Carla Jamerson Fundamentals of Educational Research EDU 671 Instructor: Kathy Hoover October 15, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
JANUARY, Public high schools that serve English Language Learners who are Spanish speakers. 2.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Which test works? Abby Boughton Shuford Elementary Third Grade ELL students take a different kind of reading assessment.
SCHOOL PLAN Madison Park Middle School
Fast ForWord ® Best Practices for Administrators Sherrelle Jiggitts Walker Chief Education Officer Scientific Learning Corporation BC Circle of Learning.
San Juan High School Intermediate Intervention/Under-performing School Program By Mike Peebles, Teacher Partial fulfillment of ED251 Instructors: Duane.
NABE 2005 AN EFFECTIVE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT MODEL FOR EDUCATORS OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS & LANGUAGE ACQUISITION ACROSS GRADES AND CONTENT AREAS—AN.
FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOR HEALTHY LIVING FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PUTTING SUCCESS INTO WORDS Y Readers Charlotte, NC | Y READERS | ©2012 YMCA OF GREATER.
Effingham County Who is a Gifted Student? A student who demonstrates a high degree of intellectual and/or creative ability, exhibits an exceptionally.
Early Grade Reading: Egypt Case Dr. Reda Abouserie First Deputy to Minister of Education Egypt All Children Reading by 2015: From Assessment to Action.
The Importance of Providing Students With An Appropriate and Successful Educational Experience By Jennifer Felty EDUC 519.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
Hiring Practices “Getting it Right” Brenda Hammons- Assistant Superintendent Dave Cox – Director of Academic Programs.
Price Middle School – Needs Improvement List State Officials are closely monitoring our progress Focus on SWD Population have are not meeting expectations.
Portage North Middle School Principal: Dr. Celeste Harris Assistant Principal: Mr. Craig Medd “Where Failure is not an Option!”
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Title I Program Evaluation Report to the IDOE (Site Visit): April 3 rd, 2014 Parent Advisory Meeting/Program Evaluation: May 27 th, 2014 Report to the.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Updated Sept. 21, 2012 OHIO’S 3 RD GRADE READING GUARANTEE.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.
Write To Learn Stephanie Needham J Glenn Edwards Elementary/ Lee County Schools April 25, A Race to the Top Initiative.
What is a Title I? Title I is Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of This program provides financial assistance to states.
Theme: Teaching and Learning Goal: Provide quality curriculum and instruction that engages and meets the needs of all students in a diverse learning community.
Welcome Parent Information Night About Mrs. Gorski Originally from Schenectady, NY. Graduated Utica College in 2005 Masters from Syracuse University.
Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescent readers Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2006). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(3),
©IRRE First Things First : A Framework and Supports For District and School Reform William Moore, Ph.D Institute for Research and Reform in Education Boston,
Tailoring Literacy Instruction to Special Education Populations Sylvia Linan-Thompson Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts The University.
Robert Girvin SVSU Winter 2012 EDL 633. Merritt Academy Middle School  Approx. 130 students in grades 6-8.  We offer separate Reading & Writing courses.
Barbara Willingham. Area of Focus Statement To find effective tools, methods, and strategies to help improve reading skills, fluency, and comprehension.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
The Learning Journey Christie Kay, Teacher, Solana Pacific School Lisa Denham, Principal, Skyline School Leslie Fausset, Superintendent.
Literacy Plan Kara Klokis and Carol Pippen Longwood University.
The Interactive Strategies Approach to Early Literacy Intervention (ISA) Michelle Eackles RDG 692 Best Practices in Early Literacy Instruction Diane M.
THE METLIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER: CHALLENGES FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP Gwendolyn Thomas Kimberly Patterson Shannon Biggs.
RACHELLE VARGAS EDU 671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PROF. WANDA FERNANDOLULLE JANUARY 20, 2016 My Action Research Proposal.
Action Research Proposal EDU 671 KATHLEEN WALTERS 1.
THE CALIFORNIA ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT TEST (CELDT) Poway Unified School District.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Tara S. Burch EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Professor Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
Extensive Reading Interventions in Grades K - 3: From Research to Practice Scammacca, Vaughn, Roberts, Wanzek, & Torgesen (2007)
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research ( MRD1423A ) Instructor: Frederick Ansoff Andrea Chisholm.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation EDU 671 Fundamentals Of Educational Research By Valerie L. Brown.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Sharelius Holmes Dr. Miller EDU 671: Fundamental of Educational Research March 3, 2016.
Jamillah Gleason EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Dennis Lawrence Reading Literacy Action Research Proposal.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Action Research Proposal Presentation Shantel L. Pugh Dr. Jessica Bogunovich – Instructor EDU671 Ashford University.
DIANA G. FIELDING EDU-671 FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASHFORD UNIVERSITY DR. A. VALLEY DECEMBER 13, 2013.
LEARNING TECHNOLOGY TOOLS Dininne Grady Ashford University EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathleen Pierce-Freedman July 3, 2015.
Dena D. Johnson Ashford University EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
The impact of intervention groups on first grade reading benchmark scores Megan Romer EDU: 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Shelia Thomas October.
Can investing in teachers raise outcomes in disadvantaged schools? Anahita Assadi, Caroline Hall, Martin Lundin och Kristina Sibbmark IFAU.
Action Research Proposal LaTrisha Pennington Edu 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Dr. Newton Miller March 14, 2016.
Using Action Research To Empower North Carolina Educators A Race to the Top Initiative NC Department of Public Instruction Educator Effectiveness Division.
TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM Presented by Kerrie N. Berry EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor N. Miller.
ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PLAN Rachelle Ryan EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor Frederick Ansoff Thursday, February 27, 2014.
 The purpose of this study is to determine the best way to deliver instruction to students. I want to find out if whole group instruction or small group.
 Area of Focus to monitor fluency with students  That are behind in their reading skills and  use a program to see if the students improve  Both in.
Derryn Beasley EDU 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Frederick Ansoff May 22 nd, 2014.
Justin Allegra EDU 671 – Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Newton Miller Ashford University March 12, 2016 Action Research Proposal Final Project.
Welcome TJMS Families Back-to-School Night Ms. Lopez
Cambridge Primary Parent Information Night
Model Demonstration Projects
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Specialized Instruction at KMS
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Snowshoe Elementary School $109,762
Presentation transcript:

