Foundation Programme Curriculum: Key Changes for 2016 David Kessel Chair AoMRC Foundation Programme Committee New Improved ?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Advertisements

Securing the Foundation Programme Stuart Carney Deputy National Director, UKFPO.
FOUNDATION CURRICULUM 3 RD EDITION Ed Neville Chairman Academy Foundation Programme Committee.
Martin Hart Assistant Director Education Case study on accreditation: the GMC’s perspective.
Review of Tomorrow’s Doctors Ben Griffith. The GMC’s role in medical education Promotes high standards Currently covers undergraduate education and the.
Trainer Recognition and Accreditation. New Arrangements for Trainer Recognition and Accreditation  In August 2012, the GMC released a document ‘Recognising.
School of Surgery Induction Day ISCP Session. Overview ISCP aims and benefits Roles and responsibilities ISCP website Learning Agreements Syllabus Assessment.
Revalidation + Trainer Recognition School of Surgery Annual Conference Dr Bret Claxton, APD Health Education Yorkshire and the Humber. April 2013.
The Role of the Regulator Excellent Training, Excellent Care Dr Vicky Osgood Assistant Director of Postgraduate Education GMC.
The 2009 Learning Portfolio and Assessment Framework for DFT.
The situation The requirements The benefits What’s needed to make it work How to move forward.
Promoting Excellence in Family Medicine nMRCGP Workplace-based Assessment March 2007.
Guide to Intern Assessment Processes for Supervisors.
Clinical Examination and Procedural Skills (CEPS) The Introduction of Integrated DOPS The assessment of psychomotor skills in WPBA for the MRCGP examination.
Clinical Examination and Procedural Skills The assessment of psychomotor skills in WPBA for the MRCGP examination.
Curriculum mapping. How to make sure the plan comes together David Taylor Liverpool.
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Overview of Nursing Process, Clinical Reasoning, and Nursing Practice.
CHANGES TO THE LEVEL 4 CERTIFICATE
Making the most of your supervision meetings Alyson Williamson Education Services Manager.
Training for Public Health Trainers.  Prof. John Collins’ report ‘Foundation for Excellence’ highlighted many positive aspects of the Curriculum but.
Mentorship Preparation Programme Week 6 Clinical Assessment processes Queen’s University Belfast Open University University of Ulster.
MMC – workplace based assessments Dr Lisa Joels Postgraduate Organiser Singleton Hospital 6 th August 08.
Clinical Audit as Evidence for Revalidation Dr David Scott, GMC Associate, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Lead for Children’s Services, East Sussex.
Bob Woodwards SAC Chair, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Revalidation Implementation for doctors in training Dr Lorna Burrows, National Revalidation Fellow, NHS South of England.
E-PORTFOLIO CRASH COURSE L Pilkington ST2 RGH 12 th September 2014.
Modernising Medical Careers for GPs Education Supervision and Review of Progression.
National Concerns What was the problem?
OUT OF HOURS INTENDING TRAINERS COURSE. DO WE CARE? WE DO NOW!
Update - ATSM Recent changes. Regulations for the Advanced Training Skills Modules Generic: The applicant must be working in the UK for the duration of.
Review of Midwifery Supervision Workshop 20 th April 2015 ‘Revalidation’ Are you ready?
Guide to the ESR By Carol and Barry. Why is the ESR important? An Educational Supervisors Review (ESR) is conducted every six calendar months for all.
The new Learning and Development Pathways for RCN Representatives.
Paramedic Science Mentor update. Practice Assessment Team Current Teaching and Assessing Qualifications Assessment Taxonomy Assessment Documents Assessment.
Medical Revalidation. What is revalidation? Revalidation is the process by which doctors will have to demonstrate to the GMC, normally every five years,
The new Learning and Development Pathways for RCN Representatives.
South Thames Foundation Schoolwww.stfs.org.uk Responding to the national agenda Dr Jan Welch Director, STFS.
Accuracy in assessment Evidence bundles: tracking Trainee achievement through pupil progress overtime.
To identify and map how the current Scottish arrangements for healthcare science training and education map on to the Modernising Scientific Careers model.
Workplace based assessment for the nMRCGP. nMRCGP Integrated assessment package comprising:  Applied knowledge test (AKT)  Clinical skills assessment.
Activity 1 Stickies on the board Any unanswered questions so far Issues or challenges What do I want to know before the end of this session?
Specialist Associate CESR Evaluation Day
Quality Standards for Psychiatry Training Dr Andrew Brittlebank Vice President for Training UEMS Section for Psychiatry.
FP Curriculum 2012: summary of key changes that will impact the FP e-portfolio Intended audience: The educational faculty (e.g. supervisors, FTPD/Ts, FSDs,
UK Foundation Programme Office Prof Derek Gallen National Director.
The Workplace Learning Environment July BETTER TRAINING BETTER CARE Role of the Trainer.
FP Curriculum 2012: summary of key changes that will impact the FP e-portfolio Intended audience: NES e-portfolio TAG, admin users within foundation schools/
Click to edit Master subtitle style Competence by Design (CBD) Foundations of Assessment.
Introduction to the eportfolio and the MRCGP HEEKSS 2015 Dr Susan Bodgener Associate Dean of Assessment, HEEKSS.
GMC Approval of trainers in the UK Enid Rowland and Patricia Le Rolland.
FOUNDATION PROGRAMME – 2016 CURRICULUM Dr Mike Masding Head of Wessex Foundation School AoMRC Foundation Programme Committee.
MLCF IMPLEMENTATION AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Professor Peter Spurgeon University of Warwick Medical School Project Director, Enhancing Engagement in Medical.
Foundation Programme Curriculum:
PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION
CT & ACT National Conference
RCGP E-Portfolio Ilford VTS
A Guide for Managers for Professional Staff
CLINICAL SUPERVISION – WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
Guide to Intern Assessment Processes for Supervisors
Dr Irfan Ghani Director of Training Faculty of Public Health
Developing an FY1 post in a Crisis Resolution & Home Treatment Team
A Guide for Professional Staff
A Guide for Professional Staff
Changes in Training and Assessment
GMC – the road to “recognition” of Educational Supervisors
Capabilities in practice
GMC Generic Professional Capabilities framework
Capabilities in practice
GMC Generic Professional Capabilities framework
Presentation transcript:

