Developing relations among human activities, stressors, and stream ecosystem responses for integrated regional, multi- stressor models R. Jan Stevenson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moffatt Thomas Lower Boise River Wetlands Restoration Project Sponsor:Pioneer Irrigation District Presenter: Scott L. Campbell Legal Counsel for Pioneer.
Advertisements

Periphyton Data from National-Scale Assessments Can Inform Nutrient Criteria Development for Southeastern States R. Jan Stevenson Michigan State University.
Massive Porites sp. corals as indicators of historical changes in river runoff: A case study for Antongil Bay (Masoala National Park, NE Madagascar ) J.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
A landscape perspective of stream food webs: Exploring cumulative effects and defining biotic thresholds.
Regional River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment University of.
Moving to Horizontal Connections: Design Concept 2 Impacts: 1. What are the critical interactions among resources (and resource management) that will.
Development of Aquatic Ecosystem Models Lizhu Wang, Shaw Lacy, Paul Seebach, Mike Wiley Institute for Fisheries Research MDNR and U of M.
Developing relations among human activities, stressors, and stream ecosystem responses for integrated regional, multi- stressor models R. Jan Stevenson.
Surface Water Simulation Group. Comprehensive watershed scale model developed and supported by the USDA-ARS capable of simulating surface and groundwater.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
Applications of GIS to River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment.
Integrated Modeling of the Muskegon River Ecosystem: A New Approach to Integrated Risk Assessment for Great Lakes Watersheds Michael Wiley 1, Bryan Pijanowski.
Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.
The Water Withdrawal Assessment Process Context within regional water policy discussions Context within regional water policy discussions –Aquatic ecosystems.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
WATERSHED MODELING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Estuary Productivity & Complexity Evaluating Human Impacts.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Ecological rationale for determining buffer width Forest Ecosystem Management and Assessment Team (FEMAT) Report.
Highlights A Study of Phosphorus Loading of Ballston Lake by Tributary Inflow Presentation to BLIA Annual Meeting June 16, 2014 Scott Miller, Bob Duncan,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
Development of a Watershed-to- Very-Near-Shore Model for Pathogen Fate and Transport Sheridan K. Haack Atiq U. Syed Joseph W. Duris USGS, Lansing, MI.
PNAMP Habitat Status and Trends Monitoring Management Question: Are the Primary Habitat Factors Limiting the Status of the Salmon and Steelhead Populations.
Ecological Assessment: An Overview Environmental Issues and Public Policy Zoo 446 Fall 2001.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
112.3 Jessica L. Feeser, M. Elise Lauterbur & Jennifer L. Soong Research Project for Systems Ecology (ENVS 316), Fall ’06 Oberlin College, Oberlin OH BackgroundFindings.
Steps 3 & 4: Evaluating types of evidence for the Truckee River case study.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
The hydrological cycle of the western United States is expected to be significantly affected by climate change (IPCC-AR4 report). Rising temperature and.
Watersheds Chapter 9. Watershed All land enclosed by a continuous hydrologic drainage divide and lying upslope from a specified point on a stream All.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Integrated Ecological Assessment February 28, 2006 Long-Term Plan Annual Update Carl Fitz Recovery Model Development and.
Conceptual Modeling as a Tool for Developing a Watershed Management Plan An aid to understanding linkages Barbara Washburn California Watershed Assessment.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
The Biological Condition Gradient and Tiered Aquatic Life Uses: With Applications in the State of Maine United States Environmental Protection Agency Tiered.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
January 27, 2011 Summary Background on Delta Flow and Habitat Relationships Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Fine-Resolution, Regional-Scale Terrestrial Hydrologic Fluxes Simulated with the Integrated Landscape Hydrology Model (ILHM) David W Hyndman Anthony D.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
October 12, 2015 Iowa State University Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Water Quality.
IERM Overview Goals: 1. Development of an integrated, whole-system model for ecological response to water level/flow scenarios 2. Blend ecological research.
Stormflow Nutrient Concentrations in Coastal Streams Tributary to the Santa Barbara Channel, California: A Common Urban Response Al Leydecker, Tim Robinson.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
Do not reproduce any photos that are in this presentation.
Human Impacts Part 2- Watersheds. What’s a Watershed? An area of land that drains into a common body of water.
Disentangling the effects of multiple stressors in lakes; should we use littoral benthic invertebrates? Rebeka ŠILING, Gorazd URBANIČ Institute for Water.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
THE USE OF BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE TRAITS TO ASSESS CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES AND VULNERABILITIES Anna Hamilton (Tetra Tech), Britta Bierwagen (US EPA),
Integrating surface water, groundwater and landscape stressor data into a regional assessment to support management decision-making Karen R. Worcester.
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Liana Prudencio and Sarah E. Null
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
Hydrologic River Routing
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Lakes & Large Impoundments Chapter 22
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
The potential for microbial nutrient cycling processes in urban soils
Environmental modeling application domains
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
IBI’s: An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Developing relations among human activities, stressors, and stream ecosystem responses for integrated regional, multi- stressor models R. Jan Stevenson 1, M. J. Wiley 2 D. Hyndman 1, B. Pijanowski 3, P. Seelbach 2 1 Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 2 Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 3 Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Project Period: 5/1/2003-4/30/2006 Project Cost: $748,527 Stevenson et al.

