1. Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services By: Date: September 11-13, 2006 Rick Castaldo, Surveillance and Broadcast Services ASAS TN2 Workshop Glasgow, Scotland

2. 2 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Agenda ATO Organization Program Charter / Governance Definition of Program Business Case Review Segment 1 Locations Acquisition Strategy Safety Risk Management Rulemaking Summary

3. 3 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 ATO Organization

4. 4 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 ATO-E Organization

5. 5 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Program Charter / Governance

6. 6 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Automatic Dependant Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) A utomatic –Periodically transmits information with no pilot or operator input required D ependent –Position and velocity vector are derived from the Global Positioning System (GPS) or a Flight Management System (FMS) S urveillance - –A method of determining position of aircraft, vehicles, or other asset B roadcast –Transmitted information available to anyone with the appropriate receiving equipment

7. 7 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Traffic Information Service - Broadcast / Flight Information Service - Broadcast TIS-B is a service which provides ADS-B equipped aircraft with position reports from secondary surveillance radar on non-ADS-B equipped aircraft. FIS-B transmits graphical National Weather Service products, temporary flight restrictions (TFRs), and special use airspace.

8. 8 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Reliable Precision Operations Improve Predictability, Safety and Airspace System Capacity

9. 9 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Program Objective Develop a multi-segment, life cycle managed, performance based ADS-B strategy that aligns with the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) vision and generates value for the National Airspace System (NAS) –Integrate Concept of Operations for Portfolio of ADS-B Applications –Develop Application Life Cycle Management Approach Portfolio Management for Applications Requirements Management Across the Applications Performance Criteria Management –Establish Infrastructure –Continuously Monitor Value and Adjust Investments

10. 10 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Initial ADS-B Services and Applications (1) Merging and Spacing and Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Assisted Visual Separation (CAVS) are a part of the Enhanced Visual Approaches Application Services / Applications: Surveillance Broadcast Services (En Route, Terminal, Surface) Traffic / Flight Information Broadcast Services Enhanced Visual Acquisition Enhanced Visual Approaches (1) Final Approach and Runway Occupancy Awareness Airport Surface Situational Awareness Conflict Detection

11. 11 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Dual Track Approach Ground Infrastructure –Industry Day #1 – June 2006 –Industry Day #2 – August 2006 –Performance Specification Request for Information (RFI) – September 2006 –Industry Day #3 – October 2006 –Screening Information Request (SIR) – November 2006 –Request for Offer (RFO) – March 2007 –Contract Award – July 2007 –Key Site Initial Operation Capability (IOC) of Broadcast Services – July 2008 –In-Service Decision (ISD) of Broadcast Services – November 2008 –Louisville IOC – October 2009 –Gulf of Mexico Surveillance IOC – December 2009 –Philadelphia IOC – February 2010 –Juneau IOC – April 2010 –In-Service Decision (ISD) – September 2010 Avionics Equipage –Rulemaking Project Team Established – May 2006 –Rulemaking Project Record (RPR) Phase 1 and Phase 2 – September 2006 –Economic Assessment of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) – October 2006 - December 2006 –Internal FAA Coordination – December 2006 - January 2007 –Submittal of NPRM to OST / OMB – February 2007 –Issuance of NPRM – September 2007 –Final Rule Preliminary Concurrence – April 2008 –Final Rule Economic Assessment – June 2008 –Final Rule AGC-1 Approval – December 2008 –Final Rule OST Approval – February 2009 –Final Rule Published – November 2009

12. 12 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Segment 1 Schedule MilestoneProjected Completion Date Segment 1 JRCJune 2006 Screening Information Request (SIR) IssuedNovember 2006 Segment 2 JRCFebruary 2007 Request for Offer ReleasedMarch 2007 Contract AwardJuly 2007 NPRM IssuedSeptember 2007 Preliminary Design Review (PDR)October 2007 Critical Design Review (CDR)January 2008 Key Site Initial Operating Capability (IOC) of Broadcast Services July 2008 In-Service Decision (ISD) of Broadcast ServicesNovember 2008 Gulf of Mexico Comm. and Weather IOCSeptember 2009 Louisville IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast ServicesOctober 2009 Final Rule PublishedNovember 2009 Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast ServicesDecember 2009 Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast ServicesFebruary 2010 Juneau IOC of Surveillance and Broadcast ServicesApril 2010 Surveillance and Broadcast Services ISD for ADS-BSeptember 2010

13. 13 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Proposed Schedule - Segments 2 - 4 MilestoneProjected Dates Segment 2 (2009 – 2014) ADS-B “Out” Final Rule PublishedFY 2010 Continue Initial Aircraft to Aircraft Application DeploymentFY 2010 – FY 2014 Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application DeploymentFY 2010 – FY 2014 Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements DefinitionFY 2010 – FY 2014 Continue / Complete TIS-B / FIS-B DeploymentFY 2009 – FY 2012 Continue / Complete ADS-B NAS Wide Infrastructure DeploymentFY 2010 – FY 2013 Complete 40% AvionicsFY 2014 Segment 3 (2015 – 2020) Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Requirements DefinitionFY 2015 – FY 2020 Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application DeploymentFY 2015 – FY 2020 Targeted Removal of Legacy SurveillanceFY 2018 – FY 2020 Complete 100% AvionicsFY 2020 Complete Initial Aircraft to Aircraft Application DeploymentFY 2020 Segment 4 (2021 – 2025) Complete Removal of Targeted Legacy SurveillanceFY 2023 Complete Targeted Removal of TIS-BFY 2025 Complete Additional Aircraft to Aircraft Application DeploymentFY 2025

