Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Department of Orthopaedics

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Department of Orthopaedics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Department of Orthopaedics
Somatotype Arthur Stewart Mandy Plumb Department of Orthopaedics


3 It is independent of size, age and gender.
Somatotype Definition Somatotype is a physique classification system which recognises a body shape category, which necessarily falls between pre-determined end limits. It is defined as a quantified expression and description of the present morphological conformation of a person. It is independent of size, age and gender.

4 Somatotype Somatotype is a three figure reference which characterises physique and body shape. It comprises values, originally proposed on a 7-point scale, which summarise the physique, and can be plotted on the tri-polar somatochart.

5 Somatotype Components
Average value Endomorphy Mesomorphy Ectomorphy 2 3 4 5 6 lean fat slender muscular heavy light

6 Somatotype History Originally proposed as a genotypic morphology rating on a 7 point scale by Sheldon (1940), drawing from earlier work of Kretschmer (1921) who classified three ‘poles’ to represent extreme physique variation, and Viola (1933) which related dimensions of the thorax, trunk and limbs to a ‘normotype’ Partly influenced by an alternative methodology from Parnell (1954), Heath and Carter (1967) introduced a three numeral rating somatotype which has become the most universally applied, which involved a photoscopic and anthropometric method, later to be revised in 1990.

7 Somatotype Assessment
Methods *Equipment required Photoscopic Anthropometric* somatotype rating form computer-calculated Combined the criterion measure Stadiometer Weighing scale Bone caliper Skin caliper Anthropometric tape

8 Somatotype Rating Form

9 Somatochart Central Endomorph Mesomorph Ectomorph


11 Anthropometric Somatotype Assessment
(Heath & Carter, 1967) Endomorphy Roundness or fatness, based on 3 skinfolds Independent of size Mesomorphy Musculo-skeletal robustness, based on elbow & knee breadths, and corrected girths of calf and upper arm Ectomorphy Relative fragility, based on height and weight Derived on 10 measurements Independent of size Descriptor of shape Assumes proportionality of size, development and symmetry Only relative data on composition

12 Measurements Required
Total mass (kg) Stature (cm) Upper arm circumference (cm) Max. Calf circumference (cm) Femur breadth (cm) Humerus breadth (cm) Triceps skinfold (mm) Subscapular skinfold (mm) Supraspinale skinfold (mm) Medial calf skinfold (mm) Measurements on the Right; Larger girths in the case of Left handed subjects; mean of 2 or median of 3.

13 Endomorphy calculation
Add the skinfolds at the triceps, subscapular and supraspinale sites Multiply this sum by / height This total (in mm) is “X” in the following calculation: Endomorphy = X X X3

14 Mesomorphy calculation
Record height (H), humerus breadth (HB) and femur breadth (FB), max calf girth and max upper arm girth, with the arm flexed to 45º and tensed. Calculate corrected arm (AG) and calf girth (CG) by subtracting triceps and medial calf skinfolds from the respective girths. Substitute these values in the following equation: Mesomorphy = 0.858HB FB AG CG H + 4.5

15 Ectomorphy calculation Record height in cm and weight in kg
Divide the height by the cube root of weight to calculate the reciprocal of the ponderal index or RPI. The magnitude of the RPI determines which formula is used to calculate ectomorphy. If RPI > 40.74, Ectomorphy = 0.732RPI If < RPI < 40.74, Ectomorphy = 0.463RPI If RPI < 39.65, Ectomorphy = 0.5

16 Rounding From equations - round decimal to one decimal place eg For general description, plotting and category boundaries, round to the nearest half unit eg. 3-4-1 Rating form are in nearest half units

17 Somatotype Attitudinal Distance
The distance between any two somatopoints (in 3D space) - calculated in component units SAD A,B = [(endoA-endoB)2 + (mesoA - mesoB) 2 + (ectoA - ectoB) 2 ]0.5 where A and B are two somatotypes Somatotype Attitudinal Mean The average 3D distance between all somatoplots and their mean

18 Physique advantages Absolute strength, injury resistance, hypothermia resistance, positive self image Cardiac health Low energy cost of locomotion power:weight ratio Injury protection via diminished forces Absolute mass for blocking sports; Hypothermia resistance, floatation

19 Physique disadvantages
Power at expense of endurance; poor heat dissipation; exercise can become obsessive in bodybuilders Low power: weight; high energy cost of locomotion; impaired heat dissipation; cardiac risk factors; low self esteem Lack of upper body strength; risk of diminished self image

20 Somatotypes of 106 male athletes
Mesomorphy Endomorphy Ectomorphy Data from Stewart & Hannan, (2000)

21 Somatotype Convergence
Athletes’ physiques evolve according to training status and periodisation. Variation in physique (i.e. SAM) reduces as competitive standard increases, as the athletes become increasingly selected Early training Performance peak Discus throwers High jumpers 400m runners Sumo wrestlers

22 Somatotype comparison in cyclists
Reference: Anthropometrica Road racing cyclists’ data from Stewart & Hannan (2000)

23 Summary The relevance of somatotype in sport Each component independently affects performance in most sports Talent identification for sporting potential of individuals Tool for matching individuals with sports which they may have advantages for Tool for determining training goals and outcomes Affects body image and self esteem

24 References Anthropometrica: Norton, K & Olds, T. (Eds) (1996) University of New South Wales Press Carter J.E.L. and Heath, B.H. (1990). Somatotyping: Development and applications. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. Eston, R. & Reilly, T. (Eds) (2001) Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology lab manual, volume 1. London: Routledge

Download ppt "Department of Orthopaedics"

Similar presentations

Ads by Google