Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Geodetic Reference Frames In Presence of Crustal Deformations Martin Lidberg 1,2, Maaria Nordman 3, Jan M. Johansson 1,4, Glenn A Milne5, Hans-Georg Scherneck.

Advertisements

Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.

IAG Sub-Commission 1.3c Regional Reference Frames for North America 1 Regional Reference Frames for North America Current Status & Future Plans of Regional.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.

LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.

Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.

Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.

Marc Véronneau Canadian Geodetic Survey, Surveyor General Branch

SOPAC's Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model: Yehuda Bock, Linette Prawirodirdjo, Peng Fang, Paul Jamason, Shimon Wdowinski (TAU, UMiami) Scripps Orbit.

Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.

New Geometric Datum: plans Modernizing the U.S. National Spatial Reference System FGCS San Diego, California Monday 11 July 2011.

International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.

1 North American Reference Frame (NAREF) Working Group Mike Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 2nd SNARF Workshop Montreal, May.

A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.

Overview of the SNARF Working Group, its activities, and accomplishments Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group (SNARF) Chair: Geoff Blewitt.

Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.

Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.

1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.

CORS and SNARF Giovanni Sella NOAA- National Geodetic Survey noaa.gov AGU Fall Meeting SNARF Splinter Session San Francisco, CA December.

Giovanni Sella CORS Program Manager NOAA-National Geodetic Survey CORS Program Updates FY Especially New Revised Coordinates CGSIC - Portland,

Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.

Deformation Analysis in the North American Plate’s Interior Calais E, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, Han JY,

Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,

First SNARF Workshop: Conclusions Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.

AGU Fall meeting Quality assessment of GPS reprocessed Terrestrial Reference Frame 1 IGN/LAREG and GRGS 2 University of Luxembourg X Collilieux.

First SNARF Workshop: Introduction Stable North America Working Group UNAVCO Inc., 27 Jan 2004 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT

National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,

Testing intraplate deformation in the North American plate interior E. Calais (Purdue Univ.), C. DeMets (U. Wisc.), J.M. Nocquet (Oxford and IGN) ● Is.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F

Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report

Earth Sciences Sector SLIDE 1 NAREF & CBN Velocity Solutions for a New Version of SNARF Mike Craymer Joe Henton Mike Piraszewski 8th SNARF Workshop AGU.

Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System

An updated Canadian GPS velocity field using NRCan’s Precise Point Positioning (PPP) Software – Plans and preliminary results J. Henton 1, M. Craymer 2,

New Vertical Datum: plans, status, GRAV-D update FGCS San Diego, CA. July 11, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical.

1 NAREF Analysis & ITRF2004 Densification Mike Craymer, Joe Henton Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada 3rd SNARF Workshop Santa Ana Pueblo,

Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.

1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.

NGS Updates MARTI IKEHARA, Geodetic Advisor CLSA Marin Chapter June 2011.

Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.

Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.

Understanding North American Geocentric Reference Frames in Geographic Calculator Dr. Qassim Abdullah, Woolpert, Inc. The 2015 Blue Marble User Conference.

Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.

The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,

Benefits of the New Reference Frames Dru Smith Joe Evjen 60 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.

GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.

PBO Frame Definition using SNARF Version 1.0 Tom Herring MIT.

Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…

5/18/2994G21D-04 Spring AGU Realization of a Stable North America Reference Frame Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary, Sciences,

Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea, James Davis, and Emma Hill Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Assessing the GIA Contribution to SNARF Mark Tamisiea and Jim Davis Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften (ÖAW) / Institut für Weltraumforschung (IWF), 8042 Graz, Austria, Contact:

Progress towards a common North American Geoid in 2012 Daniel Roman, Yan Wang & Xiaopeng Li National Geodetic Survey Geosciences Research Division.

Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.

Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Menlo Park GPS data processing and archiving J.L. Svarc, J.R. Murray, Fred Pollitz, Scott Haefner,

Ggim.un.org Positioning geospatial information to address global challenges UN-GGIM: Arab States WG3: Geodetic Reference Frame Zuheir Altamimi, IGN France.

Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F

Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan

Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1

Geodesy & Crustal Deformation

NRCan Velocity Fields & Comparisons to Some Plate Motion Estimates

Some recent decisions: NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey

Assimilated GIA Field.

VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe

Stable North America Reference Frame Working Group

Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF): Version 1

Presentation transcript:

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Reference Frames Panel Discussion M. Craymer Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada IAG Workshop on Monitoring North American Geoid Change Boulder, CO, October 21-23, 2009

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Collaboration via NAREF IAG Commission 1 Reference Frames Sub-Commission 1.3 Regional Reference Frames Regional Sub-Commission 1.3c for North America (NAREF) Regional Sub-Commission 1.3a for Europe (EUREF) Working Group 1 Regional Dense Velocity Fields ITRF Densification Reference Frame Transformations SNARF

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future NAD83 Background  Original realization based on Doppler RF = WGS84  Thought to be geocentric at the time  Now known to be offset by ~2 m and slightly misoriented  ~1.5 m difference at surface  Now realized as a best-fitting transformation from ITRF96 (IAG recommendation)  NAD83(CSRS) in Canada  NAD83(CORS96) in US  Frame kept aligned to N.A. using NUVEL-1A  Transformation updated to new ITRF’s using transformations between ITRF’s

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future NAD83 Realizations in Canada Version (epoch)FrameAdoptedDescription v0(n/a)Original Horizontal adjustments v1(?)CSRS96*1996Based on ITRF94? v2 (1997.0)CSRS98**1998Based on ITRF96 v3 (1997.0)2000Based on ITRF97 v4 (2002.0)2002Based on ITRF2000 v5 (2006.0)Based on ITRF2005 * Preliminary ITRF-NAD83 transformation (CSRS96) ** Adopted ITRF-NAD83 transformation (CSRS98=CSRS)  Difference between realizations primarily due to different epochs (crustal motion)  Reconciled with GPS velocity model/grid

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future NAD83(CSRS) Issues  Not geocentric  Not compatible with modern global frames  Motion of N.A. in ITRF modelled by NUVEL-1A  NUVEL-1A biased by ~2 mm/y  Need to periodically update frame to more recent epoch (eg, v4 & v5)  Need better estimate of plate motion  Many users/software believe NAD83=WGS84 !  h NAD83 – h WGS84/ITRF = -0.5 to >1 m ! ⇒ Replace NAD83 with an ITRF-based frame

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future NAREF ITRF Densification  Contributed Regional Solutions  NRCan/GSD (GIPSY + Bernese)  NRCan/PGC WCDA (Bernese)  NGS CORS (PAGES)  SIO Preliminary PBO (GAMIT/GLOBK)  MIT Official PBO Combos (GLOBK)  Products  Weekly coordinate combinations  Periodic velocity solutions

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Regional Contributions

NAREF Horizontal Velocities

w.r.t. ITRF2005 plate motion

NAREF Vertical Velocities

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future Canadian Campaign Solutions  Canadian Base Network (CBN)  Network of stable forced-centering pillars  Using 27 repeated campaign surveys  Three main campaigns ( , , )  Multiple 24 hr occupations/stations in each campaign  Processed with Bernese GPS Software  Same strategy as for continuous data

CBN Vertical Velocities

NAREF+CBN Vertical Velocities

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future GPS Velocity Grid for Canada Based on NAREF+CBN Vertical Velocities (some outliers removed)

Canada’s Natural Resources – Now and for the Future SNARF  Stable North American Reference Frame  Based on ITRF  Fixed to stable North America  Estimating transformation that minimizes motion of “frame” sites  Includes model of GIA  Weighted assimilation of GPS + a priori GIA model  SNARF v1.0 released Dec 1996  Based on NAREF & Calais velocity solutions  SNARF v2.0 still in preparation  Based on updated NAREF, Calais & MIT velocity solutions

SNARF v1.0