Carla Jamerson Fundamentals of Educational Research EDU 671 Instructor: Kathy Hoover October 15, 2015

Introduction The best afterschool programs do two things: they engage students in fun activities that create a desire to learn and they build on what students are learning during the school day to extend the knowledge they already have. The YMCA of Greater Long Beach California services the cities of Bellflower, San Pedro, Downey, Lakewood and Paramount. According to the 2015 Start Class Report the reading scores of this service area across the board are well below the national average (Washington, 2015). However, of these five cities the city of Bellflower schools have the lowest reading test scores in the area (Washington, 2015).

Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine if after school enrichment programs geared towards reading comprehension have a significant influence on the reading scores of second language students who have scored below average on the state academic test.

Explanation of the Problem Within the before and after school programs in the Bellflower school district I have seen a trend of less engagement in regards to planned activities and academic enrichment, associated with the academic areas of math and reading. Over the years the before and after school enrichment programs ran by the YMCA have seemed to lose focus on the academic perceptive of after school enrichment giving more attention to physical fitness and healthy living.

Explanation of the Problem Cont: Not to say that physical fitness and healthy living are not of great importance and should not be addressed in the curriculum associated with the YMCA’s after school enrichment. But as stated in the opening introduction the best afterschool programs do two things: they engage students in fun activities that create a desire to learn and they build on what students are learning during the school day to extend the knowledge they already have.

Description and Justification of Participants For this study I have chosen to focus on 4 students of which two are second language learners and are participants in the YMCA after school enrichment community. And two are traditional English learners. These students range from the ages of 7 and 8 years of age, grades 2nd and 3rd and scored below the national average in both reading and writing on the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress statewide exam, which replaced the California Star Exam in 2013.

