2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UN Reform Perception Survey II Early Overview Online and hardcopy survey for ALL UN Staff at country level Online and hardcopy survey for ALL UN.
Advertisements

A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
HKUPOP HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index First Quarter HeadlineJobs 職場滿意指數 2008 第一季調查 Results Highlights Speaker: Dr Robert Ting-Yiu Chung Director,
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
The Power of Employee Engagement
ATTITUDES TOWARD AFTERZONE Presented by Dr. Julie Pokela February, 2010.
Our Vision, Mission and Core Values
© Prentice Hall, © Prentice Hall, ObjectivesObjectives 1.A definition of the term group as used in the context of management 2.A.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Chapter 5 Motivation Theories
1 Introduction to Workforce Planning and Development in State of Alaska Executive Branch Departments.
Understanding Boards Building Connections: Community Leadership Program.
Board Recruitment. Why recruit? Effective conservation districts have outstanding and qualified board members. A diverse district board will be better.
Chapter 2 Strategic Training
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
2013 Administration & Resource Management (AR) Division Climate Survey Results 21 January 2014.
INTRODUCTION Performance management is a relatively new concept to the field of management.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Strategic Management of Human Capital FY04 Implementing Projects Foreign Agricultural Service FY 2004.
2013 Employee Engagement Survey
Identification, Analysis and Management
2010 Employee Engagement Survey Executive Summary 6 December 2010.
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
A Performance Management System
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
Use a plan review Keep Score Provide incentives for positive behavior Manage knowledge retention & transfer Follow up for Sustainable Results Cox Ch 7.
Archived Information This information has been archived National Partnership for Reinventing Government 1999 Employee Survey U.S. Department of Education.
HayGroup HR EXPO WORKSHOPS Retaining Talent in Difficult Times: Why Productive Workers Leave… and how to keep them Why Productive Workers Leave… and how.
Management Practices Lecture-15.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Supporting and Sustaining Volunteers Nonprofit Learning Point September 23, 2015.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments Summary of Scope & Methodology A. Levin © SYNERGY Consulting Services Corporation, 1999.
The State of Maine Managerial Effectiveness Survey Results.
Emory University Climate Survey Results Presented to HR Leadership Group April 21, 2005 Del King Senior Director, Human Resources.
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
© Prentice Hall, Modern Management 9 th edition.
Federal Human Capital Survey: A Closer Look - FY 2008 The Department of the Treasury Building our Workforce for the Future April 2009.
“As You Teach, You Learn.” – Jewish Proverb Steven Baker May 25, 2011 Washington, DC.
Strategic Management of Human Capital FY04 Implementing Projects Farm Service Agency FY 2004.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
C ULTURE & C LIMATE S URVEY. Sample Employee Survey Report Findings ACME Widgets.
Evaluation Process and Findings. 300 briefings and presentations 10,000 people 400 workshops 12,000 people 175 service trips 3,000 people Program Activities.
Group Members: Teng Mei Ling031857X Chan Ren Hui031771G Siti Raudhah031569Q R.Laarvanya030886R Ong Woan Wen030954P Final Presentation!!
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
Research Results for P4 Prepared by Nikolay Filinov, Alexander Settles, Nadezda Bek and Nina Vladimirova of the Department of General and Strategic Management,
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Elements surrounding employee morale
Kerry Cleary An evaluation of the impact of Values Based Interviewing at the OUH Values Based Conversations and wider engagement strategies.
What is Facilitation? Facilitation is the process of taking a group through learning or change in a way that encourages all members of the group to participate.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
Trends and Drivers of Federal Employee Engagement
Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Employee Satisfaction Survey Results 2015 v Work Areas 2015 Response Count 2014 Response Count.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
United States Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration Office of Human Resources Management Presented by Dr. Zina.
The Federal Telework Program U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Corporate Social Responsibility: Connecting to Employees and Creating Sustainable Business Anne E. Herman, Ph.D. Kenexa Research Institute October 2008.
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 23, 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) From Results to Action Presented by: Kim Haney-Brown.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Items in red require your input
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Departure View Glossary
Employee Engagement Defined
Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here
Presentation transcript:

