DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK) What are students being asked to do? How complex is the student thinking?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Advertisements

Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Teaching and Learning at All Levels
Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Common Core Elementary Symposium Transitioning to the Common Core
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Teaching with Depth… using Questions Partially Adapted from Polk County, Florida Professional Development Presentation.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge Teaching and Learning at All Levels.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Major Science Project Process A blueprint for experiment success.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
With great power comes great responsibility.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
What is RIGOR in the Math Classroom?. Presenter Introduction: Stephanie Darley East Valley RttT Math Coach Curriculum Coach at DHHS Been with TLG for.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Materials FCAT Achievement Levels Test Content and Format, pg. 12 (FCAT Skills Assessed) Examples of Reading Activities Across Cognitive Complexity Levels,
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Practical Tips for Increasing Student Thinking & Learning
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Norman L Webb.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK) What are students being asked to do? How complex is the student thinking?

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) is A scale of cognitive demand (thinking) to align standards with assessments Descriptive of the task students are being asked to do Based on the research of Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin Center for Education Research and the National Institute for Science Education  Not the same as difficulty

 To align instructional activities with the cognitive rigor needed to master the standards  Is used by Smarter Balanced to indicate the complexity of the assessment task/item  Will be used to develop new NGSS assessments  Applicable to all subject areas and at all grade levels

Varying Level of Cognitive Demand ELA Retell or summarize Little Red Riding Hood in your own words. What is your opinion about the intelligence of the wolf (in Little Red Riding Hood)? Justify using details/evidence from the story.

Varying Level of Cognitive Demand Mathematics Is 4/5 closer to 1 than 5/4? 4/5 is closer to 1 than 5/4. Show why this is true on a number line.

How are the new assessments changing? MATHEMATICSELA / LITERACY DOK 3DOK 4DOK 3DOK 4 Current Assessments<2%0%20%2% New SBAC Assessments49%21%43%25% Yuan & Le (2012); Herman & Linn (2013), from Linda Darling-Hammond Assembly Testimony, Smarter Balanced Depth of Knowledge Goals for Items

Write a definition of Cognitive Rigor on your DOK note-taking guide. Read “Worldwide Loss of Bees”– develop one basic question and one “rigorous” question. Share your questions with a partner

Rating Depth of Knowledge (DOK)

In your classroom: What part of your classroom instruction is spent in each DOK Level? Which DOK levels are assessments focused on? What lessons / activities engage students in the different DOK Levels? What DOK level would you assign your “Ant and The Grasshopper” questions?

Webb’s 4 Levels of Cognitive Complexity DOK 1: Recall & Reproduction DOK 2: Basic Application of Skills/Concepts DOK 3: Strategic Thinking and Reasoning DOK 4: Extended Thinking

LEVEL 1: RECALL Requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or simple procedure and/or performing simple procedures. Involves only basic initial comprehension, not an analysis or interpretation. Students are to work with specific facts or definitions. The activity requires a shallow understanding of the topic or text.

LEVEL 2: Skills and Concepts Includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem Actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step

Recall vs. Skills & Concepts MATH How many minutes did it take Selena to do 3 problems? Selena continues to work at the same rate. How many problems will she do in 40 minutes? Selena’s

Recall vs. Skills & Concepts Science Identify parts of the cell Distinguish between a plant cell and an animal cell

LEVEL 3: Strategic Thinking Requires deep understanding exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning The cognitive demands are complex and abstract An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response would most likely be a Level 3

3. Strategic Thinking Mathematics Solve a multi-step problem, and provide support with a mathematical explanation that justifies the answer. Beto and Jose were playing a game. At the end of each game, the loser gave the winner a penny. After a while, Jose won 3 games and Beto had 3 more pennies than he did when he began. How many games did they play.

3. Strategic Thinking A species may become extinct if environmental changes occur and the species does not adapt quickly enough to the changes. 1. Identify an environmental change that might cause a species to become extinct and identify a species that would likely be affected by such a change. 2. Describe how extinction of one species can affect other organisms in the ecosystem

Extended Thinking: Level 4 Requires high cognitive demand and is very complex Students are expected to make connections, relate ideas within the content or among content areas, and select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 often requires an extended period of time

Extended Thinking ELA/Science Construct an explanation based on evidence for how the availability of natural resources, occurrence of natural hazards, and changes in climate have influenced human activity. (NGSS HS-ESS3-1.)

