PBIS Coaches Networking: Tier 2 January 13 & 14, 2016 Marlene Gross-Ackeret Lori Cameron Emilie O’Connor

Wisconsin RtI Center Our vision: All Wisconsin students will learn and be successful in life. Our mission: To build the capacity of Wisconsin schools to develop and sustain a culturally responsive multi-level system of support to ensure the success for all students.

PBIS Coaches Networking Outcomes Connect Stakeholders Encourage collaborative learning Further develop implementation of PBIS Gather resources & model processes Address technical and adaptive change

Sticking to our norms Be here Begin on time. Be present. Avoid side conversations. Be positive & productive Put ideas forward Listen actively Assume positive intentions Be respectful Stay on agenda Monitor your airtime. Discuss ideas, not people Honor confidentiality Be Prepared Do what you’ve committed to do Share and network with colleagues

Today’s Agenda Introductions Tiered Fidelity Inventory Update: Dave Stanley – West Allis/West Milwaukee This year’s focus: Culturally Responsive Data-Based Decision- Making What’s up at The RtI Center/PBIS Network? Networking

Introductions Please take a moment to State your name Role One thing that’s going well with your Tier 2 System

Networking What topics would you like to network about?

TIERED FIDELITY INVENTORY (TFI) Dave Stanley

CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE DATA- BASED DECISION-MAKING Tier 2 Systems

Burning Question: What happens when the students in Tier 2 interventions are from the same subgroup? Students of color Students receiving ELL services Students receiving special education All majority/white students Etc… (Is this true for your school?) (Does your Systems Team look at this? Know HOW to look at this?)

Step 1: Problem Identification Risk Ratio – Represent the likelihood of the outcome (e.g., ODRs) for one group in relation to a comparison group. – Works for any educational outcome. – Comparison group most commonly used is white students Risk index for all other groups is sometimes used – Risk Ratio = 1.0 is indicative of equal risk – Risk Ratio > 1.0 is indicative of overrepresentation – Risk Ratio < 1.0 is indicative of underrepresentation Risk Index of Target Group Risk Index of Comparison Group Risk Index of Latino Students Risk Index of White Students = 1.27

Risk Ratio Module

Other Examples Students of color enrolled in AP courses Achievement gaps in state testing/screening Attendance gaps by neighborhood Girls enrolled in computer programming/STEM courses

Work time Run a risk ratio Create a problem statement: “The way our system is set up now, xxx students are xxx times more likely to xxx than xxx.” Example: The way our Tier 2 System is set up now, Black students are 4 times more likely to be in CICO than white students.

2. Problem Analysis 3. Plan Implementation 4. Plan Evaluation 1. Problem Identification Is there a problem? Why is it happening? What should be done? Is the plan working? (All data use slides adopted from Kelsey Morris; Using Data Presentation;

Step 2: Problem Analysis Why is it happening? By finding the specific cause of the problem, teams can identify more effective solutions. Focus: identifying variables that can be changed, not individual traits or variables that are beyond the control of the system(i.e. no blaming the studentsor their families!).

Problem Why?

Variables Over Which School has Control Technical Policies Procedures Programs Schedule Curriculum Instructional methods Staff roles and responsibilities SLOs Staff development Team protocols Imaging Interaction patterns Adaptive Low expectations/fixed mindset Biases, resentments, fears Sense of self-efficacy Knowledge Stereotypes, misconceptions Deficit vs. asset thinking Belief systems Ownership of vision/mission Relationships Connectedness to schooling History with schooling

Resources Equity in PBIS website from OSEP PBIS Technical Assistance Centerwebsite Data Guidebook WI Risk Ratio module and tool WI Risk Ratio module and tool

Connect and Engage Next Online Technical Assistance Sessions – Tier 1 and 2: January 19! Tier One Training Cohort – Begins April 13 th Tier Two Training Cohort – Begins March 1st