Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis 060622 Outline  Interviews of all the Group Leaders loosely or tightly concerned by hardware commissioning proposing them.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Jimenez AT/VAC Room Temperature (LSS) Vacuum Systems M. Jimenez.
Advertisements

LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
LTC Extended days, 03 March’08 J.M. Jimenez, AT Vacuum Group LHC Vacuum commissioning J.M. Jimenez On behalf of AT-VAC.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
Session th January 2010 R.Schmidt TE/MPE Hardware Commissioning 2010 and beyond R.Schmidt.
LARP Collaboration April 26 th 2006 The Commissioning of the Technical Systems of LHC 1.The final validation that all the collider components/systems.
HC review - 12 May 2005Luigi SERIO - AT/ACR/OP1 SECTOR COOL DOWN AND CRYOGENIC COMMISSIONING L. Serio.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
LHC Hardware Commissioning Review May 2005, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23 1 LHC Hardware Commissioning Review Contribution ID: 20 – Quality assurance and.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
Superconducting IR Magnets CHEN, Fusan May 11, 2007.
RSSO refresher meeting J. Pedersen M. Tavlet, T. Otto.
Review of Hardware Commissioning May 11-13, 2005 Hardware Commissioning Co-ordination Organisation Roberto Saban the logic day to day organization safety.
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
7/23/ J.Coupard. 1) Cryogenic risks 2) Cryogenic phases from RT/floating to nominal and additional safety rules A. Sectors warmed-up to RT or considered.
Status of LS1 collimator maintenance O. Aberle – 03/03/14 With input from P. Bestmann, S. De Man and J. Lendaro.
CMS Proposal for a Maintenance & Operation agreement with EN/CV/DC for fluorocarbon detector cooling circuits v.2 P. Tropea For the CMS experiment.
For more info:
Review of the operation scenarios and required manning of the activities P. Schnizer and L. Serio.
Hardware Commissioning Tools Robin. AB-CO TC 8th February 2007Hardware Commissioning Tools - RJL2 Summary Hardware Commissioning View Slides from Antonio.
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Review of Sector th of February Electrical Safety for the interventions during Hardware Commissioning of LHC Anne Funken, TS-ICC.
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
Work Organisation for Splice Consolidation Francesco Bertinelli 20 minutes presentation, 10 minutes discussion: 12 slides First LHC Splice Review, CERN,
Quality assurance - documentation and diagnostics during interventions Corrective maintenance seen from the Technical Infrastructure operation Peter Sollander,
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
4 December 2007Sylvain Weisz - LEMIC1 Status of LHC installation.
Review of Sector th of February Tunnel Access During Powering Tests Hugues Thiesen, AB-PO.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Conclusions on UPS powering test and procedure I. Romera Acknowledgements: V. Chareyre, M. Zerlauth 86 th MPP meeting –
CERN Jan 2006 Specific safety Issues for 2006 compared to 2004 P. Cennini AB Safety Requirement in case the Installation activities are going on.
Christophe Martin TE-MPE-EP 02/06/ The BIS and SMP activities during LS1 MPE Group Review, 2 June 2015 Christophe Martin, Stephane Gabourin & Nicolas.
Quality Assurance Overview Ranko Ostojic 12 Nov 2012.
MEF - Machines & Experimental Facilities March 2013 Project meeting Activities in Linac4 tunnel and building in 2013 March 2013 Project meeting 14/03/2013J.Coupard1.
MPE Workshop for LS1 Summary of Global Activities Thanks to Speakers Arjan Verweij Hugues Thiesen Zinur Charifoulline Kajetan Fuchsberger.
Training LHC Powering - Markus Zerlauth Powering Interlocks Markus Zerlauth AB/CO/MI.
MPP Meeting 07/03/2007 MPP Main Ring Magnet Performance Panel Meeting Wednesday 7th March 2007 Agenda: 1)Matters arising 2)Recommendations for the case.
An invitation to an open discussion We are team reviewing its performance globally We want to help each other to reach the objectives We know the other.
Closing session Issues and questions from the audience and some from me Rüdiger Schmidt.
Preparation for Circulating Beam - Part II Collimators (40') Oliver Aberle o Breakdown of tests foreseen in preparation for beam o Equipment folder: tests.
The prototype test String 2 May 13, 20082Roberto Saban – Academic Training Lecture 1 – Why LHC Hardware Commissioning?
Cryogenics Fault Tree A. Niemi & E. Rogova. Contents 1.Introduction of the current tree structure 2.Failure rates observed in 2015 failure data 3.Unsure.
Training LHC Powering – Blanca Perea Solano From Individual System Tests to Powering to Nominal Blanca Perea on behalf of Hardware Commissioning Coordination.
Hardware Commissioning Review, R. Denz, 12-May Superconducting circuits: what remains to be done during hardware commissioning R. Denz AT-MEL-PM.
LHC experience with installation Katy Foraz March 6th 2008, Dubna GDE Meeting - ILC Conventional Facilities and Siting Workshop ***********************************
(Access system for HWC)
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Putting it all together
Minimum Hardware Commissioning – Disclaimer
Giorgio on behalf of ELQA team
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
MPE main activities planned for LS2
Cryogenic Risk Assessment in LHC
Powering from short circuit tests up to nominal
Agenda Contents Different types of documents
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
Brief report of the hardware commissioning activities
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
Commissioning of the LHC superconducting magnets systems: Why an LHC Hardware Commissioning? Specificity and complexity of this machine Roberto Saban.
Hardware Commissioning
Review of hardware commissioning
Presentation transcript:

