1. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 1 B Physics and the High Energy Frontier — (Super) B Factory/Tevatron (LHC)

2. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 2 Strategy / Disclaimer Phenomena Pertinent to BSM Physics (vs Expt’l detail — not always most up-to-date ) [No “B Chemistry” (goto CKM meeting (Tim Gershon), if desired) Short-term impact  This Decade 2010 − 2019 “Traditional” on BSM topics Cannot cite all TH work, but unabashedly promote own pheno work and not too tricky... vs 2000 − 2009

3. NP in B and Collider George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP-IX New Physics Hints in B Decays and Collider Outlook January 7, 2006, WHEPP9 @ Bhubaneswar 1

4. Flavor/TeV George W.S. Hou (NTU) SUSY’07, 07/07 Search for TeV Scale Physics in Heavy Flavour Decays July 28, SUSY 2007 @ Karlsruhe 1

5. Thanks for WHEPP IX initiation! Makes me look forward to 2014 …

6. Will skip Bottomonium, D, K, , 

7. Down to Earth the (un) Heavenly Things v. e. v. Higgs Castle c l o u d s Child Eating Giant (LHC/ILC?) http://pbjc-lib.state.ar.us/mural.htm Flavour/TeV ≅ Loops High Energy Frontier

8. Flavor/TeV George W.S. Hou (NTU) SUSY’07, 07/07 8 6 0. “Forward to the Past” as Intro SuperPowered Theorists ? or Wormhole to the Future? Search for Future Influence from L.H.C Authors: Holger B. Nielsen, Masao NinomiyaHolger B. NielsenMasao Ninomiya (Submitted on 13 Jul 2007) Wormhole from/to the Future?

9. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 9 Beware the Nielsen-Ninomiya Effect !

10. Flavor/TeV George W.S. Hou (NTU) SUSY’07, 07/07 R. Cahn -- SSI-2006 sin 2  history (1999-2005) Discovery claimed What If ?        arg V td 7

11. Flavor/TeV George W.S. Hou (NTU) SUSY’07, 07/07 b  d transitions consistent with SM What about b  s transitions ? Our Main Theme 10

12. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 12 "for the discovery of the mechanism of spontaneous broken symmetry in subatomic physics" discoverorigin "for the discovery of the origin of the predict broken symmetry which predicts the existence of at least three families of quarks in nature" The Nobel Prize in Physics 2008 Photo: Universtity of ChicagoPhoto: KEK Photo: Kyoto University Yoichiro Nambu Makoto KobayashiToshihide Maskawa 1/2 of the prize 1/4 of the prize USA Japan Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) Tsukuba, Japan Kyoto Sangyo University; Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics (YITP), Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan b. 1921 (in Tokyo, Japan) b. 1944 b. 1940 CP Violation in SM 7 October 2008 B Factory

13. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 13 Outline 0 Intro to Intro I Intro to CP Violation II CPV in b  s w/ Boxes and Penguins S AA CP  S ;  A K   ; sin 2  B s  ; [ A CP  (B +  J/  K + ) ] III H  Probe: b  s   ; B  , [D ( * )  ] IV Electroweak Penguin: A FB (B  K* ℓ ℓ ) ; B  K ( * ) V RH Currents and Scalar Interactions  TCPV in B  X    ; B s   VI Conclusion

14. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 14 I. Introduction to CP Violation

15. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 15 CP Asymmetry needs both CP Conserv/Violating Phase Particle Process Anti Particle Process CP Violation Primer QM i iCPV

16. ElectroMagnetism: Charge e is Real. “We” Understand: Gauge Charge is Real. How CP Violation Appears Complex Coupling Imagine a Complex Coupling : True, or, Possible, for Yukawa ( 湯川 ) Coupling of quarks/leptons to Higgs boson(s)... Quantum Interference Amplitude More Interesting Quantum Interference in Amplitude More Interesting i in Dynamics: CPV & BAU (everyone can feel B aryon A symmetry of U niverse

17. CPV & BAU (& U): The Sakharov View Bang Us Baryon Number V iolation CP Violation (“Direction”) N onequilibrium (“Direction”) Pair Annihilation (  Cosmic Microwave Background ) 10 -9 Matter left ! Equal Matter -Antimatter (1966)

18. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 18 Complex Dynamics V CKM Unitary 3x3 “Rotation” Need presence of all 3 generations to exhibit CPV in Standard Model

19. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 19 Unique CPV Phase: Common A rea of Triangle Wolfenstein Parametrization to O( 5 ) N.B. geometric picture

20. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 20 Tree Penguin Interference N.B. Would need also CP Conserving Phase Difference  Most Intuitive: “Direct” CPV in B → K  CPV Phase DCPV

21. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 21

22. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 22 K: 1964 1999 CP Violation History Mixing(-dep.) Direct B: 2001 2004 0.2 % 70 % 0.0004 % 10 %

23. Nobel 2008 – B Factory to LHC George W.S. Hou (NTU) FPCP, June 1, 2009 51 Kobayashi’s Nobel slides

24. Nobel 2008 – B Factory to LHC George W.S. Hou (NTU) FPCP, June 1, 2009 CPV CPV so far only observed in KM... Nontrivial CPV Phase Nontrivial All like-charge quark pairs nondegenerate, Otherwise  Back to 2-gen. and CPV vanish. CPV J arlskog’s Invariant for CPV 52

25. Nobel 2008 – B Factory to LHC George W.S. Hou (NTU) FPCP, June 1, 2009 J seems short of the Universe by at least   53 Kobayashi’s Nobel slides

26. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 26 CPV & BAU definitely a H.E. Frontier

27. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 27 b  s II. CPV in b  s w/ Boxes and Penguins The Current Frontier    Echoes S  A K   sin 2  B s  A CP  S ;  A K   ; sin 2  B s  ; [ A CP  (B +  J/  K + ) ]

28. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 28 S Problem ?  S Problem ?

29. A : Decay Amplitude M 12 : Mixing Amplitude A M 12 Ā CPV in Mixing-Decay Interference B B t-dep. CPV (TCPV) Primer  m t B 0  B 0 Oscillations: e i  m t B0B0 B0B0 M 12 Interference of Two Types of Phases CP conserv.

30. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 30 CP Asymmetry needs both CP Conserv/Violating Phase Particle Process Anti Particle Process  2 =  m t  2 = arg V td TCPV: CP Violation Primer

31. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 31 A =  C for BaBar : Mass Difference : CP Eigenvalue of final state f : state at time  t from at  t = 0 : 1 CPV Phase in Mixing Measure TCPV Asymmetry DCPV Carter-Sanda; Bigi-Sanda

32. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 32 Purpose of B Factory Measure sin2    via TCPV in B → J/  K S

33. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 33 One B Decay Tag Flavor Other B Decay CP Eigenstate Measure Both Decay Vertex J/yK S, p + p -, h ’ K S, fK S, K S p 0 2001 ! Belle B decays in ~ picosecond The $1B Question: Mixing-dep. CPV in B → J/yK S  z   t B 0 or B 0

34. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 34 The Two B Factories Belle Mt. Tsukuba BaBar PEP- II KEKB Differ only in PID DIRC vs Aerogel Cherenkov + ToF Tag Flavor Tim Gershon

35. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 35 One B Decay Tag Flavor Other B Decay CP Eigenstate Measure Both Decay Vertex J/yK S, p + p -, h ’ K S, fK S, K S p 0 2001 ! Belle B decays in ~ picosecond The $1B Question: Mixing-dep. CPV in B → J/yK S  z   t B 0 or B 0

36. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 36 SUSY Possible SUSY FCNC/CPV Loop Can Break Equality Real ~ J/  K S (Tree) S  K S = sin 2  1 SM (KM) Prediction  b  s Penguins (Vertex Loops)

37. ICHEP 2004, Beijing b  sqq Penguin CPV Belle @LP03 (140 fb -1 ) “sin2  1 ”=  0.96  0.51 B 0   Ks sin2  1 =0.728  0.06 B 0  J/  Ks etc 3.5  deviation from the SM ! - - [PRL 91, 261602 (2003)] Different !!

38. ICHEP 2004, Beijing B 0   K 0 : CPV Result  K 0  K S +  K L : S (  K 0 ) = +0.06  0.33  0.09 A (  K 0 ) = +0.08  0.22  0.09 ~2.2  away from SM  K S +  K L : S (  K 0 ) = +0.06  0.33  0.09 A (  K 0 ) = +0.08  0.22  0.09 ~2.2  away from SM Good tags Poor tags S = 0.736 fit Good tags 274M BB Effect of 2003 “ Disappeared ” by 2004 !!

39. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 39 Smaller than b  ccs in almost all modes Smaller than b  ccs in almost all modes Naïve average of all b  s modes sin2  eff = 0.56 ± 0.05 2.1  2.1  deviation (was 2.6) btwn b  sqq and b  ccs Naïve average of all b  s modes sin2  eff = 0.56 ± 0.05 2.1  2.1  deviation (was 2.6) btwn b  sqq and b  ccs Theory Expect sin 2  1 > sin 2  1 s-penguin cc(bar)s New Physics !? Need More Data !  S  S = S sqq  S ccs < 0 “ Problem” Super B Factory Need Super B Factory to Resolve ! Even deviation of ~ few deg indicate NP Sinha, Misra, WSH, PRL 97, 131802 (2006) 2008: No Real Effect !  S  S = S sqq  S ccs < 0 “ Problem”

40. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 40 One B Decay Tag Flavor Other B Decay CP Eigenstate Measure Both Decay Vertex J/yK S, p + p -, h ’ K S, fK S, K S p 0 2001 ! Belle B decays in ~ picosecond The $1B Question: Mixing-dep. CPV in B → J/yK S  z   t B 0 or B 0 Lack of Vertex in LHCb

41. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 41  A K  Problem ?

42. Rare Hadronic B Decays FPCP07, 15 May P. Chang Acp on B → K  Belle Acp =  0.107 ±0.018  0.093 ±0.018±0.008  0.086 ±0.023±0.009    World Average including CLEO: Acp(K +   ) =  0.097 ±0.012  Acp(K +    ±  A(K  ) =  0.144 ± 0.029 @5   Need to explain the deviation. Hadronic effect or new physics?  A(K    ) =  0.12 ±0.11; S(K    ) = +0.33±0.21  Super B factory!  6  A K  Problem Direct CPV established in B system (2004) ! Experiment is Firm

43. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 43 Tree Penguin Interference CP Conserving Phase  N.B. Would need also CP Conserving Phase Difference  Most Intuitive: “Direct” CPV in B → K  DCPV in decay TH:QCDFad hoc “model” (“S4”) or fit SCETparameter fit by “framework” PQCDpredicted size and sign a priori Keum Can not take as BSM indication CPV Phase∃ “hadronic”

44. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 44 In general cannot take as BSM indication

45. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 45 Belle 2008 Nature: Simple Bean Count   A K  = A K       A K      =  0.164  0.037 4.4    A K   = A K       A K      =  0.164  0.037 4.4   0.07  0.03 vs  0.094  0.020 Difference Is Large ! And Established Belle + BaBar (+ CDF) > 5  b → s CPV Difference in Direct CPV in B → K  But NOT PREDICTED.

46. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 46 Experiment is Firm   A K  ~ 0 expected  0.097  0.012  0.050  0.025  0.147  0.028> 5   0.147  0.028 > 5  Why a Puzzle ? ? World Difference is Large ! T ree P enguin Interference CPV Phasesubleading   phase 

47. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 47 Experiment is Firm   A K  ~ 0 expected  0.097  0.012  0.050  0.025  0.147  0.028> 5   0.147  0.028 > 5  Why a Puzzle ? ? World Difference is Large ! subleading T ree P enguin Interference CPV Phase   phase  C EW Penguin

48. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 48 Experiment is Firm   A K  ~ 0 expected  0.097  0.012  0.050  0.025  0.147  0.028> 5   0.147  0.028 > 5  Why a Puzzle ? ? World Difference is Large ! subleading C EW Penguin Large C ? A lot of (hadronic) finesse Baek, London, PLB653, 249 (2007)

49. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 49 QCDF

50. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 50

51. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 51 arXiv:0901.1272 [hep-ph] PQCD claims solution, but ad hoc (not a prediction) non-calculable (SCET-ish)

52. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 52 Hadronic Effect for  A K  Hadronic C Effect for  A K  ~ nearby pulsar for Pamela

53. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 53 My first B paper nondecoupling dimensions WSH, Willey, Soni <

54. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 54 Decoupling Thm: Heavy Masses are decoupled in QED/QCD ∵ ∵ Appear in Propagator Nondecoupling Q Nondecoupling: Yukawa Couplings Q Appear in Numerator Subtlety of Spont. Broken Chiral Gauge Theory dynamical Nondecoupling

55. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 55 EW Precision - Disfavored by EW Precision ( see e.g. J. Erler hep-ph/0604035; PDG06 4th Generation Still? - N counting? 4th “neutral lepton” heavy Massive neutrinos (since 1998) call for new Physics not 4th generation not in such great conflict with EWPrT Kribs, Plehn, Spannowsky, Tait, PRD ’ 07 ∃ new mass scale in  -sector beyond v.e.v.

56. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 56 This is Still the Standard Model !

57. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 57 _d_d d  KK u u BB sb, t ’, t ’ WSH, Nagashima, Soddu, PRL’ 05 LO PQCD ⊕ 4th Gen.   A  12% vs 15% (data)   A = A K  +     A K  +    ~ 15% and, t ’, t ’ Nondecoupled t ’ in Box and Z Penguin Large CPV in B s Box

58. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 58

59. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 59 _d_d d  KK u u BB sb t, t ’ WSH, Nagashima, Soddu, PRL’ 05 LO PQCD ⊕ 4th Gen.   A  12% vs 15% (data)   A = A K  +     A K  +    ~ 15% and NLO PQCD ⊕ 4th Gen.  A  15%  S   0.11 SM3 input consistent with data Joining C & P EW Both and in Right Direction ! AA SS WSH, Li, Mishima, Nagashima, PRL’07

60. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 60 Existence Proof for 4th Generation as Explanation. Can Account for Belle/BaBar Direct CPV Difference

61. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 61 S f in b  sqq A K +   -  A K +   0 Puzzle Two Hints TCPV DCPV Mixing-dep. Direct b  sCPV NP b  s CPV Phenomena Is Current NP Frontier N P In Search of N ew P hysics  m B s  B s CPV ?   B s sin 2   B s   B s cos 2   B s SM-like

62. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 62 sin 2  B s  Problem ?

63. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 63 a bit “smallish”, if take nominal f B s CDF 1 fb -1   B s    B s  ≡    arg V ts      arg V td ⇨   B d  measured SM Window on BSM e.g. ~ real  m s = 17.77  0.10 (stat)  0.07 (sys) p s  PRL 97, 242003 (2006) CPV ?

64. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 64 For pheno digest, see WSH, Mahajan, PRD 75, 077501 (2007) hep-ex/0702030 PRL 98, 121801 (2007) Lifetime, but not Oscillations + hep-ex/0701012 (A SL ) SM: Lenz, Nierste, hep-ph/0612167 Concerted Effort [A SL advantage — periodical reversal of magnet polarity   B s cos 2   B s somewhat a blunt instrument.   B s cos 2   B s

65. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 65 One B Decay Tag Flavor Other B Decay CP Eigenstate Measure Both Decay Vertex Mixing-dep. CPV in Bs → J /     z   t B 0 or B 0 Belle J/yfJ/yf Oscillation too fast! Hadron Collider: No coherent evolution. OST SSKT out of reach at B-fac also width difference

66. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 66 Mixing-dep. CPV in B d and B s in SM Mixing-dep. CPV in B d and B s in SM b → s → b → d Measured by Belle/BaBar in B d  J/   K S sin 2  B s ≃ – 0.04 in SM3 Measure in B s  J/    “possible only at LHCb” sin 2  B d

67. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 67 _d_d d  KK u u BB sb, t ’, t ’ Arhrib and WSH, EPJC’03, t ’, t ’ Nondecoupling of t ’ QCD penguin EW penguin

68. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 68

69. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 69 arXiv:0712.2397 [hep.ex] arXiv:0802.2255 [hep.ex] Further ICHEP’08 Updates (CDF/DØ/fitters) : Strengthen ! sin 2  B s ~  0.5 -  0.7 WSH, Nagashima, Soddu, PRD’07 arXiv:0803.0659 [hep.ph] UTfit Incredible !!! sin 2  B s   0.64   0.16  0.14 3.7  ~2.8   ± ? (already in 05) PRL’08 PRL’08 SM Expect:  0.04 2.1 Summer ’09

70. Flavor/TeV George W.S. Hou (NTU) SUSY’07, 07/07 70   B s   B s  Prospect (short term) B s  J/   analogous to B d  J/  K S V V Angular & Vertex Resolved Analysis to disentangle CP  components CDF/D Ø : 8 fb  projected   B s  ( sin 2   B s ) ≃ 0.2 (?)/exp similar  LHCb : 0.5 fb  (2008 ?)   B s  ( sin 2   B s ) ≃ 0.04 ATLAS : 2.5 fb  (2008 ?)   B s  ( sin 2   B s ) ≃ 0.16 CMS ? $ $ Tevatron could get lucky if   B s large New Physics ! if sin 2   B s large New Physics ! € LHCb the winner if ~ SM   B s sin 2   B s   in SM Could Tevatron run beyond 2008 ? But 2008 looks interesting ! Nakada @ fLHC 3/07 11 12 10

71. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 71 _d_d d  KK u u BB sb t ’ ? t, t ’ ? S f in b  sqq A K +   -  A K +   0 Puzzle Two Hints TCPV DCPV Mixing-dep. Direct b  sCPV NP b  s CPV Phenomena Is Current NP Frontier N P In Search of N ew P hysics  m B s  B s CPV ? EWPenguin Boxes t ’ t ’ non decoupled   B s  sin 2   B s   –     B s large Can sin 2   B s be large ? WSH, Nagashima, Soddu PRD76, 016004 (2007) in SM4 WSH, Nagashima, Soddu, PRL’05 SM-like

72. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 72 III. H  Probes - b  s   -  B  (D ( * ) ) 

73. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 73 b  s  ~ B  X s   E  > 1.9 GeV  E  > 1.8 GeV Photon Energy Cut “fully inclusive analysis” TH still unfinished, but ball in Exp court.

74. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 74 WSH, Willey, PLB 202, 591 (1988); NPB’89 Also Grinstein, Wise, PLB’88 HFAG (exp ave) Misiak et al. PRL’07 Constraint from b  s  on H + always enhanceb  s  MSSM type H + always enhance b  s  regardless of tan  NNLO < Exp Current NNLO < Exp ! Exp NNL H + mimic  W ⇨ bound of 295 GeV favor 650 GeV !? ⇨ favor 650 GeV !? SUSY studies need assume m H+

75. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 75 Systematics Dominated Iijima at Lepton-Photon 2009

76. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 76 Iijima at Lepton-Photon 2009 Limit Unchanged

77. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 77 b  s  ~ B  X s   E  > 1.9 GeV  E  > 1.8 GeV TH still unfinished, but ball in Exp court. Future: Fully Reconstruct other B? e-e-e-e- D*D*D*D*  e+e+e+e+ B tag B signal Xs  Photon Energy Cut Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Order “fully inclusive analysis”  E  > 1.7 GeV 605 fb  3.45 ± 0.43 Systematics Control (Super B Factory) Exp updated: little changed (systematics limited)

78. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 78 B  B  , PRD48, 2342 (1993)  W the cousin of H + “Higgs Affinity” Amazing: Tree level H + Effect Trick/Cost: Full Reconstruct Tag side B @ 0.1~0.3% Two ’s BG !! rHrHrHrH

79. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 79 signal background 449M hadronic tag First evidence, 3.5  evts PRL97, 251802 (2006) 2.6  PRD76, 052002 (2007) D ℓ tag 383M  (0.9  0.6  0.1) x 10  ~  (1.2  0.4 stat  0.3 bkg  0.2 eff ) x 10  Emerged in 2006

80. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 80 Iijima at Lepton-Photon 2009 Imagine future precision

81. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 81 Iijima at Lepton-Photon 2009 Currently

82. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 82 IV. Electroweak Penguin - A FB (B  K* ℓ ℓ ) - B  K ( * )

83. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 83 March of the (B) Penguins EMP:B  K*  1993 (CLEO) b  s  1995 (CLEO) Strong P:B  K  ’K  K) 1998 (CLEO) Direct CPV2004 (BaBar/Belle) EWP:B  K ℓ  ℓ  2002 (Belle) b  s ℓ  ℓ  2002 (Belle)

84. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 84 J/  cut out evts Belle PRL’02 evts 5.3  (non-Gaussian) 4  (non-Gaussian) 31.3M

85. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 85 + Exclusive rate depend also on B  M Form Factor (hadronic) The target is A FB (B  K* ℓ  ℓ  )

86. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 86 A FB in B  K * ℓ  ℓ  made easy B - K *   – Z interference with M Z brought low ! e  e   hadrons V-A interference virtual Microscope into bsZ vertex

87. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 87 2  from SM ? 229M 386M Ali, Mannel, Morozumi, PLB273, 505 (1991) SM

88. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 88 2  from SM ? Example 2 fb -1 experiment M  2 (GeV 2 ) LHCb MC, J. Dickens @ CKM06 No Reason a priori why C , C , C  should be Real WSH, Hovhannisyan and Mahajan, PRD 77, 014016 (2008) Probe Complexity w/o CPV ~ Early LHCb data SM4 Ali, Mannel, Morozumi, PLB273, 505 (1991) SM shaded: Br constrained

89. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 89 a: SM b: 4 gen. d: ruled out e: disfavoured c: ~ SM, even zero, different for large q 2 General: Both Zero & Shape Sensitive to NP Early LHCb Data Can Tell data: LHCb MC (2 fb  )