Goals relate patterns of human landscape activity to commonly co–varying stressors (nutrients, temperature, sediment load, DO, and hydrology) relate those stressors to valued fisheries capital and ecological integrity of stream ecosystems. Stevenson et al.

Natural Ecosystems Are Complex Septic Systems Silviculture Livestock Grazing Irrigation Crop & Lawn Fertilizers Construction Organic/ Part PNC PO 4 NO x NH 3 HeatSediments Hydrologic Variability Nitrifying Bacteria Periphytic Microalgae Benthic Macroalgae Other Bacteria Benthic Invertebrates Fish Dissolved Oxygen Sewers & Treatment Herb Buffer Strips Tree Canopy Livestock Fences Ret. Basins & Wetlands Other BMPs Light Stevenson et al.

Natural Ecosystems Are Complex but can be Organized for Management Septic Systems Silviculture Livestock Grazing Irrigation Crop & Lawn Fertilizers Construction Organic/ Part PNC PO 4 NO x NH 3 HeatSediments Hydrologic Variability Nitrifying Bacteria Periphytic Microalgae Benthic Macroalgae Other Bacteria Benthic Invertebrates Fish Dissolved Oxygen Sewers & Treatment Herb Buffer Strips Tree Canopy Livestock Fences Ret. Basins & Wetlands Other BMPs Light Human Activities Stressors Responses Valued Ecological Attributes – Management Targets

Refining Relationships thresholds, contingencies, interactions, indirect and spurious effects Septic Systems Silviculture Livestock Grazing Irrigation Crop & Lawn Fertilizers Construction Organic/ Part PNC PO 4 NO x NH 3 HeatSediments Hydrologic Variability Nitrifying Bacteria Periphytic Microalgae Benthic Macroalgae Other Bacteria Benthic Invertebrates Fish Dissolved Oxygen Sewers & Treatment Herb Buffer Strips Tree Canopy Livestock Fences Ret. Basins & Wetlands Other BMPs Light Human Activities Stressors Responses Valued Ecological Attributes – Management Targets ?

Complicating Issues Non-linearity and thresholds: graded responses may be rare in complex systems and thresholds make management choices critical. Complex causation: multiple actions results in a cascade of effects which ultimately simultaneously shape biological responses; most importantly-issues of direct and indirect causation (effects) Scale and dynamics: Potential stressors operate at different spatial and dynamic scales, as do different ecosystem components. Scale hierarchies complicate the diagnosis of stressor-response relationships because they can obscure causal dependencies through time lags, ghosts of past events, and misidentification of natural spatial/temporal variability. Stevenson et al.

