2.  (logos)  assumes in the premise what the arguer should be trying to prove in the conclusion  asks readers to agree that certain points are self-evident when they are not

3. The unfair and shortsighted legislation that limits free trade is a threat to the American economy.

4.  (logos)  restates the argument rather than actually proving it Begging the Question  similar to Begging the Question

5. Jesse Jackson is a good communicator because he speaks effectively.

6. (also: Argument from Analogy)  (logos)  analogy - a form of comparison that explains an unfamiliar element by comparing it to a more familiar one. › can explain unclear or abstract ideas › do not constitute proof because there are almost always significant differences between things being compared false analogy  A false analogy frequently ignores important dissimilarities between the two things being compared.

7. The overcrowded conditions in some parts of our city have forced people together like rats in a cage. Like rats, they will eventually turn on one another, fighting and killing until balance is restored. It is therefore necessary that we vote to appropriate funds to build low-cost housing.

8. (also: Personal Attack)  (ethos)  tries to divert attention from the facts of an argument by attacking the motives or character of the person making the argument.  attacks the character of the arguer rather than the argument itself

9. The public should not take seriously Dr. Mason’s plan for improving county health services. He is a former alcoholic whose wife recently divorced him.

10. (also: Sweeping Generalization, Jumping to a Conclusion)  (logos)  reaching a conclusion based on too little evidence  Stereotyping is an example

11. Because our son really benefitted from nursery school, I am convinced that every child should go.

12. (also: Either/Or Fallacy)  (logos)  when a writer suggests that only two alternatives exist even though there may be others  oversimplifies an issue and forces people to choose between extremes instead of exploring more moderate positions

13. We must choose between life and death, between intervention and genocide. No one can take a neutral position on this issue.

14.  (logos)  when the meaning of a key term changes at some point in an argument  makes it seem as if a conclusion follows from premises when it actually does not

15. As a human endeavor, computers are a praiseworthy and even remarkable accomplishment. But how can we hope to be human if we rely on computers to make our decisions?

16.  (pathos)  when the focus of an argument is shifted to divert the audience from the actual issue

17. The mayor has proposed building a new baseball- only sports stadium. How can he even consider allocating millions of dollars to this scheme when so many professional baseball players are being paid such high salaries?

18. (also: Tu Quoque)  (ethos)  asserts that an opponent’s argument has no value because the opponent does not follow his or her own advice

19. How can that judge favor stronger penalties for convicted drug dealers? During his confirmation hearings, he admitted smoking marijuana when he was a student.

20. (also: Ad Verecundiam)  (ethos)  citing an individual who, despite being famous or even being experts on some things, has no expertise on the issue at hand

21. According to Brian Williams, interest rates will remain low during the next fiscal year.

22.  (logos)  misrepresentation or distortion of factual evidence in an attempt to influence an audience

23. Women will never be competent firefighters; after all, 50 percent of the women in the city’s training program failed the exam.

24. (also: False Cause)  (logos)  assumes that because two events occur close together in time, the first must be the cause of the second  faulty cause/effect relationship

25. Every time a Republican is elected president, recession follows. If we want to avoid another recession, we should elect a Democrat as our next president.

26. (meaning: it does not follow)  (logos)  when a statement does not follow logically from a previous statement

27. Disarmament weakened the United States after World War I. Disarmament also weakened the United States after the Vietnam War. For this reason, efforts to control guns will weaken the United States.

28. (also: Ad Poplum)  (ethos)  implies because others are making a choice, you should make the same choice

29. In a court of law, the jury vote by majority; therefore they will always make the correct decision.

30.  (logos)  suggests that once we take a first step in a direction we don’t like, we will have no choice but to continue in that direction

31.  We have to stop the banning of this book. If we don’t, they’ll start banning others until there aren’t any left to read.  If we allow this book in our libraries, soon our libraries will be filled with all kinds of unseemly books.

32.  (ethos)  greatly oversimplifies an opponent’s argument to make it easier to refute

33. People who don't support the proposed state minimum wage increase hate the poor.

34. (also: Appeal to Pity)  (pathos)  relies on appeals to pity to the exclusion of other necessary arguments

35. Think of all the poor, starving Ethiopian children! How could we be so cruel as not to help them?