Extended Thinking Science Evaluate competing design solutions for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services.* (NGSS MS-LS2-5.)

TaskThinkingDOK Level Collecting data samples over several months Recall1 Organizing data in a chartSkills / Concept2 Using charts and graphs to make predictions and justify conclusions with evidence Strategic Thinking 3 Developing a generalized model from data, graphs and analysis and applying it to a new situation or to solve a new problem Extended thinking 4

DOK an Introduction Take a few minutes to read through the descriptions or bullets for the levels of DOK 1-4 in Science How does your original definition of Cognitive Rigor Change?

Rate the Examples Level of DOK Compare and contrast desert and tropical climates. After observing a creek bed over time and analyzing data, solve a problem to improve the ecosystem. Use a glossary to define the term evaporation Explain the cause- effect relationship of dropping an object from different heights Try it!

Rate the Examples Level of DOK Identify the elements in Nitric Acid Evaluate the validity and reliability of claims in published materials of the effects that different frequencies of electromagnetic radiation have when absorbed by matter. Construct an explanation for the anatomical similarities and differences among modern organisms and between modern and fossil organisms to infer evolutionary relationships. Try it!

Rate the Level of DOK Draw and label a diagram that shows how a mid-ocean ridge forms and describe two possible consequences that the formation of mid-ocean ridges has on other locations on Earth Complete research regarding Organic, GMO and other agricultural practices. Compare legislation from around the world. Create a document with your point of view. Determine the average speed of an object when given the distance it travels in a specific amount of time Explain the process of radioactive decay Try it!

The depth of knowledge level is NOT determined by the verb, but by the context in which the verb is used and the complexity of thinking required. Depth of Knowledge

Same Verb – 3 Different Levels of DOK DOK 1- Describe three characteristics of metamorphic rocks. (Requires simple recall) DOK 2- Describe the difference between metamorphic and igneous rocks. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two rock types) DOK 3- Describe a model that you might use to represent the relationships that exist within the rock cycle. (Requires deep understanding of rock cycle and a determination of how best to represent it) Caution 1

Sort the problems by DOK Levels Choose a set of cards With your partner, sort the 8 cards based on the DOK level Compare your results with your table partners

DOK is about intended outcome not about Difficulty DOK is a reference to the complexity of mental processing that must occur to answer a question, perform a task, or generate a product. Adding is a mental process Knowing the rule for adding is the intended outcome that influences the DOK Once someone learns the “rule” of how to add, is DOK 1 and is also easy Adding 4,678, ,578,885 is still a DOK 1 but may be more “difficult”

Points to Consider DOK 1 + DOK 1 + DOK 1 = 1 Depths of knowledge classification is based on the task, not the student DOK is different from task/item difficulty DOK is not a grade level indicator DOK ratings aid in alignment of standards and assessment, and therefore instruction

How Many of Each Type of Problem? Colorado Department of Education

Creating DOK Questions and Activities at all levels

DOK: Questions at lower levels are usually more appropriate for: Evaluating students’ preparation and comprehension Diagnosing students’ strengths and weaknesses Reviewing and/or summarizing Usually questions at upper DOK levels are appropriate for: Encouraging students to think deeply and critically Problem solving Encouraging Discussions Stimulating students to seek information on their own From Karin Hess

DOK 1, 2, 3, 4 Level 1— Identify the tree Level 2— Explain the function of the leaves Level 3— Explain how a drought might affect the growth of the tree Level 4— Design an investigation of seedling growth to determine the best fertilizer for this type of tree. Oak Tree

DOK 1, 2, 3 and 4 Level 1— Identify this utensil Level 2— Level 3— Level 4—

Reflect on your learning… Revisit your definition of rigor – has it changed or been refined? How? What is one way you might apply these ideas to your work? How might you shift your classroom instructional and assessment practices? What existing materials could you examine for a range of cognitive rigor? From Karin Hess

Questions and Thoughts What questions and thoughts do you still have regarding DOK?