1. Reconfigurable Devices Presentation for Advanced Digital Electronics (ECNG3011) by Calixte George

2. A Exponential History Long History in Digital Electronics from SSI to MSI and now VLSI Traditional Computer Architecture based on Harvard & Von Neumann, using a processor core and Instruction Set Introduction of CPLD & then FPGAs No. of transistors per unit die doubles every 18 months, leading to more dense FPGAs

3. ASICs & Applications on FPGAs Application Specific Integrated Circuits – very expensive and rigid. FPGAs – reconfigurable devices which utilize CLBs and memory to organize a flexible array. Reconfigurable devices have no limit to the number of times they can be changed – true firmware. Immediate application in testing & experimentation in R&D.

4. Traditional Uses vs. Future FPGAs “traditionally” used in development of systems to be rendered onto PCBs. Originally Popular in educational aspects of Digital Electronics Could there be a greater application?  How about many ASICs on one FPGA?  How about reconfigurable computing?

5. Experimental Use-specific Applications In the first half of the 1990s experimental boards were used to accelerate a collection of applications, including genome (DNA) pattern matching, determining stereo vision from paired images, human fingerprint minutia matching, solving three-dimensional heat equations, and Hough transforms and Gaussian/Laplacian pyramid generation for images. These used a combination of 16 FPGA cores interconnected.

6. Adaptive Computing It is immediately obvious that a custom built circuit would operate much faster than a traditional computer system that requires running a programme on a generic device with various shared functions. Development of cores for different computer applications. Development of a dynamic computer that reconfigures its resources. It would have a memory of stored designs and reconfigures its gate resources to fit particular requirements.

7. Issues in Development A well entrenched Computer Industry that makes clear distinctions between hardware and software. Creation of new Architectures that allow for the integration of reconfig. devices. Rate of increase in transistor density in FPGAs. Layouts of FPGAs (e.g. 80-90% of surface is interconnects; maximizing use of LUTs?)

8. Advantages of FPGAs Share flexibility and ease of development through HDLs. Ability to have a wide body of developers (digital design equiv. of Linux in OS). Ability to perform operations repetitive operations much faster than traditional μPs. (NB: rare operations not so well). The familiar 90-10 rule asserts that 90% of execution time is consumed by about 10% of a program's code, that 10% generally being inner loops.

9. How to Converge? The development of Compilers where users will code in a software language (e.g. C) and realize an instantiation at the FPGA level. Meshing of FPGAs and existing uPs so as to give reconfigurable devices particular tasks which require heavy repetition (Hybrid model).

10. Research Areas “Reconfigurable devices may do well with small, highly repetitious kernels in applications, but standard processors are still superior for the remaining code that is irregular and/or rarely repeated.” For reconfigurable computing to be economically viable for more than a small fraction of the market, the number of parts involved has to be squeezed down to at most one chip, and preferably less. Existing microprocessors are implemented in a single chip, and the pressure in the market is always for fewer parts, not more. Reconfigurable hardware will not meet its full potential unless reconfiguration time is minimized and the reconfigurable hardware also has access to the computer's memory that is at least as good as that available to the main processor. To better integrate a reconfigurable device into a computer, various researchers have called for combining a traditional microprocessor with an FPGA-like device onto one die to form a new kind of processor.

11. From FPGA to Microprocessor

12. References Augmenting a Microprocessor with Reconfigurable Hardware, Hauser J R, UC- Berkeley, 2000. Balancing Interconnect and Computation in a Reconfigurable Computing Array, DeHon A, UC- Berkeley, 1999. Automatic Compilation of C for Hybrid Reconfigurable Architectures, Callahan T J, UC- Berkeley, 2002.

13. FPGAs & Reconfigurable Devices - A Slow Revolution? Thank you September 26, 2005.