Effective Removal of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Using MIEX Ion Exchange Treatment J. Michael Barnes, PE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arsenic/Iron Co-Precipitation and High Rate Filtration in the City of Portage Christopher Barnes, P.E., City of Portage Kendra Gwin, P.E., City of Portage.
Advertisements

Overview AST Clean water technologies was requested to design and construct an Industrial Waste water Treatment Plant with a capacity of 35 m 3 /h in.
Reducing THM via Aeration: A Case Study November 21, 2013 by Gary Williams, P.E. Jones & Henry Engineers Southeast AWWA District Meeting 1.
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
The Stage 1 Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproduct Rule.
Case Study: Disinfection byproducts in a recently constructed public water supply Maria O’Connell, P.E. Kristine Wheeler, P.E. New York State Department.
You can hardly find water which has no problem with one of 5 typical contaminants: Hardness Iron Manganese Natural organic matter (NOM) Smell of ammonia.
Simultaneous Solutions for Aesthetics and Other Water Quality Problems Stephen Booth, PhD Craig Thompson, PE.
DISINFECTION BY PRODUCTS IN ALASKAN WATER SYSTEMS by Lee Johnson, P.E. ADEC Drinking Water Program Northern Program
Membrane Softening Water Treatment Plant completed in –Upper Floridan groundwater wells provide the source water for treatment. –Treatment process.
Xccelerated Coagulation For wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Textile Processing House.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration? ä Where should the plant(s) be located?
Drinking Water Technical Assistance Water Treatment Plant and Distribution System KY Water and Wastewater Operators Association 57 th Annual Conference.
Improving Water Quality Purification of Drinking Water General process: Collected from reservoir or ground water.
Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study 1.
Effective Use Of Peracetic Acid to Reduce Effluent Disinfection Byproduct in Water Resource Recovery Facilities Isaiah Shapiro, EIT Dimitri Katehis PhD,
Civil and environmental engineering Use of Abandoned Mine Drainage for Hydraulic Fracturing in Marcellus Shale Radisav D. Vidic Department of Civil and.
POU Arsenic Removal Team DHMO Justin Ferrentino Barry Schnorr Haixian Huang David Harrison.
Formation and Dissipation of Trihalomethanes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery Operations Jason Pulley City of Salem Public Works.
Operational Evaluation Level Stage 2 D/DBP Rule Compliance Michael W. Deal Compliance Assurance Section Central Office Division of Drinking And Ground.
OPG WTP Performance / Trends in High Purity Water Treatment Presented at IAPWS Workshop May 11, 2009 By Gabriel Nicolaides.
Assessing Plant DBP Performance Using the DBP-CPE Warren J. Swanson, P.E RMSAWWA/RMWEA Annual Conference Grand Junction, Colorado Schmueser gordon.
USEPA Regulations By Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant Presented to Entrepreneurs Association of Bari.
Buckhorn Disinfection Byproducts / Backwash Disposal Project Board of Directors Meeting June 14, 2012.
Water System Planning Study
Volvo Group North America, LLC Reuse of Wastewater - A Manufacturer’s Experience Steve Pierett, Env.Mgr. CEM, CRM, CP EnMS-Industrial.
New Jersey American Water Springfield Water Treatment Plant Planning and Design.
1 Waste Treatment, Chemical ENVE Why Treat Waste Have a RCRA Waste –TSDS –Treat instead of disposal, landfill –Treat before disposal Or treat in.
STAGE 2 DISINFECTION BY- PRODUCTS (DBP’S) A GUIDE TO COMPLIANCE 1.
Processing, distribution and use of water.
Cottonwood Water & Sanitation DistrictSeptember 2002 Arber Indirect Potable Reuse at Cottonwood Water and Sanitation District Rick Arber, Ben Johnson Richard.
What effects do they have in drinking water
Dr. Joel J. Ducoste, North Carolina State University, 1 Importance of water “Water is life” Looking at water, you might think that it's the most simple.
$200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 MCLsMonitoring RulesReporting.
State of Alaska Implementation of MBDP Rules Carrie Bohan Environmental Program Specialist ADEC DW Program.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Denver Water’s Preparation for the Stage 2 Disinfectant By-Product Rule Bruce Hale (DW) Steve Lohman (DW) Arnold Strasser (DW) Edward Koval (B&V)
City of Palm Coast, Florida City Council Meeting October 2, 2012.
Wastewater Treatment 1 Water Treatment: Why? zHealthful to drink zClean enough to return to the environment......usually for others downstream to use again!
Anion Exchange for Drinking Water Treatment
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
NC AWWA-WEA 2015 Annual Conference Monday, November 16, 2015 The Use of Chlorine Dioxide to Reduce TOC at Davidson Water, Inc. Water Treatment Plant.
Reclaimed Water Solution for Disposal Capacity Village of Bald Head Island 2015 NC AWWA - WEA Annual Conference November 17, 2015.
Date: Monday, May 11 th 2015 Topic: Water Purification Objective: To recognize the stages of it.
Presented by Trevor Higgins DBO Contract: Veolia Water.
December 10, 2009 TOWN OF PALM BEACH WATER COMMITTEE Discussion of Water Plant Options.
Water Quality Facts John Shirey City Manager William Busath, P.E. Director of Utilities Pravani Vandeyar Water Quality Superintendent.
1 Highland Water District CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department |  1   Reuse, Every Drop Has Value Seminar FPL JPA.
Advanced Technologies for Attaining and Maintaining DBP Compliance
Jon Risgaard, Wastewater Branch Rick Bolich, Raleigh Regional Office
Fuel oil treatment system Distillate oil cleaning
Outline of Presentation
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Unit 5: Solutions ppm and ppb.
North Carolina Surface Water Analysis
Jim Flechtner, PE Executive Director April 26, 2018
Pilot testing services and a case study to reduce organics Devendra Borikar, Laura Zettler, Jeff Avedesian, Lindsay Ariss, Luc Léonard, Denis Dolbec,
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Unit 5: Solutions ppm and ppb.
Southwest Section AWWA 2018 – Baton Rouge, LA
Optimization of IEX resin regeneration in a zero liquid discharge drinking water treatment plant Klaas Schoutteten De Watergroep / Ghent University / KWR.
Adapting to a New Era: Declining Flow and Deteriorating Water Quality
Water Quality Vocabulary Oct 18, 2011
Case Study: Lebanon Water Works
Lebanon Water Works National Optimization Goals Case Study - Meeting the Goals at the Lebanon Water Works Company Daren Thompson, MBA, MPM.
Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Effective Removal of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Using MIEX Ion Exchange Treatment J. Michael Barnes, PE