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Outline  Interviews of all the Group Leaders loosely or tightly concerned by hardware commissioning proposing them 1.to review how the recommendations concerning them had been followed and 2.interrogating them on difficulties they think would encountered during the exercise. AB: F.Bordry, P.Collier, R.Garoby, J.Lettry, T.Linnecar, V.Mertens, H.Schmickler AT: K.H.Me β, A.Poncet, L.Rossi, P.Strubin, L.Tavian TS: P.Ciriani, C.Hauviller, J.Iñigo.Golfín, Th.Pettersson, JP.Quesnel, E.Tsesmelis SC: R.Trant

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis glossary decisiontaken during the review and all necessary technical and administrative measures must have been taken done pendingwork has started but not completed not addressedor no news

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis pending/9 documentation a lot of progress but much missing no news from : vacuum many promises from: cryo (2x), elqa, collimators, bdi others being prepared: beam dump as-installed reference database & visibility of non- conformities in MTF was discussed, was said to be OK, at last Chamonix it appears that it needs some follow-up tunnel ventilation modes compatible with survey & leak tests time slot for the smoothing of the alignment swift tuning of cryogenic loop families 2, 6 9, 10, 38 19,

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis not addressed/7 revisit leak test scenario more automated test procedures for qps, more parallelism assess cost & benefit vacuum piquet assess risk & benefit of non-nominal tests for the DFBs safety responsibility for injection test 7 32, 36,

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis done/15 ES on access conditions during ISTs and HC effects and consequences of power cuts fieldbus related application deployment (schedule & priorities) software infrastructure (analysis, post-mortem) computer network safety electricity contract ES on safety of connection & disconnection of cables on superconducting circuits sensitivity of quench detection, voltage signal across 60 and 120 A circuits 4, , 14, 16 11, , 31 33, 35

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis decisions/10 location of the control room field staff for HCC: redeployment, complements, national institutes the Crisis Team ownership of global pressure test cryogenic operation staff functional tests of DFBs 12 kA for main magnets commissioned sectors float to 80 K Main Rings Group , 27 40

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Documentation  Where documentation had been identified as missing during the review last year all those who have still to produce documentation agreed this recommendation should be followed. This concerns the Beam Dumping System, Controls, Cryogenic Instrumentation, Cryogenics (failure scenarios), Electrical Quality Assurance and Vacuum (cold and warm, tests and failure scenarios). Many have already started working on the missing documents: will they ever finish? Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis As-installed reference database, deviations and non-conformities The need for a tool for operation which would reflect the machine as it was installed and would contain the equipment non-conformities as discovered during the tests and during the commissioning was clearly expressed during the review last year. Very little, close to nothing, was done during the past year. It was recognized that it is not additional data which is required, but rather a tool which synthesizes the information already present in the MTF, the reference database and other databases. Thomas recognized that his Group, probably together with AB/CO, has to start working on this. Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Ventilation Modes Presently the ventilation of the sectors passes m 3 /h everywhere except in sector 34 where the value is m 3 /h. On request, the ventilation of sectors can be adapted to the needs of the ongoing activity (e.g. reduced to or 0 m 3 /h). This has been done for survey. It is manual and no automatic surveillance of the system is available. Is there a safety issue? Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Leak test scenario and vacuum piquet A study which revisits it in the light of the final installation scenario is under preparation by P.Cruikshank. A piquet service is foreseen during normal operation: during commissioning experts are called in. However a piquet must be there during the leak and pressure tests (PStr). Teams from the interconnects (CRI) must be secured so that they are ready for an intervention when a leak is localized. Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Tests of the DFBs in non-nominal conditions The assessment was negative (LTavian, KHMe β ). These tests will not be carried-out. Type tests of the first DFBs should take of the order of 3-4 weeks. Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Temperature of the tested sectors Maintaining all the sectors below 80 K to avoid repeating electrical quality assurance require appropriate manning of the controls and operation section of ACR. This will be achieved either with the Indian collaborators or with ALLS (LT). With the present schedule however it is more likely that – if no corrections/repairs are required to a commissioned sector - the sector will be left floating. There is a request (FBor) –for at least sector 78 – that it is kept cold at nominal temperature for fine tuning and experimenting with systems/operation. Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Powering at 12 kA LRossi pointed out that during one year and a half the magnets on the test bench were not taken beyond nominal current. This decision can be confirmed only after experience with the commissioning of the first sector. Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Negotiate and establish with the SC the detailed cryogenic conditions of forbidden, restricted and free access to the tunnels being cooled down An ES on SAFETY DURING INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM TESTS AND HARDWARE COMMISSIONING was prepared and approved; it mainly deals with access conditions and training. However, the transport of heavy (e.g. magnets in sector 78) and not so heavy loads in the presence of a cold string of magnets must be revisited. Does it present a danger for the equipment, for the personnel? Recommendations

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Crisis Team The Crisis Team has been complemented by a task force (MPP) in the AT Department, led by A.Siemko, which takes over from Mr.Circuit the responsibility for the analysis of the quench/commissioning data for the superconducting circuits and assists the HCC in the decision to continue the tests. Recommendations HCC Equipment group Equipment group Equipment group Equipment group Equipment group Equipment group Equipment group Equipment group MPP Superconducting circuits AT Department

Roberto Saban TS HC Review bis Action list Documentation A tool to consult the as-installed reference database What do we do with sector 78 Transport along a cold string of magnets