London and half in NWE Based on QOF prevalence, need approximately 40 practices, half in London and half in NWE Recruited through Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and PCRN (Primary Care Research Network) Recruited through Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and PCRN (Primary Care Research Network)

What do practices need to do? Consent to automatic database search to identify patients Practice staff check of patient list Print address labels Attach labels to pre-packed questionnaires and reminders Mail questionnaires After 2 weeks, mail reminders

PROMs pilot database search Automatic and remote search of GP QOF databases by Apollo Medical Systems Ltd. Automatic and remote search of GP QOF databases by Apollo Medical Systems Ltd. Apollo developed software for Apollo developed software for GP patient survey by the Department of Health GP patient survey by the Department of Health No information on patients will be available to Apollo or the research team No information on patients will be available to Apollo or the research team Search run over night to not disrupt practices day to day work Search run over night to not disrupt practices day to day work

PROMs pilot qualitative interviews Individuals with a LTC Individuals with a LTC 55 interviews 55 interviews Both with responders (incomplete data) and non-responders to the survey Both with responders (incomplete data) and non-responders to the survey Aim to identify barriers for completing PROMs Aim to identify barriers for completing PROMs Professional stakeholders Professional stakeholders 30 interviews 30 interviews Managers, PCT senior staff, GPs Managers, PCT senior staff, GPs Aim to identify value of using PROMs and any problems with administering PROMs Aim to identify value of using PROMs and any problems with administering PROMs

Analysis Survey Survey Response rates and quality of information between the two surveys (cohort vs. cross-sectional), over time (cohort) and for the 6 LTCs Response rates and quality of information between the two surveys (cohort vs. cross-sectional), over time (cohort) and for the 6 LTCs Qualitative interviews Qualitative interviews Thematic analysis to identify barriers to completing PROMs (individuals with LTC) Thematic analysis to identify barriers to completing PROMs (individuals with LTC) Thematic analysis to identify value of using PROMs and barriers to PROMs (professional stakeholders) Thematic analysis to identify value of using PROMs and barriers to PROMs (professional stakeholders)

Results and outputs Report to the Department of Health Report to the Department of Health Presentations of findings to stakeholders Presentations of findings to stakeholders Opportunity for stakeholders to comment on the pilot methodology and findings Opportunity for stakeholders to comment on the pilot methodology and findings Summary of findings to all participating practices Summary of findings to all participating practices Summary of findings on web-page for participants and professional stakeholders Summary of findings on web-page for participants and professional stakeholders you-about-your-health you-about-your-health

Results and outcomes Results (response rates, completeness of data, estimation of cost) will inform DH decisions whether PROMs are an acceptable way of involving the public and measuring health outcomes of the NHS on a large, national scale Results (response rates, completeness of data, estimation of cost) will inform DH decisions whether PROMs are an acceptable way of involving the public and measuring health outcomes of the NHS on a large, national scale Results will enable DH to decide whether PROMs can be more generally rolled out to engage the public in the assessment of quality of health care services for LTCs Results will enable DH to decide whether PROMs can be more generally rolled out to engage the public in the assessment of quality of health care services for LTCs

Progress to date

Ethics Approval Ethics Approval NHS permissions NHS permissions NIHR portfolio adoption NIHR portfolio adoption Service support costs for practices Service support costs for practices Selecting and licensing PROMs Selecting and licensing PROMs Apollo search Apollo search Recruitment of practices Recruitment of practices Pilot Pilot

Ethics and NHS permissions Ethical approval obtained from National Research Ethics Committee Ethical approval obtained from National Research Ethics Committee Majority of NHS permissions obtained for the participating PCTs Majority of NHS permissions obtained for the participating PCTs Adopted onto NIHR (National Institute of Health Research) portfolio Adopted onto NIHR (National Institute of Health Research) portfolio Application for service support costs for practices through CLRN in progress Application for service support costs for practices through CLRN in progress

Which PROMs? Selected on basis of reviews by Oxford PROMs group and IP (Intellectual Property) review by the Department of Health Selected on basis of reviews by Oxford PROMs group and IP (Intellectual Property) review by the Department of Health Questionnaires Questionnaires One generic PROM – EQ-5D One generic PROM – EQ-5D One disease-specific PROM One disease-specific PROM Some additional socio-demographic and co- morbidity questions Some additional socio-demographic and co- morbidity questions

Disease-specific PROMs Asthma - Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire Asthma - Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire COPD - Clinical COPD Questionnaire COPD - Clinical COPD Questionnaire Diabetes – Diabetes Health Profile Diabetes – Diabetes Health Profile Epilepsy – Quality of Life in Epilepsy Epilepsy – Quality of Life in Epilepsy Heart Failure – Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire Heart Failure – Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire Stroke – Stroke Impact Scale Stroke – Stroke Impact Scale

Identification of patients Search Search Based on same Read Codes as QOF, including medication codes for asthma and epilepsy Based on same Read Codes as QOF, including medication codes for asthma and epilepsy Stroke does not include TIAs Stroke does not include TIAs Patients with ‘refused consent’ code are excluded Patients with ‘refused consent’ code are excluded Patients only included for one LTC Patients only included for one LTC Search developed for 3 clinical systems Search developed for 3 clinical systems Search produces patient list on practices computer from which address labels can be printed Search produces patient list on practices computer from which address labels can be printed

Recruitment of practices Through PCTs, PCRN and DRN (London) Through PCTs, PCRN and DRN (London) Expression of interest Expression of interest Return of ‘Practice Information Form’ Return of ‘Practice Information Form’ Practice contact details Practice contact details Information on clinical systems Information on clinical systems LTCs the practice wishes to cover LTCs the practice wishes to cover 12 London practices and 15 NWE 12 London practices and 15 NWE ‘Pilot’ sites ‘Pilot’ sites

Key milestones Cohort baseline survey Cohort baseline survey Analysis of cohort baseline data Analysis of cohort baseline data Qualitative interviews with patients Qualitative interviews with patients Qualitative interviews with professionals Qualitative interviews with professionals Cross-sectional survey Cross-sectional survey Cohort follow up survey Cohort follow up survey Analysis of cross-sectional survey and cohort follow-up Analysis of cross-sectional survey and cohort follow-up Feedback of results to stakeholders Feedback of results to stakeholders