Foundation Programme Curriculum: Key Changes for 2016 David Kessel Chair AoMRC Foundation Programme Committee New Improved ?

Approved in Parts!

Regulator’s requirements Generic Professional Capabilities Framework

Purpose of Foundation No Change

2016 v 2012? Vincent: It’s the little differences. A lotta the same s**t we got here, they got there, but there they’re a little different. Jules: Example?

Terminology Level of performance Foundation Professional Capability = Outcomes of foundation training Descriptor Expectation / Indicative example of practice

Level of Performance High level indicators for F1 and F2 Minimum level which must be met or exceeded for progression at the end of each year of training Sign off dependent on evidence of achievement in each of the 20 foundation professional capabilities New!

Level of Performance F1 Indicators

Level of Performance F1 Mapped to most relevant foundation professional capability

Level of Performance F1

Successful Completion F1 Foundation Year 1 Certificate of Completion (F1CC) Recommendation to the GMC that the foundation doctor be granted full registration Eligible for progression into F2 training. New!

Level of Performance F2 F1 plus Description of step up in performance from F1

Level of Performance F2

Successful Completion F2 Foundation Programme Certificate of Completion (FPCC) Eligible to enter a core, specialty or general practice training programme. New!

Organisation of Curriculum

The Syllabus sections 12 subsections 40 subheadings > 100 outcomes Competences Remove to Improve!

Key Structural Changes sections 12 subsections 40 subheadings > 100 outcomes Competences sections Ooops!

