Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SMART SCHOOL MEALS OFFER VERSUS SERVE New Meal Pattern 2012 Idaho Child Nutrition Programs.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SMART SCHOOL MEALS OFFER VERSUS SERVE New Meal Pattern 2012 Idaho Child Nutrition Programs."— Presentation transcript:

1 SMART SCHOOL MEALS OFFER VERSUS SERVE New Meal Pattern 2012 Idaho Child Nutrition Programs

2 OVS - What Didn’t Change  Only required for senior high schools for the NLSP  Optional for lower grades for the NSLP  Optional for the SBP at all grade levels

3 OVS - What Didn’t Change  Student’s option to decline item(s)  Same price if child declines item(s)  Full amount of each component must be available to choose

4 Definitions  Food component—  One of five food groups for reimbursable meals  Food item—  A specific food offered within the five food components.

5 What must be offered in NSLP  5 components  Meat/meat alternate  Grains  Fruits  Vegetables  Milk

6 Lunch Example  The lunch offered: turkey, mashed potatoes, peaches, roll and milk  OVS—previously  Turkey, roll and milk = reimbursable lunch  OVS-under new regulations  Turkey, roll and milk ≠ reimbursable lunch  To be reimbursable, selection must include mashed potatoes or peaches 6

7 OVS for NSLP--What must be taken  Must take at least 3 of 5 components  Must take at least ½ cup serving of the fruit or vegetable component  Student may take two ¼ cup servings of the same item fruit or vegetable to meet the requirement 7

8 OVS for NSLP--What must be taken  Keep in mind that the ½ cup allowance for fruit or vegetables may be used only once for either the fruits or vegetables component in a meal, so the other food components selected by the student under OVS must be the full component 8

9 Minimum Serving Size  Fruits and Vegetables – 1/8 cup minimum creditable serving size  Meats/Meat Alternates – ¼ ounce M/MA equivalent  Grains – ¼ ounce equivalent

10 Different Choices  Can mix different fruits to reach minimum required serving  Can mix different vegetables to reach minimum required serving  Can combine fruit and vegetable to reach minimum required serving 10

11 OVS for SBP  Phasing-in changes in the SBP  For SY 2012-2013, no changes to SBP other than milk requirement  For SY 2012-2013, may continue to use current menu planning approach and requisite OVS requirements, unless a waiver has been approved to implement the new meal pattern 11

12 SBP for SY 2013-2014  Must offer 3 components without OVS  Grain (optional meat/meat alternate after daily grain met)  Fruit/Vegetable/Juice  Milk  Must offer 4 food items with OVS rules  Grain  Fruit/Vegetable/Juice  Milk  Additional item 12

13 In the New Meal Pattern in 2014/15 What must be offered for SBP  Non-OVS 3 components  Grain -- Slice of Toast  Fruit -- Fruit Cup (must take ½ cup)  Milk -- Non-fat or 1%  OVS must offer 4 food items  Grain -- Slice of Toast  Fruit -- Fruit Cup (must take ½ cup)  Milk -- Non-fat or 1%  One additional item -- Scrambled Eggs 13

14 OVS for SBP-What must be taken  Students may decline one item except they must take at least  ½ cup of fruit OR  ½ cup of vegetable, if offered OR  ¼ cup fruit plus ¼ cup vegetable 14

15 SMART EXAMPLE An OVS Challenge

16 Lunch: BBQ Chicken  BBQ Chicken Drumsticks  Roll  Baked Beans  Applesauce  Milk Is each combination a reimbursable meal? Why or why not? a) Drumsticks, Roll, Milk b) Beans, Applesauce, Milk c) Drumsticks, ¼ cup Applesauce, Roll, Milk

17 Answers: Is it a reimbursable meal? a) No, no fruit/vegetable serving b) Yes, 3 full components including fruit/veg c) No, even though 3 full components, not large enough serving of fruit/veg

18 QUESTIONS? Contact the Idaho State Department of Education 208-332-6820 Or email the NSLP team This institution is an equal opportunity provider.


Download ppt "SMART SCHOOL MEALS OFFER VERSUS SERVE New Meal Pattern 2012 Idaho Child Nutrition Programs."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google