1. By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Surveillance and Broadcast Services ADS-B Status Briefing: ASAS TN2.5 Vincent Capezzuto November 2008

2. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 2 Federal Aviation Administration Agenda Dual Track Strategy Essential Services Status Critical Services Status Rulemaking Status $9.3M Acquisition Next Steps

3. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 3 Federal Aviation Administration Dual Track Strategy

4. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 4 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Key Sites = Key Site Philadelphia Juneau Gulf of Mexico Louisville Miami (Essential)

5. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 5 Federal Aviation Administration Essential Services: Miami (Key West) (Homestead) (St. Cloud)

6. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 6 Federal Aviation Administration Eastern Service Area – Miami Key Site South Florida Broadcast Services –Operational since August 2008 Radio Station Status 9/24/08 SV-168 UAT – Overview (TIS-B and FIS-B) SV-168 1090ES – Overview (TIS-B)

7. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 7 Federal Aviation Administration Hardee Radio Station Installation

8. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 8 Federal Aviation Administration Sebastian Airport Installation

9. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 9 Federal Aviation Administration Key West Installation SV168-01 Key West (Beach TV) Radio Cabinet on Platform SV168-01 Key West (Beach TV) Radio Cabinet Installed on Platform SV168-01 Key West (Beach TV) Antenna Array Note: The Key West site is in a flood plain, so a raised structure was required

10. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 10 Federal Aviation Administration Essential Services: Plan for ISD MilestonePlanned Date of Completion Preliminary Design Review (PDR)November 2007 Critical Design Review (CDR)February 2008 Factory Acceptance Test for Essential ServicesMay 2008 Service Acceptance Test for Essential ServicesJune 2008 End to End System TestAugust 2008 Operational TestAugust 2008 Initial Operating Capability (IOC) for Essential ServicesAugust 2008 Independent Assessment Data CollectionSeptember 13 – September 30, 2008 Preliminary Report / BriefingOctober 15, 2008 Independent Assessment Final ReportNovember 18, 2008 In-Service DecisionNovember 24, 2008

11. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 11 Federal Aviation Administration Eastern Service Area Philadelphia and Louisville Key Sites Critical Services –Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) New ADS-B Operational at Louisville: (October 2009) New ADS-B Operational at Philadelphia (February 2010)

12. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 12 Federal Aviation Administration Central Service Area Gulf of Mexico / Houston Key Site Critical Services –New ADS-B, Weather and Communications All Operational: Gulf of Mexico/ZHU (December 2009)

13. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 13 Federal Aviation Administration Western Service Area Juneau Key Site Critical Services –Wide-Area Multilateration (WAM) New WAM Operational: ZAN (June 2009) & ZDV (April 2009) –Automatic Dependent Surveillance - Broadcast (ADS-B) New ADS-B Operational: ZAN (April 2010) –Statewide Expansion of ADS-B with Communications & Weather

14. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 14 Federal Aviation Administration September 2008 ARC Report Overview The ARC made 36 summary recommendations divided into two broad categories: –Recommendations to be resolved before any rule is adopted = 26 ADS-B Link Strategy ADS-B Program and Business Case Performance Requirements Required Equipment Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment –Recommendations for future = 10 ADS-B Program and Business Case Required Equipment Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment Security, Privacy, and Malicious Use The ARC emphasizes its support for ADS–B Out implementation in the NAS by 2020.

15. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 15 Federal Aviation Administration ARC Recommendations: Use of DO-260 Specific Recommendations: –Recommendation #6 (For Final Rule): Consistent with the ARC’s task 1 report, Optimizing the Benefits of ADS–B, the FAA should enable the use of DO–260- approved equipment for non-separation applications in the NPRM business case such as conflict probe in radar airspace. The FAA should operationally validate these benefits as soon as possible, to give operators confidence in the benefits of ADS–B Out. –Recommendation #10 (For Final Rule): To approve the use of DO–260-like equipage, the FAA should adopt, for 5 nm separations in non-radar airspace to include at least the Gulf of Mexico, European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) 20–24, with appropriate measures to ensure ADS–B integrity. –Recommendation #28 (Longer Term): To support early ADS–B benefits with DO–260-approved equipment, the FAA should further explore opportunities within the ADS–B ground infrastructure/ATC automation to fuse data to accommodate the lack of transmission of the Mode 3/A code.

16. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 16 Federal Aviation Administration ARC Recommendations: Use of DO-260 - Hardee, Florida ADS-B Receive Coverage

17. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 17 Federal Aviation Administration ARC Recommendations: Use of DO-260 - Functional Flow Diagram AIR certification of pre existing DO 260 Changes in ATC procedures Aircraft Certification List Flight Plan track association based on call sign / ICAO address RAIM prediction & availability assessment Target selection filter

18. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 18 Federal Aviation Administration ARC Recommendation #29 (Longer Term): En Route 3nm Separation The FAA should develop and implement the requirements and operational procedures for 3 nm separation in all domestic en route airspace based on ADS- B surveillance, before the ADS–B Out compliance date. Terminal Airspace 3 nm Separation En route Airspace 5 nm Separation Transition Area effective separation 3 nm

19. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 19 Federal Aviation Administration ARC Recommendation #31 (Longer Term): Search and Rescue The FAA should explore the opportunity of providing an enhancement to the emergency locator transmitter (ELT)/search and rescue operation by establishing an ADS-B tracking service that could be used to aid in crash locating.

20. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 20 Federal Aviation Administration ARC Recommendation #27 (Longer Term): ADS-B In The NPRM is focused on ADS– B Out and attempts to establish the requirements of ADS–B Out equipment so that it is compatible with ADS–B In. The FAA, in partnership with industry, should define a strategy for ADS–B In by 2012, ensuring the strategy is compatible with ADS–B Out avionics. The FAA also should ensure this program defines how to proceed with ADS–B In beyond the voluntary equipage concept included in the NPRM.

21. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 21 Federal Aviation Administration In Trail Procedures

22. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 22 Federal Aviation Administration Flight Deck Merging and Spacing (FDMS)

23. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 23 Federal Aviation Administration $9.3M Acquisition: ATSA Conflict Detection on the Surface

24. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 24 Federal Aviation Administration $9.3M Acquisition: Background The FY08 Conference Report accompanying H.R. 3074 has provided additional funding to the ADS-B program "specifically to expedite air to air capabilities" FAA intends to utilize this funding to demonstrate ADS-B capabilities in the areas of surface conflict detection and cockpit alert capabilities

25. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 25 Federal Aviation Administration $9.3M Acquisition: Awards On November 3, 2008 the FAA announced awards to two different vendors

26. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 26 Federal Aviation Administration $9.3M Acquisition: Honeywell Award Award: $3M Proposal: Develop requirements, standards and human factors analysis Location(s): –Seattle Tacoma –Snohomish County Paine Field Aircraft (experimental): –1 Cessna Sovereign –1 Beechcraft King Display: EFB and MFD Pilots: –JetBlue Airways –Alaska Airline

27. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 27 Federal Aviation Administration $9.3M Acquisition: ACSS Award Award: $6M Proposal: Create standards, flight demonstrations and prototypes Partner: US Airways Location: Philadelphia Aircraft (1 experimental, 20 revenue service): –King Air C90 (1) –Airbus 330 (20) Display: Class 2 EFB / AGD

28. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 28 Federal Aviation Administration FY2009 / FY2010 Next Steps MilestonePlanned Date / Status In Service Decision for Broadcast ServicesNovember 2008 Critical Services Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) CompleteMarch 2009 Key Site Service Acceptance Test (SAT) Louisville Service Acceptance Test (SAT) CompleteApril 2009 Gulf of Mexico Service Acceptance Test (SAT)June 2009 Philadelphia Service Acceptance Test (SAT)August 2009 Juneau Service Acceptance Test (SAT)October 2009 Key Site Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Louisville IOC of Surveillance ServicesOctober 2009 Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance ServicesDecember 2009 Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance ServicesFebruary 2010 Juneau IOC of Surveillance ServicesApril 2010 Program Milestones Final Rule PublishedApril 2010 Surveillance Services ISD for ADS-BSeptember 2010

29. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 29 Federal Aviation Administration Thank You Achieving results through coordinated international collaboration

30. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 30 Federal Aviation Administration Backup

31. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 31 Federal Aviation Administration Ground Infrastructure: 794 Ground Station Solution Provides National Coverage

32. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 32 Federal Aviation Administration ITT ADS-B Locations Locations are subject to change 22 Locations (9 shore /13 platform)

33. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 33 Federal Aviation Administration ITT AWOS Locations Locations are subject to change 37 Locations

34. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 34 Federal Aviation Administration FAA VHF Communication Locations Communication Sensors High Altitude (10 total sites, 4 new, 6 existing) Low Altitude (17 total sites, 5 new, 12 existing)

35. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 35 Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Recommendations for Final Rule Recommendation #Summary ADS-B Link Strategy Recommendation #1Urgent 1090 Study Recommendation #2Articulate changes to ACAS Recommendation #3Collaborate with ARC on final link decision ADS-B Program and Business Case Recommendation #4Retain 2020 compliance date, incorporate additional benefits Recommendation #5SNPRM (assuming contingencies) Recommendation #6Enable DO-260 Recommendation #7Preference routes and procedures Recommendation #8Recalculate cost benefit analysis Recommendation #9 Ensure cost/benefit to all operators, validate ARC cost figures Recommendation #10Use AMC 20-24 to separate in NRA at 5 miles in at least the Gulf Recommendation #11Delay compliance date (with conditions) Recommendation #12Airspace exclusion at 2500 AGL Recommendation #13Include FIS-B and TIS-B in preamble

36. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 36 Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Recommendations for Final Rule Recommendation #Summary Performance Requirements Recommendation #14Performance Requirements per domain Recommendation #15Latency recommendations Recommendation #16 Not apply vertical position accuracy in NAC 9 Recommendation #17Allow for foreign satellite constellations Recommendation #18Non-Diversity Antenna Recommendation #19Use DO-289 MASPS to define SIL Recommendation #20Broadcast message element recommendations Recommendation #21Calculate/report continuity of RNP parameters Recommendation #22Specify continuity requirement Recommendation #23Specify 2 continuity requirements for ASSA and FAROA

37. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 37 Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Recommendations for Final Rule Recommendation #Summary Required Equipment Recommendation #24 Turn Off ADS-B Recommendation #25Commit to transponder removal, explain why transponders are needed short-term (new backup strategy) Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Equipment Recommendation #26CNS roadmap in final rule

38. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 38 Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Longer Term Recommendations Recommendation #Summary ADS-B Program and Business Case Recommendation #27Define strategy for ADS-B In Recommendation #28Fuse data in automation to accommodate lack of Mode 3/A Code Recommendation #293nm en route separation Required Equipment Recommendation #30Implement transponder removal for low altitude operators not equipped with ACAS Recommendation #31Enhance ELT with tracking service Recommendation #32Replace ELTs Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance Equipment Recommendation #33 Integrated CNS strategy to deal with GNSS outages Security, Privacy and Malicious Use Recommendation #34ICAO codes treated under privacy laws Recommendation #35 Use Anonymity for UAT, develop a feature for it on 1090 MHz Recommendation #36Assign ICAO codes so they don't correlate with tail numbers

39. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 39 Federal Aviation Administration

40. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 40 Federal Aviation Administration

41. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 41 Federal Aviation Administration Sebastian Airport Installation

42. Surveillance and Broadcast Services 42 Federal Aviation Administration Process for Selecting Applications Identify NAS needs (Problems) Decompose into sub- problems Map sub-problems to required capabilities Identify applications to support capabilities Is application a subset of / traceable to an existing AIWP application? Is application description sufficient to enable business case analysis? Refer to AIWP Develop/Refine application description No Yes Conduct business case analysis Rank application based on business case results Steering Committee requires mods to prioritized list? Eliminate applications below minimum threshold Yes No PHASE 2 Application Prioritization PHASE 1 Application Characterization Timeline of Applications Portfolio of applications from existing sources

43. FY08 MilestonesFY09 MilestonesFY10 Milestones Preliminary Design Review (PDR) November 2007 Independent Assessment November 2008 Juneau SAT October 2009 Critical Design Review (CDR) February 2008 In-Service Decision November 2008 Louisville IOC of Surveillance Services October 2009 Close of NPRM Comment Period March 2008 Louisville SAT April 2009 Gulf of Mexico IOC of Surveillance Services December 2009 Factory Acceptance Test for Essential Services May 2008 Gulf of Mexico Weather Service Acceptance Test (SAT) June 2009 Philadelphia IOC of Surveillance Services February 2010 Service Acceptance Test for Essential Services June 2008 Gulf of Mexico SAT June 2009 Juneau IOC of Surveillance Services April 2010 End to End System Test / Operational Test August 2008 Philadelphia SAT August 2009 Final Rule Published April 2010 Initial Operating Capability (IOC) August 2008 Gulf of Mexico Comm. and Weather IOC September 2009 Surveillance Services ISD for ADS-B September 2010 Technical Performance Measures (TPMs) Schedule Status (FY08 / FY09 / FY10) Surveillance and Broadcast Services 18 Rated Risks: 3 High, 10 Medium, 5 Low High: 1.Rule 2.Spectrum 3.MEARTS Medium: 1.Avionics Standards 2.Application Standards 3.Separation Standards 4.Juneau WAM 5.Gulf Surv. Sites 6.CARTS 7.STARS 8.CD-2 Status Message 9.ARC Recommendations 10.WAM CD-2 Status Message Program Earned Value Management (September 2008) Program Risks FIS-B Transmission Interval: NEXRAD Reflectivity (CONUS) is turned off and the issue is being worked on. No impact on the system performance. NEXRAD Reflectivity (Regional) software fix is under testing