Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Medford Lakes School District Teacher of the Year Program 2012 PRESS to START.
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
ULS FACULTY LIBRARIAN PEER REVIEW AND MENTORING Margarete Bower Chemistry Library.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Format for Promotion Review Portfolio KCTCS Faculty Hired 2004 and thereafter; all other full-time faculty who select this criteria.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Performance Management
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Developing Performance Goals That Work For You and ANR Performance Training and Workshop for County Directors November 1, 2013.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
A Joint Labor/Management Effort Spring Lori Chapman Labor Relations Associate Office of Faculty & Staff Labor Relations Elizabeth Sullivan Executive.
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
1 Chapter Officer Roles & Responsibilities. 2 Chapter Officers/Leadership Team Serving on the Chapter Leadership Team is a privilege as well as a responsibility.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
DIANE CRAIG NATIONAL EXTENSION AND RESEARCH ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER’S CONFERENCE ALASKA - MAY 24, 2011 Identifying Competencies and Skills to Improve Training.
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Promotion Expectations and Preparation Dianne Delva.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE CAREER LADDER TRAINING FEBRUARY 2015 Joyce Martin Sherrer Jan Maples Cindy Conner Max Gallaway 1.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL ATTENDINGS Rhonda Dick, M.D. Tim Martin, M.D.
OKLAHOMA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE CAREER LADDER TRAINING FEBRUARY 2013 Joyce Martin Jan Maples Cindy Conner Leland McDaniel 1.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
FIRST STEP for Success Texas AgriLife Extension Service New Employee Development.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Key Points for Putting Your Packet Together. Titles for Promotion System  Assistant Extension Professional  Associate Extension Professional  Extension.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Awards Subcommittee Report Brett A. Bednarcyk NASA Glenn Research Center 1 Fall Structures TC Meeting November 11, 2012 Savannah, GA.
2009 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification You’re at the head of your class. Now go to the top of your profession.
Begins October 1, 2012 EFNP - NPAs. Performance Evaluation Ending of Performance Evaluation time period to the end of the fiscal year – use FY 12 performance.
Professional Career Ladder System Guidelines Promotion Packet County Extension Agents District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)
Professional Career Ladder System Guidelines Promotion Packet County Extension Agents Revised – April, 2017.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
The CED’s & DED’s role in the Tenure & Promotion of Agents
What it means for New Teachers
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
MUHC Innovation Model.
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
The School Mentor 9/19/2018.
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System
Performance Review for County Educators
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Overview of Academic Staff Title Change Process
Presentation transcript:

Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson

Career Ladder System The purpose of this career ladder is to provide a system for measuring and documenting the progress of extension agents in their profession and for rewarding their professional accomplishments.

Employee Rankings Levels – I, II, III and IV Promotions based on recommendations from regional/state peer review committees Initial ranking of new employees -Based on individual’s previous professional experiences and education. -Initial rank will be awarded and effective upon the starting date of employment. -Determined by DEA

Promotion Criteria Extension agents will be considered for advancement through the career ladder system as established in career ladder guidelines Four indicators will be considered by regional and state peer review committees for professional advancement: – Educational Effectiveness – Resources, Volunteerism & Organization Support – Relationships and Teamwork – Professional Development and Professionalism

Agents’ Overall Contributions Determination of an individuals level of accomplishment is based on evidence of overall contributions to Extension system Combination of critical professional endeavors form the basis for an accurate assessment of an Extension agent

1. Educational Effectiveness Agent’s ability to effectively design, deliver, evaluate and interpret high quality, relevant educational programs are essential to Extension education. Agent’s demonstrate a strong foundation in the program development process and fully utilize the Extension program development model. Outstanding educational programs include: program development; engagement and participation of advisory groups; a comprehensive educational plan; appropriate teaching methods; and well-designed, suitable evaluation instruments and techniques.

1. Educational Effectiveness Agents should use a variety of available resources, technologies, and creative and innovative teaching methods in the implementation of educational programs. All monthly reporting requirements must be completed on time. High quality program summaries must be completed and utilized in interpretation efforts.