2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)

Annual Employee Survey (AES) Background Goals Collect data on HUD employees’ perceptions about how effectively the Department is managing its workforce. Give senior managers critical information to answer the question: What can I do to make my agency work better? Timing The 2009 survey was available online from September 8 – 30, 2009 Questionnaire Content 6 demographic questions 40 items related to employee satisfaction 9 new items related to job training Sample 9,608 surveys were sent to employees of which 5,212 were returned for a 54% response rate. All employees were free to participate. There was a 10% increase in response rate from the Federal Human Capital Survey that was conducted in

HUD Strengths and Weaknesses HUD employees enjoy the work that they do and find value in the Department’s priorities, however employees feel performance is not rewarded properly. Statements/questions with the most positive responses : The work I do is important. – 82% positive net score I know how my work relates to the agency’s goals and priorities. – 77% positive net score I like the kind of work I do. – 70% positive net score 3 Statements/questions with the most negative responses: Pay raises depend on how well employees perform their jobs. – 25% negative net score In my work unit, steps are taken to deal with a poor performer who cannot or will not improve. – 21% negative net score How satisfied are you with your opportunity to get a better job in your organization? – 9% negative net score Note: Percentages are displayed as net scores and reflect the difference between positive and negative responses

Changes at HUD Since 2008 HUD saw improvements in statements related to the areas of Performance Management and Leadership. Largest improvement from 2008: In my work unit, differences in performance are recognized in a meaningful way. – 11% increase I have a high level of respect for my organization's senior leaders. – 5% increase Creativity and innovation are rewarded. – 3% increase In my organization, leaders generate high levels of motivation and commitment in the workforce. – 3% increase 4 Note: Improvements are based on largest increases between 2009 and 2008 net scores (the difference between positive and negative responses)

Changes at HUD (cont.) HUD shows a negative trend in multiple areas when compared to the 2008 Federal Human Capital Survey (FHCS). 5 Specific Areas of Concern: Job Satisfaction o How satisfied are you with your involvement in decisions that affect your work? – 17% decrease Recruitment, Development and Retention o The workforce has the job-relevant knowledge and skills necessary to accomplish organizational goals. – 12% decrease Performance Culture o Managers/supervisors/team leaders work well with employees of different backgrounds. – 10% decrease Leadership o Managers review and evaluate the organization's progress toward meeting its goals and objectives. – 14% decrease o My organization has prepared employees for potential security threats. – 12% decrease o Managers communicate the goals and priorities of the organization – 10% decrease. Note: Specific areas of concern are based on largest decreases between 2009 and 2008 net scores (the difference between positive and negative responses)

2009 Annual Employee Survey Appendix U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)

Personal Work Experience In 2009, HUD expressed increase negative feelings towards their personal work experience. 7

Recruitment, Development and Retention HUD employees felt strongly that the workforce does not have the full knowledge and skills needed to accomplish their work. 8

Recruitment, Development and Retention (cont.) Physical conditions of HUD offices have been noted as another barrier that prevents HUD employees from performing at their best. 9

Performance Culture In the last year, HUD has improved its ability to recognize performance in a meaningful manner. 10

Performance Culture (cont.) Survey results indicate that leaders have room for improvement in working with a diverse workforce. 11

Leadership Since 2008 HUD employees respect for senior leaders has grown. However, HUD needs to improve how it tracks and communicates its progress toward meeting its goals. 12

Leadership (cont.) Employees felt that communication of goals and priorities was not as clear as in the prior year. Additionally, employees did not feel as well prepared for potential security threats. 13

Job Satisfaction HUD employees feel less satisfied in 2009 with their involvement in decisions that affect their work. 14

Job Satisfaction (cont.) Overall most HUD employees continue to feel satisfied with their job and pay. 15

Training Satisfaction Most program areas had more employees respond negatively regarding their training satisfaction than employees that had positive feelings. 16 Note: Not Applicable responses were eliminated from the sample and percentages were re-calculated

Training Satisfaction (cont.) In 2009, HUD employees had a better experience with informal training than with more formalized training programs. 17 Note: Not Applicable responses were eliminated from the sample and percentages were re-calculated