14. 14 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Business Case Review: Economic Analysis – Segment 1

15. 15 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Business Case Review: Requested Baseline Costs Requested Baseline Costs (Segment 1)

16. 16 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Segment 1 Locations: Expansion Philadelphia, PA Ontario, CA Gulf of Mexico Louisville, KY Garden City, KS North Platte, NE Kansas City, KS

17. 17 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Segment 1 Locations (Continued) Southeast Alaska Juneau Area Bethel Area Anchorage Center (ZAN)

18. 18 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Acquisition: FAA Life Cycle Management Process Enhanced Surveillance Capability Mission Needs Statement #326, May 2001 Initial Investment Decision, September 2005 Final Investment Decision (Segment 1), June 2006 Final Investment Decision (Segment 2), February 2007 In Service Decision, September 2010 Final Investment Decision (Remainder Segment 1 & 2), July 2007 Contract Award, July 2007 CONOPS, ISP, and FPR Approved, May 2006 RFI, September 2006 SIR, November 2006 RFO, March 2007 CONOPS = Concept of Operations; ISP = Integrated Safety Plan; FPR = Final Program Requirements; RFI = Request for Information; SIR = Screening Information Request; RFO = Request for Offer Industry Week, June 2006

19. 19 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Safety Risk Management: FAA Life Cycle Management Process Operational Safety Assessment (OSA) Comparative Safety Assessment (CSA) Integrated Safety Plan (ISP) Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PHA) System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) Sub-System Hazard Analysis (SSHA) System Hazard Analysis (SHA) Operating & Support Hazard Analysis (O&SHA) Health Hazard Assessment (HHA) System Safety Assessment Report (SSAR) Safety data collection and audits Tech Refresh-specific safety analyses

20. 20 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Rulemaking: FAA Life Cycle Management Process Approval of Phase I and Phase II RPR Final Rule Published in Federal Register OPR identifies need for rulemaking Rulemaking team drafts NPRM OST and OMB Review of NPRM Federal Register Publishes NPRM Approval of Phase III RPR Rulemaking team drafts final rule OST and OMB Review of Final Rule Link to General Rulemaking Process

21. 21 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Summary Program has transitioned from Research and Development (R & D) to Implementation Segment 1 baseline established Dual track service acquisition and rulemaking activities underway Risk Mitigation plans in effect –Governance Process –Backup Analysis underway –Separation Standards Workgroup established –Specification coordination with industry and international community Success through a collaborative FAA / industry relationship

22. 22 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Video

23. 23 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 Definition of Program: Segment 1 Locations ADS-B service locations include the following: –Service Coverage Volume: Southeast Alaska Juneau Area Service Delivery Point: Anchorage Center and Juneau Air Traffic Control Tower Service: Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B –Service Coverage Volume: Gulf of Mexico Area Service Delivery Point: Houston Center and Helicopter Operator Dispatch Center Service: Communication, Weather, Surveillance –Service Coverage Volume: Louisville (KY), Kansas City (MO), Garden City (KS), and North Platte (NE) Areas Service Delivery Point: Louisville TRACON and UPS Airline Operations Center Service: Surveillance, TIS-B, FIS-B –Service Coverage Volume: Philadelphia, PA and Ontario, CA Areas Service Delivery Point: Philadelphia TRACON and UPS Airline Operation Center Service: Surveillance TIS-B / FIS-B expansion –Existing “east coast deployment” will be expanded westward into the Great Lakes Region –Phoenix/Prescott, AZ coverage will spread westward to Central and Southern California

24. 24 Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services September 11 - 13, 2006 General Rulemaking Process RPR Process* OPR identifies need for rulemaking OPR prepares Phase I RPR Council approves Phase I RPR NPRM Process* 2 Weeks Rulemaking team drafts NPRM Economist draft economic evaluation Final team concurrenc e Internal FAA coordination Significant? Federal Register publishes NPRM OST Review and OMB Review 1-3 Months Final Rule Process** Comment period closes Rulemaking team disposes of comments Rulemaking team prepares Phase III RPR Rulemaking team drafts final rule Council approves Phase III RPR Economist prepares Regulatory Evaluation Final team concurrenc e Internal FAA coordination Significant? OST Review and OMB Review Federal Register publishes final rule End Yes No 8-12 Months 6 Months 2 Weeks RPR team prepares Phase II RPR Council approves Phase II RPR Expedited Approach 90 Day Comment Period **Source: FAA Office of Rulemaking Quality Management System Rulemaking Manual; Average timeframes provided, actual timeframes depend on size and complexity of project 120 Days 45 Days 40 Days 45 Days 120 Days 15 Days Meets every 6 weeks *Estimated durations and diagram provided by AVS/Mitre Subtotal = 18 – 24.5 Months Subtotal = 16 Months Total = 34 Months – 40.5 Months 2 - 4 Weeks ANPRM, if necessar y Link to Rulemaking