1. Educational Effectiveness Components of Educational Effectiveness A. Program Development (In-Depth) 1.In-Depth Program Planning 2.In-Depth Program Implementation 3.In-Depth Program Evaluation B. Program Development (Outreach) C. Accountability and Interpretation

2. Resources, Volunteerism, and Organizational Support Agent enhances programs and program outcomes through: – Volunteer Engagement and Management – Other Human Resources – Material Resources

3. Relationships and Teamwork Agent demonstrates an ability to establish effective working relationships – Internal – coworkers, colleagues, supervisors – External – volunteers, clientele, community leaders, county and state agencies and organizations – Overall teamwork – development and involvement in teams demonstrates cooperation and coordination

4. Professional Development and Professionalism The future of Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service and Cooperative Extension Program depend upon the effectiveness of employees. -Agent maintains competence through professional development. -Agents demonstrates professionalism.

Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement Degree requirements and professional experience must be met There should be evidence of performance and accomplishments as outlined in Professional Career Ladder System Guidelines for County Extension Agents 09/ Guidelines-for-Promotion- Packet-01-FINAL.pdf 09/ Guidelines-for-Promotion- Packet-01-FINAL.pdf

Degree Requirements Level I – Bachelor’s degree will be accepted under the condition a Master’s degree will be obtained within 8 years Level II – Bachelor’s degree in appropriate subject matter required; Master’s degree preferred – Minimum 5 year’s professional experience

Degree Requirement Level III – Master’s degree required – Minimum of 10 years professional experience by June 1 of the year submitting the agent promotion packet Level IV – Master’s degree preferred – Minimum 15 year’s professional experience by June 1 of the year submitting the agent promotion packet

Professional Progression Promotion to a higher level is based on agent’s accomplishments for the past 5 years of their Extension career. An agent must remain in a professional rank for 3 years or more before submitting a promotion packet for consideration to the next level.

Timeline Timeline for promotion preparation is outlined in Appendix I of Career Ladder System Guidelines July 15 th - Intent to apply submitted to DEA September 1 st - CEA submits an electronic agent promotion packet to the DEA/CED. October - Regional Leadership Team provides a consensus vote for or against consideration for promotion

Timeline November - Regional Peer Review Committee reviews candidates for advancement as outlined in the Career System Guidelines. November - Regional chair returns promotion packets and committee’s recommendation to Associate Director for County Operations. November - Associate Director reviews score sheet and submits to DEA

Timeline November - Candidates who are recommended to move from a III to a IV will meet with their supervisor to discuss strengths and weaknesses identified at Regional Peer Review. Note - Minor adjustments can be made to Curriculum Vitae only. If promotion packet is not recommended for promotion at the Regional Peer Review the promotion packet will not be sent to the State Peer Review. December 7 th - DEA submits complete Level III to IV promotion packets to be to Associate Director for state review.

Timeline December - Director names State Peer Review Committee for Level III to IV packets. February 1 st - Candidates who are recommended for promotion from a I to II or a II to III will be notified of their career ladder promotion. April - State Peer Review committee reviews and makes recommendation of Level III to IV promotion packets.

Timeline May - Associate Directors will review and make recommendations. June - The Director/Administrator will notify agents on their promotion status September 1 st - Upon promotion to the next level, an agent will receive promotion status and salary increases as indicated, effective September 1.

Role of Level III and IV Agents Regional Peer Review Committee – Regional Committee will consist of appointed Level III and IV agents. – Regional Committee must be comprised of 3 to 8 members and have a minimum of two level IV agents. – Level III agents must have gone through the promotion process to be considered for the regional committee. – Level III agents may not review or vote on promotion packets going from Level III to IV.

Role of Level III and IV Agents State Peer Review Committee – State Review Committee will consist of appointed Level IV agents. Level III and IV agents serve as mentors throughout the promotion process

Questions?