Research Questions “What can I provide for effective reading instruction for second language English learners as well as the traditional English learners who are limited readers or nonreaders?” “What strategies will enhance the reading instruction of both the English second language learner and the traditional English learner?” “What methods of instruction will benefit the struggling reader?”

Intervention/Innovation Within my afterschool program I have chosen four students as participants for my reading comprehension study. Two are second language learners and two are traditional English learner’s grades 2 and 3. Each participant has scored below the national average in the area of reading comprehension skills. I have observed that all four students are unable to read at their grade level and are struggling with text comprehension. I have placed these students in groups of two by grade level to complete homework tasks and for participation in explicit skill instruction. Explicit skill instruction refers to task specific; teacher led instruction that overly demonstrates how to complete a task and can be used to teach students both basic and higher order reading skills.

Implication I will start with setting up a meeting to discuss the program with parents, students and staff. Once each volunteer and their parents are in agreement with the plan of intervention each student will be given reading pretest to determine their level of reading. Once the participants level of reading has been determined each student will participate in a six week program of explicit skill instruction. At the end of the six weeks on instruction each student will be given a post reading test.

Data Collection Pretest/Post-test Case Studies Questionnaires

Ethical Considerations Respect for persons-students will be treated with complete respect. Beneficence – Students will not be harmed because names will not be mentioned. Justice – Students will receive what they deserve in regards to a fair education. Informed Consent – Both students and parents will be noticed of the plan of action and informed that participation is voluntary.

Plan of Action As part of the daily afterschool enrichment program at the YMCA our students are given 1 hour homework time and 30 minutes of reading time Monday- Thursday. It will be during reading time that I with the help of an aide will implement explicit skill instruction with my four participants. So for 6 weeks during reading time my research participants will participate in explicit skill instruction.

Action Plan Cont: For the next six weeks participants will participate in the following activities. First 10 mins “Working with Words” Next 15 mins “Fluency Practice” Last 10 mins “Journal Writing”

Literature Review Hartry, A., Fitzgerald, R., & Porter, K. (2008). Implementing a structured reading program in an afterschool setting: Problems and potential solutions. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), , Retrieved from Katzir, T; Goldberg, A; Aryeh, T, Joffe B, Donnelley, K, Wolf, M. (2013). Intensity vs. Duration: Comparing the Effects of a Fluency-Based Reading Intervention Program, in After-School vs. Summer School Settings. Journal of Education and Training Studies, v1 n2 p61-73 Oct 2013 Retrieved from Kim, J.S, Capotosto, L, Hartry, A. & Fitzgerald, R. (2011).Can a Mixed- Method Literacy Intervention Improve the Reading Achievement of Low- Performing Elementary School Students in an After-School Program? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 183–201 DOI: / Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin- Glenn, M. (2004). The Effectiveness of Out-of-School-Time Strategies in Assisting Low-Achieving Students in Reading and Mathematics: A Research Synthesis. Retrieved

Literature Review Cont: Little, C. A., & Hines, A. H. (2006). Time to read: Advancing reading achievement after school. Journal of advanced Academics, 18(1), Retrieved from Martens, B. K., Eckert, T. L., Begeny, J. C., Lewandowski, L. J., DiGennaro, F. D., Montarello, S. A., & Fiese, B. H. (2007). Effects of a fluency- building program on the reading performance of low-achieving second and third grade students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), Retrieved from Mills, G. E. (2014). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc. Nelson-Royes, A.M. & Reglin, G.L. (2011). After-School Tutoring for Reading Achievement and Urban Middle School Student. Reading Improvement 48(3) Retrieved from Retrieved from Pierce, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Noam, G. G. (2007). Clusters of second and third grade dysfluent urban readers. Reading and Writing, 20(9), doi: Sanderson, D. R. (2003). Setting up a successful after school tutorial program: One district's journey. Reading Improvement, 40(1), 13. Retrieved from Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2003). Effective Reading Programs for English Language Learners. A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Retrieved from