Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University."— Presentation transcript:

1 Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University

2  Looks at Social Work Library circulation activity  Is only one measure of collection usage  Presents data both SW specific and system- wide  ?Circ Desk uses several happening locations: Social Work, Butler, BorrowDirect, HSL  No circulation data for non-circulating collections ReCAP Columbia University

3 ReCAP Columbia University  ?Social Work Library became independent entity in August 2004  ?Opening of new Social Work building  ?Print collection was previously part of Lehman Library in SIPA  ?Transition period between August 2004 and May 2005  ?Two happening locations: ◦ Social Work Circ. Deck ◦ SW Circulation Desk

4 ReCAP Columbia University  Data collated by happening location  Social Work Library became independent entity in August 2004  Five primary types of circulation activity: charge, discharge, renewal, recall and hold  Most renewals and recalls are done in the OPAC happening location, dynamically by patrons themselves  Note: circulation data includes primarily “on campus” collections

5 ReCAP Columbia University

6 ReCAP Columbia University

7 ReCAP Columbia University  Total volume of charges has fluctuated  System-wide there has been a 27.4% decline  Volume of discharge predictably mirrors charges  Other types of circulation activity happen in much lower volume  Majority of renewals occur in the OPAC happening location

8 ReCAP Columbia University  Almost 3/4 of all charges are to graduate students  Patron Group definitions have changed: ◦ Adjunct faculty, in 2008 grad students were given primary group OFF instead of GRD  Pie charts break down data for FY12 only  Bar chart compares patron group charges for each fiscal year

9 ReCAP Columbia University

10 ReCAP Columbia University

11 ReCAP Columbia University

12 ReCAP Columbia University

13 ReCAP Columbia University  Over the life of SW, charge activity is split evenly between stacks and reserves collections  In FY12, activity was heavier with Reserves  Charges to SW Stacks has declined steadily each fiscal year  Offsite charges should be placed in the Butler Happening Location  Data unavailable for non-circulating collections

14 ReCAP Columbia University

15 ReCAP Columbia University

16 ReCAP Columbia University

17 ReCAP Columbia University  Data for all transactions in the SW Happening Location  Nearly 80% is for the LC Stacks collection alone  Offsite charges are placed in the Butler Happening Location  Data unavailable for non-circulating collections

18 ReCAP Columbia University

19 ReCAP Columbia University

20 ReCAP Columbia University

21  System-wide circulation statistics are available for both on campus and offsite collections  Circulation data are accessible to all staff Circulation data are accessible  Offsite collections can be identified by CLIO location format off,xxx.  System-wide data is available from July 2003, the date of Ex Libris Voyager implementation ReCAP Columbia University

22  Comparison of on campus and offsite collection charges by volume  On campus charge volume declined by 27.4% between FY04 and FY12  On campus charges have declined every year since FY04  Offsite charge volume increased 121.3% between FY04 and FY12  N.B. On campus collection size declines each year; offsite collections grow each year ReCAP Columbia University

23 ReCAP Columbia University

24  Monthly charges of both onsite and off-site collections are in phase with the academic calendar  Peaks in the middle of Fall and Spring terms  The pattern of offsite charges is more apparent when viewed alone ReCAP Columbia University

25 ReCAP Columbia University

26 ReCAP Columbia University

27  On campu and offsite charges can be compared using a ratio  The ratio of offsite to on campus increased from FY04 to FY012  Offsite collections are accounting for proportionally more activity ReCAP Columbia University

28 ReCAP Columbia University

29  Chart compares total volume of charges to renewals for Offsite collections  Graduate students and Faculty request more Offsite collections than Undergraduates  Graduate students and especially Faculty have higher renewal/charge ratios  Over time, these two patron groups tend to renew more than charge  CUL may expect to see steady or decreasing request volume as a result ReCAP Columbia University

30 ReCAP Columbia University

31 ReCAP Columbia University

32  More information about data sets can be found on the ReCAP Data Center websiteReCAP Data Center website  Primary data categories include: accession, retrieval, delivery and circulation  Tailored data sets and analysis will be provided to staff via the ReCAP Coordinator  Please see the main ReCAP website for general information about CUL procedures and systemsReCAP website ReCAP Columbia University


Download ppt "Zack Lane ReCAP Coordinator July 2012 ReCAP Columbia University."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google