Approach Building on prior and current regional Assessment and modeling work of this team (Michigan Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Illinois, Wisconsin) Blending causal (mechanistic) with empirical (statistical) modeling integrated in an modeling system (linked Landcover-surface water- groundwater-loading framework) Emphasizing regional (wide ranging) analysis to capture ranges of variation Emphasizing intensive site sampling to address specific mechanisms and parameterize models Stevenson et al.

Where we are working Muskegon River Watershed, Mi Grand River Watershed, Mi Crane Creek Watershed, Oh Focal systems: Cedar Creek (high Ag loadings, high Slope, high GW) Brooks Creek (high Ag loadings, mod Slope, mod GW) Looking Glass River (high Ag loadings, mod Slope, mod GW) Red Cedar River (Ag and Urban loadings, mod Slope, mod GW) Crane Creek (highly impacted by Ag, very lo Slope, very lo GW) Upper Grand and Upper Muskegon (wetland dominated, mod Slope,,GW variable) Stevenson et al.

2003 Progress report Late start last year, 2004 first extensive field year Pilot Nitrification study completed in Grand River tribs Integration anad re-analysis of existing data sets well underway Linked surface water-ground water model (Hec- HMS/MODFLOW/GWLF) running for Muskegon tribs [see Stream gauging and nutrient sampling underway in Crane Creek Summer assessment sampling in July-Aug 2004&2005 Stevenson et al.

2003 highlights… detecting thresholds & refining relationships Peak Cladophora Biomass Can a noisy Threshold response to Phosphate be by resolved by biologically averaging the nutrient signal? 24 ppb cut R 2 =0.104 P=0.002 Stevenson et al.

Distinguishing Differences Among Assemblages Sensitive Taxa Tolerant Taxa Stevenson et al.

Species Abundances Along Environmental Gradient Stevenson et al.

Cladophora/Nutrient Model Improves with Diatom Inferred TSI R 2 =0.270 P<0.001 R 2 =0.104 P=0.002 Stevenson et al.

Translating TSI to Nutrient Criterion Cladophora Threshold at ppb TP Stevenson et al.

Transect Composite Total BOD Nitrif. N + inhib. CBOD Methods: How variable is Nitrification demand on oxygen? NBOD Parameterization for the DO modeling Stevenson et al highlights…Nitrification Pilot

Results from 3 transect trials Stevenson et al highlights…Nitrification Pilot

Ecological Assessment Risk Modeling Focus on Cedar Creek Landuse Transformation 2003 highlights… linking models on Cedar Creek

Holten River Rd. Holten to River Rd. Ratios Catchment area ratio= 26% Typical storm peak ratio = 25% Average flow ratio= 6.5% Max Q = 33cfs Mean Q =3cfs groundwater Runoff [ 60%] Max Q = 55cfs Mean Q =46cfs Groundwater [95%] Runoff [ 5%]

Holten Gage River Rd. Gage 2003 highlights… linking models on Cedar Creek

Holten Gage River Rd. Gage Poor Below expectation Acceptable Excellent Basic Water Quality 2003 highlights… linking models on Cedar Creek

Holten Gage River Rd. Gage Poor Below expectation Acceptable Excellent Biological Quality Observed/Expected diversity 2003 highlights… linking models on Cedar Creek

Figure 6 - Modeled hydrographs for Cedar Creek using observed 1998 and LTM projected 2040 landcover scenarios. Precipitation and temperature patterns, and all other variables held constant. Days are arbitrary simulation dates. Linked models evaluate effects of future landuse changes Cedar Creek 2003 highlights… linking models on Cedar Creek

Mega-Model Runs target the entire watershed and provide a time-dependent context for understanding our Current conditions, identifying risks that lie ahead, and a testing ground for alternate Management Scenarios.

Developing relations among human activities, stressors, and stream ecosystem responses for integrated regional, multi- stressor models R. Jan Stevenson 1, M. J. Wiley 2 D. Hyndman 1, B. Pijanowski 3, P. Seelbach 2 1 Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 2 Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 3 Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Project Period: 5/1/2003-4/30/2006 Project Cost: $748,527 Stevenson et al.