1. by Noise Performance Metrics A View on the Situation at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol in 2003 M.E.S. Vogels National Aerospace Laboratory NLR Amsterdam, the Netherlands Technical Interchange Meeting FAA- Eurocontrol 15-17 May 2002, Toulouse, France Action Plans 2, 5, 6

2. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 2 Contents Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and its environment Noise Target Setting (2003+) Assessment Method Example of Daily Performance Evaluation Future years

4. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 4 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and Its Environment New Runway 5 runways: 480.000 in 2003 4 runways: 460.000 in 2002 Reduced noise load. Benefit!!! Increased noise load. Not in populated area!!!

5. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 5 Noise control points for L den Total Noise Volume (virtual airport) Targets are set by noise loads computed for scenario 2005 Targets in noise control points include meteo-margin Noise Target Setting (2003+) Noise control points for L night

6. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 6 Noise Target Setting (2003+) Reasons for changing the noise target setting: –distrust of general public in modelling, forcing a transition from modelling towards measurements, hence a transition from a noise zone to a set of discrete control points –non-incorporation of noise levels below 65 dB(A) –absurdities: environmental protection against high noise loads on parking lots and beet fields –harmonisation in Europe towards L den and L night, abandoning Dutch Kosten Unit Transition from the current noise zone system involves: –changes in law –environmental impact procedure –independent assessment of information

7. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 7 Assessment method The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method Procedures Flight path Timetable Certification Noise Data... Noise Impact Fleet

8. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 8 Assessment method The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method Procedures Flight path Timetable Certification Noise Data... Noise Impact Fleet Actual Modelled/Planned/Predicted

9. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 9 Assessment method The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method Procedures Flight path Timetable Certification Noise Data... Noise Impact Fleet Actual Modelled/Planned/Predicted

10. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 10 Assessment method The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method Procedures Flight path Timetable Certification Noise Data... Noise Impact Fleet Actual Modelled/Planned/Predicted Also applicable to Validation of new procedures!!!

11. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 11 Assessment method The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method Procedures Flight path Timetable Certification Noise Data... Noise Impact Fleet Actual Modelled/Planned/Predicted

12. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 12 Assessment method The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method Procedures Flight path Timetable Certification Noise Data... Noise Impact Fleet Actual Modelled/Planned/Predicted

13. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 13 critical value decrease Maximum Plan Margin Actual Expected Example of Daily Performance monitoring

14. M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 14 Future years... The noise development in living areas in the 53 L den contour of the transition scenario will be monitored. From 2005+ noise measurements will be involved in target setting. Various options are being investigated. Harmonisation policy in Europe will be integrated into national regulations