90. J.-T. Wei 2008/07/31 ICHEP2008 Instead flipped C 7... BABAR, arXiv:0804.4412 657M 386M W.-S. Hou, A. Hovhannisyan, and N. Mahajan, PRD 77, 014016 (2008) (=s/m B 2 =q 2 /m B 2 ) complex wilson coefficients SM 4th generation (SM4) 2fb -1 MC study of LHCb (~7000 K*ll events) Belle Deviation from SM3 ! ? SM3 SM4 Preliminary arXiv:0810.0335 arXiv:0904.0770 ~ preferred

91. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 91 See Joaquin Mathias’ talk for more measurables

92. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 92 B  K ( * )

93. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 93 B  B   Amazing: Tree level H + Effect Trick/Cost: Full Reconstruct Tag side B @ 0.1~0.3% Efficiency Two missing ’s BG !! r H The r H factor is indep. of hadronic parameters ONLY @ B FACTORY ! K, K* B   B      x    e  x     x    K  x     x    K*  x   B  B  K K* EWP  x   B  B  K K*

94. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 94 0707.0138 [hep-ex] SM B  20 535M DAMA CDMS Probe Loop Light Dark Matter < 3.4 x 10  < 1.4 x 10  < 1.4 x 10  < 1.6 x 10  Still 3x SM Bird et al., PRL 93, 201803 (2004) Full Recon Other B submitted

95. G. Eigen, FPCP Taipei, 08-05-2008 Search for B  K * by B A B AR For B  K * fit extra energy E extra distribution to expected signal For B  K * fit extra energy E extra distribution to expected signal shape and background shape and background Use semileptonic double tags Use semileptonic double tags as control sample to check MC as control sample to check MC B A B AR yields (preliminary): B A B AR yields (preliminary): B (B  K (*) ) limits are ~ factor 4-7 above SM (lowest limit by Belle) above SM (lowest limit by Belle) K *0 413 fb -1 (454M) E extra : additionalneutralenergy >50 MeV new new PRL 99,221802 (2007) Belle: 493 fb -1 * * Limits mostly slightly weaker

96. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 96 V. RH Currents and Scalar Interactions - TCPV in B  X    - B s  

97. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 97 - - - - + TCPV in B 0  (K S  0 ) K*   : Probe RH Currents Atwood, Gershon, Hazumi, Soni, PRD71, 076003 (2005) B0B0 K*0K*0 LL B0B0 K*0K*0 RR M 12  R m s /m b suppressed  L m s /m b suppressed Interference suppressed in SM Atwood, Gronau, Soni, PRL79, 185 (1997) Problem: No Vertex ! KS vertexing HE Beam Unique at Asymmetric Energy (Super) B Factory  Not available at LHCb (try B   )

98. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 98 - - - - + TCPV in B 0  (K S  0 ) K*   : Probe RH Currents Atwood, Gershon, Hazumi, Soni, PRD71, 076003 (2005) B0B0 K*0K*0 LL B0B0 K*0K*0 RR M 12  R m s /m b suppressed  L m s /m b suppressed Interference suppressed in SM Atwood, Gronau, Soni, PRL79, 185 (1997) 535M 232M  ±   ±  Consistent with zero. Also, angular probes F L, A T (2) in B  K* ℓ  ℓ  and  -pol. in  b   K S vertexing Future probe at SuperB

99. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 99 B s  

100. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 100 Iijima at Lepton-Photon ’09 Babu, Kolda, PRL84, 228 (2000) CMSSM tan 6 

101. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 101 Iijima at Lepton-Photon ’09

102. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 102 Iijima at Lepton-Photon ’09

103. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 103 Golutvin at EPSHEP ’09

104. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 104 Conclusion: Best Bet for BSM Soon I CPV in b  s w/ Boxes and Penguins  S  A K  sin 2  B s A CP  S ;  A K   ; sin 2  B s  ; A CP  (B +  J/  K + ) b  s  B   II H  Probe: b  s   ; B   (+D ( * ) ) A FB (B  K* ℓ ℓ ) III Electroweak Penguin: A FB (B  K* ℓ ℓ ) ; B  K ( * ) IV RH Currents and Scalar Interactions TCPV in B  X    B s    TCPV in B  X    ; B s   Thing to watch in 2010 (Tevatron) ! Hints for BSM Belle/BaBar Combo (to come) ! CDF/Dzero/LHCb battle !

105. B & HE George W.S. Hou (NTU) WHEPP XI, 01/04/10 105