Sections Professional Behaviour and Trust Communication, Team-working and Leadership Clinical Care Safety and Quality

Key Structural Changes sections 12 subsections 40 subheadings > 100 outcomes Competences sections 20 foundation professional capabilities (outcomes) Section 1 Foundation Professional Capability 1 Foundation Professional Capability 2…

Profesional Behaviour and Trust Foundation Professional Capabilities 1.Acts professionally 2.Delivers patient centred care and maintains trust 3.Behaves in accordance with ethical and legal requirements 4.Keeps practice up to date through learning and teaching 5.Demonstrates engagement in career planning

Communication, Team- working and Leadership Foundation Professional Capabilities 6.Communicates clearly in a variety of settings 7.Works effectively as a team member 8.Demonstrates leadership skills

Clinical Care Foundation Professional Capabilities 9.Recognises, assesses and initiates management of the acutely ill patient 10.Recognises, Assesses and manages patients with long term conditions 11.Obtains history, performs clinical examination, formulates differential diagnosis and management plan 12.Requests relevant investigations and acts upon results 13.Prescribes safely 14.Performs procedures safely 15.Is trained and manages cardiac and respiratory arrest 16.Demonstrates understanding of the principles of health promotion and illness prevention 17.Manages palliative and end of life care

Safety and Quality Foundation Professional Capabilities 18.Recognises and works within limits of personal competence 19.Makes patient safety a priority in clinical practice 20.Contributes to quality improvement

Key Structural Changes sections 12 subsections 40 subheadings > 100 outcomes Competences sections 20 professional capabilities Descriptors Section 1 Foundation Professional Capability 1 Descriptors F1 / F2 Foundation Professional Capability 2 Descriptors F1 / F2

Descriptors Indicative examples and general expectations Web Based

Descriptors Indicative examples and general expectations

Assessment Clinical Supervisor’s Reports Educational Supervisor’s Reports TAB Informed by Observation of practice Feedback from PSG Evidence of achievement of 20 outcomes No Change

Supervisors’ reports Sign off outcome level Based on achievement of >100 outcomes

Supervisors’ reports 2016 Comment at section level Is the foundation doctor on course to meet or exceed the minimum level of performance in each of the 20 foundation professional capabilities required for sign off by the end of the year of training?

Supervisors’ reports 2016 Comment at section level Is the foundation doctor on course to meet or exceed the minimum level of performance in each of the 20 foundation professional capabilities required for sign off by the end of the year of training? No concern Some concern Major concern

Supervisors’ reports No Concern Indicates that this doctor is performing at the expected level for this stage of foundation training, that there are/have been no issues which still need to be addressed and is on course to meet/exceed minimum expected level of performance required for sign off across all 20 foundation professional capabilities (Foundation Programme training outcomes) by the end of the year of training Issues which have been satisfactorily resolved should be recorded in the ‘educators’ notes’ section of the e- portfolio On Track!

Supervisors’ reports Some Concern Indicates that there are or have been aspects of performance which are ongoing and considered to need extra support in order to meet/exceed minimum expected level of performance required for sign off across all 20 foundation professional capabilities (Foundation Programme training outcomes) by the end of the year of training Needs Support

Supervisors’ reports Major Concern Indicates that there are or have been aspects of performance which which if not corrected may not meet the minimum expected level of performance required for sign off across all 20 foundation professional capabilities (Foundation Programme training outcomes) by the end of the year of training and may impact on this doctor’s ability to satisfactorily complete the current year of Foundation training Risks not being signed off

Supervisors’ reports Comments in support of rating for each section Concerns regarding performance? Drop down menu Select outcome/s +/- descriptor/s where concerns exist Narrative to justify Discuss with trainee Document

End of Year ES end of year report ARCP Review of evidence whether the foundation doctor has met or exceeded the minimum level of performance in each of the 20 foundation professional capabilities to allow them to progress to the next stage of training?

Foundation Programme Report Future Part of GMC QA Review of delivery foundation programme training Data collection e.g. – % doctors in difficulty – % requiring support – Performance of Foundation Schools Watch this space!