APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation

No Progress made toward the District’s SMART Goal. Making progress toward the District’s SMART Goal and additional data is pending. Performing at or above the District’s SMART Goals at this point and time. Exceeding the District’s SMART Goal and the set MAP Performance Index (MPI) Goal.

Overall Rating

MSIP 5 Definitions MSIP 5 measures five standards. Academic Achievement, Subgroup Achievement, College and Career Readiness, Attendance, and Graduation Rate. MPI – MAP Performance Index APR – Annual Progress Report Status, Progress and Growth measurements of the district or school’s level of achievement is based upon a three year average. Exceeding, On Track, Approaching and Floor – four levels within Status, Progress or Growth EOC – End of Course exams administered only at the high school level MAP – Missouri Assessment Program administered only in grades 3 - 8

MSIP 5 LEA Summary Report

District Supporting Data for Annual Performance Report

Academic Achievement – ELA and MA

Missouri Growth Model Growth measures in MSIP 5 are designed to provide estimates of schooling effectiveness for units (LEAs or schools) as a whole. Growth Model uses data from grades 3 through 8. The use of multiple years of data improves the stability of the growth estimates. For Standard 2, Subgroup significant growth indicates that the super-subgroup students in the school, on average, outperformed the non-super subgroup students. Subgroup represents, Black, Hispanic, low income students, students with disabilities and English language learners. A super subgroup is comprised of these five subgroups and include only students who are in one or more of the five identified subgroups.

Student Growth

Academic Achievement – SCI and SS

Subgroup Achievement – ELA & Math

Subgroup Achievement – SCI and SS

College and Career Readiness Standards

Attendance and Graduation Rate Standards

Schools 2013 and 2014 MPI

2014 Schools APR Percent of APR Points Earned

KCPS SY15 Preliminary Goals

KCPS SY15 Preliminary Goals Cont.

Questions

Moving Forward Curriculum, Instruction and Professional Development

Professional Learning Communities/Data Teams 1.Use state rubric to evaluate current level of implementation. 2.Provide feedback from initial evaluation and develop action plan for improvement. 3.Monitor quarterly the functioning of the PLCs and provide feedback. 4.Provide Professional Development to PLC teams as needed.

Assessments Formative: 1.Provide professional development on the effective use of formative assessment (Assessment for Learning). 2.Expect formative assessments to be used in the data cycle. 3.Monitor the data teams to ensure that formative assessments are being used. 4.Provide feedback to the data teams on the use of formative assessments during the quarterly PLC feedback session. NWEA: 1.Administer three times per year. 2.PD on analyzing data scheduled for September 26 th. 3.Utilize Screener for grades K-2. 4.Utilize Survey for grades 3-8.

Curriculum Alignment 1.Core Curriculum aligned to Missouri Learning Standards. 2.Quarterly performance events integrated across the four core areas. 3.Emphasis on Argumentative and Expository writing across cores. 4.Focus on Academic Vocabulary. 5.Cluster the standards to design cohesive units that allow for deeper exploration of learning. 6.Units in all core areas focus on argumentative literacy and require student to cite supporting evidence. 7.Walk throughs will be used to monitor. 8.End of Quarter assessment will be used to monitor.

Improvement of Instruction

Enhancing Student Learning & School Culture with Technology Topic Overview of the KCPS Framework Planning and Preparing Routines and Procedures Interacting New Knowledge with Technology Classroom Environment and Organization Practicing and Deepening New Knowledge with Technology Provide Active and Cognitively Engaging Questions Generating and Testing Hypotheses of New Knowledge with Technology Data Review, Fluency, Mid-Year Reflection Building Relationships Interacting New Knowledge with Technology Practicing and Deepening New Knowledge with Technology Generating and Testing Hypotheses with Technology

Role of the Instructional Coaches 1.Support in delivering the curriculum by demonstrating and co-teaching. 2.Support teachers in incorporating existing digital resources in a one-to-one environment by demonstrating and co-teaching. 3.Encourage teachers to explore two or three additional tools.

Questions

School Leadership: An Unswerving Focus on Student Achievement

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools Sankofa Lesson Reflect on Past to Build a Successful Future Analyze the 2014 MAP Data to identify areas of refinement by grade by content area Teacher review 2014 MAP data for current students

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools Retain & Refine Data Consults to include: Principal Teacher Data Teams

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools Retain & Refine: Map Staff & Data Teams School-Wide Assessment Teams—Struggling Teachers Systemic Implementation of Student CEO Concept Standardize the School Leadership Visitation Form Building-Specific MSIP 5 Goals

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools Laser-Focus on: Moving the Students Across Proficiency Categories Attendance—Early Intervention Behavior/OSS—Leverage Behavioral Interventionist & Require a School-Wide Behavior Plan

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools New Components School-Wide Assessment Teams II—Effective Teachers Leverage Peer Feedback Through Data Teams o Classroom Visitations o Video Teaching Create an Early Warning System Using the NWEA Screener

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools New Components Analyze D/F Reports Explore Offering Salary Schedule Enhancements Leverage the new weekly 75 minute Collaboration/PD Time Males of Color/M2M Initiative Student Incentives

The Game Plan: Air-Tight Prescription for Monitoring Schools Build Leadership Capacity NISL Building Leadership Capacity Segment at Each Principal Meeting School Administrator Management (SAM) Project New Principal Mentor Program Principals’ Advisory

Questions