What is MIEX Project Background Why MIEX? Cost Analysis What are the results Presentation Outline

Ion Exchange Process by Orica that removes DOC Source: Ixiom Watercare What is MIEX?

Ion Exchange Process by Orica that removes DOC Source: Ixiom Watercare What is MIEX?

Source: Ixiom Watercare What is MIEX?

First plant started up in 2001 in Australia First US installation in 2005 in Florida First NC installation in Johnston County 2011 Second NC installation in Roxboro 2014 What is MIEX?

Roxboro, North Carolina. NOV in 2010 Average water treated per day is 2.6 MGD Maximum water treated per day is 3.4 MGD Plant capacity is 8 MGD Study looked at – Raw Water TOC concentration – WTP TOC removal efficiency – Distribution concentrations of TTHM’s and HAA’s Project Background

Raw Water Concentration Measurements – TOC average was 5.6 DOC average was 4.7 Project Background

WTP TOC Removal Efficiency – Was feeding alum at approx 60 ppm for coagulant – Average TOC after removal was 2.55 ( ) – Average TOC removal % was 50% ( )

Distribution Concentrations of TTHM and HAA – 4 Sample Sites - Averaged over 80 ug/l ( ) – 7 out of the 16 readings were above limits – Must meet Stage 2 by October 2015 Project Background

Distribution Concentrations of TTHM and HAA – 4 Sample Sites - Avg below 60 ug/l ( ) – 2 out of the 16 readings were above limits – Must meet Stage 2 by October 2015

Why MIEX? Ion Exchange versus chemical coagulant Investigated change from alum to: – Ferric Sulfate at 80 ppm – Carbon at 40 ppm Ran Life Cycle Cost Analysis for both solutions Compared at 4.0 MGD and 8.0 MGD

Why MIEX? 8.0 MGD 4.0 MGD Chem CoagMIEX Chem CoagMIEX Capital Cost Annual Chem Costs Annual Sludge Disposal Present worth at 7% 20 Yrs Total *Costs in Millions

Results Since 2015 Average TOC after MIEX is 1.34 (vs 2.55) Average Removal % is 75% (vs. 50%) TTHM average 51 ug/l (vs 81 ug/l) HAA average 21 ug/l (vs 44 ug/l)

Questions